| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
48
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 09:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
(edit: I You dont know what i'm taliking about, read sumit minutes - theyre is a possibility they will add limited SP mechanism in eve)
SP respec. I mean, really? SP respec in my EVE?
I think someone got hit in the head with something heavy.
When titans lost ability to shoot DD trough portal and later lost AOE effect - no one refunded them their Energy Weapons V When SB lost cruise bonus no one gave us Cruise specialisation back as SP When there was nano nerf, no one gave us back skills from navigation and minmatar HAC 5 When you nerfed PI, no one gave us back PI skiils When you nerfed carriers (removed large cargo-hold) no one refunded us capital skills
SO WHY THE HELL, when SC nerf hits we suddenly hear about giving back skills for drones, or more, even SP RESPEC MECHANISM?
Eve is all about action and consequences of said actions. As oposed to games like WOW, where there is limit of what i can learn, there is no situation when i hit imaginery wall and can not train further
In EVE when i no longer need some skills (want to check something new) i just start training them. I remap and +5 needed skills and start trainig for new stuff.
This will actually hit new players very hard - imagine that we have 100m SP bitter-vet and 5m SP no-longer-noob fresh player. Imagine now that CCP introduced new type of ships - something in range of new player that don't require tons of skills to fly.
What new payer can do? well, he have no skills to abandon just like that, so he have to train for it. What about bitter-vet? Well, he just drop his Titan 5 and gets all needed skill to lvl 5 in minutes.
This in turn will cause even larger gap between veterans and new players. Right now when something new is introduced (PI for example) all payers are on equal footing - everyone have to train to use new stuff. OFC veterans have more isk = can use +5, possible have remaps for such occasion stored, so they can get there slightly faster - but they still have to train to it.
SO ALL IN ALL - DONT RESPEC, OR WE WILL LOOSE ALL RESPECT :)
(by We i mean I, and everyone thinking alike) |

Jabba Miner
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
I agree. No respec in my EVE |

Triana
Bulls On Parade
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 11:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
No respec, ever.
|

Takeshi Yamato
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
135
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 12:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
I want mining gone from my character sheet 
Otherwise I agree, being able to respec from one FOTM to the next would be bad. |

Drake Draconis
Nexus Advanced Technologies Fidelas Constans
238
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote:(edit: If You don't know what i'm taliking about, read sumit minutes - theyre is a possibility they will add limited SP respecialisation mechanism in eve)
SP respec. I mean, really? SP respec in my EVE?
I think someone got hit in the head with something heavy.
When titans lost ability to shoot DD trough portal and later lost AOE effect - no one refunded them their Energy Weapons V When SB lost cruise bonus no one gave us Cruise specialisation back as SP When there was nano nerf, no one gave us back skills from navigation and minmatar HAC 5 When you nerfed PI, no one gave us back PI skiils When you nerfed carriers (removed large cargo-hold) no one refunded us capital skills
SO WHY THE HELL, when SC nerf hits we suddenly hear about giving back skills for drones, or more, even SP RESPEC MECHANISM?
Eve is all about action and consequences of said actions. As oposed to games like WOW, where there is limit of what i can learn, there is no situation when i hit imaginery wall and can not train further
In EVE when i no longer need some skills (want to check something new) i just start training them. I remap and +5 needed skills and start trainig for new stuff.
This will actually hit new players very hard - imagine that we have 100m SP bitter-vet and 5m SP no-longer-noob fresh player. Imagine now that CCP introduced new type of ships - something in range of new player that don't require tons of skills to fly.
What new payer can do? well, he have no skills to abandon just like that, so he have to train for it. What about bitter-vet? Well, he just drop his Titan 5 and gets all needed skill to lvl 5 in minutes.
This in turn will cause even larger gap between veterans and new players. Right now when something new is introduced (PI for example) all payers are on equal footing - everyone have to train to use new stuff. OFC veterans have more isk = can use +5, possible have remaps for such occasion stored, so they can get there slightly faster - but they still have to train to it.
SO ALL IN ALL - DONT RESPEC, OR WE WILL LOOSE ALL RESPECT :)
(by We i mean I, and everyone thinking alike)
*wipes off spittle from shouting*
Hate to break it to you...but its already there in the game...they've used it twice now. But I support either way. |

Jaari Val'Dara
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
56
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
Takeshi Yamato wrote:I want mining gone from my character sheet  Otherwise I agree, being able to respec from one FOTM to the next would be bad.
+1, I would use it even if I got nothing in return :D |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
61
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Drake Draconis wrote:
*wipes off spittle from shouting*
Hate to break it to you...but its already there in the game...they've used it twice now. But I support either way.
There is a difference between allowing players to choose what they dont like - remove it - and aply somewhere else
AND
reinbursting players for skills that where completely removed from game. |

Goose99
708
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Preemptive whine leading to premature butthurt, lulz
-1 |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
62
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Preemptive whine leading to premature butthurt, lulz  -1
Hi goose99, good we have professional troll in here, this thread was definetly to much one-sided until now :) |

TrollFace TrololMcFluf
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
63
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Posting in a "bitter vet afraid of change!" thread |

Drake Draconis
Nexus Advanced Technologies Fidelas Constans
241
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 16:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote:Drake Draconis wrote:
*wipes off spittle from shouting*
Hate to break it to you...but its already there in the game...they've used it twice now. But I support either way.
There is a difference between allowing players to choose what they dont like - remove it - and aply somewhere else AND reinbursting players for skills that where completely removed from game.
You've got some serious issues man.  |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
514
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jabba Miner wrote:I agree. No respec in my EVE Yea
|

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1110
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 17:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
No to any SP respec what so ever.
Whoever dreamed this up should be taken out back and shot.
Survivors should be shot again. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
949
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Depends on what the "limited" part of the SP respec means.
-1 Because I think some respec is needed if not just to get rid of useless starter skills. Not to mention it won't hurt anything at all and this entire thread is one huge overreaction to nothing at all. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

Drake Draconis
Nexus Advanced Technologies Fidelas Constans
244
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Depends on what the "limited" part of the SP respec means.
-1 Because I think some respec is needed if not just to get rid of useless starter skills. Not to mention it won't hurt anything at all and this entire thread is one huge overreaction to nothing at all.
And once again you miss the point. |

Smiling Menace
Star Nebulae Holdings Inc.
101
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Depends on what the "limited" part of the SP respec means.
-1 Because I think some respec is needed if not just to get rid of useless starter skills. Not to mention it won't hurt anything at all and this entire thread is one huge overreaction to nothing at all.
I can see why the OP posted this though.
CCP will always change things, and it would be pretty unfair to allow a respec for carriers when they haven't done this for say, SB's or other ships that they have nerfed over the years.
It's not game breaking, granted, but it does seem pretty unfair. |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 18:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Smiling Menace wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:Depends on what the "limited" part of the SP respec means.
-1 Because I think some respec is needed if not just to get rid of useless starter skills. Not to mention it won't hurt anything at all and this entire thread is one huge overreaction to nothing at all. I can see why the OP posted this though. CCP will always change things, and it would be pretty unfair to allow a respec for carriers when they haven't done this for say, SB's or other ships that they have nerfed over the years. It's not game breaking, granted, but it does seem pretty unfair.
Exactly, and tomorrow they will implement nerf for X, and day after for Y, and what? FOTM without consequence? |

Tidurious
The Dirty Rejects Scelus Sceleris.
24
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 19:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
Respec is for pussies and for games such as WOW. The only respec that I find even remotely acceptable is if skills are completely removed from the game; otherwise, HELL NO.
[Edit: Surprised that Pussies didn't censor...] |

Ras Blumin
A Cross The Universe
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 23:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Do we know more than this:?
"The CSM reiterated its desire for CCP to implement a partial skill respec, especially in the aftermath of major changes to ship classes such as the removal of drones from supercarriers."
That could mean lots of things. If it's just SC and drone skills that get respec-able, then I agree that CCP should not give a get-out-of-jail-free-card to such a small number of players, especially in light of other people skilling up for stuff that later got changed.
If it means that we can respec say 1-10m skillpoints yearly, well, that's something I think is pretty cool. I have some more or less wasted skillpoints I wouldn't mind putting elsewhere.
edit. OP why didn't you give us that quote I have posted? Bad OP. BAD. Go to your box. |

