| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
   |
Posted - 2007.10.16 13:01:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Abn Matar
Youre not dead, you just suck att taking space... sorry.
we seem to be pretty good at helping take Nyxs from you, though. 
just sayin..
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.16 23:30:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Abyssal Angel
Now for cleaning your front steps of the rest of that nasty infestation growing there.
Looking forwards to many more and more bloody battlereports in the days to come.
AA
/me digs in their proverbial heels and watches 300 a few times.
indeed.. 
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.17 14:14:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tassi
BoB didn't help their feythabolis pets because they needed to kill IAC.
IAC is still kicking major butt and taking back station systems.
Feythabolis pets are drowning/nearly drowning.
WHAT has molly exactly achieved here? 
A quick *****of the FAT lady won't make you look any cool 
clearly.. personally, i hope they keep 'kicking butt' like this.
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.17 14:49:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Map Screen
Originally by: Empyre
Originally by: Tassi
BoB didn't help their feythabolis pets because they needed to kill IAC.
IAC is still kicking major butt and taking back station systems.
Feythabolis pets are drowning/nearly drowning.
WHAT has molly exactly achieved here?
A quick *****of the FAT lady won't make you look any cool
clearly.. personally, i hope they keep 'kicking butt' like this.
How much did you guys pay MC for all those prohibition contracts? Cause w/ stations, Count's MS and all the isk you guys ****ed away on mercs, IAC is not only coming out ontop in the fights but is probably well ahead isk wise.
proof or.. ah, you know the rest. i provided a picture was all. but i guess since you say so it must be true. i'm making no claims for or against my alliance (deja vu), but only helping to invalidate your silly claims iac is in any way 'kicking butt'.
but its the pot calling the kettle black to insinuate that iss cannot do anything without help. every iac assault (ah the c3- days) is usually destroyed or repelled and then followed up by an overwhelming force of their allies.
but hey, at least we're not going around posting their internal forum stuff here on eve-o.. and it's pretty dang juicy.
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.17 15:54:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Empyre on 17/10/2007 15:56:39
Originally by: Abn Matar
Ok, so what youre saying is that we (IAC + allies) are not repelling the pos attacks on our systems in JZV and close const's and that (helping on a minor scale) with killing MOM's is helping you un-fail in taking systems?? I wouldnt say were (IAC) kicking butt (and i have never claimed so), but we (IAC) are kicking you out, again and will keep doing so, FAT will yet again be IAC controlled space. Even thought ISS are a really great aliance and we fear them... :shiver:
EDIT: Corrections on "we" to reflect the groups involved.
and i never said you did.. Tassi did. and that is who i responded to. you're the one that felt it necessary to chime in on the issue. once again, i only made one claim. people just like to start humping these claims and then, before you know it, we've got all sorts of little illegitimate claims running rampant over the threads.
btw, i find it hilarious that you assume we are 'taking back' any stations. the stations of yours we've been involved in when taken we never owned and there is absolutely no evidence that we want any of them anyway. (personally, i would MUCH rather watch you guys struggle to keep them than try and take on those logistical nightmares ourselves) you guys obviously never even thought so since you attacked one of the (2) BoB towers first instead of the (4) of ours.
personally i'd trade a couple towers for that fight we had any day. but i'm not in any position to know what my alliance has planned nor do i want to be in a position like that. i'm just happy melting hulls.
see you on the field.
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.17 17:01:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Uuve Savisaalo
Originally by: Empyre
there is absolutely no evidence that we want any of them anyway.
Ah yes, except for that interesting bit of history in which your alliance lost all of its territorial possessions practically overnight after a failed attempt to hold f4r?
I suppose the former ISSO share holders did not want their investments anyway?
i refuse to comment any further on my alliance. if you have questions about the alliance itself, please contact a director. i'll be more than happy to talk about myself or aspects of eve that do not relate to my alliance.
i don't have any knowledge or involvement at that level of the alliance and therefore cannot even begin to accurately comment on any of that.
how 'bout those mets? o_O
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
Empyre
Domestic Reform
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.10.18 13:31:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sentinel Eeex
Currently listening: E Nomine - SCHWARZE SONNE.mp3
clever.. but not so clever on my part. it was my first attempt but i found another way in.
Please stop messing with my signature!!! |
| |
|