EVE Search - Carrier nerf, back to pos hugin

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Carrier nerf, back to pos hugin

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
maria stallion Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:19:00 - [1] Edited by: maria stallion on 23/10/2007 18:19:37 I think it's important to point everybody to the carrier changes post: Linkage ,this probally aplies to a lot of us. In short carrier role will change from a ship with firepower to a ship that can delegate fire power to gang members. The carrier and mothership will only be able to use 5 drones/fighters them selfs meaning carriers and motherships will have the same firepower of a battlecruiser. There have been several post why this is a bad idea, but CCP thinks the critism isn't bassed on anything so as of today they put the changes on the test server.
maria stallion Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:19:00 - [2] Edited by: maria stallion on 23/10/2007 18:19:37 I think it's important to point everybody to the carrier changes post: Linkage ,this probally aplies to a lot of us. In short carrier role will change from a ship with firepower to a ship that can delegate fire power to gang members. The carrier and mothership will only be able to use 5 drones/fighters them selfs meaning carriers and motherships will have the same firepower of a battlecruiser. There have been several post why this is a bad idea, but CCP thinks the critism isn't bassed on anything so as of today they put the changes on the test server.
Kyoi Shuttles Dont Tank Well	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:20:00 - [3] In before Goonswarm
Kyoi Shuttles Dont Tank Well	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:20:00 - [4] In before Goonswarm
Stoffer Ninjapirate Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:21:00 - [5] Edited by: Stoffer Ninjapirate on 23/10/2007 18:23:22 It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign against changes in the game you don't like.
Virtuality Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:21:00 - [6] Band of Brothers has never lost a major fleet battle.
Stoffer Ninjapirate Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:21:00 - [7] Edited by: Stoffer Ninjapirate on 23/10/2007 18:23:22 It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign against changes in the game you don't like.
Virtuality Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:21:00 - [8] Band of Brothers has never lost a major fleet battle.
touchvill D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:22:00 - [9] It's not a bug fix, it's nothing but a big kick in the balls to everyone who has trained to fly a carrier or mothership. ----------
touchvill D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:22:00 - [10] It's not a bug fix, it's nothing but a big kick in the balls to everyone who has trained to fly a carrier or mothership. ----------
zilllii Squirrel Power	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:23:00 - [11] but bob didnt need their gazillion fighters causing lag anyway right? gimme bigger letter count in my sig so it wont cut off everything damnit!!!!
zilllii Squirrel Power	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:23:00 - [12] but bob didnt need their gazillion fighters causing lag anyway right? gimme bigger letter count in my sig so it wont cut off everything damnit!!!!
maria stallion Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:24:00 - [13] Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign for bug fixes you don't like. sorry if you feel that way, I think the changes are of great affect for coperations and alliances. Goonswarm also uses a fair amount of carriers and motherships and this will affect your alliance aswell. this forum is for everything that aplies to corp and alliances, this is one of those things I believe.
maria stallion Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:24:00 - [14] Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign for bug fixes you don't like. sorry if you feel that way, I think the changes are of great affect for coperations and alliances. Goonswarm also uses a fair amount of carriers and motherships and this will affect your alliance aswell. this forum is for everything that aplies to corp and alliances, this is one of those things I believe.
katz3 PPN United Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:27:00 - [15] wrong forum ? ___________________ Originally by: Kasak Black ...in EVE people die!
katz3 PPN United Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:27:00 - [16] wrong forum ? ___________________ Originally by: Kasak Black ...in EVE people die!
Jonathan Peterbilt Caldari Damage Unlimited Inc	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:27:00 - [17] I hope you understand the only thing CCP cares about is the number of subscribers right?
Svetlanna The Collective Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:28:00 - [18] Have you ever heard of recycling? Go green, try it.
Imperator Palpatine666 YouWhat	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:30:00 - [19] Originally by: Jonathan Peterbilt I hope you understand the only thing CCP cares about is the number of subscribers right? whit this movement ccp lose a loth of subscribers
Stoffer Ninjapirate Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:30:00 - [20] Originally by: maria stallion Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign for bug fixes you don't like. sorry if you feel that way, I think the changes are of great affect for coperations and alliances. Goonswarm also uses a fair amount of carriers and motherships and this will affect your alliance aswell. this forum is for everything that aplies to corp and alliances, this is one of those things I believe. Understandable good sir, but some of us work hard to keep the standard of this forum high, with political material, relevant alliance info etc.
JeanPaul Sartre 26th of July Movement	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:30:00 - [21] Will a Goon claim this as a victory for all Goonkind? -- Quote: If a victory is told in detail, one can no longer distinguish it from a defeat.
