EVE Search - Time to end cloaking ...

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Time to end cloaking ...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:21:00 - [1] Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously....
Infected Cure	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:21:00 - [2] tl;dr
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:33:00 - [3] Originally by: Infected Cure tl;dr wall of text oh and locked for rant/spam reasons
Kil'Roy Minmatar The Rat Patrol	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:36:00 - [4] Normally due to the title I would expect to see a firestorm not see since the end of the Dinosaurs, but after looking at the content of the OP, I would expect a laughing fit not see since... Well, I can't come up with anything. Sorry.
Niccolado Starwalker Shadow Templars	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:39:00 - [5] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously.... Nope! Seriously! Originally by: Dianabolic Your tears are absolutely divine, like a fine fine wine, rolling down your cheeks until they flow down the river of LOL
Riho Gallente Mercenary Forces Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:44:00 - [6] no thx... i like my anathema/helios/arazu/rapier/pilgrim (lol) ---------------------------------- Yes... this is my main. Extreme Troll Slayer...
DroneCommander Gallente	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:47:00 - [7] Originally by: Infected Cure tl;dr ------------- Now I'm sad...
Apoctasy The Python Cartel	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:56:00 - [8] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously.... Use some PUNCTUATION and maybe some COHERENT SENTENCE STRUCTURE before I read that jumbled paragraph
Zurrar Gallente Epiphyte Mining and Exploration Combined Planetary Union	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:57:00 - [9] removing cloaks from ships that shouldnt have them. or making it so they cant lock anything *WHILE THEY HAVE THE MODULE ONLINE* Originally by: Darla Dawson Quit, and go play wow I slaughter the english language better than a isk farmer. I love you.
Gwendion Gallente No Quarter. Vae Victis.	Posted - 2008.05.18 18:59:00 - [10] Originally by: Zurrar removing cloaks from ships that shouldnt have them. or making it so they cant lock anything *WHILE THEY HAVE THE MODULE ONLINE* Never used a cloak have you? Please, cloaking is this games least worries. It provides safety where there normally wouldn't be any.
Hannobaal Gallente Shadow Forces Inc.	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:01:00 - [11] Originally by: Infected Cure tl;dr Indeed.
Jinx Barker GFB Scientific	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:08:00 - [12] Cloaking needs to be fixed in regards to turd-brains who stay in local all day cloaked in their Raven. Make it difficult to just AFK in a ratter with a cloak on. Cloaking needs to be fixed in regards to Back Ops. Battleships - give them ability to fit Covert Ops cloaking device. And tweak a few other things, making them a true front line Battleship rather than a joke they are now. Other than that - rest of cloaking mechanic works just fine.
Kil'Roy Minmatar The Rat Patrol	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:11:00 - [13] Originally by: Jinx Barker Cloaking needs to be fixed in regards to turd-brains who stay in local all day cloaked in their Raven. Make it difficult to just AFK in a ratter with a cloak on. Cloaking needs to be fixed in regards to Back Ops. Battleships - give them ability to fit Covert Ops cloaking device. And tweak a few other things, making them a true front line Battleship rather than a joke they are now. Other than that - rest of cloaking mechanic works just fine. Black Ops were never meant to be front line BS,and if you give them the CovOps Cloak, the will be the gankers dream. Are you a Ganker? I have been from time to time and think that would be overkill.
Danton Marcellus Nebula Rasa Holdings	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:14:00 - [14] Time to end nonsense posts, not even making a case for itself. Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav! Also Known As
Haraldhardrade Amarr Pax Amarr	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:14:00 - [15] Give klingon Caveo of Minmatar , torva vacuus regimen of deus es plurrimi periculosus of bestia
Arvald Caldari The School 0f Fine Arts	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:16:00 - [16] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously.... your name, it makes me giggle like a little school girl Originally by: Liang Nuren There are no dangerous ships, there are dangerous people. IIRC, you are one of them.
Mrsticks Minmatar RNCGM Inc.	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:18:00 - [17] Originally by: Jinx Barker Cloaking needs to be fixed in regards to turd-brains who stay in local all day cloaked in their Raven. Make it difficult to just AFK in a ratter with a cloak on. Quick Nerf local thatill Fix it!! Long Live TEXAS! Texans join the Texas channel in game plz.
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:35:00 - [18] Too short, didn't read __ CSM candidates - quick reference cards (NEW: spreadsheet) Or just vote for LaVista Vista or Leandro Salazar like I did.
Alyth Gallente Corp 1 Allstars Insurgency	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:42:00 - [19] Originally by: Gwendion Originally by: Zurrar removing cloaks from ships that shouldnt have them. or making it so they cant lock anything *WHILE THEY HAVE THE MODULE ONLINE* Never used a cloak have you? Please, cloaking is this games least worries. It provides safety where there normally wouldn't be any. Which is exactly the problem, nothing in EVE should provided 100% safety. Ships without a cloak bonus should be penalised (more, lets face it a sig res penalty for invincibility in a safe is hardly a penalty) while using them. For example make them scannable albeit with a greatly reduced chance of finding them with that chance increasing the longer they stay cloaked
Surfin's PlunderBunny Minmatar Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:46:00 - [20] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously.... () () (â;..;)â (")(")
Juin Dar	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:47:00 - [21] What does tl;dr mean?
Jinx Barker GFB Scientific	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:48:00 - [22] Originally by: Juin Dar What does tl;dr mean? Yea, I want to know too.... "srsly"
Shadow Joy	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:52:00 - [23] If only I had a raven setup to post....
SiJira	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:54:00 - [24] Originally by: Alyth For example make them scannable albeit with a greatly reduced chance of finding them with that chance stupid example that will never work - read the other cloak threads Quote: increasing the longer they stay cloaked lol Trashed sig, Shark was here
Akita T Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force	Posted - 2008.05.18 19:57:00 - [25] Originally by: Jinx Barker Originally by: Juin Dar What does tl;dr mean? Yea, I want to know too.... "srsly" Dramatisation : " tl;dr " __ CSM candidates - quick reference cards (NEW: spreadsheet) Or just vote for LaVista Vista or Leandro Salazar like I did.
Juin Dar	Posted - 2008.05.18 20:02:00 - [26] Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Jinx Barker Originally by: Juin Dar What does tl;dr mean? Yea, I want to know too.... "srsly" Dramatisation : " tl;dr " Thanks, I didn't what that coffee anyways, but now I coffee dripping out my nose.
SCSPOOK Caldari 16th Interspacial Dynasty The 11th Hour	Posted - 2008.05.18 20:41:00 - [27] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 18/05/2008 18:21:11 seriously.... ..........no.................
Joe Starbreaker	Posted - 2008.05.18 20:42:00 - [28] Too long; didn't read. I have also seen it as TL;DNR (too long; did not read). ---------------- [insert signature here]
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2008.05.18 22:06:00 - [29] Originally by: Joe Starbreaker Too long; didn't read. I have also seen it as TL;DNR (too long; did not read). tsoiwtldr aka that second one is way too long didn't read
Armoured C Gallente Globaltech Industries The ENTITY.	Posted - 2008.05.18 22:14:00 - [30] what the point of having a cloak if it can be found the idea of a cloaking device is that you are invisable ... i dont want my covert op / recon ship still being able to be found with the top of the line cloaking device that would completly negate a few entire lines of ship including : stealth bombers covert op frigates recons black op ships all these types of ships require special cloaking devices just waving around with no other alternative you just made 20 ships completly useless op need to srly futt his own buck (get it that his name lol ... well it made me laugh)

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.