| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
K162
110
   |
Posted - 2011.09.10 20:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
AnzacPaul wrote:Darius III wrote:
We recently had meeting with Zulu. Unfortunately I can't discuss for NDA reasons, virtually anything that was said. I am free to say that I think good things are happening.D3
I hope you are correct. If everything that was claimed to be in the winter expansion is in it, I may reconsider subbing, once the patch hits. However, I hope that after this meeting is done with, and the minutes are released/devblogs are released post-haste, that we will get more than "CCP acknowledges that its capsuleers love the FiS aspect of Eve, and we are commited to continuing the development of it in the future" However I highly doubt we will receive anything more than a "Soon Gäó" statement." Good luck CSM, though I find it hard to see how you can convince CCP of something that people that work for their company will claim to know much more about.
Uh, you guys aren't getting minutes of this one. In general, minutes are only from summits, and this was a conference call. Any changes that may result from this sort of meeting would be revealed in a DevBlog or CSM spotlight or something.
CSM 6 Alternate Delegate
@two_step_eve on Twitter
My Blog
What does CSM 6 do? |
AnzacPaul
Perkone
Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.09.11 05:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
Two step wrote:AnzacPaul wrote:n the winter expansion is in it, I may reconsider subbing, once the patch hits.
minutes are released/devblogs are released post-haste
Uh, you guys aren't getting minutes of this one. In general, minutes are only from summits, and this was a conference call. Any changes that may result from this sort of meeting would be revealed in a DevBlog or CSM spotlight or something.
Bolded, and underlined just in case you failed to see. |
Goose Sokarad
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 05:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Did ccp scrap the idear of treaties because they thought would lead to more non aggression pacts or is it still on the table? |
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
187
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 06:38:00 -
[34] - Quote
Goose Sokarad wrote:Did ccp scrap the idear of treaties because they thought would lead to more non aggression pacts or is it still on the table?
They didn't as far as I was last told. It didn't get in due to a combination of incomplete design and lack of resources/time to implement/design it
Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
67
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 18:30:00 -
[35] - Quote
Goose Sokarad wrote:Did ccp scrap the idear of treaties because they thought would lead to more non aggression pacts or is it still on the table?
The feature was design complete at the time and ready to go forward into programming however it was shelved due to the resources (people / time) being needed on P.I.
CCP needs a Reality Check.
Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
222
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 19:00:00 -
[36] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Goose Sokarad wrote:Did ccp scrap the idear of treaties because they thought would lead to more non aggression pacts or is it still on the table? The feature was design complete at the time and ready to go forward into programming however it was shelved due to the resources (people / time) being needed on P.I. CCP needs a Reality Check.
But did they throw away the code or what? Is there a significant obstacle to it's introduction now that they've done the majority of the work on it? It seems shockingly wasteful to simply ditch a nearly-complete feature. At a time when I presume they're desperately trying to include as much FiS content as possible in the Winter expansion, reviving Treaties would seem like an easy win. Especially now that the player base has shown our willingness to accept phased expansions.
Are there any other missing features you know of that have similar histories? Reviving a few like this could be an extremely cost effective way for CCP to get some goodwill and really improve the game.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Deumos
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 19:14:00 -
[37] - Quote
Whats happening with removing local as a intel tool in 0.0?
Have ccp shown you anything with regard to improving directional scanning that you are happy with? |
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial
Rooks and Kings
236
|
Posted - 2011.10.04 19:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Deumos wrote:Whats happening with removing local as a intel tool in 0.0?
Have ccp shown you anything with regard to improving directional scanning that you are happy with?
No such change has been announced yet, we're going to have talks with CCP about it when it's on the radar (or we're having them if they're already on the radar, but I wouldn't be able to say if that was the case).
Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
BricK sQuAD.
226
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 11:12:00 -
[39] - Quote
Look at all the serious answers in this thread.......
If Women aren't supposed to do the cooking, why are their bodies full of milk and eggs? |
Signal11th
118
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 11:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
Darius III wrote:Look at all the serious answers in this thread.......
Blimey, this thread is actually a real one, Humm no trolling, no mickey taking, no Bad idea is bad replies I'm not feeling well .......Somebody call me an ambulan.......................
God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!"-á I came second and won a toaster. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |