EVE Search - Kills in highsec. Exploit or what ??

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Kills in highsec. Exploit or what ??

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:17:00 - [1] Ok. Here is a picture... I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system, getting cargo scanned by frigate. And killed by dominix. Easy to kill bumped to prevent from warping away, drones and blasters... He was killed by CONCORD, but i die first. Now we getting more. While you trying to get new ship, yours getting salvaged, so no marking for stealing loot, and cargo stolen. And agressors loot also retrieved by his gang. The End.
Jinx Barker GFB Scientific	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:20:00 - [2] Ok. Sounds like a perfectly legitimate game mechanic. CONCORD PUNISHED the offender. Offender has friends they picked up the loot. Moving on....
Morn Judith Caldari Sovereigns of Destiny	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:21:00 - [3] Originally by: Ni'ka Ok. Here is a picture... I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system, getting cargo scanned by frigate. And killed by dominix. Easy to kill bumped to prevent from warping away, drones and blasters... He was killed by CONCORD, but i die first. Now we getting more. While you trying to get new ship, yours getting salvaged, so no marking for stealing loot, and cargo stolen. And agressors loot also retrieved by his gang. The End. No exploit. Thats how it is. The price for him attacking you was losing his ship. He lost his ship. You lost your cargo. Get used to it, because theres a huge amount of money to be made in suicide ganking. Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
Kaar Art of War Cult of War	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:22:00 - [4] Originally by: Ni'ka Ok. Here is a picture... I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system, getting cargo scanned by frigate. And killed by dominix. Easy to kill bumped to prevent from warping away, drones and blasters... He was killed by CONCORD, but i die first. Now we getting more. While you trying to get new ship, yours getting salvaged, so no marking for stealing loot, and cargo stolen. And agressors loot also retrieved by his gang. The End. Epic story. Can't wait for the movie. --- ---
Jenny Spitfire Caldari	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:26:00 - [5] Sorry for you Ni'ka. I feel your loss :( In my opinion, I say it is a legal exploit because they are killed by Concord but you still lose your stuffs and loot. --------- Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria! Kali is for KArebearLIng. I 100% agree with Avon. Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game.
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:26:00 - [6] Don't tell me about suicide kills. I know all about it. The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec!
Amaron Ghant Caldari Ascent of Ages Dark Matter Coalition	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:30:00 - [7] Dont fly afk with a cargo worth killing you for. The only part of the equation thats not logical is the pirate gets reimbursed for his ship after concorde kills him. Apart from that? see my first comment.
SoftRevolution	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:32:00 - [8] It's not an exploit. It is a bit meta-gamey when they use newbie corp alts though. There's also an ongoing campaign to have insurance not pay out if you're popped by Concord. That probably just pushes the point at which it's worthwhile popping you upwards a bit which may or may not be a "fix". Quote: I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system Don't. Everyone and their dog locking you in and around tradehubs (some of them use passive targeters but they still probably need to run sensorboosters) should be the giveaway here. If your cargo is worth their loss for blowing you up then you are definitely at risk. The number of items probably plays a part since I think each item has it's own % chance of getting blown up so ten items worth 20m is probably > one item worth 220m. There's also the opportunity cost involved in ganking a specific ship as opposed to the next one along which might have a more valuable cargo since I assume it takes a certain amount of time to get another ship to their camp spot.
ArmyOfMe hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:33:00 - [9] Originally by: Ni'ka The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec! That actually sounds like a exploit tbh, petition it and see is the only advice i can give you
3535325385hdgsbndgsdjg	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:39:00 - [10] Learn that 1.0 does not mean you are safe. Autopiloting expensive goods in a regular slow frigate is a great idea.
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:39:00 - [11] Anyway... he's going too loose his ship twice... I got killright, and now he's going to meet something less harmless than Iteron...
Tortun Nahme Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:40:00 - [12] you get an agro timer for the loot theft even if they salvage the wreck first I'm currently involved in medical research, concerning the therapuetic aspects of a swift kick in the rear What do zombies and forum posters have in common? They like to sit about and moan!
Sorted Low Sec Liberators	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:40:00 - [13] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I say it is a legal exploit contradiction in terms no? its just legal. (in game mechanic terms)
Sorted Low Sec Liberators	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:41:00 - [14] Originally by: Ni'ka Anyway... he's going too loose his ship twice... I got killright, and now he's going to meet something less harmless than Iteron... Thats the spirit, go and BBQ him.
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:47:00 - [15] Originally by: Tortun Nahme you get an agro timer for the loot theft even if they salvage the wreck first And??? 15 minute criminal ... just sit docked
Amy Wang	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:47:00 - [16] Originally by: ArmyOfMe Originally by: Ni'ka The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec! That actually sounds like a exploit tbh, petition it and see is the only advice i can give you Doesnt the can that drops after salvaging retain the same ownership as the wreck had before? If so looting will give the normal penalty.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:49:00 - [17] If it wasnt' supposed to be this way they wouldn't be able to do it now would they? Legitiment ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Tortun Nahme Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:49:00 - [18] Originally by: Ni'ka Originally by: Tortun Nahme you get an agro timer for the loot theft even if they salvage the wreck first And??? 15 minute criminal ... just sit docked and, if had an escort to scoop/defend your can, or actually tanked your itty a single domi couldnt have brought you down before he was concordokkened you wouldn't be whining right now I'm currently involved in medical research, concerning the therapuetic aspects of a swift kick in the rear What do zombies and forum posters have in common? They like to sit about and moan!
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:50:00 - [19] Originally by: 3535325385hdgsbndgsdjg Learn that 1.0 does not mean you are safe. Autopiloting expensive goods in a regular slow frigate is a great idea. Even if you warp @ 0km it takes 5 second you kill a hauler in a BS
Jenny Spitfire Caldari	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:52:00 - [20] Legal exploit is legal exploit. It is allowed to an extent if it is not intentional griefing but exploit because it is a badly thought of game mechanic. --------- Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria! Kali is for KArebearLIng. I 100% agree with Avon. Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:52:00 - [21] Edited by: DubanFP on 20/10/2007 15:54:05 Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Legal exploit is legal exploit. It is allowed to an extent if it is not intentional griefing but exploit because it is a badly thought of game mechanic. Or it was intentional. Why else would they have a system like this LOL. That and you used to not even nessissarily lose your ship to concord in early EVE. At one point even a good frigate setup could tank them long enough to dock. Old Jenny > New Jenny ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Atavachron	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:57:00 - [22] Insurance should be removed for suicide ganking, but suicide ganking per-se is perfectly within the rules, but how to do that without screwing over legit loses???
Tarminic Black Flame Industries	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:57:00 - [23] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Legal exploit is legal exploit. It is allowed to an extent if it is not intentional griefing but exploit because it is a badly thought of game mechanic. No Jenny, they did it this way intentionally, otherwise there wouldn't be varying response times depending on the security level of the system. We also have several developers who have commented on the fact that they did it intentionally. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it accidental. Also, by definition there is no such thing as a legal exploit. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 million SP in Forum Warfare Originally by: CCP Wrangler Booooo!!! Tarminic sux!!!
Jenny Spitfire Caldari	Posted - 2007.10.20 15:59:00 - [24] If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. --------- Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria! Kali is for KArebearLIng. I 100% agree with Avon. Female EVE gamers? Mail Zajo or visit WGOE.Public in-game.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:00:00 - [25] Edited by: DubanFP on 20/10/2007 16:01:22 Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. Funny thing is you kicked yourself in the ass with this one. That's totally legit, and people SHOULD be able to do it. I mean they shouldn't do it from a moral point of view, but they should at least be able to if they wanted to. Don't like it? Do us all a favor and leave. ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Tortun Nahme Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:02:00 - [26] griefing isnt an exploit jenny, nor does griefing imply the game mechanics USED to grief are an exploit to the rest of you, stop feeding her so she just goes away I'm currently involved in medical research, concerning the therapuetic aspects of a swift kick in the rear What do zombies and forum posters have in common? They like to sit about and moan!
