EVE Search - BOB regaining ground?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

BOB regaining ground?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ishamel 1 Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:16:00 - [91] Originally by: Sebea Originally by: Ishamel 1 Edited by: Ishamel 1 on 28/02/2008 00:07:41 Originally by: Sebea This stems from an a statement i made telling you that the fact it was stolen was NOT the reason it was returned, and that even if you find it morally wrong, its within the realm of game mechanics to steal in EVE. You see this where you are going wrong, he wasn't replying to you at all, he was clearly replying to the guy above him who said it wasn't stolen, it was given back. Unless that guy is your alt in which case u r an idiot. i couldnt let you defend me, i had to make myself wrong to liberate you from your shackles of defense. i read the thread, read what he said in that post, and wanted to point out the obvious fact that it wasnt returned because it was stolen, but because a game mechanic was violated. If he'd have just clarified that point in his statement none of this would be here. and no, i know its rare, but i've no "forum alts" to post with. tbh, thats chicken s**t I am sorry but no-one could misinterpret what he said unless they wanted too, maybe if he hadn't quoted but really, u r just trolling. Even if taken out of context, whether he was saying it was returned because it was stolen is open to interpretation.
marakor Gallente Anti Lag Forum Smackers	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:17:00 - [92] Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 00:18:31 Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 00:17:28 Originally by: Sebea Originally by: Ishamel 1 Originally by: Sebea This stems from an a statement i made telling you that the fact it was stolen was NOT the reason it was returned, and that even if you find it morally wrong, its within the realm of game mechanics to steal in EVE. You see this where you are going wrong, he wasn't replying to you at all, he was clearly replying to the guy above him who said it wasn't stolen, it was given back. Unless that guy is your alt in which case u r an idiot. If he'd have just clarified that point in his statement none of this would be here. Why should i need to clarify anything when the posted conversation was right there to be read ffs. If you had of read the entire thread as you claim you would have seen the context of what was being said and not needed to make your stupid and totaly off topic trolly post. HEY LISTEN for ruler of eve.
Nebuchadnezzar I Art of War	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:17:00 - [93] Seba, you are misreading it, stop rambling already. The GM would not have to give the titan back if it was not taken. IE if it was not taken, the one who lost the titan would still have it. See? He's not talking about whether you can or cannot steal in EvE, without a GM handing it back and whipping you HARD. Oh and what ish said. In conclusion. Kill some gewns.
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:18:00 - [94] Edited by: Sebea on 28/02/2008 00:18:51 Originally by: marakor words so lets get the facts straight then shall we. I read all that. 1.)The honest truth is RA did in fact steal that titan. It was fully in their possession. 2.)The Titan was in fact returned to the original owner. 3.)The reason it was returned had NOTHING to do with the theft itself, but the manner in which it was stolen, as it violated a game mechanic. The problem i had is marakor was making it sound like the theft itself was the reason it was returned, which is untrue. CCP will do nothing to return stolen items in this game unless it violates a game mechanic when the item in question is stolen. He then proceeded to take the moral high ground saying theft is bad and all that, to which i actually agree with him (shocked, dont be). However, i am a man who also believes my morals are my business, and should not ever be interjected into an argument as any type of point for authority.
Ishamel 1 Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:22:00 - [95] Originally by: Sebea Edited by: Sebea on 28/02/2008 00:18:51 Originally by: marakor words so lets get the facts straight then shall we. I read all that. 1.)The honest truth is RA did in fact steal that titan. It was fully in their possession. 2.)The Titan was in fact returned to the original owner. 3.)The reason it was returned had NOTHING to do with the theft itself, but the manner in which it was stolen, as it violated a game mechanic. The problem i had is marakor was making it sound like the theft itself was the reason it was returned, which is untrue. CCP will do nothing to return stolen items in this game unless it violates a game mechanic when the item in question is stolen. He then proceeded to take the moral high ground saying theft is bad and all that, to which i actually agree with him (shocked, dont be). However, i am a man who also believes my morals are my business, and should not ever be interjected into an argument as any type of point for authority. Still its 2 pages of forum s**t people have to read which is quite funny
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:25:00 - [96] forum s**t is the best kind, the smell can't make it through the monitor
marakor Gallente Anti Lag Forum Smackers	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:26:00 - [97] Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 00:27:09 Originally by: Sebea Originally by: marakor Why should i need to clarify anything when the posted conversation was right there to be read ffs. If you had of read the entire thread as you claim you would have seen the context of what was being said and not needed to make your stupid and totaly off topic trolly post. so lets get the facts straight then shall we. I read all that. 1.)The honest truth is RA did in fact steal that titan. It was fully in their possession. and im an idiot 2.)The Titan was in fact returned to the original owner. and im a moron 3.)The reason it was returned had NOTHING to do with the theft itself, but the manner in which it was stolen, as it violated a game mechanic a fact that if you read his posts marakor never actualy refers too at all and sticks to the hipocracy of RAGOON like in his original post. and im still an idiot The problem i had is marakor was actualy pointing out that all the posts RAGOON made about how BOB treated their pets was total hipocracy because of these facts about the titan theft. and im still stupid. He then proceeded to take no moral high ground what so ever saying nothing about theft being bad and tried to stick to his original facts but i kept snipping a single sentance out and continued to look like a rtrd. and im still stupid fixed HEY LISTEN for ruler of eve.
