Hans Jagerblitzen looks good for high sec/low sec.

Hans might seem good, but he's got very meager experience in the hisec arena and very little idea of the way it actually works. If you are interested in seeing the new expansion's focus on warfare in hisec turn out well for all parties, I strongly recommend Alekseyev Karrde.

Looking at the "likes" Hans has more support to actualy win vs Alekseyev Karrde.

Correct me if i am missing something.

Looking at the "likes" Hans has more support to actualy win vs Alekseyev Karrde.

Correct me if i am missing something.

"Likes" aren't votes. If they were, I'd have told people to like my post . As is, I hit 100 the first day I posted up and have spend my time organizing for the election.

Were I to be asked my opinion of who the finest candidate in all of New Eden is I would promptly reply, "The Mittani, fine sir."

The almost made it crew:
Alekseyev Karrde - Noir. Mercenary Group - Gregory Russo - United States
Elise Randolph - Pandemic Legion - Peter Farrell - United States
Greene Lee - Against ALL Authorities - Dmitriy Vasiliev - Russia

Exciting to know who has won already. Now I don't have to wast energy voting, since its has been decided.

Mittens obviously will be back with more improvements.

Just don't let Xenuria get in there or everyone will quit EVE.

Is it just me or are the "Yanks" taking over the World?

Where is barabaner? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=812844#post812844

He has much more than 100 likes

To clarify a concern that has been raised, if a someone isn't listed in my posts at the beginning of the thread then they either didn't apply or didn't meet the acceptance criteria. We can't divulge information on specific applicants so if you are concerned that someone you were supporting isn't listed, all we can advise is contacting them and asking them about it.

Is it just me or are the "Yanks" taking over the World?

I have now enabled the list for the final ballot candidates on the CSM section of the EVE website.

Could you post the final list here with final "like" count at the end of the nomination proccess.

Also is the order of candidates random on that page? If not it needs to be to keep things fair.

Is it possible, that in the list of canditates it says shortly what the canditates stands for. Like a phrase or something short. Its now painfull to read every canditates post to get a picture, what are they going to bring on the table. For example:

nameLink1 : "More same old FIS, less everything else."

Or a list example:
Pro:
walking on stations: nameLink1, nameLink4...
new player experiense: nameLink3, nameLink4...
flying in space: nameLink2

Against...
mining changes: nameLink, nameLink2, nameLink3...
capital nerf: nameLink2, nameLink4...

Hope to see this soon =)

The order is indeed randomised. We don't have plans on releasing "like" numbers as it's not really related to the final part of the voting process; there are some player created tools that have done this though (like this).

It's randomised every visit - go to it and hit F5

Seleene
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
The Mittani
Trebor Daehdoow
Two step

Those are people I'd vote for.

I'm not a yank, I wasn't born in the US.

CCP - please kill this folly and hire a first rate marketing firm.

What corporation in the top ten thousand corps in the world has a customer advisory council elected by the customers? Customer advisory board, yes, but never elected by the customers.

All at large candidates? You end up with one view point or all individual viewpoints - nothing representational of the voter base!

Please modernize your business practices - this is more like a neighborhood association and just as petty.

Please don't take my abstention as voter apathy, but a lack of variety among the candidates.

I want a game I can play, not a system in which I must be a political organizer to get a decent game put together - That is not how a great many of your customers want to spend their game time.

Please, hire a first rate marketing firm, have them produce quality customer surveys and let the customers fill them out periodically. Use your knowledge of your demographics to appeal to new customers and quality assurance questionaires to keep in touch with your existing customers. You could select a slate of candates at random and get input as valid as you will from any group of people who are there representing their own interests as any CSM panel will do.

Just remember, the only people they represent are the ones who voted, so if you get a ten percent turnout, the "winners" will be representing just over half of that number and even if it is a landslide with the winners taking every vote cast, they will still be representing only ten percent of your customers. Take every non-vote as a "none of the above" vote.

It ain't apathy, it's disgust.

OH - and fix this damn forum that fails just about every first try to post something. Anyone who want to post anything has to copy it and try to get it to "take" the second or even more attempts - or failing that, just do a rage walk away, have one more irritant to deal with, and no one gets their viewpoint.

CCP - please kill this folly and hire a first rate marketing firm.

What corporation in the top ten thousand corps in the world has a customer advisory council elected by the customers? Customer advisory board, yes, but never elected by the customers.

All at large candidates? You end up with one view point or all individual viewpoints - nothing representational of the voter base!

Please modernize your business practices - this is more like a neighborhood association and just as petty.

Please don't take my abstention as voter apathy, but a lack of variety among the candidates.

I want a game I can play, not a system in which I must be a political organizer to get a decent game put together - That is not how a great many of your customers want to spend their game time.

Please, hire a first rate marketing firm, have them produce quality customer surveys and let the customers fill them out periodically. Use your knowledge of your demographics to appeal to new customers and quality assurance questionaires to keep in touch with your existing customers. You could select a slate of candates at random and get input as valid as you will from any group of people who are there representing their own interests as any CSM panel will do.

Just remember, the only people they represent are the ones who voted, so if you get a ten percent turnout, the "winners" will be representing just over half of that number and even if it is a landslide with the winners taking every vote cast, they will still be representing only ten percent of your customers. Take every non-vote as a "none of the above" vote.

It ain't apathy, it's disgust.

OH - and fix this damn forum that fails just about every first try to post something. Anyone who want to post anything has to copy it and try to get it to "take" the second or even more attempts - or failing that, just do a rage walk away, have one more irritant to deal with, and no one gets their viewpoint.

please gb2WoW please

CCP - please kill this folly and hire a first rate marketing firm.

What corporation in the top ten thousand corps in the world has a customer advisory council elected by the customers? Customer advisory board, yes, but never elected by the customers.

All at large candidates? You end up with one view point or all individual viewpoints - nothing representational of the voter base!

Please modernize your business practices - this is more like a neighborhood association and just as petty.

Please don't take my abstention as voter apathy, but a lack of variety among the candidates.

I want a game I can play, not a system in which I must be a political organizer to get a decent game put together - That is not how a great many of your customers want to spend their game time.

Please, hire a first rate marketing firm, have them produce quality customer surveys and let the customers fill them out periodically. Use your knowledge of your demographics to appeal to new customers and quality assurance questionaires to keep in touch with your existing customers. You could select a slate of candates at random and get input as valid as you will from any group of people who are there representing their own interests as any CSM panel will do.

Just remember, the only people they represent are the ones who voted, so if you get a ten percent turnout, the "winners" will be representing just over half of that number and even if it is a landslide with the winners taking every vote cast, they will still be representing only ten percent of your customers. Take every non-vote as a "none of the above" vote.

It ain't apathy, it's disgust.

OH - and fix this damn forum that fails just about every first try to post something. Anyone who want to post anything has to copy it and try to get it to "take" the second or even more attempts - or failing that, just do a rage walk away, have one more irritant to deal with, and no one gets their viewpoint.

I'm I little lost here. I'm trying to post my submission but its saying "Currently there is no open submission period." I got the newsletter saying I can try. Did I mess something or is submissions over?

Be helpful :)

I'm I little lost here. I'm trying to post my submission but its saying "Currently there is no open submission period." I got the newsletter saying I can try. Did I mess something or is submissions over?

Be helpful :)

This here is the vast majority of your player base. Is it any wonder the organised groups win CSM seats?

Yeah... really. I mean we wouldn't want anyone up there that doesn't understand the correct way to post charcters for sale like the CSM I saw post a few months back. Better yet someone in there that doesn't understand wormhole mechanics would we?


Praytell let someone in that wants to do away with all minerals in WH space!


Oh... I heard a rumor that one of the current CSMs wants to do something about Tech II ships/items and trade hubs? What is all that about? Something about risk/reward for hi-sec again?

Please do not vote for the scammer Darius III. he has been scamming for votes all day in our Help channel and is rather annoying. If anything we dont' need scammers and lamebrains on the CSM. Granted scamming is allowed but it also destroys the player base at its roots.


[02:59:39] Darius III > Also the only candidate giving away free plex for votes is me

Darius III > Please dont make a forum post about it, it would RUIN my campaing. TIA

Darius III > Also good luck banning my 7 alts too.

Darius III > Also please keep paying your subscription fees-CCP needs your cash to pay for my free trips. D3

Liar, cheater, scammer. three things that EVE does not need, or want.



Likes: Trebor, Seleen