Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Elixir Revabot
Serpent Innovations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 14:59:00 -
[241] - Quote
I wonder how many of these people that are attacking Riverini's weight, are actually fat also.... |
KFenn
Percussive Diplomacy
156
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 17:00:00 -
[242] - Quote
Someone who actively encouraged botting to make CCP take notice of it? And is paranoid to the point of lashing out at public figures simply to massage his own ego? No thanks. Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade SLAPD Director |
Polghara
RGSU Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 17:56:00 -
[243] - Quote
So i hope for changes in mining system.And ban all bots permanently. Reverini i trust u! |
Snot Shot
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.14 18:28:00 -
[244] - Quote
This guy is probably one of the most dedicated people to ever play the game. His knowledge of game mechanics and issues related to 0.0 and Empire are unsurpassed.
My vote goes to Riverini because he has all of our best interests in mind and not just trying to ruin the game like the Mitani has been doingGǪ.. . http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=50753
Yeah, I'm a killin machine! |
Vladimir Vladimirovitch Putain
Remanaquie Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 02:51:00 -
[245] - Quote
Anyone who manages to become the target of so many attacks and inspiration for such vintage whine is worth voting for. |
SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
366
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 02:57:00 -
[246] - Quote
Snot Shot wrote:His knowledge of game mechanics and issues related to 0.0 and Empire are unsurpassed.
Ahah.
This is all the arguments I needed to muster against this ridiculous claim in order to obliterate it.
|
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
248
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 02:59:00 -
[247] - Quote
If there's one thing Snot Shot and Riverini have in common it's unbiased reporting. |
SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
366
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 03:01:00 -
[248] - Quote
Also, Malcanis has my vote in terms of INIT. potential CSMs.
Just kidding, I'll probably vote for Mittens. The sheer amount of butthurt, tears and more generally whiny claims brings me to this conclusion.
I like Chaos. I like Dynamite too. And gunpowder.
|
Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
79
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 03:17:00 -
[249] - Quote
Is CCP going to be providing you with two plane tickets? |
Capt Bri
Lets Get Rocked Important Internet Spaceship League
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 05:04:00 -
[250] - Quote
Riverini, first thanks for all you have done. I check evenews24 at least once a day for my eve news fix. I like your ideas for improving the game. You have my likes. It is clear you have given this a lot of thought. I am sure you have the knowledge needed to get your point across to the masses as well as CCP. I am wondering though if you want what is best for the game could you use evenews24 to help get the ideas of other CSM candadates out here for us all? If they all had a voice we would be able to choose the one we think has the best ideas and the ability to make our voices heard at CCP. You have due to your dedication and hard work put yourself in a position to make this happen. I'm sure you could think of a way to make this work out if you wanted too and were able. Thanks for your time.
|
|
Ender Sai
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
32
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 08:42:00 -
[251] - Quote
Posting to state obvious: Riverini is a tool.
Also, forum needs dislike button.
Or maybe "do not want" button. Preferably with an emoticon too. |
Baki Yuku
Nordgoetter Viking Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 10:40:00 -
[252] - Quote
Ender Sai wrote:Posting to state obvious: Riverini is a tool.
Also, forum needs dislike button.
Or maybe "do not want" button. Preferably with an emoticon too.
I second that morons like him on the CSM not thanks and if the only item on his "agenda" is botting that's not enough at least in my book. |
Uppsy Daisy
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
75
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 13:34:00 -
[253] - Quote
riverini wrote:WAR ON BOTS
I have been one of the staunchest opponents to the ever growing botting and RMT situation. To me botting is the single most dangerous threat to EVE Online as a game. I know this, CCP knows this, and you know this. Why isnGÇÖt more being done to cope with this issue? ThatGÇÖs one of the issues what I intend to investigate and to propose solutions for.
Prior to the Crucible release, I prepared what could have been the biggest bombshell to EVE Online: an almost risk free botting guide. Due to the fact that I listened to my readers and collaboratorGÇÖs advice and the great job CCP Games did with the Crucible expansion, I chose not to release it. In the process of working on this six article expos+¬ I learned vast ways on how the botting trade goes untouched. GÇÿKnow-howGÇÖ I intend to use as in-game expertise to get this issue addressed.
Make no mistake, with the issue of botting there are no silver bullets, only best practices to diminish how widespread this issue is.
riverini wrote:Those guides were never made public. Even I have limits on what I can and can't do for Eve News24. Make no mistake, post-Crucible; I have so much love for Eve Online I don't regret not making that hard work public.
What a total load of rubbish!! Part one of these guides WAS made public.
Part one was online for a least a couple of weeks before you pulled it down (presumably due to external pressure).
And now you expect the player to vote for you, after blatantly lying to them!?
I will not publish a link to it here, but suffice to say it is trivial to find a mirror copy of it given 5 minutes, half a brain, and google. |
Farashuu Perkunos
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 14:31:00 -
[254] - Quote
All the complaining Goons just want to safe their Mittens' CEO-seat.
"Riverini, forgive them, because they don't know what they're doing."
You have my vote R. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 20:35:00 -
[255] - Quote
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
Paxton Brimstone
Multiplex Gaming SpaceMonkey's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 23:29:00 -
[256] - Quote
You dont have to be a goon to know Mittens understands what EvE needs to make it fun again where as Riverini just knows how to blow hot air and impress the uninformed. -1 for Riverini and long live freedom , chaos and pew. |
EveNews247
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 00:52:00 -
[257] - Quote
Riverini as CSM? VOTE NO www.evenews247.com EveNews247 / EVENEWS247 @evenews247 DOWNVOTE RIVERINI www.EveNews247.com CSM? SAY NO! |
Staar Antollare
The Graduates RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 00:57:00 -
[258] - Quote
An idea for Null Sec:
Allow Sov Holding Alliances to lease "Systems" to renter alliances. This would introduce revenue generation at the alliance level and new meta-game options for players.
Thanks. |
Zagam
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
504
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:15:00 -
[259] - Quote
This candidacy shows more advertising of a biased "news" website, than anything else.
|
Smejka
korpa pYco The Garden of Eden Creation KIt
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 14:04:00 -
[260] - Quote
+1 from me |
|
Endeavour Starfleet
641
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 01:43:00 -
[261] - Quote
I am curious about your candidacy however before I can support you (Or anyone) I need to know some things.
#1 What is your thoughts about incursions? Will you be pro grouping in hisec and only suggest changes that can benefit the fun experience (More sites, Better pay for the large Assault and HQ groups) Or join the rather clueless brigade that wants them nerfed because it competes with the BS known as nullsec CTAs? Considering the hostility shown by several CSM candidates I consider this my #1 issue
#2 What will you say about AFK cloaking and other aspects that benefit only the big alliances wanting to drive out the small? Will you support the removal of moon mining with focus sifting on members ratting for said materials? How would you balance hotdropping?
#3 Do you support the modular POS and corp system and other efforts to lower the risk of spiez giving smaller corps a chance to flourish and give better roles? What can be done to help smaller corps?
#4 Do you support the idea that CCP should tell major changes (Drake nerf for one) to the players directly first rather than waiting to spring it on the CSM that is usually from one type of play in the game? |
riverini
Reliables Inc Initiative Mercenaries
418
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 01:52:00 -
[262] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:I am curious about your candidacy however before I can support you (Or anyone) I need to know some things.
#1 What is your thoughts about incursions? Will you be pro grouping in hisec and only suggest changes that can benefit the fun experience (More sites, Better pay for the large Assault and HQ groups) Or join the rather clueless brigade that wants them nerfed because it competes with the BS known as nullsec CTAs? Considering the hostility shown by several CSM candidates I consider this my #1 issue
I fully support the current state of high-sec incursions and would be willing to discuss expanding it into a wider audience. I invite you to read my view on Incursions here http://www.evenews24.com/2012/02/14/rvrnicsm7-the-carebear-nation-rats-incursions-and-miners/
The rest of your answers will be answered in less than 24 hours. I promise :)
Feel free to write me in-game or via [email protected] if you want to discuss specific views. Am open to feedback and opinions.
R RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24 |
Endeavour Starfleet
641
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 02:28:00 -
[263] - Quote
Quote:The easy, immersion-based, solution would be for the sec status of a system to drop. However, that is a huge can of worms on many levels. I would push for CCP to come up with a solution, and happily brainstorm with them on this if asked.
Please consider removing this from your platform. You KNOW this will just lead to gankfests and people leaving incursions in droves.
RP needs to happen from CCP appointing a volunteer board to puppet more live incursions. (You can pick time and to an extent story but not know where until you start) Not from game breaking sec status drops.
|
riverini
Reliables Inc Initiative Mercenaries
422
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 12:24:00 -
[264] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Quote:The easy, immersion-based, solution would be for the sec status of a system to drop. However, that is a huge can of worms on many levels. I would push for CCP to come up with a solution, and happily brainstorm with them on this if asked. Please consider removing this from your platform. You KNOW this will just lead to gankfests and people leaving incursions in droves. RP needs to happen from CCP appointing a volunteer board to puppet more live incursions. (You can pick time and to an extent story but not know where until you start) Not from game breaking sec status drops.
My view on security drops:
riverini wrote:Incursions should be buffed up in the way there is more freedom within the site. When I ran an Incursion with Darius, the incursion runners started sending saboteurs, I totally loved that. Shouldn't had they been popped by Concord, it would have created ruckus for our fleet. (and still they did got us in trouble). A buff up isn't always in the form of increased payouts, but in this case increased freedom of action for both sides.
As you can see am not calling for it to be gank-central, I want to allow incursion FCs to asses the situation and be allowed to engage should they wish to. I feel ECM and Ewar should be treated as flagging as criminal the perpetrator within the Incursion sites. An FC should consider whether to attack the perpetrators or just ignore them. RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24 |
Paxton Brimstone
Multiplex Gaming SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 02:49:00 -
[265] - Quote
Quote:This guy is probably one of the most dedicated people to ever play the game. His knowledge of game mechanics and issues related to 0.0 and Empire are unsurpassed.
My vote goes to Riverini because he has all of our best interests in mind and not just trying to ruin the game like the Mitani has been doingGǪ.. .
Love it !!!!! it's like an endorsement from a convicted pedophile for the next pope or your children s daycare lol.... another epic reason to not elect Riverini to CSM. It's so comical your media machine pumps out so much of its content about nul sec (fictional mostly) and yet you continually court the empire pubbie vote to rally its conestoga wagons to circle and elect you.
Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive! |
Endeavour Starfleet
646
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 04:50:00 -
[266] - Quote
Now what do you mean "Ran with Darius" ? That is a huge red flag for me right there as in my opinion him and traitor Ammzi do anything BUT represent the best interests of the community.
I really hope this does not mean you were part of the incursion interdiction fleets. |
riverini
Reliables Inc Initiative Mercenaries
430
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 05:48:00 -
[267] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Now what do you mean "Ran with Darius" ? That is a huge red flag for me right there as in my opinion him and traitor Ammzi do anything BUT represent the best interests of the community.
I really hope this does not mean you were part of the incursion interdiction fleets.
I ran one of the Head Quarters since as I was invited to it after covering the HQ fleets in eve news24. I joined the fleet, the incursion runners started attacking us and jammed one of my oneiros and lost it. The second one (on riverini) stayed until the bitter end.
The whole experience was pretty good, the incursion runners were good sports at sabotaging the competition of the HQ and GFs were shouted in local.
I love how in your view running incursions HQ as CCP intended is a huge red flag. Shame on you. Troll.
RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24 |
Endeavour Starfleet
646
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 06:05:00 -
[268] - Quote
If you were covering it you would know that the intention was to harm incursion runners NOT to run them as intended. Care to explain why the group you were running with were running fake logi fleets that got billions upon billions of isk worth of ships destroyed? How was that running HQs as intended?
Considering you are getting ALOT of flak on this topic considering your reporting style and neutrality I would seriously suggest not lowering yourself to the level of a child calling a serious question trolling. If you looked for five seconds you would see that I am pressing a number of potential candidates on the issue. If my intention was to troll I would be doing nothing but empty quoting BUTTS now would I not?
IF you intend to ask for my and other's vote you are going to have to learn to accept that we are going to call red flags when we see them. This is politics and your past WILL come to haunt you if you are not prepared to defend yourself in a serious manner.
Now do you want to try that again? |
Widemouth Deepthroat
Pink Sockers
25
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 09:03:00 -
[269] - Quote
I usually vote for the cripple goon out of pity but seeing as he isn't in the running this year I guess I'll vote for your fat ass. Good luck! |
riverini
Reliables Inc Initiative Mercenaries
431
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 01:10:00 -
[270] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:If you were covering it you would know that the intention was to harm incursion runners NOT to run them as intended. Care to explain why the group you were running with were running fake logi fleets that got billions upon billions of isk worth of ships destroyed? How was that running HQs as intended?
Uhh you mad . I wasn't involved on those. Nice try. Tool.
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Considering you are getting ALOT of flak on this topic considering your reporting style and neutrality I would seriously suggest not lowering yourself to the level of a child calling a serious question trolling. If you looked for five seconds you would see that I am pressing a number of potential candidates on the issue. If my intention was to troll I would be doing nothing but empty quoting BUTTS now would I not?
Lot of flak? I sit at both Incursion channels and talk to the guys on it on a daily basis, they seem to have no problem with it.
You need to keep taking your pills more often...
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: IF you intend to ask for my and other's vote you are going to have to learn to accept that we are going to call red flags when we see them. This is politics and your past WILL come to haunt you if you are not prepared to defend yourself in a serious manner.
Now do you want to try that again?
0/10
I don't want your vote, you are the kind of dip-**** who thinks the world owes him something. Take your pubbie tears elsewhere, shame Ankh is not running, u are definitively her kind of material. RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |