Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

Originally by: Tarminic

---

Quote:

---

Stop dreaming

---

Stop hallucinating.

---

stop trolling. somehow your name seems familiar, could it be that it's cause you've been called a proper troll on more than just 1 occation? only not be me, that is untill now anyways.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

Occation, untill.

These are the kind of people who support Ron Paul. 'Nuff said.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

no, less income tax = less debt = less overspending = less state debt = room for improvements such as medical care, social security and many other things that are essential.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

economics 101. increased spending incurs increased debt.

what an arrogant little ***** you are, i'm liking you less and less, you sure don't grow on people, and no i don't think i want to "get" you either.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

Originally by: lofty29

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

economics 101. increased spending incurs increased debt.

what an arrogant little ***** you are, i'm liking you less and less, you sure don't grow on people, and no i don't think i want to "get" you either.

---

Logic 101, if you have more money to spend, you won't run into debt.

---

so tell me, do you have any loans?

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

an eve analogy: base mineral price vs production and sales price. now impose an income tax on top of all this and u'll understand where i'm going with this. everything becomes more expensive.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

with all due respect lofty, when u get a little older you'll understand how things connect much easier, because you'll have more knowledge of how things work.

the more money and things are cheaper scenario you are suggesting, is a false image of what will happen. in fact you'll have less money but the prices will also be less. it will balance itself out.

---

Originally by: Micheal Dietrich

---

Originally by: lofty29

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

with all due respect lofty, when u get a little older you'll understand how things connect much easier, because you'll have more knowledge of how things work.

the more money and things are cheaper scenario you are suggesting, is a false image of what will happen. in fact you'll have less money but the prices will also be less. it will balance itself out.

---

You were the one who suggested it

---

I like how he got on your case with the grammar bit then he gets ya back saying your too young to understand.

---

Originally by: 7shining7one7

---

i understand where your coming from, but i honestly can't agree, i suggest you check out what exactly it is they want to do and look at their competence instead.

let's take guillani, who was the guy who owned the wtc towers and said openly on bbc/cnn that he agreed with the firechief that they decided to pull wtc 7 since there had been so much damage allready (pulling a building takes weeks of planning, and is lingo for a controlled demolition) somethign that is completely omitted in the official report. so much for his credibility

not to mention that he recieved a BIG PHAT INSURANCE CHECK on the building that was RECENTLY FULLY RENOVATED FOR MILLIONS OF DOLLARS just before 9/11.

or hillary who just wants to continue the "war on terror" and decrease your liberties and continue with the insane military budgets that incurred the trillions of dollars in us debt and continue to send the US currency down the path to a fullblown economic chrisis.

or ron paul who wants to abolish all of the above and reclaim freedom and unconstitutional acts, where the president actually has to make a vote to see if u should go to war.

but do research this.

---