Mr Broker Amarr Station Gremlings	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:31:00 - [22] Every change affects everyone, and I for one hope CCP will continue being the developpers. You guys are being selfish, it's not just about you, it's also about new people joining the game. They won't be in carriers and they will be quite useless versus a capital blob, it's even starting to happen in low-sec. CCP is thinking of the future. They always nerf stuff, and people always whine, and I know this is the one nerf that will break the camel's back. Sorry but CCP has heard that a thousand times and you're still here, and you will simply find another way to enjoy the game in a fair manner.
Blood Ghost Occam's Razor Combine	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:33:00 - [23] Originally by: Mr Broker Every change affects everyone, and I for one hope CCP will continue being the developpers. You guys are being selfish, it's not just about you, it's also about new people joining the game. They won't be in carriers and they will be quite useless versus a capital blob, it's even starting to happen in low-sec. CCP is thinking of the future. They always nerf stuff, and people always whine, and I know this is the one nerf that will break the camel's back. Sorry but CCP has heard that a thousand times and you're still here, and you will simply find another way to enjoy the game in a fair manner. So what exactly is the problem with carriers? New players will always be outmatched, they going to nerf battleships next?? Instead of fielding a carrier, players will field 10-15 battleships at the same price, meaning doing damage to the enemy requires thousands and thousands of loses. Old players can still afford those losses, new players canÆt û carriers or no carriers. Nerf old players???
Local Her0 Minmatar La Mancha Corp	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:34:00 - [24] Edited by: Local Her0 on 23/10/2007 18:35:18 we from La Manacha Corp welcome these carrier changes, because 'cap-ships-online' is not what eve should be
Gama24 No Quarter. Vae Victis.	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:39:00 - [25] Just sign the damn petition and show to CCP that you care. Will it do any good? We will know, with time. -------------------------------------- g24
sophisticatedlimabean Gallente The JORG Corporation Methods of Mayhem Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:44:00 - [26] Theres 3-4 threads on this in the development forum a few threads have got to 20-30 pages of ppl saying the idea sucks. One of the threads has not got to even a single page and its pro-carrier nerf lol and most of the posts on it are talling the OP to stfu. My views may represent those of my corp/alliance but you will have to ask em to be sure.
Toffles GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:44:00 - [27] Edited by: Toffles on 23/10/2007 18:47:28 I'm a carrier/dread pilot and was opposed to this at first but now I'm thinking it will be a good thing. It seems like they're trying to stop the trend of carriers/motherships becoming the new t2 sniping bs for fleet fights. Without any changes we'll gradually see more and more of what we've already started to see, fleets that are almost entirely carriers/motherships with anything below serving as weak fodder. They want capitals used in fleet fights but they also want to see other ships being useful and filling a role. So basically the changes will limit the amount of carriers/motherships you would want to bring to a fight and necessitate more variety in fleet composition. But yeah, CCP deserves all the **** they're getting right now, this change might have been okay a year or two ago but so many people have invested in training carriers up, you can't blame them.
Cyllaina Gallente Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:47:00 - [28] Originally by: Local Her0 Edited by: Local Her0 on 23/10/2007 18:35:18 we from La Manacha Corp welcome these carrier changes, because 'cap-ships-online' is not what eve should be Yeah I agree, next " feature " CCP unleashes should take away all sovreign space and turn all player built outposts into NPC faction controlled stations that are NOT conquerable. Players shouldnt be allowed to achieve larger and more powerful vessels that dwarf the capacity of a fresh subscriber. Veterans of this game should be forever locked in the same ships with the same hull designs as the rookie ships new players get upon creating their character just to make things fair. Also.... All current ingame POS's should be turned into quafe vending machines. Thanks.
King4aDay Minmatar Murder-Death-Kill	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:50:00 - [29] Originally by: Stoffer Ninjapirate Edited by: Stoffer Ninjapirate on 23/10/2007 18:23:22 It's posts like these that ruin COAD. This is a smack free forum for people who wish do debate the political scene, not somewhere you can campaign against changes in the game you don't like. :icetroll:
Ramlir 0.0 Corp	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:50:00 - [30] Originally by: Cyllaina Yeah I agree, next " feature " CCP unleashes should take away all sovreign space and turn all player built outposts into NPC faction controlled stations that are NOT conquerable. Players shouldnt be allowed to achieve larger and more powerful vessels that dwarf the capacity of a fresh subscriber. Veterans of this game should be forever locked in the same ships with the same hull designs as the rookie ships new players get upon creating their character just to make things fair. Also.... All current ingame POS's should be turned into quafe vending machines. Thanks. d[O_o]b Calm down.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.