EVE Search - When a pos is destroyed and the guns remain

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Science and Industry

When a pos is destroyed and the guns remain

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Drifta	Posted - 2007.09.25 23:56:00 - [1] There was once a pos at a moon, that pos was destroyed. Remaining at the moon are a number of 'anchored' guns and some 'incapacitated' ones. When I try to anchor a pos at the moon i get this message: "Notify You cannot anchor the control tower because there are one or more objects anchored within 22997 of the position you are trying to anchor at, one of which is: Small Railgun Battery." Do the guns ever dissapear? surely i shouldn't have to destroy them all, I attacked one and it had a shed load of shield and armour hitpoints, and I didn't even dent its structure. Seems a bit unfair that this moon can never have a pos again unless I find a fleet of pilots willing to throw away sec status.
Nobuo213	Posted - 2007.09.26 00:27:00 - [2] You have to destroy them I think,gl. :)
Lady Natacha Minmatar Water and Power	Posted - 2007.09.26 00:28:00 - [3] The guns won't disappear unless you make them disappear. Yes, it sucks. 250M implant HAS disappeared: Linkage
Helen Hunts Gallente Red Dragon Mining inc	Posted - 2007.09.26 04:08:00 - [4] If you're in low-sec, there's plenty of guys out there who can't get any lower sec status. Hand them money and ammo and stand clear. And 0.0 ratting brings up sec status like crazy, btw. _______________________________ Mine da rocks, make more ships. Pop da rats, make more rigs. Sell da gear, make more money. Any Questions?
Drifta	Posted - 2007.09.26 11:56:00 - [5] Edited by: Drifta on 26/09/2007 11:56:53 I don't think you have tried it tbh, the guns and damps have millions and millions of structure, dreads don't hit them well because of their signiture. I don't have billions of isk to hire a battleship fleet, to sit there for hours shooting old pos guns.
Rude Bwoy	Posted - 2007.09.26 12:07:00 - [6] petition it - its preventing you progressing. get a GM to remove them. Who's the rudest of them all!
Imhotep Khem Minmatar Madhatters Inc. M. PIRE	Posted - 2007.09.27 12:41:00 - [7] Edited by: Imhotep Khem on 27/09/2007 12:40:55 If you cant get people to shoot incapacitated GUNS, how do you plan on defending your POS _________ If your not dyin' your not tryin'.
Falkrich Swifthand	Posted - 2007.09.27 16:40:00 - [8] I've found a low-sec moon with no POS and 2 ONLINE missile batteries. They don't shoot though. If the moon has anything I'll petition.
Jackson Murphy	Posted - 2007.09.28 06:03:00 - [9] Edited by: Jackson Murphy on 28/09/2007 06:03:45 i dont know why ccp didnt solved that at the first try. The solution is so easy its redicilus. Reduce the guns structure from 1,5 mill to 15000 and give them 99% strucutre resitance against every damage typ as long a pos is anchored next to them. So the guns are still a ass in the pain to destroy completly when a pos is there, and nearly instant dead when the pos is gone. Problem solved.
Tunajuice Convergent Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2007.09.30 05:44:00 - [10] Originally by: Jackson Murphy Edited by: Jackson Murphy on 28/09/2007 06:03:45 i dont know why ccp didnt solved that at the first try. The solution is so easy its redicilus. Reduce the guns structure from 1,5 mill to 15000 and give them 99% strucutre resitance against every damage typ as long a pos is anchored next to them. So the guns are still a ass in the pain to destroy completly when a pos is there, and nearly instant dead when the pos is gone. Problem solved. Sorry logic is not allowed in eve online.

Venkul Mul Gallente	Posted - 2007.09.30 11:05:00 - [11] Edited by: Venkul Mul on 30/09/2007 11:10:29 Originally by: Jackson Murphy Edited by: Jackson Murphy on 28/09/2007 06:03:45 i dont know why ccp didnt solved that at the first try. The solution is so easy its redicilus. Reduce the guns structure from 1,5 mill to 15000 and give them 99% strucutre resitance against every damage typ as long a pos is anchored next to them. So the guns are still a ass in the pain to destroy completly when a pos is there, and nearly instant dead when the pos is gone. Problem solved. What would be the effect of hardeners then? they work only on the POS shield or they work on all the structures? I really dubt that petitioning to get them removed would get you anything. They have been placed there legittimally and removing them would be helping you. The only exception is if you can demonstrate that they have been placed there with the clear intention of blocking a moon with interesting minerals, but unless you can find a thread where the player corp is selling the "rights" toi that moon I dubt you can demonstrate anything.
Admiral Butthead	Posted - 2007.10.01 08:10:00 - [12] Originally by: Venkul Mul I really dubt that petitioning to get them removed would get you anything. They have been placed there legittimally and removing them would be helping you. BZZT. They will do it. It's been petitioned before in 0.0 takeovers after taking out POSs for sovereignty, and the GMs have obliged.
mechtech Entropy Industries	Posted - 2007.10.01 23:19:00 - [13] Originally by: Jackson Murphy Edited by: Jackson Murphy on 28/09/2007 06:03:45 i dont know why ccp didnt solved that at the first try. The solution is so easy its redicilus. Reduce the guns structure from 1,5 mill to 15000 and give them 99% strucutre resitance against every damage typ as long a pos is anchored next to them. So the guns are still a ass in the pain to destroy completly when a pos is there, and nearly instant dead when the pos is gone. Problem solved. /signed

CCP Chronotis	Posted - 2007.10.02 10:08:00 - [14] Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed.

Di Jiensai Gallente Domination. League of Abnormal Gentlemen	Posted - 2007.10.02 11:18:00 - [15] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. \o/ That means the 'winner gets it all', right? Perfect.
smitz GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.02 12:30:00 - [16] Originally by: CCP Chronotis The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. Yeeeeeessssssssss!!!!!!!!!
Helison Gallente Times of Ancar Pure.	Posted - 2007.10.02 12:36:00 - [17] Originally by: CCP Chronotis ... The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. Massive change, but great! I personally would prefer to make them unanchorable by everybody (anchoring skill required) as soon as the CT is destroyed.
olzi Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.02 13:08:00 - [18] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. Excellent changes, thank you ccp!
Qlanth Caldari Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.02 13:34:00 - [19] Cool.
Gillian Haas	Posted - 2007.10.02 13:41:00 - [20] If it were up to me I'd make it a bit more exciting by making any in-capped modules explde with the tower, other modules go unanchored. that way you face the decision on whether or not to incap the guns or try to tank em so you can scoop em later.

Scatim Helicon GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.02 16:58:00 - [21] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. I totally called this last week :V Thanks CCP, you are awesome.
Pwett Minmatar QUANT Corp.	Posted - 2007.10.02 17:23:00 - [22] This is the best thing to happen to POS warfare since the day before POS warfare was released. _______________ Pwett CEO and Founder [QTC]QUANT Corp.
Moctobot GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.02 19:43:00 - [23] thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you
Pilk Axiom Empire	Posted - 2007.10.02 20:27:00 - [24] Originally by: Gillian Haas If it were up to me I'd make it a bit more exciting by making any in-capped modules explde with the tower, other modules go unanchored. that way you face the decision on whether or not to incap the guns or try to tank em so you can scoop em later. Ha! Neat twist! Regardless of which way you do it, CCP, good change! Now can we get the ability to target-paint them, too? --P Kosh: The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2007.10.02 21:35:00 - [25] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. SWEET ! Although... won't that be a huge "ISK sink" gone down the drain ? _ Caldari N.V.T.F. is recruiting...
Joshua Foiritain Gallente Coreli Corporation Exuro Mortis	Posted - 2007.10.04 13:10:00 - [26] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. Sexy Sexy Sexy Sexy Sexy Sexy Sexy Sexy, wewt! ----- [Coreli Corporation Mainframe]
Braaage eXceed Inc. INVICTUS.	Posted - 2007.10.04 14:17:00 - [27] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. But what about if the guns/structures were incapacitated, you can't unanchor an incapacitated gun atm. Whilst it is a welcomed move surely blowing all structures up once the tower goes boom is a logical step. You are in essence gifting the agressor with POS modules readily available in a system they are attacking in. They can blow up and enemy POS and then take all the other structures back to their own POS for ready for deployment. Sorry but is it just me that sees a huge imbalance in unanchoring rather than blowing up? -- eve-guides.com POS, Outpost and Sovereignty info Now includes setting up POSs in Empire
Elmicker Black Sea Industries Cult of War	Posted - 2007.10.04 14:20:00 - [28] Originally by: CCP Chronotis Its already been put in for kali 3, the HP reduced and the bonus from the tower increased to 0.99. The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. Win.
MirrorGod Heretic Army Fang Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.04 20:42:00 - [29] Originally by: CCP Chronotis The intention is also to unanchor all structures after the control tower is destroyed. <dancing> \\0 0// </dancing> CCP wins this thread.
Zighsev Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency	Posted - 2007.10.05 12:51:00 - [30] omfg its about time!!!!!!!! i love u ccp.... Now a few other things......... Regius Curator CEO {Recruiting}



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.