Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Spineker
95
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 03:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hahah I flew the nighthawk in missions for year or two until tengu it was my favorite L4 ship. The drake doesn't on any level over shadow the Nighthawk that is silly. Drake overshadows Nighthawk LMAO what are people smoking they obviously don't fly a Nighthawk.
HACS being overshadowed could be argued I suppose when it comes to the Cerb and a couple others but .... bwhahaha poor excuse is poor excuse.
I would eat your drake with a night hawk while making coffee, you would never break its tank. |

Spineker
95
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 03:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
HACS should get a buff period to make them viable. Nerfbatting drake is not going to make the poor pitiful HACS better. Why not just grab a Hurri or Brutix. |

Spineker
95
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 04:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
I agree Val why don't we see WHOLE FLEETS of hawks blobing the galaxy!? I wonder if he ever flew one instead of looking at stats?
Hawk has been broken for years in fact. |

Spineker
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 06:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Buff Jesus wrote:Leisen wrote:Sure smells like EFT warrior in here.
Sure, the Cane has less EHP than the Drake, as it should. I mean it's not like the Cane is faster, has a larger drone bay, can fit more utility, has a larger capacitor that can support two medium neuts, or benefits from having turret DPS that can do more damage against smaller targets when dual webbed (did I mention it can fit more utility?). Face it, the Drake can fit a nasty tank, that's what it's good at, and that's what it ought to be good at. Most people never mention how you can fit a stronger shield tank on a Myrmidon, or anything of that nature. Caldari ships sacrifice everything for the sake of tank, so why take their tank away, unless you're going to give them what other ships have? The Cane is versatile as hell, that's why people like it. The Drake tanks well, so it's noob friendly, but it's slow and dumb (and has a signature larger than a battleship MAKING IT THE WORST TIER 2 BATTLECRUISER TO TAKE AGAINST A LARGER SHIP CLASS) and as long as you're not a moron you can control the engagement in a way that will leave a Drake nearly helpless, or, worst case scenario, unable to hold you down while you run off and save your ass. This would be a half decent thread if there were more people in it that actually have used a Drake and less that surmise that it's some kind of unstoppable juggernaut of doom.
I think the hype has scared them to flying away. LOL |

Spineker
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 17:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:The only things drake's do well is explode
Haha so true.
Drake has always been over hyped. Anyone with skills and knowledge can rip it apart. It is amazing how many people have never even fought one yet have so many opinions on it. Some sort of social dysfunction with humans because they have no experience but instantly relate as a pack of foaming rabid voices in agreement with something they don't even understand. The years of yelling NERF NERF NERF has been like PavlovGÇÖs Dogs to some people. Say Drake and the nerfherders start salivating.
Anytime I hear the words "CSM CCP talking of "balancing"" makes me throw up a little. |

Spineker
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 18:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sidus Isaacs wrote:Val MeR wrote:http://www.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf
It seems like CCP is favoring Minmatar, while CSM is made up of Gallente... well, of course its all made in the name of "balance", but see for yourself if you like those small changes:
GÇ£CCP and the CSM discussed the new Tier 3 battlecruisers. CCP noted that the Talos needs adjustment upwards; the CSM noted that the Naga is too powerful compared to the Talos. CCP acknowledged this, citing the difficulty of finding a role for blasters as well as the power of passive shield tanking.GÇ¥
Naga is overpowered? Power of passive shield tanking on a Naga?
GÇ£CCP and the CSM agreed that remote sensor dampeners have been rendered useless and need rebalancing. CCP wants to look into this, as well as the damping ships themselves. The CSM also discussed the merits (or lack thereof) of ECM.GÇ¥
Yeah, Caldari are unworthy of ECM magicGǪ
GÇ£The CSM and CCP both acknowledged the need to rebalance Drake, which GÇÿdoes everything too too wellGÇÖ. CCP is considering giving it a more offensive role like Raven or Caracal where it would lose the shield resistance bonus and the 5% Kinetic damage bonus and instead gain a rate of fire bonus and a missile velocity bonus. The CSM vehemently approved of this idea. CCP and the CSM also agreed that this possible change to the Drake would help add more uniqueness to the Nighthawk, which is presently overshadowed entirely by the Drake.GÇ¥
Nerf Drake, so it can become as GǣdesirableGǥ as Gǣoffensive Raven or CaracalGǥGǪ NightHawk will finally GǣshineGǥGǪ at least when compared to a NEW "offensive Drake." Change Drake to make NH shine? *Sigh* that is just bad balancing right there. Refer to the countless threads on S&M about the NH over the years on how to make it shine. Tip: The grid it has is just far too low. An extra mid slot or launcher slot would not hurt either.
SO true and so easy to fix!!!! BUt they would rather nerf something into a pile of steamingdung to make another pile look better. Such Logic is why there have been so many failures in this game when it comes to balancing. |

Spineker
98
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 20:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Melangell wrote:Zyress wrote:Screw it, I've cross trained winmatar, if you only want one viable race so be it, but you might warn new players before they bother traning any other race. One ship gets an adjustment lowering its (massive) tank and boosting its DPS a bit - *instantly* rendering 3/4 of the ships in the game useless... drama much?
If they are trying to make the CS look better why would they boost the Drake DPS? Is it just lies then? The only real thing besides resist the NH has over the Drake is its DPS is better by a bit. I don't have the numbers but it is.
Why would you want to nerf the drake based on a lie by CCP? "We want to make sure it doesn't overshadow CS" yet to increase the drakes dps does just that. Either they don't fly the damn ships are the are liars which is it? |

Spineker
98
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 21:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yah and the above fit could kill what again? |

Spineker
112
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 01:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Yeah I trained up Minnie for off hours stuff like PVP. They are far and above the best PVP ships in the game if you count the Mach well hell they win everything I suppose. |

Spineker
113
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 04:18:00 -
[10] - Quote
Quote:leich wrote:Caldari are overpowered (For ratting)
The Tengu is the most over powered ship in game.
Based on the two above facts i think a caldari nerf is well overdue.
If you only fly Caldari i recomend you cross train now.
Oh I forgot about how REALLY overpowered ECM is.
Stop moaning faildari pilots.
No that would be the Mach not the tengu, guess what ship that is? Minny oh noes!
More tears please we have not had enough today.
|

Spineker
113
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 04:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mr M wrote:Boohoo! It not like they're forcing you to train Standard Missile Specialization 4 just to be able to use Heavy Missile Launcher IIs.
Not like you can get armor repping II without much work is there? Boohoo. |

Spineker
114
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 05:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Hooray my harbinger is relevant again.
If it was irrelevant it will still be so bacause you suck otherwise. Sorry welcome to life. |
|
|