Drake Draconis
Nexus Advanced Technologies Fidelas Constans
244
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 23:58:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ras Blumin wrote:Do we know more than this:?
"The CSM reiterated its desire for CCP to implement a partial skill respec, especially in the aftermath of major changes to ship classes such as the removal of drones from supercarriers."
That could mean lots of things. If it's just SC and drone skills that get respec-able, then I agree that CCP should not give a get-out-of-jail-free-card to such a small number of players, especially in light of other people skilling up for stuff that later got changed.
If it means that we can respec say 1-10m skillpoints yearly, well, that's something I think is pretty cool. I have some more or less wasted skillpoints I wouldn't mind putting elsewhere.
edit. OP why didn't you give us that quote I have posted? Bad OP. BAD. Go to your box.
My take on the SC losing drones and whining about SP's - Oh you poor little baby....get the #### over yourself.
Drone skills are very useful across many sub-captial classes of ships.
Just because you lost the ability to use them on a specific ship class doesn't mean you hqave to go ape-#### crazy like some damned baby.
The answer is and should remain NO.
The only times I'll accept an SP is for "reimbursement" due to skill deletion or server crash that disupts play time for like say a week or something.
Period.
PS: if what Im seeing is the truth...sounds like this proposal is a drama panic attack based on what CSM is pushing...not what CCP is saying. That is a major difference I would think. |

Ras Blumin
A Cross The Universe
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 00:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote: This will actually hit new players very hard - imagine that we have 100m SP bitter-vet and 5m SP no-longer-noob fresh player. Imagine now that CCP introduced new type of ships - something in range of new player that don't require tons of skills to fly.
What new payer can do? well, he have no skills to abandon just like that, so he have to train for it. What about bitter-vet? Well, he just drop his Titan 5 and gets all needed skill to lvl 5 in minutes.
The 100m SP bitter-vet will most likely already have the prerequisites at 5, maybe 4, so if he wants to fly it shortly after release, he will no matter what. If he respecs, he might get a 1-month headstart for flying a ship that is going to be in the game for years...
Max Kolonko wrote: This in turn will cause even larger gap between veterans and new players. Right now when something new is introduced (PI for example) all payers are on equal footing - everyone have to train to use new stuff. OFC veterans have more isk = can use +5, possible have remaps for such occasion stored, so they can get there slightly faster - but they still have to train to it.
..and besides, CCP could just limit new stuff so that it cannot be respecced into.
How do you feel about remaps?
also there is no minmatar hac skill |

Rhichi Ramjag
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 01:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
No respec, awful f'in idea. Leave that stuff to WoW. |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
70
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 07:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ras Blumin wrote:Do we know more than this:?
"The CSM reiterated its desire for CCP to implement a partial skill respec, especially in the aftermath of major changes to ship classes such as the removal of drones from supercarriers."
That could mean lots of things. If it's just SC and drone skills that get respec-able, then I agree that CCP should not give a get-out-of-jail-free-card to such a small number of players, especially in light of other people skilling up for stuff that later got changed.
If it means that we can respec say 1-10m skillpoints yearly, well, that's something I think is pretty cool. I have some more or less wasted skillpoints I wouldn't mind putting elsewhere.
edit. OP why didn't you give us that quote I have posted? Bad OP. BAD. Go to your box.
OP hides in dark corner and cries :) |

Thryson
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 07:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
A wise man once said,
WoW holds your hand from level 1 to 80 and even if your not smart enough to do anything once there they still give you a cookie, EVE not only takes your cookie but laughs at you for bringing one.
there is NO end game to EVE and there should be no REMAP. |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
71
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 10:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
Ras Blumin wrote:Max Kolonko wrote: This will actually hit new players very hard - imagine that we have 100m SP bitter-vet and 5m SP no-longer-noob fresh player. Imagine now that CCP introduced new type of ships - something in range of new player that don't require tons of skills to fly.
What new payer can do? well, he have no skills to abandon just like that, so he have to train for it. What about bitter-vet? Well, he just drop his Titan 5 and gets all needed skill to lvl 5 in minutes.
The 100m SP bitter-vet will most likely already have the prerequisites at 5, maybe 4, so if he wants to fly it shortly after release, he will no matter what. If he respecs, he might get a 1-month headstart for flying a ship that is going to be in the game for years...
True, but did You remember when they introduced: - PI - Gas Mining - Noctis
Those are just an example of new stuff that are available to new player almost from the beggining.
I will not argue that many hi-level new stuff will always have vets in better position to use them - true
Ras Blumin wrote:Max Kolonko wrote: This in turn will cause even larger gap between veterans and new players. Right now when something new is introduced (PI for example) all payers are on equal footing - everyone have to train to use new stuff. OFC veterans have more isk = can use +5, possible have remaps for such occasion stored, so they can get there slightly faster - but they still have to train to it.
..and besides, CCP could just limit new stuff so that it cannot be respecced into. How do you feel about remaps? also there is no minmatar hac skill
I use remaps, because they are there. I have mixed filling about using them. I agree that the moment they've removed ability to choose skills as You make new char it was inevitable.
as for HAC skills - touche :) |

Kusanagi Kasuga
Ferocious Felines
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 16:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
+1 No respecs unless skills are being completely removed from game. Especially not because FOTM changed, ffs. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
775
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 18:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
If it were there, I'd use it and be glad to get all those industrial skills off my sheet. I'd already be in a Proteus if I could respec a few skills. If it never comes about, I'm fine with that too.
The key word here is LIMITED. A limited respec to allow people to respec 1-2 million SP to correct noob mistakes or occupation changes wouldn't be a bad thing. Being able to respec from a miner to a carrier pilot in a day...that would be game-breaking.
edit: I wasn't around before there were attribute remaps, but I've got to say it's stupid to NOT have those. A new player shouldn't be punished for choosing an attribute set on Day 1 that turns out to not fit at all with the play style they developed over six months of play. My view on skill respecs is the same: I trained a lot of industrial and science skills before I realized those weren't what I wanted to do long-term. The opportunity to recover wasted SP would be welcome. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
952
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 19:37:00 -
[28] - Quote
My point being that I am not going to freak out about the "possible" consequences of something we know nothing about yet. They said they had an idea for a limited SP respec. That's it...other than that we know NOTHING! No need to freak out about it. We don't even know what they have in mind for the word "limited".
What if they implement it in such a way that in order to refund the SP you have to "unlearn" it by spending the same amount of time unlearning as you did learning it? Maybe even set it so that during that time you would not be able to learn other skills while unlearning another.
How could you argue to that? Spend the time to refund SP and use that SP to put it into something you could have spend the time learning if you hadn't been unlearning?
If you say that wouldn't work for any reason...you are an idiot. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

Ras Blumin
A Cross The Universe
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 20:55:00 -
[29] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote:True, but did You remember when they introduced: - PI - Gas Mining - Noctis
Those are just an example of new stuff that are available to new player almost from the beggining. I now agree that respec'ing into New game-changers is bad. So, my updated position is that New Stuff should be off-limits for 2-3 months (or maybe based upon how long it would take to train normally). Iterations (such as giving infinipoints to supercarriers) could be included in this limit.
There should also be a limit to how many SP (maybe 5m per year, 500k per month or similar) that can be respec'ed, as I wrote earlier (just to get my full position down).
Max Kolonko wrote:I use remaps, because they are there. I have mixed filling about using them. I can respec that (h++h++). |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 21:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ras Blumin wrote:Max Kolonko wrote:I use remaps, because they are there. I have mixed filling about using them. I can respec that (h++h++).
I see what You did there :) |

OldMan Gana
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 22:12:00 -
[31] - Quote
Eve is a game in a competitive market. As the market is constantly changing, so EVE should be constantly developing. That's the facts of business. If tinkering with SP appeals to the market then tinkering there will be. If there are other MMO's who do or are doing something similar then it's natural that EVE will do the same. " I spent most of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best-á |

Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 22:13:00 -
[32] - Quote
OldMan Gana wrote:Eve is a game in a competitive market. As the market is constantly changing, so EVE should be constantly developing. That's the facts of business. If tinkering with SP appeals to the market then tinkering there will be. If there are other MMO's who do or are doing something similar then it's natural that EVE will do the same.
There are, and there are tones (WOW comes to mind, and any other clone). But what drove people toward EVE was that in here, there is not. |

Frank Graden
Axiom Navy
5
|
Posted - 2012.01.19 23:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote:OldMan Gana wrote:Eve is a game in a competitive market. As the market is constantly changing, so EVE should be constantly developing. That's the facts of business. If tinkering with SP appeals to the market then tinkering there will be. If there are other MMO's who do or are doing something similar then it's natural that EVE will do the same. There are, and there are tones (WOW comes to mind, and any other clone). But what drove people toward EVE was that in here, there is not.
And then I'll respec my player into Azeroth then eat a bullet because I'm playing wow.
Thats why alot of people play EVE, it doesnt follow the market, its dark and brutal and mistakes count for something here. If you make a mistake and blowup you lose your ship forever, you cant wait 15min and get it back. Our choices count for something, good or bad and we have to live with them. That is what makes EVE so great. Tough s**t that you skill trained like a noob for 2 months, maybe you should have found a corp to teach you what to skill train earlier.
No respec for nurfs. Respec only for skills removed from the game. You dont like it go play with your barbie dolls. |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
72
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 07:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
I'll +1 on the idea that full or partial respecs shouldn't be allowed; I've got no use for them anyway, so it really doesn't matter to me.
A very limited respec might not be terrible, but it should come at a cost: Wipe 1.2 million SP, and get 600K back to spend as you wish. This will limit Respecs being influenced by attribute mechanics, and make people think twice before doing it. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
357
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 10:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
So I'm going to agree, and disagree, and also show you the parts you missed, but first, lets go over your examples:
Max Kolonko wrote: When titans lost ability to shoot DD trough portal and later lost AOE effect - no one refunded them their Energy Weapons V
Titans could still Doomsday after this change, so there wouldn't have been a need to give them these sp back.
Your example would have been better if they'd removed the DD.
Max Kolonko wrote:When SB lost cruise bonus no one gave us Cruise specialisation back as SP
If you maxed out missile training, all of the supporting skills went directly into the new weapons type, and you could always just get out of the ship and put those cruise missile skills to use in another ship.
Max Kolonko wrote:When there was nano nerf, no one gave us back skills from navigation and minmatar HAC 5
Navigation skills work across all ships, what you're neglecting to see is that they did in fact pull all of the implant sets from everybody on the cluster, they weren't going to be as useful, so they gave you the option of plugging them back in or not.
Max Kolonko wrote:When you nerfed PI, no one gave us back PI skiils
You could still do PI after the change.
Max Kolonko wrote:When you nerfed carriers (removed large cargo-hold) no one refunded us capital skills
The carrier was still a carrier, why would they give you skill points back for it? If you'd have trained carrier 5, and they removed carriers, and didn't refund your SP, this would be a valid point.
You see, some of the SC pilots have been in SC's for years, they can't leave the ship, and they trained all those drone skills on purpose, they were stuck in the ship, there was nothing it could do but launch drones, so they maxed out their drones.
A closer comparison would be like, if they suddenly redid all the Amarr ships with no guns on them, no more lasers, just missiles. They would in fact give players those skill points back, as its a fairly radical change that has drastic consequences that disrupt years of training.
Its not the nerfing of single weapons system that you can take or leave, its the complete re-imagination of a platform, where 10+ million sp (minimum, some more like 15) are now absolutely worthless, and the pilot isn't able to just reship and use them in something else
ALL THAT SAID
That part goes on to talk about the alternative, which is dockable 0.0 stations for supers, which relieves some of the burden from the Supercarrier pilot, it then gives him the OPTION of using those skills that he's spent years training in a different platform, like the case with the Stealthbomber nerf you mentioned.
One way or another, the super pilots who've spent years in training just got pretty boned with that removal, it wouldn't be a blanket respec, it would likely be targeted at any pilot currently in a supercarrier. |

