| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mou'adib
Gallente Ethical Dilemma
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 15:15:00 -
[31]
Originally by: LUKEC But hey... amarr has staying power.
To stay in empire and mine.

|

Weakame
Caldari ARCK
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 15:30:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Weakame on 23/10/2007 15:30:27 love to be a caldari, amarr specialized :/
Go train kronos' skills you said ? :x |

ManBitch
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 15:41:00 -
[33]
Errm.. it's a paladin.. paladin's dont do DPS.. Simple.
|

LeMoose
Viper Squad Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 16:11:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Man***** Errm.. it's a paladin.. paladin's dont do DPS.. Simple.
crawl back to wow or nwn or whatever plz
Caldari ships | PVP | Success | Solo
(Pick 3) |

Karash Amerius
Evolution Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 16:26:00 -
[35]
About the only thing I can see it useful for is heavy Neuts in small gangs. Still, there is no 'staying power' in that sort of setup, especially with lasers fitted.
Ex-Merc Blog |

Xiliath
JUDGE DREAD Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 16:36:00 -
[36]
Just put a petition together to get it changed, these stats I'm sure aren't all final, and they're probally looking for some input to make it better, Make a thread and petition the bonus to be ROF or a Damage bonus, whatever the mass majority think it should be. I fly Minmatar, but I can fly all the BS, and agree the bonus should be ROF or Damage instead of another capacitor bonus. |

Xequecal
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 16:55:00 -
[37]
The ship would be perfect with a RoF or damage bonus instead of either the capacitor bonus or laser cap use bonus.
|

mama guru
Gallente Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 17:37:00 -
[38]
Stop whining about the kronos already, the paladin needs a buff yes. The Golem is gonna have alot more fun then any of the other ships facing lets say defender spamming sansha battleships. I'd be suprised if 3 misssiles actually reached the target. -YOU ARE NOW READING MY SIGNATURE-
EVE is like the "Fisherman's Friend" of MMOs. If it's too hard, you are too weak. |

LUKEC
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 17:55:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Xequecal The ship would be perfect with a RoF or damage bonus instead of either the capacitor bonus or laser cap use bonus.
I was actually thinking of optimal range bonus instead of web strength. Some kind of oversized zealot.
|

Siakel
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 18:47:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Udyr Vulpayne the 5% cap bonus on the paladin seems quiet nice for missions. the not really needed web effectiveness bonus combined with the lack of damage bonus is a lot more whine-worthy.
Sure, it might be useful if you were trying to run a perma-tanking setup.
Or rather, it would be, if the Paladin didn't use over twice as much cap to fire it's guns as a Kronos does.
|

Xequecal
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 18:50:00 -
[41]
Originally by: LUKEC
Originally by: Xequecal The ship would be perfect with a RoF or damage bonus instead of either the capacitor bonus or laser cap use bonus.
I was actually thinking of optimal range bonus instead of web strength. Some kind of oversized zealot.
No thanks. Nobody is going to bring a 11 sensor strength sniping BS into fleet. Do you like losing money?
|

Mastin Dragonfly
Absolutely No Return The Red Skull
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 18:53:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Rodj Blake Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the Marauders meant to be optimised for PvE?
And isn't lots of capacitor generally considered to be quite a good thing when doing, say, level 4 missions?
Which is why the Abaddon is the current mission ship of choice? Replace this useless bonus with a +5% damage bonus so it does at least as much damage as an Abaddon, it fails if it doesn't.
|

LUKEC
Destructive Influence Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 18:59:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Xequecal
Originally by: LUKEC
Originally by: Xequecal The ship would be perfect with a RoF or damage bonus instead of either the capacitor bonus or laser cap use bonus.
I was actually thinking of optimal range bonus instead of web strength. Some kind of oversized zealot.
No thanks. Nobody is going to bring a 11 sensor strength sniping BS into fleet. Do you like losing money?
Scorch is getting expensive to shoot rats in belts  
Seriously, when did you get jammed for the last time? Because I didn't saw jamming ship quite some time. Sure these things might change, but I didn't even think about fitting it for fleet.
|

Frothgar
Caldari coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 19:01:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Frothgar on 23/10/2007 19:01:46 Redo the whole ship. Trade the rep amount bonus back to the gallente counterpart for our resist bonus (Its a better bonus)
Remove the 5% cap amount for something unique like 10% optimal range allowing us to use our role of better range. Web and tracking don't really compliment each other TBH but its doable and the least of this ship's issues.
I like optimal range because it allows you to use shorter range ammo giving it somewhat more versatility in damage and range.
Give us our resist bonus back please, its uniquely amarr while rep amount (Inferior) is a gallente racial theme. Overall resist provides a greater HP buffer and rep amount (Repairing higher resists is more effective) while the gallente ship with our 5% resist bonus now tanks better than the amarran ships. That needs to be sorted.
Gallente do NOT need to tank better than Amarr =(
|

Xequecal
|
Posted - 2007.10.23 19:10:00 -
[45]
Originally by: LUKEC
Originally by: Xequecal
Originally by: LUKEC
Originally by: Xequecal The ship would be perfect with a RoF or damage bonus instead of either the capacitor bonus or laser cap use bonus.
I was actually thinking of optimal range bonus instead of web strength. Some kind of oversized zealot.
No thanks. Nobody is going to bring a 11 sensor strength sniping BS into fleet. Do you like losing money?
Scorch is getting expensive to shoot rats in belts  
Seriously, when did you get jammed for the last time? Because I didn't saw jamming ship quite some time. Sure these things might change, but I didn't even think about fitting it for fleet.
There is the small problem that the production cost of this thing is like 1 billion alone, let alone the markup for profit and the additional markup needed to cover losses from freightering materials into low sec to build it. Why would you bring a 1 billion ISK BS into fleet that's worse than the Armageddon? It's a worse mission runner than Abaddon as well, I just don't see the point.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |