|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 17:02:00 -
[1]
please edit your post so we can read it.
and titans give a bonus of 50% to all cap, or 65% reduction to all sig radius, or other broken bonuses.
the doomsday is not the best weapon it has. a good titan pilot wouldn't even use it unless the fight had been going on for a while a a quick big burst of damage is needed.
that cap would be better used for tanking to keep the other ships bonuses alive. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 18:13:00 -
[2]
once again... a 50% bonus to cap for every ship in the fleet is worth 50 bil alone. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 18:23:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Haakon Jarl
Originally by: MotherMoon once again... a 50% bonus to cap for every ship in the fleet is worth 50 bil alone.
Yeah but youre a n00b
meaning? ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 04:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Zeros Omega
Quote: Their value is indescribable. Functioning for those who own them as a mobile base of operations as well as a flagship, Titans turn the tides of war with their mere presence. Aside from their blistering armament and many-metres-thick armour, they boast the ability to transport entire fleets within their hulks across entire star systems. Their mind-boggling mass can cause small ships to become trapped in the gravity bow-wave before them. A few of these vessels are massive enough that their presence affects planetary tidal patterns.
http://www.eve-online.com/background/potw/apr01-01.asp
this is what TITANS are supposed to do, an interdictor even FLYING near it should be destroyed
yeah most people just say that our titans are babys. because if they are like that stoy says, then why are stations 5 times bigger than a titan? I thought building something that big was hard... ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.25 04:56:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Astro Teller
Originally by: Zeros Omega
Quote: Their value is indescribable. Functioning for those who own them as a mobile base of operations as well as a flagship, Titans turn the tides of war with their mere presence. Aside from their blistering armament and many-metres-thick armour, they boast the ability to transport entire fleets within their hulks across entire star systems. Their mind-boggling mass can cause small ships to become trapped in the gravity bow-wave before them. A few of these vessels are massive enough that their presence affects planetary tidal patterns.
http://www.eve-online.com/background/potw/apr01-01.asp
this is what TITANS are supposed to do, an interdictor even FLYING near it should be destroyed
? because of gravity? please- the space shuttle in low earth orbit would like to have a word with you
oh and and by blistering armament and many-metres-thick armour they mean 350,000 hp... which is less than the stuture on a POS gun... ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 02:35:00 -
[6]
if struture is based on size of an object and a POS gun has 5 mil hp then why does a titan have 300k? ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 02:46:00 -
[7]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/07/2007 02:48:09 Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/07/2007 02:46:46
Originally by: Illyria Ambri
Originally by: MotherMoon if struture is based on size of an object and a POS gun has 5 mil hp then why does a titan have 300k?
Stationary weapon emplacements are constructed of superdense metals and alloys that would severly hinder a flying ship hence those metals are used for stationary stations and POS modules as they dont have to move.
true.. but... ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.paul.penguincrossing.com/images/eve_chart-rmr.jpg
a POS gun is the size of a frigate. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 03:17:00 -
[8]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/07/2007 03:19:49
Originally by: Illyria Ambri
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/07/2007 02:48:09 Edited by: MotherMoon on 26/07/2007 02:46:46
Originally by: Illyria Ambri
Originally by: MotherMoon if struture is based on size of an object and a POS gun has 5 mil hp then why does a titan have 300k?
Stationary weapon emplacements are constructed of superdense metals and alloys that would severly hinder a flying ship hence those metals are used for stationary stations and POS modules as they dont have to move.
true.. but... ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.paul.penguincrossing.com/images/eve_chart-rmr.jpg
a POS gun is the size of a frigate.
So? dosen't change the fact that its built with metal too dense to fit on a ship. Also dosent require crew quarters or mess halls or bathrooms or any of the other things that take up the interrior space of a frigate.. lots more room for armor defense.
Think about it.. its nothing but a gun the size of a frigate floating in space. guns are small.. frigates are large.. thats alot of spare room for super dense armor plates... oh and no engines either wich is what usually takes up most of a ships space.
Linkage
but were not talking about armor plates. that is called armor hp
were talking about defenseless hunk of metal. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 03:28:00 -
[9]
Originally by: An Anarchyyt Edited by: An Anarchyyt on 26/07/2007 03:23:26
Originally by: Illyria Ambri
Originally by: An Anarchyyt
Even though I don't need to use Wikipedia (Or Wookiepedia), due to the fact that I own more Star Wars crap than my car is worth, you might want to try reading this
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm Unless of course, you don't think the BBC and the British Journal "Nature" are reliable.
Oh I'm sure the BBC is reliable.. But its not the BBC we are talking about. Nor are we refering to the scientific articles that BBC checked on. We are talking about science fiction entries that are open to interpretation and editign by anyone.
You did read the tidbit at the end? "Wikipedia came under fire earlier this month from prominent US journalist John Seigenthaler.
The founding editorial director of USA Today attacked a Wikipedia entry that incorrectly named him as a suspect in the assassinations of president John F Kennedy and his brother, Robert.
The false information was the work of Tennessean Brian Chase, who said he was trying to trick a co-worker. "
This alone proves.. Wikipedia as a factual source is incorrect.
Except it was fixed soon enough. By your logic, no encyclopedia is a factual source, since none of them are 100% correct.
The main difference, is Encyclopedia Britannica or any other doesn't have nearly the size of oversight Wikipedia does. And errors are fixed much more quickly (you've got at least a year before a new printing.
Amazingly enough, there's a great Wikipedia page of Errors in the Encyclopedia Britannica that have been Corrected in Wikipedia
nice. I think you just won. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.26 04:36:00 -
[10]
OMG stay on topic.
My god look what you started! where fighting over the BBC, wikis and how this related to how many battle cruisers where in the star wars movie!
what have we become?!?!?!?! ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.07.28 12:34:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Voculus Titans were not nerfed enough. In fact, Titans should be nerfed out of existance. I still can't believe how the peeps at CCP sat down and decided that destroying 200+ ships in an instant with a single mouse click was a good idea.
it's passive gang buff is much more useful. mybae just get rid of doomsday but never the titan.
make it possible to dock inside them :) ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.09.02 02:36:00 -
[12]
Originally by: SiJira
Originally by: Aequitas Veritas Capital Scramblers, and let all capitals use them. Let carriers for instance have strength of 1, motherships 5 and titans 10. If you want to kill a supercap, you need to bring capitals to the job. Today you can just easily lag out system and overwhelm the titans tank which is poo because there is no siege mode, which brings me to the other thing they need to implement a titan siege module. It should be hard to overcome a titan's tank, not something you do in 5 minutes with a bunch of battleships...
didnt they nerf the titans just recently? they wont buff them again
titans are very overpowered still. but just liek missiles are bad in pvp
Quote: it says it on the forums, so it must be true
hahaha man if you think a titan is usless you need a reality check. Im' sure that in 4 months time people will call for another titan nerf, jsut like how now people are saying nano ships are over powered, when they said they were dead before.
same with nos.
I don't think the forums are always a good place to tell what is what in game. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP need...more room... |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong Namtz'aar k'in
|
Posted - 2007.09.02 02:37:00 -
[13]
I'll add one last point. how many people here HAVE a titan?
lolz.
because it seems like more people than their are titans. and those people MUST know what a titan is good for. ----------------------------------- I'm working my way through college target CCP need...more room... |
|
|
|