J Kunjeh
334
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:My point being that I am not going to freak out about the "possible" consequences of something we know nothing about yet. They said they had an idea for a limited SP respec. That's it...other than that we know NOTHING! No need to freak out about it. We don't even know what they have in mind for the word "limited".
We know what they meant. Here's an explanation for you from Seleene's blog (member of CSM6):
Quote: Pilots - most particularly super-carrier pilots - should be given a "partial respec" of their skill-points
I don't like re-specs at all. That being said I did, at the urging of several people that contacted me, bring up the fact that there are a lot of ~mad~ supercarrier pilots out there who now have literally millions of skill points in drones trained which they can do nothing with. Yes, yes, whaaaaaaaaa, etc... However, I'm one of these people. Seleene has been in a Nyx since late 2006 and, once you make that leap, about the only thing left to actually train was the drone skills. I maxed those out years ago. I think it's kind of dumb that I can no longer use those skills that I trained specifically for the ship I was flying / trapped in. However, I'd still prefer the docking solution I mentioned earlier before opening the Pandora's Box of respecs.
"The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Jalmari Huitsikko
draketrain Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 04:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
I DEMAND BACK ALL MY DRAKE SKILLPOINTS
I WANT TO SPEND THEM ON TITAN
|

Jade Mitch
United Coalitions ZADA ALLIANCE
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 03:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
My skill points represent all the time and money I've poured into Eve since day one, many years ago. Eve is all about the *natural consequences* of your choices, not about arbitrary limitations. If I make some bad skill choices with a char, the only way to correct it is to recycle the char and make a new one, thereby flushing my time and money down the drain. Nothing in your wall of text explains the imbalance or inequity of a skill point redistribution mechanism so, I still see nothing wrong with it. -1 |

Phoehnix
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
Well the big problem with the docking alternative is super carrier docking games.. *shivers* |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Jade Mitch wrote:If I make some bad skill choices with a char, the only way to correct it is to recycle the char and make a new one, thereby flushing my time and money down the drain.
Or you know, just train something else and go ask your doctor for stronger OCD medicine. |

E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
196
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:40:00 -
[41] - Quote
I do not think there should be a refund.
Do i get to refund projectile skills to train rails because they are finally usefull on a myrmidon?
Also any skill refund is just bad, it will always favor the higher SP pilots.
Need more-ádecent content a casual player can access in a 1-2h play period that is actually fun and contributes to long term personal and corp goals. This applies to PvE and PvP. |

MinerChick
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
I honestly would be fine with it if it was on a timer like remaps. That way character sales would be nicer because you could buy a character with the SP respec and move skill points out of like Electronic attack ships 5 and put them into something good. But hey I still have not remapped because 15 Charisma is the best, but being able to lose some skills and move the SP around would be cool. |

Janus Konor
Left Leaning Liberals Beware
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:55:00 -
[43] - Quote
I agree, no re-spec. As mentioned before, if there was a cap on skill limits, then respec yes. But since we have 0 limitation, then there should be 0 respec. You got the benefits of your sp when you could. Sorry its changed. In that case, refund all the ships you blew up because of your investment in those drone skills. I dont see anyone jumping at that.
+1, No respec. Its eve stop whining. This universe is to harsh and cold for your whining over SP points to have any effect. |

Lykouleon
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
433
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 19:32:00 -
[44] - Quote
~ consequences ~ Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER SO I CAN HIT THEM WITH MY SWORD
WIdot Director of Quality Control and Ironically Signing My Title to Posts To Make People ~mad~ |

SketS47
Alpha Intellectual Military Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
The option to relocate sp points is a horrible horrible horrible idea.. If this happends I will never again play eve.
(opinion of an used to be super active player till leaks showed were nothing but money bunnys for ccp wich sorta ruined the game.. also adding wth is my station walking wich was promised? Why are botters still not removed? Why the gay cave in to our demands in the last few months, its not sincere so stop the crap!) |

BigRed Seven
404 File Not Found
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 22:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
I have been playing eve since 06 and I have made some bad choices of skills over the year. Being an older player I think the perks need to flow like wine for us who have been playing for a long time. That is why I think respec is a good thing. I am all in favor for respec but there should be some constraints.
1. Respec once a year only. 2. Limit of 10 million skill points.
That's my opinion
|

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
978
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 23:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
BigRed Seven wrote:I have been playing eve since 06 and I have made some bad choices of skills over the year. Being an older player I think the perks need to flow like wine for us who have been playing for a long time. That is why I think respec is a good thing. I am all in favor for respec but there should be some constraints.
1. Respec once a year only. 2. Limit of 10 million skill points.
That's my opinion
Feel free to post in my thread and flame to your hearts content as the other two people that have posted have been for 3 pages. 
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59605&find=unread
Seriously though...if you want a respec to happen, idea's need to be put forth that work. Being a vet myself I don't necessarily want a respec option to be put into the game. But if the idea of one benefits EvE and CCP as a whole and also makes sense in it's introduction to the game then I will back it. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

Sicex
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 23:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
EVE is not like other games with a finite amount of SP or 'tech-tree' options.
Everyone has the ability to train everything to max... The time frame in which you choose to train something is completely up to you and there should never be any sort of Respec option. |

Samillian
Jump.Jump.Jump.
72
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 14:06:00 -
[49] - Quote
No to SP Respec, live with the consequences of your decisions. |

Sundarpants
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 15:50:00 -
[50] - Quote
+1 No Respec in Eve |

Manji Lee
Missions Mining and Mayhem Northern Coalition.
48
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 16:08:00 -
[51] - Quote
I'm not supporting drone respec for supercap pilot. It's completely a bullshit idea. And it gives a odd mix message to a lot vet's. I mean if they can get a respec on drones. Then as a combat pilot, why can't I get a repsec on the mining skills that I have already? |

Viribus
Lynch Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 18:04:00 -
[52] - Quote
I just want to get rid of my goddamn industry skills |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
995
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 19:02:00 -
[53] - Quote
Viribus wrote:I just want to get rid of my goddamn industry skills Many of us would feel your pain. Personally I have a few I wouldn't mind getting rid of but I do use them from time to time. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

GetSirrus
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 00:48:00 -
[54] - Quote
I am not seeing the rational between remap and respec. At the game's inception players would choose a culture within a race. The system had hard-coded attributes which would be beneficial to particular career path in the game. Too bad if you decided you wanted to move from Industry to Trading.
Based on the sentiment of many opposing respec, "live with the choice" - players would still be trapped without remaps.
I am in favour an extremely limited respec system. Something like 3% of total SP, every two years.
The re-distrubution of Learning SP and adjustment to Social SP were widely welcome in the game. Providing some proof that the system of respec can be worked without major harm to the status quo. |

Xyzibit
New-Roots
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 10:45:00 -
[55] - Quote
voting AGAINST respec / remap of SP NOT even 1% per anno...  |

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
57
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 12:40:00 -
[56] - Quote
another NO to any type of respec.
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |

Lili Lu
170
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 00:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
What a bunch of butthurt from supercarrier club pilots whining to selene. Oh but I can't use the fighterbombers anymore whaaaaaaa.
Bullshit, you just can't use them to kill everything now, you can still use them in much more limited role.
No respecs, not for noobs who want to dump mining skills that they used.
No respecs, not for petulent supercarrier pilots that used they drone skill for how many months to kill everything in sight and now can still use them but just not to kill everything in sight.
No respecs, to use the meme, cry more. |

Claire Raynor
NovaGear
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 14:02:00 -
[58] - Quote
Triana wrote:No respec, ever.
THIS |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |