EVE Search - List of meta/named systems

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Padme Am	Posted - 2004.04.20 22:07:00 - [31] Thumbs up Cindy ;)
Padme Am	Posted - 2004.04.20 22:07:00 - [32] Thumbs up Cindy ;)
Huckleberry	Posted - 2004.04.21 09:04:00 - [33] Hmmm dont see any tracking mods for either low slots or the medium. I think the medium slot tracking mods are... 1.monopulse 2.orion 3.optical 4.? the lows 1.faq-delayline...something 2. 3.fourier transform 4. Not sure I have the right order but maybe someone else knows them all? Great idea however-always wanted a list like this //Huck
Huckleberry Minmatar Brutor tribe	Posted - 2004.04.21 09:04:00 - [34] Hmmm dont see any tracking mods for either low slots or the medium. I think the medium slot tracking mods are... 1.monopulse 2.orion 3.optical 4.? the lows 1.faq-delayline...something 2. 3.fourier transform 4. Not sure I have the right order but maybe someone else knows them all? Great idea however-always wanted a list like this //Huck
Golgrath	Posted - 2004.04.28 04:04:00 - [35] I don't like the Mk I - IV idea. it's not always obvious which one is the best. Examples: Beta and Mark I are the best (in cpu) in power diagnostic systems but Local Hull is best in cargo expanders. Is CL-5 better than Clarity Ward in shield boosters? (more shield boost vs less cpu).
Golgrath Minmatar Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2004.04.28 04:04:00 - [36] I don't like the Mk I - IV idea. it's not always obvious which one is the best. Examples: Beta and Mark I are the best (in cpu) in power diagnostic systems but Local Hull is best in cargo expanders. Is CL-5 better than Clarity Ward in shield boosters? (more shield boost vs less cpu).
Dr Zoom	Posted - 2004.04.28 06:43:00 - [37] Perfect....Thanks a lot
Dr Zoom	Posted - 2004.04.28 06:43:00 - [38] Perfect....Thanks a lot
Baltar Thegoodone	Posted - 2004.04.30 12:42:00 - [39] TOPS, very useful, and i used it to win an argument. Always good. He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.
Baltar Thegoodone Caldari Crux Republic Aerospace Navy Elites	Posted - 2004.04.30 12:42:00 - [40] TOPS, very useful, and i used it to win an argument. Always good. He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster.

0seeker0	Posted - 2004.05.03 01:13:00 - [41] Its the damage that raises peoples eyebrows, but other various fiddly things that makes the more discerning killer wink. Thus, we should consider having the most destructive weapon variant given the highest mk, while leaving the hidden deatails for those who wish to look. Seeker. Character "Widescreen" is a scammer; beware. Check my bio for a list of known scammers.
0seeker0 Gallente	Posted - 2004.05.03 01:13:00 - [42] Its the damage that raises peoples eyebrows, but other various fiddly things that makes the more discerning killer wink. Thus, we should consider having the most destructive weapon variant given the highest mk, while leaving the hidden deatails for those who wish to look. Seeker. Character "Widescreen" is a scammer; beware. Check my bio for a list of known scammers.
Kaladryn	Posted - 2004.05.04 20:35:00 - [43] this list rocks! thank you for taking the time to make it! Kaladryn
Kaladryn KaYSeRiSPoR	Posted - 2004.05.04 20:35:00 - [44] this list rocks! thank you for taking the time to make it! Kaladryn
TWD	Posted - 2004.05.09 03:32:00 - [45] I dont have problems with the current naming system. its usually bonuses of 5, 10, 15 or 20% In weapons, there are different types of bonuses on different types of named weapons. (cap usage/cpu usage/damage bonus and tracking bonus) so in named weapons, the mk system doesnt make much sense.
TWD TAOSP Band of Brothers	Posted - 2004.05.09 03:32:00 - [46] I dont have problems with the current naming system. its usually bonuses of 5, 10, 15 or 20% In weapons, there are different types of bonuses on different types of named weapons. (cap usage/cpu usage/damage bonus and tracking bonus) so in named weapons, the mk system doesnt make much sense.
Maya Rkell	Posted - 2004.05.11 18:20:00 - [47] Great thread. I think the current naming conversins are fine though. "As far as I can tell, It doesn't matter who you are, If you can believe there's something worth fighting for " - Garbage, "Parade"
Maya Rkell Forsaken Empire The Forsaken Empire	Posted - 2004.05.11 18:20:00 - [48] Great thread. I think the current naming conversins are fine though. //Maya
zaqq	Posted - 2004.05.12 06:47:00 - [49] be nice if an area was linked to each section, so we have an idea where to search.
zaqq	Posted - 2004.05.12 06:47:00 - [50] be nice if an area was linked to each section, so we have an idea where to search.

John McCreedy	Posted - 2004.05.12 11:40:00 - [51] Just a quick thank you for an excellent post. This is very handy reference material. Make a difference
John McCreedy Caldari Eve Defence Force	Posted - 2004.05.12 11:40:00 - [52] Just a quick thank you for an excellent post. This is very handy reference material. Make a Difference
Brennan Mulwray	Posted - 2004.05.13 05:33:00 - [53] Edited by: Brennan Mulwray on 13/05/2004 05:40:01 Good work Cindy! You could have copy-pasted it from certain sources but it's not always easy to find. Anyways I think different improvements can be made on names and types. For 1 I find that there shouldn't be any commen names but specific names for a certain type of weapen. Like scout=projectile, proto=hybrid and so on. Certain names are type-specific (compressed coil, modulated, ...) but others are not. Special names have a nice ring to them off course but a system of numbers and versions is a little more obvious. Use of colors for some part of the item's image could be nice. When inspecting an item before sale you know what "grade" it is through it's color. Like basic is yellow, then the named ones are: red, purple, blue and black or something. Just use colors you can identify easily, not like the brown and red used in threats. Then I also think that the use of images isn't always consistant with the item. It might be that this has been fixed in some patch but I can't check right now since I have no Eve here. But I remember having a hard time identifying cap relays from power diag's since they had the same image. Also there could be minor differences between cap relay's and cap flux's. In general you should be able to tell what an item is just by looking at your screen. Not needing to move your mouse over it or even get the info screen would be so cool. *www.swc-eve.com*
Brennan Mulwray Section XIII Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2004.05.13 05:33:00 - [54] Edited by: Brennan Mulwray on 13/05/2004 05:40:01 Good work Cindy! You could have copy-pasted it from certain sources but it's not always easy to find. Anyways I think different improvements can be made on names and types. For 1 I find that there shouldn't be any commen names but specific names for a certain type of weapen. Like scout=projectile, proto=hybrid and so on. Certain names are type-specific (compressed coil, modulated, ...) but others are not. Special names have a nice ring to them off course but a system of numbers and versions is a little more obvious. Use of colors for some part of the item's image could be nice. When inspecting an item before sale you know what "grade" it is through it's color. Like basic is yellow, then the named ones are: red, purple, blue and black or something. Just use colors you can identify easily, not like the brown and red used in threats. Then I also think that the use of images isn't always consistant with the item. It might be that this has been fixed in some patch but I can't check right now since I have no Eve here. But I remember having a hard time identifying cap relays from power diag's since they had the same image. Also there could be minor differences between cap relay's and cap flux's. In general you should be able to tell what an item is just by looking at your screen. Not needing to move your mouse over it or even get the info screen would be so cool.
OmegaTron	Posted - 2004.05.13 11:53:00 - [55] very nice Cindy ------------------------------------------------ A Plague is comming....
OmegaTron Amarr Viziam	Posted - 2004.05.13 11:53:00 - [56] very nice Cindy ------------------------------------------------ A Plague is comming....
Drakxter	Posted - 2004.05.16 18:14:00 - [57] Nice list.. Anyway, if new names was added I say a mix of old ones and new ones.. Like: 425mm "Prototype Gauss" Railgun I Mk V We still have the names that make it a little more fun, and the Mk X to help clear up what is best. ------------- Most tired of thing atm: - Mods on the forum saying: "Please use the bug report page to submit bugs, the forum is not the place to post them." and then closing a topic.
Drakxter Gallente Fortunis Novum	Posted - 2004.05.16 18:14:00 - [58] Nice list.. Anyway, if new names was added I say a mix of old ones and new ones.. Like: 425mm "Prototype Gauss" Railgun I Mk V We still have the names that make it a little more fun, and the Mk X to help clear up what is best. -------------
Morn Hyland	Posted - 2004.05.17 00:05:00 - [59] Nice list - If you have not already done so I would enter it into the Eve-I FAQ competition.
Morn Hyland	Posted - 2004.05.17 00:05:00 - [60] Nice list - If you have not already done so I would enter it into the Eve-I FAQ competition.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.