|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dristra
Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.09 21:56:00 -
[1]
/Signed
Even though i must raise the issue that amarr is not true suck, just average on all fronts while the other races have places where they shine.
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|
Dristra
Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.10 14:49:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Grim Vandal I honestly have to say that amarr does NOT need any boost
but the whole tanking stupidness stinks
Breaking a tank only due to a certain amount of DPS is lame in my book.
armor tanking should be more about plates and less repair ... while shield tanking should be more about peak recharge beeing broken by high volly dammage and a certain amount of dps ...
this does mean nerf armor reps, boost armor hitpoints this also means let shield boosters affect shield recharge time and remove shield boosters cuz they are obsolete due to shield rechargers ...
this is a DIFFICULT task to do ... but come one ccp nearly 300 employees you should have some spare folk to do it ...
right now shield and armor works the same way and gets boring quite fast ...
Why do you brilliant guys not also think about more hight slots for all ships ... and introduce eg. racial hard points and non-racial hard points ...
eg.
Armageddon: 12 high slots, 7 racial hard points (for lasers) 3 non-racial hard points (can NOT be fitted with any laser, but any other) 2 utility slots
tempest: 13 high slots 6 racial hard points (for cannons) 5 non-racial hard points (can NOT be fitted with any projectile weapons, but any other) 2 utility slots
typhoon: 12 high slots 4 racial hard points (projectile only) 4 racial hard points (missiles only) 4 non-racial hard points (can NOT be fitted with any projectile weapons or missiles, but any other) no utility slot
you get the gist ... GET CREATIVE you have the manpower to do it now ...
this problems raised here are definately not an Amarr problem imo!
300 yarrr
Epic fail. Sorry i just don't like the idea, could be interesting, in some other game.
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|
Dristra
Amarr Shadows of the Dead Aftermath Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.15 11:27:00 -
[3]
Originally by: PeacefullNub Harbinger the worst tier2 BC. It is recognized even by those who does not see "amarr problem". Could someone compare tier1 BC or tier2-3 cruisers?
Actually the harby can readly be compared to the brutix, and you will find out that the harby is easier to fit, and that is about it...
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
|
Dristra
Amarr Shadows of the Dead The Dawn of Darkness
|
Posted - 2008.01.20 13:41:00 -
[4]
Originally by: PeacefullNub Edited by: PeacefullNub on 20/01/2008 13:24:30 Edited by: PeacefullNub on 20/01/2008 13:14:14
Originally by: Felysta Sandorn
Do those four points, and the Harbinger will be a competitive battlecruiser.
I think this is too much. With extra dps/drone bonus it will be one of the best (if not simply best) gank BC in game. With defensive bonuses it will be best combination of tank and damage in game. But simply reducting cap usage and PG reqs for lasers, and switching cap_usage_bonus to something minior (tracking, sensor resolution, drone control range, fallof bonus etc.) will give harbi more versatility and new setups to be competentive.
Added: Maybe adding bonuses to EW drones (+5% for EW drones hp, speed and strength per ship lvl) for some amarr ships (omen, harbi, apoc for example) solve amarr EW capability?
If it is not supposed to be the best gank bc, what is it supposed to be best at? this is the problem, all ships should have some place they are "best", and Amarr have very few places they can say "i am best at this" or "yea, im special"
Giving Amarr ew drone bonus would make no sense, be too good, and kick Caldari in the nuts
It's great being Amarr isn't it.
Support the introduction of Blaze M crystals for Amarr!
|
|
|
|