EVE Search - Let's Iterate Low Security Space!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Let's Iterate Low Security Space!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 6814	Posted - 2012.01.28 01:22:00 - [1] - Quote Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer
Morganta Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia 948	Posted - 2012.01.28 01:24:00 - [2] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. allow dictors to bubble hictors and mobiles no, but dictors yes The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 6814	Posted - 2012.01.28 01:26:00 - [3] - Quote Morganta wrote: Lyris Nairn wrote: Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. allow dictors to bubble hictors and mobiles no, but dictors yes Why the differentiation? Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer
Tres Farmer Gallente Federation Intelligence Service 71	Posted - 2012.01.28 01:31:00 - [4] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: snip I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. snap Low sec is fine, leave it alone unless you know how 90% of the people who play there think about it. If you want to change something look at the bounty system, the criminal watch system and maybe boosters. But that stuff is not restricted to low sec only. If after that you still need something to do, look at projection of power with capitals, again, not restricted to low sec alone. PS: there was a thread from somebody about some thoughts about the sec ratings/pvp aspect of low sec to enable weekend-warriors from high sec a go at it without marginalising them.. sounded nice. PPS: low sec doesn't need carebears, understand that right from the start.
Ganagati Perkone Caldari State 59	Posted - 2012.01.28 02:05:00 - [5] - Quote My suggestion- Don't add bubbles. Lowsec is one of the few remaining places you can hope to find solo or small gang PvP, and one of the few places that highsec carebears dare to venture for some pew pew action (meaning more people for everyone else to fight). If every highsec->lowsec gate can be bubbled, you will start to see a lot less movement from high->low, a reduction in the population of lowsec and the near death of small gang PvP. It'll become just another stomping ground for large alliance blobs, and everyone else will be reduced to wardeccing each other in highsec corps just to get any PvP. Please don't kill lowsec. :( The poster above me pretty much has it. Lowsec is as fine as it can be right now. It could be better, but changes to the system likely would only make things worse.
Morganta Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia 954	Posted - 2012.01.28 02:24:00 - [6] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: Morganta wrote: Lyris Nairn wrote: Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. allow dictors to bubble hictors and mobiles no, but dictors yes Why the differentiation? you do play this game right? I mean personally I wouldn't mind, but you got to give and take a little to move ahead now I'm starting to question your political skills... Are they really high or are you just using implants? The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy
Jas Dor Republic University Minmatar Republic 32	Posted - 2012.01.28 02:53:00 - [7] - Quote Burn low sec and drop the systems into a wormhole. Leave only the low sec systems needed for faction wars, high risk high sec shortcuts (and the occasional jump logistics landing zone). This creates two types of system: CLS systems are systems that do not get flushed down the wormhole (god I'm talking to a goon about holes, what has the world come to). NLS systems mean new low sec. These systems become 0.0 - WH space with higher bounty rats. Ships may only jump out of NLS, they may not jump in. No form of capital construction array may be anchored in NLS. Stations may not produce capships. There should be no bubbles. Current high sec islands in low sec space become true islands. They have at least one attached CLS allowing access by cyno. Solitude becomes an isolated region. All stations in NLS get replaced by wrecked stations. A wrecked station has no services, no market, and no contracts. Pilots may install a "station salvage module" in a wrecked station (think command center). This allows the pilot to install personal station service modules. You can have your own personal lab in a wrecked station (though these should give no more than a 10% time bonus, perhaps tied to a station salvage skill giving a 2% time bonus per level). Personal repair modules should probably use nanites/minerals as a consumed resource. Corps with offices at the station should be able to to construct similar structure at a corp level. There is one form of ownership beacon that may be anchored by a corp to cliam a NLS station (one timer only). Ownership of this beacon allows the owning corp to install market, contracts, agent and office modules. The owning corp gets a cut of all taxes , brokers and office fees assessed at the station (maybe mission rewards). The owning corp can purchase NPC mission agents for the station off some form of market. The owning corp may not restrict docking rights, clone bay access, or impose docking fees. You can take a cut of the action at a wrecked stations market but it still retains elements of an NPC station. A station owning corp may pay isk to repair the station causing the internal and external models to slowly shift from wrecked to repaired (the owning corp also gets some input into what the station hanger screen looks like). This should give some limited mechanical benefit (maybe allowing some station services to be restored), cost isk to maintain, and probably have the isk cost reduced based on the number of pilots using the station. Every docked pilot sees a 10km high banner with the owning corps choice of either their corp or alliance logo when docked. There is a 60 second redocking timers at a wrecked station. NLS comes in two types. First are the lost constellations. These are constellations that have retained their internal jump gates but have lost there connection to the rest of the universe. They have, somewhere, a WH connecting them to the shattered stars. The shattered stars are systems that have come lose. They access the rest of the universe through a shifting system of wormholes. These systems have special kind of wormholes. A blueshifted wormhole is part of a path that leads through the shattered stars to empire. A red shifted wormhole leads to one of the high sec islands. From the lost constellations there are generally less jumps required to reach an island than to reach empire. This gives us a bunch of petty empires, generating isk from mission running (with agents chosen by the station owners, so I suspect pirate factions will be well represented). Getting anything in or out is going to require a trip through a pirate infested pipe. My big concern is trying to retain the kind of accidental communities that form in NRDS space. This might happen by tying level/choice of agents to the number of pilots living at a station. For extra fun, don't allow research agents to locate in NLS. This would do interesting things to the balance between T2 and faction gear and give T2 BPOs a strategic role.
Hicksimus Xion Limited 93	Posted - 2012.01.28 02:59:00 - [8] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. You mean the same Rifters that take 4 hits from a gate gun and die? Hint: Gate guns ruin a lot of fun and don't actually provide a useful level of security, just an annoyance. Things I have realized from the EvE forums: Many people beleive cost means money and only money
2bhammered Perkone Caldari State 10	Posted - 2012.01.28 03:03:00 - [9] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. The first 3 times I read "list of what you fine folks think" I thought it said "list of what you fools think"... I need more drinks What I want is Arena PVP, since I am bored of looking for fights. Like ehm maybe alliance tournament but all the time with anyone being able to make a team and enter a queue or go to a specific location, in order to fight for ranking/fun or betting and perhaps even with instancing with or without podkilling and if without limit what implants you can use or make it without penatlies. Whatever, just want some more "E" in the word sport when it comes to eve online. Also make lowesec matter and remove the zergs from it.
Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 56	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:00:00 - [10] - Quote Remove the arbitrary restriction on Drug Labs/Moon Harvesting/Refinery Arrays that splits lowsec into "lowsec that is worth a damn" and 0.4 Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been Eve is a great game if you can get past all of the asshats....

Shazzam Vokanavom Hedion University Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:02:00 - [11] - Quote Ganagati wrote: My suggestion- Don't add bubbles. Lowsec is one of the few remaining places you can hope to find solo or small gang PvP, and one of the few places that highsec carebears dare to venture for some pew pew action (meaning more people for everyone else to fight). If every highsec->lowsec gate can be bubbled, you will start to see a lot less movement from high->low, a reduction in the population of lowsec and the near death of small gang PvP. It'll become just another stomping ground for large alliance blobs, and everyone else will be reduced to wardeccing each other in highsec corps just to get any PvP. Please don't kill lowsec. :( The poster above me pretty much has it. Lowsec is as fine as it can be right now. It could be better, but changes to the system likely would only make things worse. Didn't you know lowsec is to be the new FW testing ground since the null sec mafioso's dont want the changes in their SOV space. How does it feel to be a "hamster" on a wheel? Just don't expect any cheese I guess. Or as the old addage goes "who moved my cheese" in this case?
Dbars Grinding Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation 341	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:05:00 - [12] - Quote do you know the definition of Iterate ?
Ganagati Perkone Caldari State 64	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:10:00 - [13] - Quote Shazzam Vokanavom wrote: Ganagati wrote: My suggestion- Don't add bubbles. Lowsec is one of the few remaining places you can hope to find solo or small gang PvP, and one of the few places that highsec carebears dare to venture for some pew pew action (meaning more people for everyone else to fight). If every highsec->lowsec gate can be bubbled, you will start to see a lot less movement from high->low, a reduction in the population of lowsec and the near death of small gang PvP. It'll become just another stomping ground for large alliance blobs, and everyone else will be reduced to wardeccing each other in highsec corps just to get any PvP. Please don't kill lowsec. :( The poster above me pretty much has it. Lowsec is as fine as it can be right now. It could be better, but changes to the system likely would only make things worse. Didn't you know lowsec is to be the new FW testing ground since the null sec mafioso's dont want the changes in their SOV space. How does it feel to be a "hamster" on a wheel? Just don't expect any cheese I guess. Or as the old addage goes "who moved my cheese" in this case? :(
Shazzam Vokanavom Hedion University Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:17:00 - [14] - Quote Dbars Grinding wrote: do you know the definition of Iterate ? Yes. In this case it means, low sec is our science project to make sure we can control FW mechanics before it effects null sec.
Nicolo da'Vicenza Divine Power. Cascade Imminent 266	Posted - 2012.01.28 05:17:00 - [15] - Quote People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes.
Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 57	Posted - 2012.01.28 07:14:00 - [16] - Quote Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been Eve is a great game if you can get past all of the asshats....
KrakizBad Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension 315	Posted - 2012.01.28 07:16:00 - [17] - Quote Elessa Enaka wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. Only militia members in their own held systems being able to anchor bubbles? That's a f'ing great idea. No troll, it would be great. http://i.imgur.com/cOmMP.gif
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 8065	Posted - 2012.01.28 07:19:00 - [18] - Quote KrakizBad wrote: Elessa Enaka wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. Only militia members in their own held systems being able to anchor bubbles? That's a f'ing great idea. No troll, it would be great. Sounds like we have a proposal that people like! I'll be sure to voice it, if I am elected to CSM7. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 8065	Posted - 2012.01.28 07:21:00 - [19] - Quote Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC 0.0 and other lowsec systems, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. These are some great ideas! Thank you for posting them. I'll be sure to mention them if I am elected. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 8065	Posted - 2012.01.28 07:24:00 - [20] - Quote Elessa Enaka wrote: Remove the arbitrary restriction on Drug Labs/Moon Harvesting/Refinery Arrays that splits lowsec into "lowsec that is worth a damn" and 0.4 I think I can add this seamlessly into some changes that other people have been asking for with regards to POS. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer

Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 57	Posted - 2012.01.28 08:00:00 - [21] - Quote KrakizBad wrote: Elessa Enaka wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. Only militia members in their own held systems being able to anchor bubbles? That's a f'ing great idea. No troll, it would be great. I know that you say you legitimately like the idea, but I can't shake the feeling that you are trolling.... Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been Eve is a great game if you can get past all of the asshats....
Lyris Nairn GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 8079	Posted - 2012.01.28 08:04:00 - [22] - Quote I think it's funny to always assume that people are serious, even if they're obviously trolling. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer
sYnc Vir Wolfsbrigade 139	Posted - 2012.01.28 08:35:00 - [23] - Quote Elessa Enaka wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. You're about the dumbest person ever, ask someone to explain why.
Akrasjel Lanate Naquatech Conglomerate 552	Posted - 2012.01.28 08:46:00 - [24] - Quote Lyris Nairn wrote: Hello space friends; You may or may not be aware that I am running for CSM in 2012. No hurt feelings from me if you didn't know that; honestly, I only know it because I'm the one doing it. In any event, it seems to me that the CSM could benefit from a consolidated list of what you fine folks think with regards to the present state of Low Security Space. Iterations, improvements, additions, suggestions and all manner of constructive discussion are welcome! I realize that what I am asking is a bit out of the ordinary, because we have been trained to simply pick a politician based on what he claims to want and then to complain about the politicians who we perceive did not give us what we want. That is not the kind of politician that I am! I have no vested interest in or against Low Security Space. I bring no preconceived notions, no biases and no entanglements with me to the discussion. I just want a list of things that you, the People, would like to see done with regards to Low Security Space, and if I am elected then it is my solemn promise that I shall strive to the best of my ability to represent your expressed desires as a passionate advocate on your behalf. So that's my spiel. Whether or not you vote for me, how about contributing to a list of things you'd like to see? I, for one, am in love with Rifters. A vote for Lyris is a vote for Rifters. Goons live in Null sec nap fest not low sec
Issler Dainze Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord 586	Posted - 2012.01.28 08:53:00 - [25] - Quote Leave the goons and denounce them. Then run on making low sec where you make and smuggle drugs. Finally, become our Voice of Reason Party low sec candidate and I will work to get you elected! Also get some of you goon friends to support us in making low sec a drug dealers haven! Issler Dainze Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate

ISD Eshtir Community Communications Liaisons 51	Posted - 2012.01.28 09:31:00 - [26] - Quote Thread moved to Jita Park Speakers Corner. ISD Eshtir Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department

Nicolo da'Vicenza Divine Power. Cascade Imminent 271	Posted - 2012.01.28 09:44:00 - [27] - Quote then allow me to kick off the thread's relocation with a traditional ban npc forum alts from csm forums
Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 57	Posted - 2012.01.28 15:09:00 - [28] - Quote sYnc Vir wrote: Elessa Enaka wrote: Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: People in FW get some station tweaking rights and can anchor some otherwise 0.0 exclusive modules in regions they hold like cynojammers, but by no means all. People with high pirate faction standings get access to standings-exclusive, destructable stargates that respawn and connect to NPC space, simulating jump bridges but with NPC-generated routes. It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. You're about the dumbest person ever, ask someone to explain why. Oh, well, little miss high-and-mighty "I write everything in italics cause I thought the I meant that it made what I was saying important" why don't you enlighten me? What about an idea that I proposed in an internet forum thread soliciting ideas makes me the dumbest person ever? Can you do something other than belittle or is that all your mommy and daddy taught you by example? Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been Eve is a great game if you can get past all of the asshats....
Aineko Macx Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 130	Posted - 2012.01.28 16:10:00 - [29] - Quote I like Jack Dant's proposal for improving low sec: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=42987
Alavaria Fera GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 17	Posted - 2012.01.28 16:12:00 - [30] - Quote Elessa Enaka wrote: It would be really cool if Militia members could anchor bubbles and use them sort of like checkpoints. After all, they are only tools, they aren't intrinsically bad things, it's just how they are used. I think that these ideas have some real merit. They could be called Large Roving National Defense Checkpoint. Failure to stop before reaching the checkpoint will result in automatic blowings up and poddings. Issler Dainze wrote: Also get some of you goon friends to support us in making low sec a drug dealers haven! We can't, we exist in subjugation and have no free will apart from our socialist overlords. More seriously, I don't know how many people use the drugs (boosters?)



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.