EVE Search - Re-Elect Prometheus Exenthal for CSM7

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Re-Elect Prometheus Exenthal for CSM7

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lady Spank Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 1551	Posted - 2012.02.12 17:40:00 - [31] - Quote I've read these proposals that Prom has put forwards to CCP and I have to say I'm stunned with the thorough level of detail that he puts into them, never mind the extensive testing; to hear him talk about the changes and goings on on Sisi you can tell he is putting the hours in. Making a dumbass remark about absence, when he has already addressed this concern honestly and openly is pretty pathetic and just highlights how cretinous you are. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
2ippy Nova Ardour 10	Posted - 2012.02.12 18:07:00 - [32] - Quote You will always have my support in your running for CSM. As you are out there all the time, experiencing what truly needs a nerf or a buff Your strongest point imo is the war on ECM, I can't force enough how much I support this 2ippy
Plutonian Intransigent 90	Posted - 2012.02.12 21:19:00 - [33] - Quote Prometheus Exenthal wrote: IGÇÖve got the momentum, influence & know-how to push CCP into devising changes to low-tier T1 Frigates & Cruisers, Electronic Attack Ships, and Command Ships; All of which are in need invigoration. To be perfectly honest, when you told me T1 frigs would be getting looked at I assumed you were simply trying to get me to leave your AF thread alone. I was very happy to hear CCP seeks to keep us competitive. Prometheus Exenthal wrote: The primary purpose would be to lower the skillpoint & wallet requirements for players to have success in combat. Statistically speaking, yes, I'd like to see t1 named weapons perform better, possibly with best-named being better than their T2 counterparts." I very much like hearing this. I've felt for a long time that rebalancing the T1 frigates and cruisers without looking at the Problem With Non-T2 Modules is a waste of effort. One has only to look at the Armor Plate modules to see how completely out of whack things are (i.e., why do we even have anything besides rolled-tungsten?). Prometheus Exenthal wrote: Not to get into too much detail, but I'd like to bring link ships out safe spots & POSes (all of them). Now I'm close to ******* cheering. If you cannot get them out of their little safe hidey-places, would you be willing to propose to CCP a simple 'Pilot was in Gang" yes/no on the killmail? If you're into the solo fighting scene, it really sucks not knowing if you fought well but lost to a boosted opponent, or fought badly. The effects of booster alts is considerable when two ships of the same type face off, and in a semi-crowded system it becomes impossible to tell if someone's boosted. Same question I asked Seleene: I d-scanned a Rifter in a belt in lowsec, and warped to that belt at range. I aligned for the planet, and after allowing time for the pilot to see where I was going, I warped there. The other Rifter followed and we fought. Given the circumstances, we both wanted to fight. One of us took a GCC and lost security status. Eventually that pilot will have to start shooting little red crosses or suffer the consequences of 'going pirate'. On this occasion, it was me. Perhaps tomorrow it will be him. Why are we punished for seeking combat? Is this working as intended or something you feel needs fixing?
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 879	Posted - 2012.02.12 21:56:00 - [34] - Quote Prom was indeed pretty much MIA for the first half of CSM 6. However, one day he crawled out of his grave and decided to join the rest of us all supercharged and we couldn't shut him up some days. I got a chance to meet Adrian at the last CSM summit. He's very laid back, spoke up in the meetings and articulated his points well. If you want a human spreadsheet on the CSM, Prom is about as close as you're gonna get. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter
Prometheus Exenthal Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 280	Posted - 2012.02.12 22:07:00 - [35] - Quote Plutonian wrote: Why are we punished for seeking combat? Is this working as intended or something you feel needs fixing? I wan't to say this is working as intended, but I get the feeling that isn't what you want to hear I don't think it's means of punishment as much as it could be a restriction to the crimewatch system. There are ways to get a fight in low-sec without getting GCC, but they aren't always convenient. Dropping cans and/or looting/salvaging wrecks gives aggro now, and that's still a fairly popular mechanic. I think FW is something CCP is trying to push onto the low-sec population for this very reason. If you're living in low-sec you'd probably be doing one of four things: - pirating (don't care about GCC) - hunting pirates (not affected by GCC) - pve (not related to GCC) - fw (not affected by GCC) If you're looking to shoot someone without going through those avenues, you still have the looting mechanic. Point is, the above list will be the big ideas, and will probably work alright. At the end of the day though, you can always goto NPC 00 On the other hand.. it could be neat to have mutual aggression mechanic, similar to trading but results in a private timer. HEY BRO, WANT TO FIGHT? ACCEPT AGGRO INVITE! CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7 www.promsrage.com
Plutonian Intransigent 91	Posted - 2012.02.12 22:31:00 - [36] - Quote Prometheus Exenthal wrote: I wan't to say this is working as intended, but I get the feeling that isn't what you want to hear Hell... I'm used to it. I've not joined a fleet in over 4 years. I refuse to have a second account. I'm a six-year old character who enjoys solo T1 frig PvP in lowsec. I believe this puts me into the smallest category of the lowest population in the game. Thanks.
Viribus Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx 29	Posted - 2012.02.13 00:22:00 - [37] - Quote It'll be nice to vote for someone who wants to buff underused ships into relevance rather than nerf popular ships into irrelevance.
Tsubutai The Tuskers 64	Posted - 2012.02.13 09:31:00 - [38] - Quote Good solo pvp'er focused on balance issues relating to small-scale pvp? Check Good videos? Check Not prone to making random outbursts in support of National Socialism? Check A+ candidate, will vote again.
Eraebus Black Rebel Rifter Club 0	Posted - 2012.02.13 18:16:00 - [39] - Quote PROM4CSM4LYFE
Andrea Griffin 113	Posted - 2012.02.13 19:16:00 - [40] - Quote Bump for a candidate with a deep understanding of Eve's mechanics at a mathematical level. It's not you guys who need to repair what has been broken, it's us. CCP Wrangler

The Mittani GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 4723	Posted - 2012.02.13 20:02:00 - [41] - Quote Prom is a 'troubled' candidate because he was awol for half his term in CSM6. However, for the half that he DID turn up for, he was completely engaged on a daily basis. He's a human EFT, in ways that are a little frightening. If you're an ~elite solo pvper~ or an EFT wizard, you could do worse than voting for Prom. I'd like to see him back on CSM7. I doubt he'll get a top-7 slot, but at least that way Punkturis and I can keep teasing him about his supercharger in Skype. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues
doombreed52 Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 19	Posted - 2012.02.13 20:27:00 - [42] - Quote The Mittani wrote: Prom is a 'troubled' candidate because he was awol for half his term in CSM6. However, for the half that he DID turn up for, he was completely engaged on a daily basis. He's a human EFT, in ways that are a little frightening. If you're an ~elite solo pvper~ or an EFT wizard, you could do worse than voting for Prom. I'd like to see him back on CSM7. I doubt he'll get a top-7 slot, but at least that way Punkturis and I can keep teasing him about his supercharger in Skype. look at it this way at least he isn't a giant trolling tard like d3
Johanne D'Arc Rhine and Courtesan 7	Posted - 2012.02.13 21:03:00 - [43] - Quote Look at it this way. He did wonders for Destroyers and AF's (not single handedly but was a key influence as far as I am concerned). If you would like to see continued balances made to other ship classes then you know what to do.
OldMan Gana The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance 25	Posted - 2012.02.13 21:44:00 - [44] - Quote The most concise and articulate post by any CSM candidate yet. Not only that, but read his qualifications/experience and his knowledge on the game. Bravo sir. Now here's a guy who should be first on the new CSM. " I spent most of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best-á
Lelob ElitistOps Pandemic Legion 19	Posted - 2012.02.14 19:32:00 - [45] - Quote To summarize you pushed for and got a nerf of the dram, ninja nerf of the sabre and most dictors with af's, made the enyo fotm when it was fine beforehand in the hands of someone who didn't suck (AF's in general were fine before imo), and kept drugs relatively ******, despite CCP's proposed changes on sisi making them actually look viable. Now you're planning on nerfing falcons and unprobable t3 links. I voted for you last time, and I respect you as a pvper, but there's no way I'm voting based on the above.
Prometheus Exenthal Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 323	Posted - 2012.02.14 20:31:00 - [46] - Quote Lelob wrote: To summarize you pushed for and got a nerf of the dram, ninja nerf of the sabre and most dictors with af's, made the enyo fotm when it was fine beforehand in the hands of someone who didn't suck (AF's in general were fine before imo), and kept drugs relatively ****, despite CCP's proposed changes on sisi making them actually look viable. Now you're planning on nerfing falcons and unprobable t3 links. I voted for you last time, and I respect you as a pvper, but there's no way I'm voting based on the above. The majority of the eve community pushed for a Dramiel nerf. The CSM was just there to nod it through. The ship did everything too well, and it didn't take a genius to see that. I'm sorry, but no, you can't have your 11km/s Dramiel back. You're bad if you can't kill AFs with a destroyer hull. Interdictors have their role, and that is to bubble first and act as anti-support second. If you're getting destroyed by AFs, change up your fit to handle support better. Destroyers on the other hand have their first priority of being anti-support. They need to be balanced against frigates, but still be threatening to AFs when piloted by low-sp players. Fun Fact: They are. AFs were bad before, are decent now, and the Enyo is the worst excuse for a fotm. AFs had no life expectancy outside of empire, and that has been remedied. They haven't killed EVE, and I've yet to come across some undeniably ridiculous setup that doesn't involved a billion or so in links & implants. The Enyo as FOTM is just a poor excuse from a bad pilot. Of all the AFs, the Enyo is arguably the easiest to kill. Weak tank, weak capacitor, low speed, and low effective range. If you're dying because you're trying to brawl him down with another frig or destroyer hull, just unsub now. IIRC The entire CSM was against the drug changes. They were not only weaker than the current implementations (ie: strong being slightly better than standard), but also pushed them into the realm of mandatory items for successful pvp. The best solution for drugs was, and still remains, to remove the legality issues and/or increase production volumes. ECM is a broken mechanic, and it has been broken for years. Links are on a similar path. Being such critical fleet components, link ships shouldn't be hidden away and comparatively invulnerable. The majority of people who don't agree spend their time relying on said mechanics. They need to be brought closer to the combat. This would likely require tweaking the T3 subsystem. With that said, if you're not one to listen to logic & reason that works in favor of EVE, I don't want your vote. CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7** www.promsrage.com
Ntrails Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation 38	Posted - 2012.02.14 20:45:00 - [47] - Quote If it wasn't for block voting, and the fact that I would be too lazy to vote at all without it, I would definitely consider voting for this guy
Calyse Right Click Industries 0	Posted - 2012.02.15 08:06:00 - [48] - Quote Love the new balancing, like your ideas. PROM4CSM
Grumpy Owly Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 168	Posted - 2012.02.15 20:34:00 - [49] - Quote Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting "All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems."
Prometheus Exenthal Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 332	Posted - 2012.02.15 20:53:00 - [50] - Quote I want the Bounty Hunting system to actually work. I like the fact that there are advertised bounties on people, but I would also like to see something like covert bounties. Putting a hit on someone shouldn't necessarily be advertised around the world, and having contracts from anonymous sources would be pretty cool (imo). And when the time comes, it would be nice to be able to.. uh.. "claim your bounties" while walking in station. With that said, CCP has already stated that they are designing a new crimewatch system, so I'm expecting bounties to be part of that overhaul. CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7 www.promsrage.com

Grumpy Owly Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 168	Posted - 2012.02.15 20:58:00 - [51] - Quote Prometheus Exenthal wrote: I want the Bounty Hunting system to actually work. I like the fact that there are advertised bounties on people, but I would also like to see something like covert bounties. Putting a hit on someone shouldn't necessarily be advertised around the world, and having contracts from anonymous sources would be pretty cool (imo). And when the time comes, it would be nice to be able to.. uh.. "claim your bounties" while walking in station. With that said, CCP has already stated that they are designing a new crimewatch system, so I'm expecting bounties to be part of that overhaul. Thank you, will quote in general thread. "All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems."
penguin man Spricer Raiden. 0	Posted - 2012.02.17 22:55:00 - [52] - Quote +1 Good luck
doombreed52 Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore 26	Posted - 2012.02.18 16:52:00 - [53] - Quote How do you feel about some of the more useless crusiers the eagle,imo rhe muinn.and what about tech2 insurance do you feel that is fair?
T0RT0ISE KRAFTSTOFF GmbH KRAFTSTOFF 0	Posted - 2012.02.18 18:35:00 - [54] - Quote This guy is our best hope for positive fixes to ships and other game mechanics, which affect everyone. I hope you get in this time round.
Prometheus Exenthal Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED 359	Posted - 2012.02.18 19:08:00 - [55] - Quote doombreed52 wrote: How do you feel about some of the more useless crusiers the eagle,imo rhe muinn.and what about tech2 insurance do you feel that is fair? There are a number of fairly useless ships, and the two you mention are some of them. The Eagle needs a bit more kick, and adding 25m3 of drones is the best way of doing it. Adding more grid would actually make it way way better for kiting than anything else (lol optimal bonus + null), so I'm against that idea. The drones would bump up its damage by 100 (hob2s) and offer some utility and defense against frigates. The Muninn is on the same boat. As a sniper, it's a bit outclassed by the Tornado. My solution for this thing is for it to lose one of its utility high slots and to gain a low. Voila you've now got a better armor tanker or damage dealer (near & far), and retain a utility high for whatever. I think T2 insurance is okay. A little bit better would be nice, but at the moment the payout actually reflects the cost of the ship at the time it is insured. It's not perfect, but it's better than what we had and it's a step in the right direction. CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7 www.promsrage.com
GeeShizzle MacCloud 59	Posted - 2012.02.22 12:17:00 - [56] - Quote +1 prom btw just wanted to ask what u thought about invulerabilities in certain ship classes, and about infinite value attributes on weapons and items. do you consider them game breaking and if so, why?
Rhadit x13 Raiden. 5	Posted - 2012.02.23 14:11:00 - [57] - Quote +1 vote for Prom. Seeing his LONG posts. He got to know Something . . . Also. His PvP vids are Super
Prometheus Exenthal mnemonic. 373	Posted - 2012.02.23 15:03:00 - [58] - Quote GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote: +1 prom btw just wanted to ask what u thought about invulerabilities in certain ship classes, and about infinite value attributes on weapons and items. do you consider them game breaking and if so, why? It's my personal opinion that no ships in the game should be indefinitely invulnerable to any mechanics. What may have made sense as a design decision years ago, no longer works with the thousands of players playing at once, often in the same types of ships. I don't have a solution or a very clear idea of what the results of such a change would be, so you may be best suited bouncing the thought off of the capital-flying community CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7 www.promsrage.com
SMT008 Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation 374	Posted - 2012.02.23 15:48:00 - [59] - Quote [quote=LelobNow you're planning on nerfing falcons and unprobable t3 links. I voted for you last time, and I respect you as a pvper, but there's no way I'm voting based on the above.[/quote] ITT Butthurt PL Falcon pilots Prometheus, keep up the good work. I'm pretty sure you're the man when it comes to balancing ships and modules, sov warfare will be dealt with by others, just keep coming up with that kind of features (AF Buff, Hybrid Rebalancing and such). I'll just leave this here : Split Blackops in 2 categories (Combat Blackops, Support Blackops) ? 200km on-grid warps ? Or maybe 250km ? Buff sniping, for once ? And please, the most important of them all (for me, at least, and probably quite a lot of peoples), the removal of the tier system ?
Prometheus Exenthal mnemonic. 373	Posted - 2012.02.23 16:24:00 - [60] - Quote SMT008 wrote: I'll just leave this here : Split Blackops in 2 categories (Combat Blackops, Support Blackops) ? 200km on-grid warps ? Or maybe 250km ? Buff sniping, for once ? And please, the most important of them all (for me, at least, and probably quite a lot of peoples), the removal of the tier system ? - The BlOps should be balanced a bit before one can even considering adding more - I've wanted longer grid warps for a LONG time, and would totally back that. - I'd like to give the ** tiers a chance with some fixed fitting and other changes, before I back tiericide CSM Candidate & PVP Samurai RE-ELECT PROM4CSM7** www.promsrage.com



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.