| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Valei Khurelem
199
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 12:48:00 -
[151] - Quote
Quote:Yes I said it. Fun. Eve is a video game. Video games are a type of game. Games are meant to be fun. Therefore, Eve is meant to be fun. Please dont crucify me because I play games to have fun
Any chance you're going to look at maybe proving CSM aren't catering to 0.0 alliances and looking at making 0.0 more viable for solo players and small groups without forcing them to pay ridiculous taxes just to go into the space without getting ganked?
That is, if you really are about having fun and not just wanting fun for yourself.
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
116
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 13:03:00 -
[152] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:Quote:Yes I said it. Fun. Eve is a video game. Video games are a type of game. Games are meant to be fun. Therefore, Eve is meant to be fun. Please dont crucify me because I play games to have fun Any chance you're going to look at maybe proving CSM aren't catering to 0.0 alliances and looking at making 0.0 more viable for solo players and small groups without forcing them to pay ridiculous taxes just to go into the space without getting ganked? That is, if you really are about having fun and not just wanting fun for yourself. why solo? because you don't want to care about anyone except you. why should anybody care about solo player then? |

Orion GUardian
96
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 14:18:00 -
[153] - Quote
jonnus ursidae wrote:I've never run an Incursion but I hear the rewards are ridiculous, good on whoever is stopping that.. Darius III wasn't he a Goon?
I've never collected moon goo but I hear the rewards are ridiculous, good on whoever is stopping that... wait that'd be nobody.
Yes but different than Incursions it does not blow ISK into the system!
You cannot earn what others won't pay. But with Incursions, Ratting and Missions you get ISK for thin air ;) |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 18:00:00 -
[154] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:The hole 0.0 is too overpowered and needs some serious nerfing or rethinked. Its far too much isk flowing to their wallets. Only then you can have smaller alliances actually have a chance vs these super powers and their allies. If CCP is serious about stiring the pot and making people to do more pvp, then nerfing 0.0 is the way, otherise who can actually afford to go vs merc, ship replacement programs, coalitions and their allies? I'll give you a non-trolling answer: The problem isn't the amount of isk. The problem is that the actual act of taking away a system is a massive cockstab which is way, way too easy to deflect. The SOV system needs to be modified to be much, much more dynamic than it currently is, with a lot more small targets. This would have the knock-on benefits of enabling two coalitions to run constant harassment against the other to grind down SOV, instead of these fuckoff huge fleets we currently see all the time with 1000+ in local. While 1000+ in local is fun, designing a SOV system which encourages smaller fleet engagements would most likely be more fun and enable smaller alliances to gain a foothold in otherwise unused nullsec space.
This is actually a very good answer by a goon. But there is one problem. ISK. Small entities cannot compete with large entities. Even if you by some miracle get a system or a bunch of system you still cannot afford to war on your enemy. Not when your enemy has ship replacemnt programs etc. They can always win by either share number, or super caps, or merc or isk. So many alliances have moved into 0.0 emire space to earn isk with the possibility of later obtaining space but instead 0.0 empire becomes the death of them cos they cant move and actually conquer space. The reasons mentioned above just keep showing its ogly face =( |

Avid Bumhumper
Furian Necromongers
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 18:30:00 -
[155] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:ElQuirko wrote:the nullsec ISK faucet - I refer, of course, to tech moons. Tech isn't an isk faucet. It transfers isk, yes, but it doesn't add or remove isk from the game in any way, shape or form.
Running for President? 
|

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
543
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 19:04:00 -
[156] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote:This is actually a very good answer by a goon. But there is one problem. ISK. Small entities cannot compete with large entities. Even if you by some miracle get a system or a bunch of system you still cannot afford to war on your enemy. Not when your enemy has ship replacemnt programs etc. They can always win by either share number, or super caps, or merc or isk. So many alliances have moved into 0.0 emire space to earn isk with the possibility of later obtaining space but instead 0.0 empire becomes the death of them cos they cant move and actually conquer space. The reasons mentioned above just keep showing its ogly face =( Of course ISK wil rear its face at some point, that doesn't change the fact that what we're seeing, right now, is a ton of space not being used by anyone, but it's also not being attacked because everyone knows it'll take a LONG time to actually get anywhere, if just looking at the mass of EHP on structures. There's a reason Delve/Querious/etc was left in IT Alliance's hands for months after they essentially died.
If the act of actually losing SOV (and as a result, taking SOV) was easier, then today's large sprawling empires wouldn't be nearly as easy to defend, and as such they would end up contracting on their own.
ISK does make it easier to defend space because you have ship replacement programs etc, yes, but there comes a point where you end up having too much to defend. ISK can only carry you so far before you burn out. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
543
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 19:04:00 -
[157] - Quote
Avid Bumhumper wrote:Lord Zim wrote:ElQuirko wrote:the nullsec ISK faucet - I refer, of course, to tech moons. Tech isn't an isk faucet. It transfers isk, yes, but it doesn't add or remove isk from the game in any way, shape or form. Running for President?  Yes. I'm running for presidency in the Captain Pedantry Club. |

Tansen89
Brazed Shadow of the P3ntacle
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 20:38:00 -
[158] - Quote
Darius III wrote:Sorry I am doing a drive by on this thread.
OP is literally the weakest link here. This doesn't have anything to do with the CSM or CCP. Nor does it have to do with 0.0 Vs bears.
This is focused on removal of an out of whack mechanic and removing a risk free Isk Faucet.
At first I thought no one could be dumber than Endevor Starfleet. Thanks for proving me wrong.
You guys with your conspiracy theories are really taxing my ability to read, and respond to, genuine questions/concerns about what we are doing. For some, this is about the tears. For others revenge is the motive. At the core-we really are genuinely trying to force CCP to balance Incursions with the rest of Eve. I suspect a lot of us are doing this because it is something to do, and that it overlaps other reasons listed above.
CCP has a long history of bringing something into a game and tweaking it to bring it to close levels with other things of a similar nature. Remember when the Drone Regions were new? I erected a POS with refining array. Was making stupid amounts of ISK refining the drone compounds. When I say stupid amounts of ISK I mean crazy stupid amounts of ISK. Few months later they reduced the mineral payouts from killing Drone spawns.
I was a little sad, but I understood that what I was making unfair amounts of money doing something easy, and when they nerfed the deal, I made a more balanced income vs. the risk of other occupations. They did good balancing act on that, even though it hurt me personally.
My primary personal motivations and goals for shutting down incursions have been met, mostly. What I really wanted to do was make a big enough impression that the organizers of leading incursion teams would have a conference with me. They did, and it was productive-at least to me. I got their truthful answers and very valuable input about incursions, that I used to make my recommendations to CCP about a nerf. Most of the rest of it was for trolling and for fun.
Yes I said it. Fun. Eve is a video game. Video games are a type of game. Games are meant to be fun. Therefore, Eve is meant to be fun. Please dont crucify me because I play games to have fun
You say its an isk faucet yet if you look at the market wouldn't you say everything has inflated to match? I mean Plex has gone up like crazy, those of you in low and null pulling pirate boats and prints to jita have seen a significant increase in demand and price.
Also the risk of running an incursion only decreases with skills and the trust of your fleet. Of course even in a good fleet your looking at a significant amount of risk: Logi's not paying attention, griefers / suicide gankers, and of course the dreaded disconnect. I am confidently saying that there have been many fleets I have been in where I've seen a 5b nightmare go down because our trusted logi was not as trusted as we thought. Or because somebody failed to mention they were at war and they were not repped and another few bill down the drain. Sadly even the odd time where someone has the genius idea to make their large sig radius a super large sig radius with no resists.
If it were a public fleet you'd run many more risks and it significantly raises these factors, plenty of people have lost ships and its no different from anything else if you are careless and/or your fleet fails to perform their duties.
However if say you were to propose the rewards for low sec incursions to be more enticing I think you'd actually have some support from incursioners. Maybe the low sec has a small slight chance to drop sansha mods :P
|

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
543
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 20:49:00 -
[159] - Quote
If that's "risk", then boy, EVE must be one scary place. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
240
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 21:02:00 -
[160] - Quote
risk to hisec incursion runners:
1: Going to incursion and not fitting resists 2: not bringing logisticships before warping to incursion 3: undocking during wardec and not broadcasting for reps
chilling stuff, i have no idea how you guys are able to farm 23/7 in the face of such adversity |

Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 21:03:00 -
[161] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:This is actually a very good answer by a goon. But there is one problem. ISK. Small entities cannot compete with large entities. Even if you by some miracle get a system or a bunch of system you still cannot afford to war on your enemy. Not when your enemy has ship replacemnt programs etc. They can always win by either share number, or super caps, or merc or isk. So many alliances have moved into 0.0 emire space to earn isk with the possibility of later obtaining space but instead 0.0 empire becomes the death of them cos they cant move and actually conquer space. The reasons mentioned above just keep showing its ogly face =( Of course ISK wil rear its face at some point, that doesn't change the fact that what we're seeing, right now, is a ton of space not being used by anyone, but it's also not being attacked because everyone knows it'll take a LONG time to actually get anywhere, if just looking at the mass of EHP on structures. There's a reason Delve/Querious/etc was left in IT Alliance's hands for months after they essentially died. If the act of actually losing SOV (and as a result, taking SOV) was easier, then today's large sprawling empires wouldn't be nearly as easy to defend, and as such they would end up contracting on their own. ISK does make it easier to defend space because you have ship replacement programs etc, yes, but there comes a point where you end up having too much to defend. ISK can only carry you so far before you burn out.
I want to see this unused space....cos i really dont see it. Or are you talking about the area of space thats like the edge system? If you are talking about the worthless areas then you know why nobody wants them. All of this could have been solved if they didnt nerf the anomolies. Now look at us. Half of eve is gone and the other half does not want to do anythign with 0.0. This is as much fault with all those people that screamed for nerfing the anomolies and did not listen that people were going to leave 0.0 in masses. Yes isk can only carry you some way but you cant without it make war. You are just cutting the legs under from the new alliance both medium and small. Effectivelly you are nerfing us back to 2005.
You do know whats gonna happen now right? People are still not gonna go to 0.0! Too many disadvantages and literally no advantages to small or even medium sized alliances cos they simply cannot hold it. Not that they want to invest into something either where they will lose billion in what could be another stupid ccp nerf like it happened in the past.
I would not be surprised if more people leave now. If CCP has had such a hard time geting people in then geting rid of a few players is not gonna make this game any good. People again in 00 are gonna scream we got noone to shoot. I guarantee you people are not gonna go back to 0.0 cos there is no insentive whats so ever. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
544
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 21:06:00 -
[162] - Quote
What's this "You are" business? |

Camios
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 21:07:00 -
[163] - Quote
Nerf highsec.
It is the best place to make money for a lone player. It should not be like that, period. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
727
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 21:33:00 -
[164] - Quote
/me facepalms
How exactly is CCP supporting them? Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Gazmin VanBurin
The Tower Of Nevaurus The 99 Percent
55
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 22:32:00 -
[165] - Quote
incursions dont need nerfed they need balanced so they cant be grinded forever, there should be a reward for ending an incursion quickly, or make the site bountys degrade over time. then ccp can focus on breathing life back into 0.0 by making sov worth taking. |

Caldari Acolyte
Perkone Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 23:35:00 -
[166] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:incursions dont need nerfed they need balanced so they cant be grinded forever, there should be a reward for ending an incursion quickly, or make the site bountys degrade over time. then ccp can focus on breathing life back into 0.0 by making sov worth taking.
"ccp can focus on breathing life back into 0.0 by making sov worth taking" lol, good one! you know thats never gonna happen. dream on. |

Gazmin VanBurin
The Tower Of Nevaurus The 99 Percent
55
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 23:58:00 -
[167] - Quote
*sparkel eyed* and then they can give me a puppy in my captains quarters...
but seriously, based off the csm minets they are thinking of ways to do it, but likely they will just fudge it up. |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 00:57:00 -
[168] - Quote
TLDR;
Null sec tears becuase they can't make that much isk/hour in null which is BS High sec tears saying leave my game play alone for my gaming style they do the job Darrius 3 wanting revenge for having his little pos nerfed in drone region.... oh and Lord zim being a typical goon thinking the game is all about null sec.
missed anything? |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
152
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 01:38:00 -
[169] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:TLDR;
Null sec tears becuase they can't make that much isk/hour in null which is BS High sec tears saying leave my game play alone for my gaming style they do the job Darrius 3 wanting revenge for having his little pos nerfed in drone region.... oh and Lord zim being a typical goon thinking the game is all about null sec.
missed anything? I hope your lasers are better aimed than your perception...
Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online: No Local. No Lag. No Blues (No Intell Channesl). No Blobs.
NEW FEATURE: NO INCARNA! |

Sara XIII
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:10:00 -
[170] - Quote
The shocking thing i discovered about Incursions, it's just like..........
"359 arms warrior LFBWD-25 pst"
Eliminate Incursions please.  |

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 02:38:00 -
[171] - Quote
Juliana Stinger wrote:"621 billion ISK is paid out by CONCORD every week from Incursions" impressive amount of isk they are making.
One of us has issues with their browser. Mine has "Some questionable math by community leaders..." added before that number. Yours? |

Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
568
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:17:00 -
[172] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:TLDR;
Null sec tears becuase they can't make that much isk/hour in null which is BS High sec tears saying leave my game play alone for my gaming style they do the job Darrius 3 wanting revenge for having his little pos nerfed in drone region....
missed anything?
You didnt miss anything, you missed everything.
CCP and even the CSM have a lot of hardworking men and women who are very intelligent, working on making New Eden a better place-it is CCP management that I fear the most. |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:20:00 -
[173] - Quote
Darius III wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:TLDR;
Null sec tears becuase they can't make that much isk/hour in null which is BS High sec tears saying leave my game play alone for my gaming style they do the job Darrius 3 wanting revenge for having his little pos nerfed in drone region....
missed anything? You didnt miss anything, you missed everything I wanted you to believe.
Fixed
By the way since you are intent on killing incursions with your hit squads killing the mom asap isn't that an interesting form of pvp....
Have you ever thought that what you are doing is really good for the game not your tears and stamping of your feet and desire to get your own way like a 3 year old but becuase you have issue's with the percieved "in-balance" and decided to develop a type of game play to disrupt the well oiled teams (remember just becuase people work well together doesn't mean its inbalanced sometimes all thats needed is a bit of variety and flexibility to surprise). That to me is another form of PVP and a route for the game that makes it interesting.
Now do something useful since you don't want people to be able to make ISK, do it against the moon holders who have it just as easy with their JF's, JB routes, Cyno gens, intel channels... Go ahead and do your best to make me believe that apparently that isn't "in-balanced". |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
545
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:24:00 -
[174] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:Now do something useful since you don't want people to be able to make ISK, do it against the moon holders who have it just as easy with their JF's, JB routes, Cyno gens, intel channels... Go ahead and do your best to make me believe that apparently that isn't "in-balanced". "Why don't you go pick on them instead? We're just a small snack, they're a much bigger snack!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAu_Ykvju5A |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:33:00 -
[175] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:Now do something useful since you don't want people to be able to make ISK, do it against the moon holders who have it just as easy with their JF's, JB routes, Cyno gens, intel channels... Go ahead and do your best to make me believe that apparently that isn't "in-balanced". "Why don't you go pick on them instead? We're just a small snack, they're a much bigger snack!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAu_Ykvju5A
LOL great response. All you do is mock people who bring valid points to the argument you've done it with every reply whether it is to me or to other people.
Its called framing - you are framing incursions as the "end of the game", when what is really on everyones mind is the end of the game will be the influence of people like you and the null sec entities. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
545
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:39:00 -
[176] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:Now do something useful since you don't want people to be able to make ISK, do it against the moon holders who have it just as easy with their JF's, JB routes, Cyno gens, intel channels... Go ahead and do your best to make me believe that apparently that isn't "in-balanced". "Why don't you go pick on them instead? We're just a small snack, they're a much bigger snack!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAu_Ykvju5A LOL great response. All you do is mock people who bring valid points to the argument you've done it with every reply whether it is to me or to other people. Its called framing - you are framing incursions as the "end of the game", when what is really on everyones mind is the end of the game will be the influence of people like you and the null sec entities. There's a reason I'm mocking people like you. You're being whiny about someone ruining the game because they're playing the incursions in a way which is perfectly legal, by killing off the mothership when it appears. Nowhere does it say "the mothership must not be touched until the absolute last moment" in the rules.
Harden the **** up, wardec them and make them stop, instead of being a whiny little goat going "please grief them instead, they're much fatter than me!".
Jeez. |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:40:00 -
[177] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:Now do something useful since you don't want people to be able to make ISK, do it against the moon holders who have it just as easy with their JF's, JB routes, Cyno gens, intel channels... Go ahead and do your best to make me believe that apparently that isn't "in-balanced". "Why don't you go pick on them instead? We're just a small snack, they're a much bigger snack!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAu_Ykvju5A LOL great response. All you do is mock people who bring valid points to the argument you've done it with every reply whether it is to me or to other people. Its called framing - you are framing incursions as the "end of the game", when what is really on everyones mind is the end of the game will be the influence of people like you and the null sec entities. There's a reason I'm mocking people like you. You're being whiny about someone ruining the game because they're playing the incursions in a way which is perfectly legal, by killing off the mothership when it appears. Nowhere does it say "the mothership must not be touched until the absolute last moment" in the rules. Harden the **** up, wardec them and make them stop, instead of being a whiny little goat going "please grief them instead, they're much fatter than me!". Jeez.
******* hell you dumb **** read the ******* post you ********. I say that its a form of pvp that is fine and good for the game you tit.
Quote:Have you ever thought that what you are doing is really good for the game not your tears and stamping of your feet and desire to get your own way like a 3 year old but becuase you have issue's with the percieved "in-balance" and decided to develop a type of game play to disrupt the well oiled teams (remember just becuase people work well together doesn't mean its inbalanced sometimes all thats needed is a bit of variety and flexibility to surprise). That to me is another form of PVP and a route for the game that makes it interesting.
So yes by all means disrupt the isk making via incursions by killing the moms quickly...
I wish it was just as easy for people to disrupt the 80% of isk making that is done through moon mining as easily. |

Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
545
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:48:00 -
[178] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:******* hell you dumb **** read the ******* post you ********. I say that its a form of pvp that is fine and good for the game you tit. "It's perfectly fine, but please, please, go grief the nullbears instead. :( :( :(" |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:53:00 -
[179] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:******* hell you dumb **** read the ******* post you ********. I say that its a form of pvp that is fine and good for the game you tit. "It's perfectly fine, but please, please, go grief the nullbears instead. :( :( :("
Oh deary me
Goonie being embarrassed in grown up conversation has no reply. |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:54:00 -
[180] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:Lord Zim wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:******* hell you dumb **** read the ******* post you ********. I say that its a form of pvp that is fine and good for the game you tit. "It's perfectly fine, but please, please, go grief the nullbears instead. :( :( :(" Oh deary me Goonie being embarrassed in grown up conversation has no reply. Just so you can read what I wrote very clearly
Quote:Have you ever thought that what you are doing is really good for the game not your tears and stamping of your feet and desire to get your own way like a 3 year old but becuase you have issue's with the percieved "in-balance" and decided to develop a type of game play to disrupt the well oiled teams (remember just becuase people work well together doesn't mean its inbalanced sometimes all thats needed is a bit of variety and flexibility to surprise). That to me is another form of PVP and a route for the game that makes it interesting.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |