| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
369
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi, my name is Iam Widdershins. I am the current CEO of Project Nemesis, which many know to be a long-time respected small-scale PVP corporation, home to such heroes as Ten Tron and BossDrum. I am an EVE player of 4 years, a well-ranked PVPer and a lover of good fights be they in hisec, wspace, lowsec, or nullsec. I have a background in software & game testing, programming and design, and mathematics.
You may know me from my posts on BattleClinic's forums, my first and second threads summarizing the changes in the Crucible expansion in the weeks leading up to the release of the patch notes, or (more recently) some of my posts on /r/EVE. If you don't know me from these places, there's a decent chance I blew up you or someone you know.
I consider virtually any effort that contributes to improving EVE as a whole to be well spent. I have submitted 50+ bug reports to EVE's system, over a quarter of which were accepted as original submissions of problems that were previously undocumented.
I believe I could be a useful member of the 7th CSM.
~~~ I'm not going to make you read a ten thousand word dissertation of my views on EVE's development, future direction, and needs. I am perfectly willing to engage in discourse with anyone about my views and hopes, but for now I will give you a brief summary. I trust that my own direct answers to your questions and concerns will be easier to read than if you had to seek an answer in some 25-page-PDF magnum opus I uploaded.
My focus and perspective, summarized:I think the direction CCP took with the Crucible expansion is fantastic. Fixing extant bugs, peeves with the UI, and mechanics that just make us want to stab our monitors is a crucial process that not only makes existing gameplay better, but is an essential process to enable expanding the game into new areas and making more major changes that let the game continue to mature. I am very interested in seeing this trend continue and finish some of these left-behind features.
I would like to see a growing focus on improvements to the game's UI and its less visible mechanics; while recent changes have been excellent, I'd like to see more specific overview settings, general UI usability improvements, and a push for the re-write of the Crimewatch engine which handles all the aggression flags in the game.
I believe that EVE is built around conflict and risk. EVE is a risk-permeated wonderland, a PVP-saturated extravaganza fraught with risk & reward, and I want to see the future of EVE maintain this excitement and keep PVP in every area of the game. This does not mean we should make it easier for established PVPers to prey on the weak, any more than it should be easier for our carebears to completely avoid all harm in any security space. New Eden is not a tennis court, with strict boundaries of play and frequent breaks: it is a long and bloody beach with an unrelenting drive and no such thing as complete safety. That's what makes it so good: we should protect that however we can.
Along these lines, we should help foster mechanics that will drive small-scale PVP alongside large-scale. Not everyone wants to be involved in epic-scale fleet engagements, and a lot of people's computers/internet cannot even handle the strain. I believe everyone should be able to look to their left, look to their right, and find opportunities for good PVP on either hand wherever they are -- in the future, much as it is today. Hisec PVP is an extremely important and oft-overlooked aspect of this, because only in hisec can an aspiring PVPer learn by getting engagements with a limited number of opponents without CONCORD involvement. If PVP is reduced in hisec, the barrier for entry into PVP is raised dramatically.
If you have any questions about what I think about something or whether I would support a certain proposition, I will do my best to answer all comers.
My job as an internet spaceship politician:I'm not here to play at being a politician, garner internet fame or in-game notoriety, or do anything but work to improve the game as best I can. I don't pretend to be a great problem-solver, some kind of analytic powerhouse, or a great mediator of disputes. I am here to improve the core of the game, and I hope the rest of CSM7 can be productive adults as well.
I believe I am well-suited among the current candidates to contribute to future discussions, and my greatest honor would be to contribute in a meaningful way to the future of the game and its development.
I hope I have your support, and that of your friends.
also there should totally be hats in the NEX. this needs to be a thing. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
369
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
reserved |

Otocinclus
Tax On Happyness
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
HI GUIS YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR HIM HE SOUNDS LIKE HE KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT
IF YOU DONT CARE ABOUT THAT THEN HE IS A RUGGED MAN SO YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR THAT
+1 FOR RUGGEDNESS |

The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
These guys do an excellent job ganking endless jump freighters and are generally hilarious, A++. Ten Tron is also a hero Curse pilot. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
369
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 04:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:These guys do an excellent job ganking endless jump freighters and are generally hilarious, A++. Ten Tron is also a hero Curse pilot.
Thanks. I'm not much into the jump freighter thing myself, it's a lot of time invested doing nothing for few to no A-grade fights, but it's a good work and Emizeko and his posse have it down to a science.
Ten Tron is my hero, too. |

FreshClip
Tax On Happyness
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 05:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
You told me i was your hero.
I hate you.
This man knows more about internet spaceships than anyone else i have ever met and i believe will have a VERY positive influence on its' direction.
A vote for Widdershins is a vote for justice. My latest video Reverie |

Devils Embrace
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming Moar Tears
31
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Supporting this candidate
A vote for Widdershins is a vote for justice. It's like they usually say about fantasy MMO's and men playing female characters: "If I'm going to spend alot of time watching this character, it might as well have a good looking ass". |

Otonashi Saya
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
59
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Widdershins - This Man has My Vote!
Always willing to Listen and provide good outcomes for the Future of this Game, if you dont vote for that the I ask why do you even Vote for. "Do you expect me to talk?"........"No Mr Bond I expect you to die" |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
393
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
FreshClip wrote:You told me i was your hero.
I hate you.
This man knows more about internet spaceships than anyone else i have ever met and i believe will have a VERY positive influence on its' direction.
A vote for Widdershins is a vote for justice.
I would like to say, on page 1, that you are a heroic PVPer and I love your videos.
All you people at home need to checkthemout. |

wolf incognito
Gurista Enterprise Pty Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:24:00 -
[10] - Quote
You Sir have my Vote. |

CAAN0N
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:30:00 -
[11] - Quote
Having worked closely with Iam Widdershins on a Daily basis for the last several months I can honestly say that his attention to detail and general knowledge of game mechanics is second to none.
100% support for a PVPer and leader. |

NetheranE
Error-404
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
I will vote for you, follow you into the depths of the null and the darkest corners of the wormholes without hesitation.
You have my blaster.
- This man knows his ****, and is an exceptionally amazing influence to me. An outstanding individual as well. |

SureShot001
Error-404
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
You have my Vote and your goals are things I have wanted to see for some time myself. I will have to keep up with EvE politics for this CSM election. |

Keanu Reeeves
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 06:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
I don't always vote or like candidates, BUT when i do, I vote for the best one!
You have my vote |

Chrismyazz
Tax On Happyness
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
NetheranE wrote:I will vote for you, follow you into the depths of the null and the darkest corners of the wormholes without hesitation.
You have my blaster.
- This man knows his ****, and is an exceptionally amazing influence to me. An outstanding individual as well.
AND MY AXE. |

Ten Tron
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Widders would make a great CSM. He knows a lot about EvE and has some great ideas on how to make it better. He's a good listener and would take suggestions from the community very seriously. He's got my vote. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1507
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
Do you agree with Issler Dainze that CCP should ignore FiS content to make more space pants? The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
264
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
We should always ignore FiS for any reason, no matter how small or how pants like it is. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
410
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Do you agree with Issler Dainze that CCP should ignore FiS content to make more space pants? Flying In Space is obviously a priority, much the way a homeless dude's priority is food and wine. However, there are already a lot of space pants whose assets are already made and in the game (try searching "women's" in the market window), and I see no reason why those can't be released for our consumption.
When CCP finishes their V3 revamp of all the visuals in the game, I would not object to them putting one artist back on making content for the NEX... as long as it's hats. The TF2 hat economy is 50 million dollars a year, and hats are one of the only accessories available that would feature prominently in the portrait. I think people would buy them. Hell, I'd buy them.
But no, Flying In Space should never be ignored for the sake of spacepants or any other item of spaceclothing. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1508
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 07:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Do you agree with Issler Dainze that CCP should ignore FiS content to make more space pants? But no, Flying In Space should never be ignored for the sake of spacepants or any other item of spaceclothing.
If only all of the candidates had your sense.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
412
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 08:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Do you agree with Issler Dainze that CCP should ignore FiS content to make more space pants? But no, Flying In Space should never be ignored for the sake of spacepants or any other item of spaceclothing. If only all of the candidates had your sense. While I cannot deny that I would probably pay some of my incredibly scarce real-life money to wear dashing hats in an internet spaceship game, I don't think it should have any real priority until it is actually pretty far up there in the list of things that will add value to EVE as a whole. |

Deen Wispa
Screaming War Eagles Incorporated
117
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 08:57:00 -
[22] - Quote
Hello- Seeing that you believe hisec pvp should be a launching pad for aspiring pvpers, I'd like to know how you envision hisec wardec mechanics should be fixed? And consequently, how hisec pvp should be enhanced for those who are just starting out.
Apparently, once you create a sig. You can't completely delete it. So this is my sig...for now. |

Hooride707
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
+1 |

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
562
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:
My focus and perspective, summarized:I think the direction CCP took with the Crucible expansion is fantastic. Fixing extant bugs, peeves with the UI, and mechanics that just make us want to stab our monitors is a crucial process that not only makes existing gameplay better, but is an essential process to enable expanding the game into new areas and making more major changes that let the game continue to mature. I am very interested in seeing this trend continue and finish some of these left-behind features.
I would like to see a growing focus on improvements to the game's UI and its less visible mechanics; while recent changes have been excellent, I'd like to see more specific overview settings, general UI usability improvements, and a push for the re-write of the Crimewatch engine which handles all the aggression flags in the game.
I believe that EVE is built around conflict and risk. EVE is a risk-permeated wonderland, a PVP-saturated extravaganza fraught with risk & reward, and I want to see the future of EVE maintain this excitement and keep PVP in every area of the game. This does not mean we should make it easier for established PVPers to prey on the weak, any more than it should be easier for our carebears to completely avoid all harm in any security space. New Eden is not a tennis court, with strict boundaries of play and frequent breaks: it is a long and bloody beach with an unrelenting drive and no such thing as complete safety. That's what makes it so good: we should protect that however we can.
Along these lines, we should help foster mechanics that will drive small-scale PVP alongside large-scale. Not everyone wants to be involved in epic-scale fleet engagements, and a lot of people's computers/internet cannot even handle the strain. I believe everyone should be able to look to their left, look to their right, and find opportunities for good PVP on either hand wherever they are -- in the future, much as it is today. Hisec PVP is an extremely important and oft-overlooked aspect of this, because only in hisec can an aspiring PVPer learn by getting engagements with a limited number of opponents without CONCORD involvement. If PVP is reduced in hisec, the barrier for entry into PVP is raised dramatically.
If you have any questions about what I think about something or whether I would support a certain proposition, I will do my best to answer all comers. I like you point of view.
Iam Widdershins wrote:My job as an internet spaceship politician:I'm not here to play at being a politician, garner internet fame or in-game notoriety, or do anything but work to improve the game as best I can. I don't pretend to be a great problem-solver, some kind of analytic powerhouse, or a great mediator of disputes. I am here to improve the core of the game, and I hope the rest of CSM7 can be productive adults as well.
I believe I am well-suited among the current candidates to contribute to future discussions, and my greatest honor would be to contribute in a meaningful way to the future of the game and its development.
I see who you mean by that...
|

Pinky Feldman
Gank Bangers Moar Tears
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:
My job as an internet spaceship politician:I'm not here to play at being a politician, garner internet fame or in-game notoriety, or do anything but work to improve the game as best I can. I don't pretend to be a great problem-solver, some kind of analytic powerhouse, or a great mediator of disputes. I am here to improve the core of the game, and I hope the rest of CSM7 can be productive adults as well.
I believe I am well-suited among the current candidates to contribute to future discussions, and my greatest honor would be to contribute in a meaningful way to the future of the game and its development. [/i]
This is why Widders will make a great member of the CSM. So many of the current CSM candidates seem to want to do it out of ego or political games, and while their platforms have been tailored around what people in game claim to want, after reading many of their posts, its clear that they don't understand game mechanics well enough to realize what this game needs.
You can vote for a CSM candidate who will promise you the EVE you think you want to play and things they can never deliver on because they're outside of the CSM's scope, or you can vote for someone who will give you a better and more playable EVE.
Remember, the key to being a good CSM is also their ability to suggest changes that can reasonably be implemented by CCP and won't break the system even further. I look at many of the highsec CSM candidates platforms and while their suggestions about highsec may be good for garnering votes its clear to me that if they were ever implemented, highsec carebear groups would be exploited even more than they are now. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
416
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 09:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:Hello- Seeing that you believe hisec pvp should be a launching pad for aspiring pvpers, I'd like to know how you envision hisec wardec mechanics should be fixed? And consequently, how hisec pvp should be enhanced for those who are just starting out.
Hey, good question thanks.
I apologize if this is a disorganized answer, as I just started coming down with the flu from the flu shot I got like 10 hours ago (ain't that nice). Here we go.
Right now one of the largest new challenges facing young hisec wardeckers is the legitimization of alliance hopping, particularly to Dec Shield. Once your target jumps to Dec Shield, so does the war. In addition, the war does not immediately shut down as it did before: you can actually pay to continue it as long as you like. While this is good on the surface, the problem remains that the corporation will leave the alliance again in around 24 hours. If you are not on top of the ball with canceling the war, you will be completely unable to be at war with them again at best case for 24 hours due to the mechanics of voting (cannot put up a war if you have 3 or more, even if they are ending; cannot put up a war against a corporation or alliance you are already at war with; cannot vote to declare war on a corporation that is currently in an alliance).
Another tactic that used to be illegal that (I believe) is now allowed is completely dissolving your corporation, then re-forming it under the same name with the same people, ending the war for at least 48 hours (24 for the vote, 24 for the war to go live). While this leaves control towers and other corp-anchored assets abandoned, that is not a major problem for most carebear corps.
If your targets do not jump to an alliance to end your war or completely reform their corp, then you are no worse off than you were in '07; however, this is not to say that those mechanics were good either.
Joining and leaving corporations is fluid and easy for both sides, though it favors the aggressor, who is prepared to engage by already having no roles, and perhaps not even starting out in the corporation that is at war. Joining and leaving corporations at any time is fully sanctioned by senior GM staff, as long as you go through a very basic and minimal process; currently, the bare minimum amount of time to be in the corporation is 15 seconds. While these tactics are fun for the aggressor and can provide surprise ganks against reticent targets, they seem reasonable more and more in ruling only, and the rules that allow this have only been fully clarified by the GMs in the last year or so.
Changes I would probably like to see:
There have been various suggestions for changes to mechanics that will force members of corporations to remain in their corporation, or at least not be allowed to leave, that seem to be heading in the right direction conceptually. I think a model where only the aggressors are allowed to leave their corporation and only those who were declared upon are allowed to recruit could be successful, as long as the corp that was declared upon is forbidden to hop to an alliance for the duration of the war through forced game mechanics. The corp that is set upon would be allowed to hire free-roaming mercs to fight for them, and the aggressors would not be able to grow in numbers; the biggest problem the set-upon would have is scammers and enemy AWOXers being recruited. (I do not think this should allow or disallow recruitment or expulsion of corporations from alliances that are at war, but I do think that there needs to be a better notification of acceptance to an alliance so that all parties know when it will happen. Lots of people die because they suddenly find themselves in alliance at war while they are travelling, just as the 24h timer finishes.)
However, this also holds its own problems. Whenever I come up with a change to game mechanics, I think to myself: How could I exploit this to ruin someone's day? That is my calling in EVE, and I have spent years practicing it.
For instance, with a rule like this, I could recruit mission runners to a corporation that is having war declared upon it; they would then be unable to leave, ever, and I could grief them straight out of the game for a few paltry million isk a week! There should therefore be a way for you to forcibly leave a corporation that on a long timer, say 4 or 6 days, notifying your corporation members and their war targets. Corporation recruitments on behalf of the aggressive corporation could perhaps also be similarly delayed, say 24 hours with (again) a notification to both groups that the timer is beginning when the recruitment is set in motion.
Always remember! Any condition in a game mechanic can be exploited in your favor. You can meet any guidelines; if you were allowed to leave a corporation immediately when you're getting teamkilled while at war, then corporations could immediately be dissolved by just blowing up their own members in shuttles. When someone offers a proposal, always think about the worst thing you could possibly do to someone with that change in place.
I also think that corporations should be able to declare war on other groups while they have less than three ACTIVE wars, not less than three wars in any state whatsoever. If you declare war on an alliance and it collapses two corps at a time for a whole week, you cannot declare war on any of those corporations because you've always got three items on the list. This is counterintuitive to the way alliance wars work, where wars that are already ending do not count towards the total cost of adding a new one.
In short:
Hard restrictions on the movement of corporations that are at war, long-timer restrictions on joining and leaving for the aggressors and the victims respectively, and lots of notifications for when when timers begin and corps join warring alliances. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
416
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:03:00 -
[27] - Quote
I just came up with this as I was going along. I have not really sat down to think about this in-depth before, but I have given it some thought on the side. I believe that, alongside some easier-to-use mechanics to securely ransom the corporation that's being aggressed, this could really make war-declarations in hisec something extremely useful and eliminate the corp-hopping issue almost entirely. Wars should really be an honest brawl between two competing corporations, and coming up with the mechanics to foster that environment is difficult. I don't know if this is the best way to do it, but it's a start.
I am very interested and very much anticipating what CCP is planning for fixing the war system; I hope it is something similar to this, or that they read that post and take it into consideration. There's a lot that could be improved, and there's a lot that could go horribly wrong if this isn't done right; if there is something to be exploited to use the mechanic to your advantage, EVE's players (including us in Project Nemesis) will be all over it in a flash.
That's the kind of insight I like to bring to a discussion. |

HellGate fr
Yarrbear Inc.
18
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 10:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
One thousand times yes |

Roime
UNFRL Fleet Operations CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
169
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 12:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
I don't know you, but you got a very good agenda up there.
Good luck!
|

Heimdallofasgard
Blazing Celts
63
|
Posted - 2012.02.09 12:05:00 -
[30] - Quote
HellGate fr wrote:One thousand times yes
You have my votes too! |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |