EVE Search - CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 96 post(s)
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.07 18:43:00 - [1] Thanks for the reply Nozh. Of course people will flood in to disagree (using the polite term here) on the specifics, but thanks anyway. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.07 19:30:00 - [2] Originally by: Xaen Erm...since it seems to be pester a CCP dev day... Any word on a global GUI overhaul? Solution to Jita? I don't remember exactly, so don't quote me on this, but I believe a complete UI overhaul is scheduled after Trinity is released. As for Jita, they're working on implementing RDMA that will be implemented in the first half of 2008. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.07 19:35:00 - [3] Originally by: Xaen I wish they'd consult me for the GUI design, or at least my thread (and others' posts too). It takes a very picky bastard to design a top notch GUI. A merely sufficient GUI is a complete failure. If you can't grasp that as a truth, don't work on GUIs. Indeed, we can only hope. Quote: Tarminic, wtf is RDMA? Wikipedia Summary: Quote: Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) allows data to move directly from the memory of one computer into that of another without involving either one's operating system. This permits high-throughput, low-latency networking, which is especially useful in massively parallel computer clusters. RDMA relies on a special philosophy in using DMA. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.07 20:00:00 - [4] Originally by: punnani Originally by: CCP Nozh Originally by: punnani Taking away damage whoop-ass from a carrier is the most ugly part. WTF!!!! I hate u CCP, you make me wanna cancel my subscriptions. If you turn on your TV or google carriers you will find out, that carriers ARE the ultimate damage deallers. They are meant to strike from far and destroy pretty much everything. They are CAPITAL SHIPS not resupply barges! If you link me to a post or dev blog from me where I say carriers are overpowered and I'm taking away their damage, I'll eat my own head. Also EVE Balance > RL/Other Sci Fi. As soon as people start comparing EVE to real life or battlestar galactica I stop reading. You nearfing damage where you allow to only launch 5 fighters and not be able to kill small ships with it. EAT IT! God, your parents really should have beat you more as a kid. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.07 20:20:00 - [5] Originally by: punnani My apologies, if thats only an idea. BAD idea , bad ! :) Just think from the perspective of space arms race, what race would invest into a capital ship that does a job that a regular battleship can do. When confused always reference reality. Carriers are uber YES but they are vulnerable to subs and can be easily destroyed if enemy closes range. Maybe reduce its tanking and logistics ability while boosting firepower. Its a fleet ship of doom, let it stay that way. Sorry for being a crybaby, I'm bored That's in real life, and EVE is not real life. Carriers will do whatever the hell developers want them to do, end of story. And if you thought this was a bad idea, why didn't you come up with a solution and post it in the feedback thread, where the developers will actually take it into consideration? ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.08 21:44:00 - [6] Just a quick question for you guys - There are a few modules that for whatever reason have either been obsolete from the beginning or made so through later balances/patches. Two examples that come to mind here: Capacitor Batteries (Topic Discussing them here) Tech 2 Stasis Webifiers Would you guys mind taking a look at them? ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.08 21:47:00 - [7] Originally by: CCP Nozh Originally by: Tarminic Just a quick question for you guys - There are a few modules that for whatever reason have either been obsolete from the beginning or made so through later balances/patches. Two examples that come to mind here: Capacitor Batteries (Topic Discussing them here) Tech 2 Stasis Webifiers Would you guys mind taking a look at them? I'm the module guy, I'll put these on my list for review. Thanks CCP Nozh, I appreciate the effort. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance	Posted - 2007.11.08 22:08:00 - [8] Originally by: KaptnSparrow btw are you doing anything about the lock bug? They work on game balance, I don't think they can answer questions on bug fixing... ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.