Abrazzar	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:03:00 - [27] Say, if I put my cargo in a secure container and password lock it, the pirates aren't able to open it, even if they scoop it from my wreck, right? So if I am correct, this should be the solution for all highsec suicide ganking.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:03:00 - [28] Edited by: DubanFP on 20/10/2007 16:03:48 Originally by: Abrazzar Say, if I put my cargo in a secure container and password lock it, the pirates aren't able to open it, even if they scoop it from my wreck, right? So if I am correct, this should be the solution for all highsec suicide ganking. They can just repackage it, gaining everything that was inside. No, that's not an exploit either. ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Tarminic Black Flame Industries	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:04:00 - [29] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. IT IS. And we're not even talking about doing this repeatedly, we're talking about randomly killing someone in high-sec for his cargo. There's no harassment going on because he wasn't picked because of his identity. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 million SP in Forum Warfare Originally by: CCP Wrangler Booooo!!! Tarminic sux!!!
Esmenet	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:05:00 - [30] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. You are allowed to do that, but its rather pointless unless you got a big grudge against that player. If the hauler gets frustrated he should ask for help to fight back.
Helen Hunts Gallente Red Dragon Mining inc	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:05:00 - [31] 1. Don't autopilot with high dollar loads. 2. Even in high-sec, fit sort of tank on that hauler so CONCORD has time to drop the donuts and get out there. 3. CONCORD provides consequences for offenders, not safety. 4. Read #1 again. _______________________________ Mine da rocks, make more ships. Pop da rats, make more rigs. Sell da gear, make more money. Any Questions?
Plutoinum German Cyberdome Corp Cult of War	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:09:00 - [32] Edited by: Plutoinum on 20/10/2007 16:09:36 Originally by: Ni'ka Don't tell me about suicide kills. I know all about it. The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec! Sounds odd and not intended. So yes, I think this goes into the direction exploit. If I assume that stealing from a wreck flags you, stealing from the can after salvaging should do the same. ( I rarely pvp in empire and rarely get loot, so not 100% sure. lol )
ninjaholic Gallente Burn the Jolly Roger Phoenix Rising Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:23:00 - [33] Edited by: ninjaholic on 20/10/2007 16:25:06 Man, moaning about suicide ganking in high-sec is getting old. It's THIS simple: You autopilot ANYWHERE in the game with valuable cargo, you're taking a BIG risk. No matter where you are, you are NEVER safe, if your cargo is worth more than a battleship. If you warp to zero in a freighter, YOU ARE STILL A TARGET. Move arount the most valuable stuff in small ships, the smaller the better, and cover the small ship's lows in warp stabs, (you'll have to remove your balls first). 1.0 is only safer than 0.0, not "safe".
Transcendant One	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:25:00 - [34] Originally by: ninjaholic Edited by: ninjaholic on 20/10/2007 16:24:05 Man, moaning about suicide ganking in high-sec is getting old. It's THIS simple: You autopilot ANYWHERE in the game with valuable cargo, you're taking a BIG risk. No matter where you are, you are NEVER safe, if your cargo is worth more than a battleship. If you warp to zero in a freighter, YOU ARE STILL A TARGET. Move arount the most valuable stuff in small ships, the smaller the better, and cover the small ship's lows in warp stabs, (you'll have to remove your balls first). [font color=green]1.0[/font] is only safer than [font color=red]0.0[/font], not "safe". Read the thread.
ninjaholic Gallente Burn the Jolly Roger Phoenix Rising Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:33:00 - [35] Edited by: ninjaholic on 20/10/2007 16:35:27 The thread is clearly derailed. The topic was whether or not suicide ganking is an exploit or not. It's legal game mechanics. And I'm clearly defining that people are sick of other people not listening when they're told three times a week on the forums that you're not safe in high-sec, it's called high security for a reason, not absolute security. I'm not interested in whether people are flagged for stealing from a can, that just dropped from a salvaged ship, that just got suicide ganked, because someone thought that flying a freighter/industrial in high-sec meant they were safe, OR derailing the thread any further. Pointless arguement, as CCP aren't interested in fixing the high-sec penalties to make suicide gankers jobs harder, as they're clearly happy with the way things are. This isn't wow, there is no safe space, you are always a target, so use warp stabs, small ships and don't fly with expensive stuff bunched together. If you can do one run back and forward in a freighter, you can do 6 runs back and forward in an Iteron V, with inertial stabilisers and warp core stabs in the lows. You got lazy, and paid the price. How many more people are going to pay the price before people realise that high-sec's not safe? If people stopped assuming that suicide ganking won't happen to them, they're the perfect target for a suicide gank. The only way to STOP the suicide ganks is to stop giving them valuable targets. Get less lazy, and make sure that you to little and often runs, not everything you own in one go in an Obelisk. That's ASKING to get ganked.
Tarron Sarek Gallente Endica Enterprises	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:43:00 - [36] Edited by: Tarron Sarek on 20/10/2007 16:44:01 The only problem is that the 'punishment' means nothing to the evildoer. With a revised insurance system that doesn't give payouts for being killed by Concord (which would require a smarter concord, of course), you could really say 'punished by concord'. Atm saying so is a bad joke. Very valuable goods will always be worth killing/dying for. But the current insurance system sets the bar too low. Edit: oh, and I really wish people would read properly before posting.. _________________________________ - Balance is power, guard it well -
Ni'ka	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:43:00 - [37] Originally by: ninjaholic Edited by: ninjaholic on 20/10/2007 16:35:27 The thread is clearly derailed. Renamed thread specially for YOU.
Shar'Tuk TheHated	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:45:00 - [38] How could getting killed in high sec be an exploit? Your NEVER safe, thats the beauty of EvE. Next time dont assume your safe on auto pilot and think EvE is hello kitty online. 1) Dont auto pilot 2) If your flying say a frieghter you should have an escort even if your in empire if you want to ensure safety. Just a few simple things that could have prevented your loss. DRINK RUM It fights scurvy & boosts morale! THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES!
Heisenburg Principle	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:48:00 - [39] Originally by: Ni'ka Edited by: Ni''ka on 20/10/2007 16:42:20 Ok. Here is a picture... I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system, getting cargo scanned by frigate. And killed by dominix. Easy to kill bumped to prevent from warping away, drones and blasters... He was killed by CONCORD, but i die first. Now we getting more. While you trying to get new ship, yours getting salvaged, so no marking for stealing loot, and cargo stolen. And agressors loot also retrieved by his gang. The End. CCP i urge you to ban all weapons and all forms of combat within eve, people are dieing out there!
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.20 16:57:00 - [40] Originally by: Heisenburg Principle CCP i urge you to ban all weapons and all forms of combat within eve, people are dieing out there! OMG! How fummy! I'm just dying... I LIVE in 0.0. And then i go to "safe" empire space i want protection... If you so smart, make war-dec, and kill if you can. And get ready to face consequences.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:00:00 - [41] Originally by: Ni'ka Originally by: Heisenburg Principle CCP i urge you to ban all weapons and all forms of combat within eve, people are dieing out there! OMG! How fummy! I'm just dying... I LIVE in 0.0. And then i go to "safe" empire space Since when has empire been "safe". I've yet to see a single developer say that, however they have said quite the contrary. ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Acoco Osiris Gallente Sublime.	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:08:00 - [42] Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. IT IS. And we're not even talking about doing this repeatedly, we're talking about randomly killing someone in high-sec for his cargo. There's no harassment going on because he wasn't picked because of his identity. I must agree with Tarminic here. Repeatedly suicide ganking somebody is harrasment and a bannable offense. Randomly killing some guy because he was stupid enough to autopilot an untanked Iteron loaded with cargo through a trade hub is just profit. ------------------------------ One more soldier off to war... And one Velator in my hangars.
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:15:00 - [43] Originally by: Acoco Osiris Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I must agree with Tarminic here. Repeatedly suicide ganking somebody is harrasment and a bannable offense. Why it should be ??
Horatio Nately Caldari 808 Enterprises The Red Skull	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:20:00 - [44] Originally by: Ni'ka I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system I found your problem. --------------------------------------- CEO 808 Enterprises, A Hawaii, USA Playercorp channel 808 ingame
Nadjar WING MAN INC	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:24:00 - [45] LIES!! Hisec space is totally safe, no-one ever dies in 0.5+ _____________ No sig here, move along.
Keirt	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:24:00 - [46] Ah but it would be an exploit if the attacker is using a Domi and sets his drones out to attack, you tank till concord shows up, but they only kill the domi and not the drones, you were able to tank the Orge IIs till that point, but even after the Domi is gone the drones are still attacking. You cant say that because concord wont kill drones atm isnt an exploit.
DubanFP Caldari Four Rings Phalanx Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:27:00 - [47] Originally by: Keirt Ah but it would be an exploit if the attacker is using a Domi and sets his drones out to attack, you tank till concord shows up, but they only kill the domi and not the drones, you were able to tank the Orge IIs till that point, but even after the Domi is gone the drones are still attacking. You cant say that because concord wont kill drones atm isnt an exploit. Kill the ship, the drones deactivate. Learn your stuff before you begin making accusations. ___________ Desolacer> Who the heck gives YOU the right to ruin it for others buy blowing them up. Zaqar> CCP
Megadon Caldari Deathshead Inc.	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:29:00 - [48] Originally by: Plutoinum Edited by: Plutoinum on 20/10/2007 16:09:36 Originally by: Ni'ka Don't tell me about suicide kills. I know all about it. The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec! Sounds odd and not intended. So yes, I think this goes into the direction exploit. If I assume that stealing from a wreck flags you, stealing from the can after salvaging should do the same. ( I rarely pvp in empire and rarely get loot, so not 100% sure. lol ) Agreed, you should be flagged regardless of when you take the loot... either before or after salvage I thought. Just because you salvaged first I did'nt think made any diff. Exploit? --------------
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.20 17:34:00 - [49] Originally by: DubanFP Kill the ship, the drones deactivate. Learn your stuff before you begin making accusations. Yes, the point of using domi, is reduce agro \ damage for the drone owner.
3535325385hdgsbndgsdjg	Posted - 2007.10.20 19:26:00 - [50] Originally by: Ni'ka Originally by: 3535325385hdgsbndgsdjg Learn that 1.0 does not mean you are safe. Autopiloting expensive goods in a regular slow frigate is a great idea. Even if you warp @ 0km it takes 5 second you kill a hauler in a BS Not sure why you quoted me.
Acoco Osiris Gallente Sublime.	Posted - 2007.10.20 19:31:00 - [51] Doesn't CONCORD insta-pop drones now? I thought they did make that change, because drones surviving meant that you could use T2 Ogres and expect them to survive. ------------------------------ One more soldier off to war... And one Velator in my hangars.
Zarrika Khan Caldari No Quarter. Academy Vae Victis.	Posted - 2007.10.20 19:35:00 - [52] Originally by: DubanFP Edited by: DubanFP on 20/10/2007 16:01:22 Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. Funny thing is you kicked yourself in the ass with this one. That's totally legit, and people SHOULD be able to do it. I mean they shouldn't do it from a moral point of view, but they should at least be able to if they wanted to.<snip> DubanFP, Your sig pretty much sums up this thread. The option to shoot ANYONE is there for EVERYONE, anywhere, anytime. Sure you may have to live with consequences like Concord, Sec Status and my personal favorite: Forum Whines. But it is a sacrafice I am willing to make. Mmmmm hmmmm
ninjaholic Gallente Burn the Jolly Roger Phoenix Rising Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.21 12:49:00 - [53] Originally by: Ni'ka Renamed thread specially for YOU. Thanks! ^^ Originally by: Tarron Sarek and I really wish people would read properly before posting.. That @ me? I did read the thread, and it got derailed. And it's comments like yours that derailed it. My post was directed at the original post, not the subsequent and off-topic discussion. And for a good reason. IF Ni'ka wasn't autopiloting in high-sec, with valuable cargo, then the high-sec suicide gank would never have happened. Regardless of the lax penalties for suicide gankers, if you give them a target, IT WILL STILL HAPPEN, and will always pay out for the gankers. Even if you remove the insurance payout for CONCORD suicide ganks, if the cargo's worth anything, it'll still happen. Why are you people even debating the idea? This game is NOT SAFE, if you want to hide somewhere, go play another MMORPG. I don't care what sec space you're in, if you're not ready to lose it, don't undock in it. If you have to move ridiculous amounts of valuable cargo, do it in small loads, and short trips. Changing the game dynamics regarding insurance payouts ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN. Stop whining, and start getting SMARTER. If your cargo's worth anything, and you're not packing security, you're the perfect target for a suicide gank squad. Fly SMART, fly safe. Otherwise you're toast.
000Hunter000 Gallente Magners Marauders	Posted - 2007.10.21 12:57:00 - [54] Getting suicide ganked in hi sec sux, but, ur 2nd sentence starts with the words 'I fly on autopilot in 1.0 system' so don't expect a lot of sympathy. So what was it u were transporting? bpo's? in a frig or something? CCP, let us pay the online shop with Direct Debit!!! Magners is now recruiting, evemail me or Dagazbo ingame.
Ni'ka Alfa Corporation	Posted - 2007.10.21 17:41:00 - [55] Originally by: 000Hunter000 So what was it u were transporting? bpo's? in a frig or something? It was some T2 components... worth around 120m... In 1 stack...
Crazy Broad	Posted - 2007.10.21 17:51:00 - [56] Originally by: Abrazzar Say, if I put my cargo in a secure container and password lock it, the pirates aren't able to open it, even if they scoop it from my wreck, right? So if I am correct, this should be the solution for all highsec suicide ganking. Doesnt work anymore, they repackage it, they can also scan you and see whats inside it. ------------------------------ Originally by: Captian Internet This thread isn't delivery its digorno
Cassius Longinus Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2007.10.21 23:06:00 - [57] My advice to Ni'ka: Follow your hauler with a cheap cruiser. Someone pops your hauler, you pop the wreck. Misery loves company. What I DO wish is that kill rights were transferable or something, but that is neither here nor there.
Reem Fairchild Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2007.10.21 23:19:00 - [58] A ship carrying something valuable enough to risk being suicided should have a full rack of WCS in the lows and shield extenders in the mids.
angggggry	Posted - 2007.10.22 00:26:00 - [59] ive yet tooooo seeeeeeeeeee people that are not aaaaaaaaauto[pillloting to gettttt suicideeeeeeeeeeed
Ryoji Tanakama Caldari Daikoku Fleet Shipyards	Posted - 2007.10.22 00:40:00 - [60] Originally by: Esmenet Originally by: Jenny Spitfire If it is allowed, why not you go hunt a single hauler pilot and take his stuffs until he doesn't log in anymore? I am sure it is very legal. You are allowed to do that, but its rather pointless unless you got a big grudge against that player. If the hauler gets frustrated he should ask for help to fight back. Actually you're not allowed to do that. Singling out a sprcific player repeatedly does fall under harassment, and will get you in trouble. ~Ryoji Tanakama Daikoku Fleet Shipyards
Shakuul Caldari O RLY corp YTMND.	Posted - 2007.10.22 01:09:00 - [61] Originally by: Jinx Barker Ok. Sounds like a perfectly legitimate game mechanic. CONCORD PUNISHED the offender. Offender has friends they picked up the loot. Moving on.... The only thing wrong with the picture is he (the suicide ganker) gets insurance. Suicide ganking is part of the game, but it shouldn't be artificially subsidized.
Macro Slasher	Posted - 2007.10.22 09:35:00 - [62] OP was just stupid not to leave instantly when getting scanned. He/she/it got what deserved.
Ares Lightfeather Gallente	Posted - 2007.10.22 09:44:00 - [63] Originally by: Ni'ka Don't tell me about suicide kills. I know all about it. The problem is that if you SALVAGE someone ship first, and than take his cargo, you not recieving any penalties for stealing stuff in highsec! So... it seems like the problem was this, which pretty much looks like an exploit to me, and all there was in this thread is stupid anti-op bashing about things he(she) already knew... -- Siggie ! Come back here ! -- Originally by: Victor Valka Originally by: MotherMoon well a drone UI is a bit of an artist job Drone AI is obviously done by an artist too. One that is heavily into abstract

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.