Ishamel 1 Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:27:00 - [98] Originally by: marakor Originally by: Sebea Originally by: marakor Why should i need to clarify anything when the posted conversation was right there to be read ffs. If you had of read the entire thread as you claim you would have seen the context of what was being said and not needed to make your stupid and totaly off topic trolly post. so lets get the facts straight then shall we. I read all that. 1.)The honest truth is RA did in fact steal that titan. It was fully in their possession. and im an idiot 2.)The Titan was in fact returned to the original owner. and im a moron 3.)The reason it was returned had NOTHING to do with the theft itself, but the manner in which it was stolen, as it violated a game mechanic a fact that if you read his posts marakor never actualy refers too game mechanics at all. and im still an idiot The problem i had is marakor was actualy pointing out that all the posts RAGOON made about how BOB treated their pets was total hipocracy because of these facts about the titan theft. and im still stupid. He then proceeded to take no moral high ground what so ever saying nothing about theft being bad and tried to stick to his original facts but i kept snipping a single sentance out and continued to look like a rtrd. and im still stupid fixed aww, and the tone had just improved too
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:28:00 - [99] Edited by: Sebea on 28/02/2008 00:30:53 Originally by: marakor Originally by: Sebea Originally by: marakor Why should i need to clarify anything when the posted conversation was right there to be read ffs. If you had of read the entire thread as you claim you would have seen the context of what was being said and not needed to make your stupid and totaly off topic trolly post. so lets get the facts straight then shall we. I read all that. 1.)The honest truth is RA did in fact steal that titan. It was fully in their possession. and im an idiot 2.)The Titan was in fact returned to the original owner. and im a moron 3.)The reason it was returned had NOTHING to do with the theft itself, but the manner in which it was stolen, as it violated a game mechanic a fact that if you read his posts marakor never actualy refers too game mechanics at all. and im still an idiot The problem i had is marakor was actualy pointing out that all the posts RAGOON made about how BOB treated their pets was total hipocracy because of these facts about the titan theft. and im still stupid. He then proceeded to take no moral high ground what so ever saying nothing about theft being bad and tried to stick to his original facts but i kept snipping a single sentance out and continued to look like a rtrd. and im still stupid fixed you are now officially my hero, but still a twit. Edit: don't worry Ish, to me, this is actually fun. He can't possible consider that i may have a point, and needs to insult me, and a dead alliance, even though i can actually consider his point valid, and his moral well founded. Let his mouth be his representative for his character
marakor Gallente Anti Lag Forum Smackers	Posted - 2008.02.28 00:53:00 - [100] Originally by: Sebea Let his mouth be his representative for his character And your inabilaty to say "hey i did not read what was being said properly and screwed up" says a lot about your personality pal. PS; the first personal attack was you refering to me in a sarcastic way with this comment "your illustrious self" (post 73) or are you gonna claim that was a compliment?. HEY LISTEN for ruler of eve.
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:00:00 - [101] Originally by: marakor PS; the first personal attack was you refering to me in a sarcastic way with this comment "your illustrious self" (post 73) or are you gonna claim that was a compliment?. jeez man, sensitive much? one little poke results in you calling me names and insulting all manner of people... and tbh, you are a pretty prominent poster marakor, im betting i could quote about 100 posts from you in the past week easily, making you a bit of a forum personality, and actually inheriting the title "illustrious". Lighten up bud, its just a game man.
Jehovah Cooper Convergent Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:01:00 - [102] I would like the last 10 minutes of my life back.
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:02:00 - [103] Edited by: Sebea on 28/02/2008 01:02:45 Originally by: Jehovah Cooper I would like the last 10 minutes of my life back. sorry, it's being held for the next seven days on a credit check Edit: thats actually not a shot at you, i just got off the phone with a CC company and that was a response to what happened to a payment i submitted. Figure i should be more specific, emotions run high on COAD
marakor Gallente Anti Lag Forum Smackers	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:04:00 - [104] Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 01:05:11 Originally by: Jehovah Cooper I would like the last 10 minutes of my life back. Tell me what you will do with those 10 mins and il consider it. edit; for spelling as im watching the series "eureka" i just found an old folder full of episodes. HEY LISTEN for ruler of eve.
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:05:00 - [105] Originally by: marakor Tell me what you will do with those 10 mins ans il consider it. dont give it back, he looks sneaky, he'll only get into mischief with it
Jehovah Cooper Convergent Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:08:00 - [106] Originally by: marakor Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 01:05:11 Originally by: Jehovah Cooper I would like the last 10 minutes of my life back. Tell me what you will do with those 10 mins and il consider it. Watch the Jayhawks game. Is that worthy enough?
marakor Gallente Anti Lag Forum Smackers	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:13:00 - [107] Originally by: Jehovah Cooper Originally by: marakor Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 01:05:11 Originally by: Jehovah Cooper I would like the last 10 minutes of my life back. Tell me what you will do with those 10 mins and il consider it. Watch the Jayhawks game. Is that worthy enough? Nope you can make it up yourself in the half time break. HEY LISTEN for ruler of eve.
Katherine Marx Muff Diving	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:14:00 - [108] i fail to see where BoB has regained anything other than a forum presence.
Sebea STK Scientific	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:17:00 - [109] Originally by: Katherine Marx i fail to see where BoB has regained anything other than a forum presence. from a certain perspective, they've gained nothing, but from another perspective, they've gain morale, which can be dangerous in of itself. thats the worst thing about all these posts, only time will tell, so there is no real point in speculation.
Tholarim Amarr Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.02.28 01:26:00 - [110] Regaining is just losing in reverse. so erm, no.
Dog Solitude Omega Fleet Enterprises Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.02.28 02:08:00 - [111] "And the show has reached....a new low" This is a terrible thread.
Spaja Saist Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2008.02.28 19:37:00 - [112] Originally by: marakor Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 00:18:31 Edited by: marakor on 28/02/2008 00:17:28 Originally by: Sebea Originally by: Ishamel 1 Originally by: Sebea This stems from an a statement i made telling you that the fact it was stolen was NOT the reason it was returned, and that even if you find it morally wrong, its within the realm of game mechanics to steal in EVE. You see this where you are going wrong, he wasn't replying to you at all, he was clearly replying to the guy above him who said it wasn't stolen, it was given back. Unless that guy is your alt in which case u r an idiot. If he'd have just clarified that point in his statement none of this would be here. Why should i need to clarify anything when the posted conversation was right there to be read ffs. If you had of read the entire thread as you claim you would have seen the context of what was being said and not needed to make your stupid and totaly off topic trolly post. You probably shouldn't accuse other people of trolling since that's all you really do. You wait for an appropriate post that attacks alliances you don't like then you start trolling till the cows come home. I think if I hated any alliances as much as you do I'd avoid the forums for fear of giving myself an anuerism. It really isn't healthy and I only say this because I care.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.02.28 19:50:00 - [113] itt people argue semantics
Dramaticus GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.02.28 19:53:00 - [114] Originally by: Tholarim Regaining is just losing in reverse. so erm, no. but what if you start making turns in reverse because two wrongs dont make a right but two lefts do however you're going right to go left and ohgod im confused Please don't use RL pictuers of players in Sig without permission. - WeatherMan
Civrax GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.02.28 20:46:00 - [115] There seems to be a bit of a problem and/or issue being discussed in this thread so,
RagnarH Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency	Posted - 2008.02.28 21:35:00 - [116] So Goons...where are u tonight ? I hear bob is killing your POSs as we speak ? -------------------------- For your termination of Lord Zap we have paid you the bounty that was set to his head: 15,817,032 ISK
Ki An Gallente Filiolus Of Bellum	Posted - 2008.02.28 21:50:00 - [117] Edited by: Ki An on 28/02/2008 21:50:06 Originally by: Dramaticus but what if you start making turns in reverse because two wrongs dont make a right but two lefts do however you're going right to go left and ohgod im confused Fail! You need to make three left turns to make a right. Otherwise you're going back the way you came. Quick edit: Unless you make two bigger left turns. I mean, we're talking like 135 degree turns here. Filiolus of Bellum is recruiting
Daylen Drazzi Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.02.28 21:52:00 - [118] Originally by: RagnarH So Goons...where are u tonight ? I hear bob is killing your POSs as we speak ? Oh, you know - all those hulks in hi-sec are requiring our best pilots. It's not glamorous, it's dirty, hard, hard, dirty work, but someone has to do it for the betterment of EVE. "Ya see us Goons neva lose, If we'r dead, we'r dead so nobody cares, If'n we win we'v won, so's only we cares If'n we run away we always come back later so Goons neva lose ya see?"
Agent2 Holtze Amarr x13	Posted - 2008.02.28 22:07:00 - [119] Originally by: Siddy Originally by: Empero Edited by: Empero on 27/02/2008 14:27:18 BOB is about to disband for joining Hydra! Edit: typo im coming in hot! Haha, Couldn't have put it better myself! Posting and you!
Brmble Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.02.28 22:34:00 - [120] Originally by: RagnarH So Goons...where are u tonight ? I hear bob is killing your POSs as we speak ? yeah ~ no not believin in urself ~

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.