EVE Search - There will never be a CSM representative for highsec..

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

There will never be a CSM representative for highsec..

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1293	Posted - 2012.01.27 07:44:00 - [1] - Quote Ai Shun wrote: met worst wrote: If you are so damned right that the status quo is fine and "works" then YOU have nothing to worry about anyway do you? I'm not worried. What gives you the idea I'm worried? And Met, while you throw generalizations around; deliberately misrepresent events and have your posts carefully dissected and disproved by people like Rubyporto I'll keep on thinking of you as a dummy. A whiny dummy. Why do you worry what some random person on the internet thinks about you anyway? You have a CSM to take down. After all, with no CSM. No wait. You wanted 7-9 mini CSMs. No wait. It was geographical regions. No wait ... I'm a forum Coroner. Dissecting the poasts to see what kilt 'em. Easy job to get. Just have to read every post on F&I's front page without killing yours.... so cold, so very cold, can't escape, they're coming for my brain, what kind of loving G...elf and you get the job. Can't think of any side effects from the interview process. Nope, none at all. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1294	Posted - 2012.01.27 08:02:00 - [2] - Quote Serge Bastana wrote: Lyrrashae wrote: Serge Bastana wrote: She's having trouble with her r's dropping, everything sags with age ^^^^^^^ [/Me giggles. Then titters. Then chuckles. Then howls] Thank you for that. My faith, at least such as it ever is, in humanity is restored! Those are not words I would ever have imagined I would illicit, maybe there's hope for me yet Isn't tittering lower on the laugh spectrum than giggling? Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1296	Posted - 2012.01.27 08:17:00 - [3] - Quote Lharanai wrote: BECAUSE ITS A GAME Sorry to inform you that for some people EVE is not the center of their life, just a product they pay for. But I have to agree with former posters....WHO DOES NOT VOTE HAS NO RIGHT TO COMPLAIN That something is a game does not make it invalid to become invested in it. Just like people who run bowling leagues, or organize adult sports teams, or coach kids baseball. We do it because it's an enjoyable hobby, and we become invested because we want out hobby to remain available to us and continue to improve for us. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1296	Posted - 2012.01.27 08:24:00 - [4] - Quote Implying Implications wrote: Highsec dwellers are a bunch of retards that shouldn't even be allowed to vote. This kind of attitude annoys me just as much. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1315	Posted - 2012.01.30 02:16:00 - [5] - Quote Rellik B00n wrote: i did not suggest direct democracy, i suggested a consultation excercise. Instead of consulting the csm (and their personal/corp/alliance agendas) over these ideas then working with the feedback you are consulting everyone that logs in over a certain period. These people also have agendas and block voting is still possible. Wikipedia wrote: a form of government in which people vote on policy initiatives directly, as opposed to a representative democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives You suggest a system by which people vote directly(Take a Poll) on policy initiatives(Proposed changes) to replace a system in which people vote for representatives(Vote for the CSM) who then vote on policy initiatives(CCP Consults the CSM). That you cal it "consulting" doesn't change that. In addition, it, as was already said, limits debate to a series of very specific questions with little to no help in interpreting them, and subject to the biases of both the maker of the survey and the reader of the survey (in the event of short answer questions). Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1315	Posted - 2012.01.30 02:32:00 - [6] - Quote Malcanis wrote: Mr Kidd wrote: Malcanis wrote: I'm not at all convinced that there's less money in hi-sec hands than there is in moon goo. I can't answer specifically to the point. However, I would say that while there might be more isk (which I doubt) overall in HS, how many hands hold that isk? This goes back to cohesion and the lack of it in HS. Individually, even in small groups hs cannot compete financially with individuals in null. I'm reasonably sure that the richest individuals in the game mostly operate in hi-sec. I've also yet to see a convincing argument (that means ones with evidence and causal chains that don't involve lizard-people beaming mind-rays from their moonbase) that in game wealth affects CSM elections. I MAEK ALTS to RIG ERECTION. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1315	Posted - 2012.01.30 04:23:00 - [7] - Quote Karthwritte wrote: Carebears are not famous. Like me. Hate being a carebear But you have your own Official CCP Emoticon Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1326	Posted - 2012.01.30 06:22:00 - [8] - Quote Jhagiti Tyran wrote: Didn't the carebears have a CSM once? Iirc she threw spoons at the CCP devs and then broke the NDA by giving another developer info she learned during the CSM meetings. Wait, she broke NDA by spilling to a Dev who wasn't in the loop? Wow, the Bears can't do anything well, can they? Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1336	Posted - 2012.01.31 02:18:00 - [9] - Quote MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: Tres Farmer wrote: Because people who play in high sec and who aren't alts of any other group aren't as passionate about the game. And being passionate about the game is needed to become a CSM representative.. it's additional stress and work besides playing this game, which even after you did it to the best of your knowledge and ability in 90% of the cases earns you mockery and verbal abuse. For people who are just playing casually this is not feasible. So the only ones, who rally for CSM and take the downsides are those who get something out of it for their group. It's funny though.. a very large group, composed of casual players has no voice because of the nature of it's members. Wait. When did it become fashionable to be emotionally invested or "passionate" about this game? Aren't carebears shunned for taking this game too seriously? Did someone forget to send out the memo? Or can this just be the usual carebear-hating hypocritical mantra spewed by the "i-nevar-take-eve-seriously" elitists? I care about the game deeply. I don't particularly care that Rifter #342 or Abaddon #32 or Hurricane #459 got deadified. That's what we make fun of the carebears for. "WWWWWAAAAAAAHHHHHHH Tengu #1 got blowed up by ebil piewates, WWWWWAAAAAAHHHHH CCP FIX THIS OR I WILL GET EVERYONE EVER TO QUIT" That sort of stuff. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1360	Posted - 2012.02.03 03:02:00 - [10] - Quote Alavaria Fera wrote: RubyPorto wrote: I care about the game deeply. I don't particularly care that Rifter #342 or Abaddon #32 or Hurricane #459 got deadified. That's what we make fun of the carebears for. "WWWWWAAAAAAAHHHHHHH Tengu #1 got blowed up by ebil piewates, WWWWWAAAAAAHHHHH CCP FIX THIS OR I WILL GET EVERYONE EVER TO QUIT" That sort of stuff. What kind of tengu, the 2billion loot pinata type? Probably. Mind you, when I last lost a loot pinata, it was valued at ~1b and happened because I went out ratting while watching the AT. My response was to something like "aw shucks" and off buy a new one. I try to avoid losing ratting ships, as their loss stings for the simple reason that it's entirely my fault I lost it. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1388	Posted - 2012.02.07 17:06:00 - [11] - Quote Dztrgovac wrote: Reason there are so few highsec CSM delegates (and now likely there won't be any, because CSM is too important to 00 people to allow loss of a single seat) is that there aren't any thousands strong monolithic blocks of players. So even if there are honest candidates (most "highsec candidates" are trolls or alts or pirates and griefers) they will just split the votes to no end. Alliance ordering their troops to vote for their delegate is simple. But how can real highsec CSM candidate get the message spread? Forums? Most people ignore them like troll filled plague they are. There are no big channels or communities in game that have sufficient listeners. And so in our pretty little democracy 70% of players don't get represented at all; or occasionally get one delegate. Sounds like you want some sort of chat window that everyone automatically has open all the time, like some way of talking to the local population of each system.... Oh wait... The last HS CSM (Crazy Spoon thrower that she was) went system to system campaigning(lying) about the upcoming nerfs she was planning to fight. She got herself a seat, she got the second most votes of any seat that election. Then she went and broke the NDA. So spread the message by making some effort and Campaign. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.
RubyPorto Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion 1400	Posted - 2012.02.09 14:03:00 - [12] - Quote Mocam wrote: Poetic Stanziel wrote: If any highsec representative has a shot at getting, if not into the Circle of Seven, at least to the Oval of Fourteen, it would be Kelduum Revaan. True but he wouldn't really be a "highsec rep" - he'd be more about EVE in general than focused on just highsec and the issues there. HAHAHAHAAHA Please, you're killing me, tell me another one. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox. 5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes.

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20250912/1944
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.