| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 21:28:00 -
[1]
I realy dont undistand americans.
How can you justify owning a Barrett 50. cal sniper rifle? The damn thing will penetrate steel reinforced concrete walls like butter from 1km away let alone a deers head...
Is it just me that finds it disterbing that in America you can be better equiped for a war than the military?
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 21:38:00 -
[2]
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1 I realy dont undistand americans.
How can you justify owning a Barrett 50. cal sniper rifle? The damn thing will penetrate steel reinforced concrete walls like butter from 1km away let alone a deers head...
Is it just me that finds it disterbing that in America you can be better equiped for a war than the military?
Because its awesome ...The military is much better equipped btw,they use this weapon alot more then we do.
Oh and it also makes sense,I mean they gave the people the right to bear arms for 2 reasons,1 since so many people had rifles from the war for independence they decided not to deal with it and 2,they wanted the general public to be able to overthrow the government once it gets bad and starts taking away freedoms.
So this gives the public the right to a weapon that can penetrate the armour of T34 tank?
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 21:45:00 -
[3]
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1 I realy dont undistand americans.
How can you justify owning a Barrett 50. cal sniper rifle? The damn thing will penetrate steel reinforced concrete walls like butter from 1km away let alone a deers head...
Is it just me that finds it disterbing that in America you can be better equiped for a war than the military?
Because its awesome ...The military is much better equipped btw,they use this weapon alot more then we do.
Oh and it also makes sense,I mean they gave the people the right to bear arms for 2 reasons,1 since so many people had rifles from the war for independence they decided not to deal with it and 2,they wanted the general public to be able to overthrow the government once it gets bad and starts taking away freedoms.
So this gives the public the right to a weapon that can penetrate the armour of T34 tank?
Yes
Im sorry but... That is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard.
Why shoud terrorist even bother with bombs and crashing planes. All they need to do is buy a M14, visit the mall and pick targets...
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 21:52:00 -
[4]
Originally by: goodby4u
The said terrorist would need to register for the weapon and have alot of background checks,and if its in one of those states that you dont need to register he will kill one guy,because the rest of them will fill his ass full of lead.
Cosidering a teenager with a history of mental health problems managed to get 3 hand guns and a shotgun I dont have much faith in your system.
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 21:55:00 -
[5]
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: goodby4u
The said terrorist would need to register for the weapon and have alot of background checks,and if its in one of those states that you dont need to register he will kill one guy,because the rest of them will fill his ass full of lead.
Cosidering a teenager with a history of mental health problems managed to get 3 hand guns and a shotgun I dont have much faith in your system.
He got them either from his parents or it was a state with no registration laws,the reason he killed so many is because guns are not allowed on campus for the kids that follow the laws.
so... your answer is to give even more kids guns?
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 22:05:00 -
[6]
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: goodby4u
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: goodby4u
The said terrorist would need to register for the weapon and have alot of background checks,and if its in one of those states that you dont need to register he will kill one guy,because the rest of them will fill his ass full of lead.
Cosidering a teenager with a history of mental health problems managed to get 3 hand guns and a shotgun I dont have much faith in your system.
He got them either from his parents or it was a state with no registration laws,the reason he killed so many is because guns are not allowed on campus for the kids that follow the laws.
so... your answer is to give even more kids guns?
No,my answer is give the registered teachers guns,though im not talking about m16s I mean a unloaded revolver in the desk which is locked away.
That or security guards because if a kid wants to shootup a school he will with or without gun laws.
We have some of the most strict gun laws in the world and as a result we have had less shootings at out shools in the past 10 years than you have in the past week.
Rather than letting this crap continue wouldn't it be a better idea to ban teenages, people with mental health problems and anyone convicted of a crime from ANY weapons and limiting the actual weapons for sale? Thus stopping these problems and making sure that the police are never forced to take down someone with a hell of alot more firepower than them.
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 22:23:00 -
[7]
Originally by: goodby4u These laws are in place,the problem is the kid with his mental problems can still steal the weapon from his parents...Or at the most ask tony at the docks that he wants an ak47...If I wanted to I bet I could get an ak47 within 2-3 days on the black market with 2-3 clips of ammo at a reasonable price 100% illegally,thus stopping the people that buy their weapons legally doesnt solve the problem of the people that will just buy their weapons illegally but it actually makes it worse.
Like I said america isnt britain.
no you cant.
If it was that easy to get AK's wouldnt you think we would have a huge problem in the UK since our police do not carry firearms?
Just look at the IRA. The only had weapons because america supplied them. When that stopped low and behold good friday happened and now we have peace. I find it hard to belive that you could do better than the IRA at securing arms.
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 22:32:00 -
[8]
Originally by: goodby4u Edited by: goodby4u on 17/02/2008 22:24:43
Originally by: baltec1
Originally by: goodby4u These laws are in place,the problem is the kid with his mental problems can still steal the weapon from his parents...Or at the most ask tony at the docks that he wants an ak47...If I wanted to I bet I could get an ak47 within 2-3 days on the black market with 2-3 clips of ammo at a reasonable price 100% illegally,thus stopping the people that buy their weapons legally doesnt solve the problem of the people that will just buy their weapons illegally but it actually makes it worse.
Like I said america isnt britain.
no you cant.
If it was that easy to get AK's wouldnt you think we would have a huge problem in the UK since our police do not carry firearms?
Just look at the IRA. The only had weapons because america supplied them. When that stopped low and behold good friday happened and now we have peace. I find it hard to belive that you could do better than the IRA at securing arms.
Lol look who is ignorant now.
I can because I saw people do it before.....Its just a matter of asking the right people.
badboys doesnt count
seriously though if you realy did see that and are not just making it up for the internets then report it! Smuggled guns are used for only one thing.
|

baltec1
|
Posted - 2008.02.17 22:40:00 -
[9]
nah its copyrighted 
....
pub?
|
| |
|