Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:30:00 -
[1]
Right'o, its no big secret that im doing something big, which has to do with lotteries. It will make it possible to create totally safe lotteries with little hassle.
But eventually, in any lottery, a winner will have to be found.
The automated system i have in mind, cant really take the winning numbers from the british lottery, which seems to be standard at this point.
But i have alternatives. I have the option of using a random number generator which is intergrated in .NET. Or if somebody have an even better one, id love to use it.
Whats your feelings about this?Is the british lottery the only way to go? Or is random number generators a valid autocome for a lottery?
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Halkin
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:46:00 -
[2]
i havent played one eve related lottery tbh (maybe just nothing i fancy or dont already have/can afford), but if was to play it would be backed up an offical nations bonus ball thingy
Originally by: InigoMontoya - re: iMune alliance situation I would sue Concord for breach of contract, you paid the fees, where is your pew pew?
|

Miki Fin
Gallente Independant Union of Rangers
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:49:00 -
[3]
How will you prove that the number which was randomly generated is the number that is published?
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Miki Fin How will you prove that the number which was randomly generated is the number that is published?
Thats the thing, i REALLY cant, but having auditors check my code. I have a made a small piece of code, that use a standard number generator.
It generates 15 numbers, and takes the average of them. Thats what i plan for using.
Of course, the national ball thing is always a cookie cutter method. But its not really that automated as id like.
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Ki Tarra
Caldari Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:55:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 22:56:20 The reason that public lottery numbers are used is because they can be verified independantly.
If you are generating your own random numbers, then people need to be able to trust you to actually select the winner randomly and not arbitrally.
It really comes down to trust.
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 22:58:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ki Tarra Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 22:56:20 The reason that public lottery numbers are used is because they can be verified independantly.
If you are generating your own random numbers, then people need to be able to trust you to actually select the winner randomly and not arbitrally.
It really comes down to trust.
For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
But also i will have third party people like Hexxx and Mr. Horizontal check the live code, to make sure its not rigged, if they volunteer(Im sure they will).
Is that enough you think?
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Halkin
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:00:00 -
[7]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Ki Tarra Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 22:56:20 The reason that public lottery numbers are used is because they can be verified independantly.
If you are generating your own random numbers, then people need to be able to trust you to actually select the winner randomly and not arbitrally.
It really comes down to trust.
For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
But also i will have third party people like Hexxx and Mr. Horizontal check the live code, to make sure its not rigged, if they volunteer(Im sure they will).
Is that enough you think?
i really doubt it tbh, people have a need to be suspicous in rl but even more of a reason in eve becuse everyone wants teh virtual monies :p
Originally by: InigoMontoya - re: iMune alliance situation I would sue Concord for breach of contract, you paid the fees, where is your pew pew?
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:01:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Halkin
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Ki Tarra Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 22:56:20 The reason that public lottery numbers are used is because they can be verified independantly.
If you are generating your own random numbers, then people need to be able to trust you to actually select the winner randomly and not arbitrally.
It really comes down to trust.
For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
But also i will have third party people like Hexxx and Mr. Horizontal check the live code, to make sure its not rigged, if they volunteer(Im sure they will).
Is that enough you think?
i really doubt it tbh, people have a need to be suspicous in rl but even more of a reason in eve becuse everyone wants teh virtual monies :p
What if we made Chribba do a small site which outputs a random number, and i use that for all lotteries?
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Ki Tarra
Caldari Ki Tech Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:16:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 23:17:53
Originally by: LaVista Vista What if we made Chribba do a small site which outputs a random number, and i use that for all lotteries?
Wouldn't it be just as easier to find an XML feed from a regular public lottery? Save Chribba the work. 
Thirty seconds on google and I found this site. There is no shortage of random numbers there and they can be independantly verified.
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:18:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Ki Tarra
Originally by: LaVista Vista What if we made Chribba do a small site which outputs a random number, and i use that for all lotteries?
Wouldn't it be just as easy to find an XML feed from a regular public lottery? Save Chribba the work. 
Id love if you could point me in a direction of a such XML feed
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Miki Fin
Gallente Independant Union of Rangers
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:20:00 -
[11]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Ki Tarra Edited by: Ki Tarra on 02/01/2008 22:56:20 The reason that public lottery numbers are used is because they can be verified independantly.
If you are generating your own random numbers, then people need to be able to trust you to actually select the winner randomly and not arbitrally.
It really comes down to trust.
For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
But also i will have third party people like Hexxx and Mr. Horizontal check the live code, to make sure its not rigged, if they volunteer(Im sure they will).
Is that enough you think?
I've never heard of you before, nor the other 2 names. I'm sure I'm not the only one either.
|

jongalt
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:33:00 -
[12]
lavista,
having the numbers verified independently is the best way towards the golden bridge of Trust.
dropping names of "popular" forum posters from the marketing forums is only effective if people know who they are. and ill go out on a limb and say >your demographic< probably doesnt.
its not a diss against them or you, but dont under-estimate the vanity and arrogance of any one forum poster to self-promote themselves. humility has its advantages. sometimes that includes "trust".
gl with your lottery. im sure you will be successful.
-jg.
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:35:00 -
[13]
Originally by: jongalt lavista,
having the numbers verified independently is the best way towards the golden bridge of Trust.
dropping names of "popular" forum posters from the marketing forums is only effective if people know who they are. and ill go out on a limb and say >your demographic< probably doesnt.
its not a diss against them or you, but dont under-estimate the vanity and arrogance of any one forum poster to self-promote themselves. humility has its advantages. sometimes that includes "trust".
gl with your lottery. im sure you will be successful.
-jg.
You make a good point.
I expect that people read the market discussion forum, or know about EBank. Its of course very arrogant of me.
But yes, i see that the verified and independent number generator is definately the best way to go. Ill just need to find this.
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

jongalt
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 23:43:00 -
[14]
ki tarra has edited one of her posts above to include a link to an XML feed for the world's lotteries. this might be useful to you...?
-jg.
|

Xera Mai
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 01:30:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Xera Mai on 03/01/2008 01:31:06
Quote: It generates 15 numbers, and takes the average of them. Thats what i plan for using.
I know you've moved the conversation on to other ways to do this, but for reference, making lots of rolls and averaging them is a real no-no, as the number you generate will tend towards the centre of your range, giving next to no chance of ever rolling the extreme values. Your lottery -needs- to have an equal chance for each number to win.
Also, computer-generated random numbers can be a little unrandom themselves, as they're generally based on sin waves when you get right down to it. No substitute for actually picking a name out of a hat :D
|

lofty29
Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 01:34:00 -
[16]
Originally by: LaVista Vista For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
Who are you...?  ---
Latest Video : FAT- Camp |

Mobius
Amarr Bad Temper's
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 02:07:00 -
[17]
sorry rarely have i ever read the market forums
|

Jurgen Cartis
Caldari Interstellar Corporation of Exploration
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 03:56:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Xera Mai Edited by: Xera Mai on 03/01/2008 01:31:06
Quote: It generates 15 numbers, and takes the average of them. Thats what i plan for using.
I know you've moved the conversation on to other ways to do this, but for reference, making lots of rolls and averaging them is a real no-no, as the number you generate will tend towards the centre of your range, giving next to no chance of ever rolling the extreme values. Your lottery -needs- to have an equal chance for each number to win.
Also, computer-generated random numbers can be a little unrandom themselves, as they're generally based on sin waves when you get right down to it. No substitute for actually picking a name out of a hat :D
I see somebody beat me to it.
Another method I've seen used is using the decimal digits of the DJIA close for a day.
Using a national lottery winning number is probably best, though, as it can be verified by anyone easily. -------------------- ICE Blueprint Sales FIRST!! -Yipsilanti Pfft. Never such a thing as a "last chance". ;) -Rauth |

Feng Schui
Minmatar The Ninja Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 04:47:00 -
[19]
theres a online lotto system that eve-radio uses. may want to check with one of the DJ's to see where it is.
|

Helen Hunts
Gallente Red Dragon Mining inc Red Dragon Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 07:44:00 -
[20]
Stick to some number system that is far from your reach. A little piece of computer code run by you is....not necessarily something to be trusted. Even if you had the almighty Veld-"loving" Chribba do the number generation, there'd still be those who'd doubt. (and who's more well known and trusted than Chribba, eh?)
Stick to numbers that no player can possibly interfere with, and you'll have fewer doubters. _______________________________
Mine da rocks, make more ships. Pop da rats, make more rigs. Sell da gear, make more money.
Any Questions? |

Bilanto Gatejumper
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 08:13:00 -
[21]
I dont got a faintest idea about who you are or who any of the others you mention is, but as I understand that names are to be trusted you must of course trust me. I know me so everyone else should.
Well. Enough about that.
So: Whatever you do NEVER EVER do average numbering in a lottery. If I said: Guess a number then I toss this two dices and we see if the average is what you guessed. Then you would have correct 6/36 times if you choose 3.5 and 1/36 if you choose 1. so as you see the distribution is not even and then you can calculate whats got the best odds. Of course you would miss 5 of 6 times, but if the payout is 36 times what you bet it will still be a lot of money to pick out of that game.
If you then take average number of 15 numbers you just make it even worse.
And a third thing: When I bet, how should I know that your trustworthy anyway. If I bet that number 123 will be the winner and it is. How should I know that you don't turn around and say. Hey, you did not bet on that number. You said something else. Even if I can verify the numbers thru officials ways there is no way that I can trust you to give me what I have won.
|

Kryttos
Caldari Hard Corp
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 09:42:00 -
[22]
ive been playing BIG Games lottery. out of about 6 entries. i won once. 625m so it seems BIG, at least, is honest
|

Adonis 4174
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 11:07:00 -
[23]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Ki Tarra
Originally by: LaVista Vista What if we made Chribba do a small site which outputs a random number, and i use that for all lotteries?
Wouldn't it be just as easy to find an XML feed from a regular public lottery? Save Chribba the work. 
Id love if you could point me in a direction of a such XML feed
Not looked at them but here are some RSS feeds of national lotteries. ---- Anything less is wasted effort |

Mr Funkadelic
Tenacious Danes Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 11:35:00 -
[24]
I vaugly remember the name LaVista Vista, he used to run some IPO that went down/bad whatever.
Anyways, i would not use it unless i could check the outcome my self.
|

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 11:59:00 -
[25]
Originally by: lofty29
Originally by: LaVista Vista For all its worth, i like to think my name is enough.
Who are you...? 
If you havent heard of EBank or CAP4U, then you wouldnt know about me. But im a regular on the market discussion forum, and have now handeled 40bill worth of public isk in different bonds/ipo's. Also i help do EBank.
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 12:00:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Xera Mai Edited by: Xera Mai on 03/01/2008 01:31:06
Quote: It generates 15 numbers, and takes the average of them. Thats what i plan for using.
I know you've moved the conversation on to other ways to do this, but for reference, making lots of rolls and averaging them is a real no-no, as the number you generate will tend towards the centre of your range, giving next to no chance of ever rolling the extreme values. Your lottery -needs- to have an equal chance for each number to win.
Also, computer-generated random numbers can be a little unrandom themselves, as they're generally based on sin waves when you get right down to it. No substitute for actually picking a name out of a hat :D
Yeah, i just realised that after actually running it.
Ill be looking to use those XML feeds :)
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |

Jade Grimpkin
Grimpkin Independent Traders
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 12:02:00 -
[27]
i'd be happy to just pick a number for you. Look:
3, 12, 19, 34, 45, 46
see, easy, no hassle. |

Soulja
Caldari THEM. Praesidium Libertatis
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 14:07:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Soulja on 03/01/2008 14:14:36 I don't know if you have been provided with the XML feeds that you seek, or if the links contained here http://www.superpages.com/cities/lottery/index_rss.html are suitable as I haven't followed any of them...
edit: yeah looks like someone beat me to it 
|

Jonny JoJo
Amarr The Imperial Guards Darkness Rising Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 14:16:00 -
[29]
Edited by: Jonny JoJo on 03/01/2008 14:17:06 Guys
Best answer is simplist - you want your customers to feel secure.
You cannot make people feel confortable with a "insert random internet lotto gen". There is no brand name or focus and thats even true if there is no scam going on. Trusting joe random on internet with your money to audit a random lotto gen is like trusting Tuxford with balacing Amarr.
So why do the hard work when real life lottries do that for you? People feel confident in a "insert high quality real life lotto name here" system and let them pick numbers for you. Heck, even if you are a scammer, people will think you are more honest and are less likely to perceive you doing a run.
Why complicate something that is simple?
Oh and here is 100% foolproof lotto scam plan
Run honest lottery and if you alt looses - hand over prizes. This builds trust and just repeat ad infimitum. Or if you alt looses, keep prices and go on run.
Refresh to see next Real Life CCP sig(16 total) |

LaVista Vista
Corporate Research And Production Pty Ltd Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.01.03 14:40:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Jonny JoJo [ Oh and here is 100% foolproof lotto scam plan
Run honest lottery and if you alt looses - hand over prizes. This builds trust and just repeat ad infimitum. Or if you alt looses, keep prices and go on run.
Problem just is that i wont be running any lottery myself. The plan was to make a lottery service, where people could run lotteries which are secured by a third party(Like me), and then people buy tickets trough EBank, which is fully secured.
This signature is brought to you by EBankÖ, free space for moderators to brag. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |