Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mr Saito
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:33:00 -
[1]
Sorry for the stupid question but is M/S "meters per second"?
And if my Raven goes 143 M/S how does that speed translate into MPH?
Sorry if this is a noob question. |

ceyriot
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:34:00 -
[2]
heh...M/S is meters a second, which into miles is WTFIUNNO cause im canadian.
|

Dr Fighter
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:37:00 -
[3]
320 miles per hour i think.
|

DTson Gauur
Glauxian Brothers Ground Zeero
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:37:00 -
[4]
shy under 320mph (319.88)
|

Wardog 1
Infinitus Odium The Church.
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:38:00 -
[5]
143 m/sec = 319.89100 mi/hr
|

Sqalevon
Masuat'aa Matari
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:41:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Sqalevon on 15/09/2007 11:44:22 Lets first calculate m/s to km/h
there go 3600 s in a h there go 1000 m in a km
143m/s = 514800m/h
now devide it by 1000 to get km/h
514800m/h = 514.8km/h
and we all know ( I hope ) that there go roughly 1.609 km in a mile.
514.8km/h = 319.95m/h
math is easy
EDIT : seems like I was not using the precise number for km -> mile, and some people have been rounding off ^^
|

Terianna Eri
Amarr STK Scientific M. PIRE
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:57:00 -
[7]
1 m/s = 2.23693629 mph, according to google... and yes, even ships that are quite slow in space are rather fast compared to terrestrial vehicles. Of course, spaceships don't have to deal with friction.
__________________________________
|

Mr Saito
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 11:58:00 -
[8]
Thank you all very much.
I'm terrible at math.
|

Grab Khan
New Justice
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 12:39:00 -
[9]
The answer to this (and any other conversions / calculations) is handily provided by our friend, The Google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=143%20m/s%20in%20mph
(it's also handy for weird stuff like "speed of light in furlongs per fortnight" - try it! :)
|

Juha85
Beasts of Burden YouWhat
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 13:31:00 -
[10]
God I hate americans for not using the SI (metric) system. Same goes for the UK people but atleast they are getting into the standard. Doing unit conversions between the systems just makes me mad... (work) ---------------------------------------
|
|

Krann
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 13:51:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:52:32 Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:52:21 Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:51:53
Originally by: Juha85 God I hate americans for not using the SI (metric) system. Same goes for the UK people but atleast they are getting into the standard. Doing unit conversions between the systems just makes me mad... (work)
Hah, read it and weep metric boy!
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008486701
|

Andrue
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 14:10:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Andrue on 15/09/2007 14:10:17
Originally by: Krann Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:52:32 Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:52:21 Edited by: Krann on 15/09/2007 13:51:53
Originally by: Juha85 God I hate americans for not using the SI (metric) system. Same goes for the UK people but atleast they are
getting into the standard. Doing unit conversions between the systems just makes me mad... (work)
Hah, read it and weep metric boy!
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7008486701
Yeah,
it's pathetic. Makes me somewhat ashamed to be British. Elderly people that just like the old units is one thing but when I read about people under 40 claiming to not understand the metric system it boggles my mind. I was forty this year and I was taught in metric at school. In any case..if you're not senile or mentally challenged how you can not understand metric?
About the only valid complaint against the metric system is that it dumbs things down panders to the lazy. -- (Battle hardened industrialist)
[Brackley, UK]
My budgie can say "ploppy bottom". You have been warned. |

Sphynx Stormlord
Gallente Anqara Tech
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 14:12:00 -
[13]
How fast? Very slightly longer than it takes to type 143 m/s in mph into google (and have it answer 143 (meters / second) = 319.88189 mph)
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 14:41:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Sphynx Stormlord google
Yeah, when in doubt, always google it  _
[CNVTF] is recruiting | Char creation guide | Stack-nerfing explained |

Nian Banks
Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 15:13:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Nian Banks on 15/09/2007 15:13:29 Ok for all you imperialists heres a little bit of metric education, Are you ready children?
Here we go...
Basic naming abbreviations.
Distance 1mm = one millimetre 1cm = one centimetre 1m = one metre 1km = one kilometre
Weight 1mg = one milligram 1g = one gram 1kg = one kilogram 1t = one metric ton
Volume 1ml = one millilitre 1l = one litre 1kl = one kilolitre 1ml = one megalitre
Ok guys here we go.
10mm = 1cm, 100cm = 1m, 1000m = 1km 1000mg = 1g, 1000g = 1kg, 1000kg = 1t 1000ml = 1l, 1000l = 1kl, 1000kl = 1ml
Ok heres the trippy part, 10cm x 10cm 1x0cm, thats 10cm cubed, when filled with water at sea level that is 4 degrees centigrade it takes 1 litre of pure water for it to be full. That one litre also equals one kilogram.
10cm cubed = 1 litre = 1 kilogram.
|

Klavayne
Free Mercenaries Union FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 15:22:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Nian Banks
Volume 1ml = one millilitre 1l = one litre 1kl = one kilolitre 1ml = one megalitre
Ok guys here we go.
1000ml = 1l, 1000l = 1kl, 1000kl = 1ml
By your units, 1000ml = 1ml. But i'm sure you meant ml as a megalitre which should really be Ml. Nobody really uses 1kl or 1Ml because 1kl = 1m3 of water. Then you just scale up from that.
|

Barbens
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 15:25:00 -
[17]
1m = 3.28 feet :)
![]() |

Nian Banks
Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 16:10:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Klavayne
Originally by: Nian Banks
Volume 1ml = one millilitre 1l = one litre 1kl = one kilolitre 1ml = one megalitre
Ok guys here we go.
1000ml = 1l, 1000l = 1kl, 1000kl = 1ml
By your units, 1000ml = 1ml. But i'm sure you meant ml as a megalitre which should really be Ml. Nobody really uses 1kl or 1Ml because 1kl = 1m3 of water. Then you just scale up from that.
I knew I did a typo somewhere but couldn't find it. Ta
|

Mudkest
MetaForge Ekliptika
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 16:28:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Mudkest on 15/09/2007 16:31:53
Originally by: Nian Banks
Ok heres the trippy part, 10cm x 10cm 1x0cm, thats 10cm cubed, when filled with water at sea level that is 4 degrees centigrade it takes 1 litre of pure water for it to be full. That one litre also equals one kilogram.
10cm cubed = 1 litre = 1 kilogram.
been a while since math class, but wouldn 10cm*10cm*10cm=1000cm¦? wich is 1dm¦ or 1 litre
----- GIEV custom ship paint jobs!
I want my hello-kitty-kessie! |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 16:45:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Mudkest been a while since math class, but wouldn 10cm*10cm*10cm=1000cm¦? wich is 1dm¦ or 1 litre
Yes, it is 1000 cubic centimeters indeed, or as you pointed out, 1 cubic decimeter. But it's a cube with a side of 10 cm (1 dm)  That's the only explanation for his mistaken confusion with "10cm cubed". _
[CNVTF] is recruiting | Char creation guide | Stack-nerfing explained |
|

Liang Nuren
The Refugees
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 17:49:00 -
[21]
Well, if native "speakers" of metric can't even give a simple explanation - how is everyone else supposed to understand!!
Liang
PS: I do know the metric system.
Yarr? |

Nian Banks
Minmatar Berserkers of Aesir
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 17:53:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Mudkest been a while since math class, but wouldn 10cm*10cm*10cm=1000cm¦? wich is 1dm¦ or 1 litre
Yes, it is 1000 cubic centimeters indeed, or as you pointed out, 1 cubic decimeter. But it's a cube with a side of 10 cm (1 dm)  That's the only explanation for his mistaken confusion with "10cm cubed".
:) Its all good, embarrassing but at least there's people who can pick up and rectify my mistakes. On a fun Saturday night after drinks and a little 8ball you usually aren't the greatest mathematician in the world. Now if we were to start to talk about angles of approach and velocity in regards to little coloured balls on a green flat surface. I think bed time would be in order.
|

Abye
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 18:14:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Abye on 15/09/2007 18:13:55 I just imagine the horrors of having physics classes with the imperial measurements.
3 countries have not officially adopted the metric system: USA, Liberia and Myanmar -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_system ___
|

Ruciza
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 18:26:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Abye
I just imagine the horrors of having physics classes with the imperial measurements.
No, the horrors begin when you arrive in the real world, which is metric. Science is in metric generally, and if not you lose your space probe and years of effort. And money.
|

Paulo Damarr
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 19:02:00 -
[25]
That's pretty disappointing to find out what the speeds translate as Some of the super advanced starships in EVE are not much faster than this
|

Mudkest
MetaForge Ekliptika
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 20:16:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Liang Nuren Well, if native "speakers" of metric can't even give a simple explanation - how is everyone else supposed to understand!!
Liang
PS: I do know the metric system.
its not metrix system fault, people who make that mistake will also say 10 inch * 10 inch * 10 inch is 10 cubic inch. wich it isnt, 10X10X10 is 1000 so 1000 cubic inch(and I drove my math teachers crazy with those mistakes :s)
just a simple and common math error 8)
----- GIEV custom ship paint jobs!
I want my hello-kitty-kessie! |

Bagdon
Radical Fighters
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 20:52:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Nian Banks
Ok heres the trippy part, 10cm x 10cm 1x0cm, thats 1000cm cubed (fixed ), when filled with water at sea level that is 4 degrees centigrade it takes 1 litre of pure water for it to be full. That one litre also equals one kilogram.
Erm. I hate to be the picky one, but litre is not part of the official SI system. It is accepted as a measure, but the correct unit of measure of volume is cubic meter (m¦). Also. The kilogram used to be defined in the terms of a litre of water until people learned that there is no such thing as pure water, even if you disregard the problems with various isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in it. So the kilogram is defined as "whatever happens to have the same mass as a thingy that's stored in a safe place outside Paris" and incidentally the thingy in Paris is losing mass very slowly, so the measurement science is in trouble and are trying to find a better reference mass.
|

Marine HK4861
Caldari Seoltachd
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 21:17:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Nian Banks
1t = one metric ton
I'd like to point out that 1 metric ton is just a short hand.
The correct notation would be 1 mega-gram (1x10e6 grams). 
|

Dristra
Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 22:32:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Terianna Eri 1 m/s = 2.23693629 mph, according to google... and yes, even ships that are quite slow in space are rather fast compared to terrestrial vehicles. Of course, spaceships don't have to deal with friction.
in eve even spaceships deal with friction, look at how ships act man, someone even calculated that space must consist of motor-oil for stuff to move this slow and be de-accelerated as much
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|

LeMoose
Viper Squad Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.09.15 22:34:00 -
[30]
i really should have bought shares in google 5 years ago.
Caldari ships | PVP | Success | Solo
(Pick 3) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |