EVE Search - The cloaking issue

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

The cloaking issue

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 05:31:00 - [1] Lets make cloak pretty heavy on the energy grid?
Mal Plox Keepers of Balance Legion of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2008.05.22 05:33:00 - [2] Originally by: Futtbucker Lets make cloak pretty heavy on the energy grid? Let's not. ---
Kis Kecheri	Posted - 2008.05.22 05:54:00 - [3] I love you.
Furb Killer The Peacekeeper Core	Posted - 2008.05.22 05:56:00 - [4] Stupid idea. Battleships wont notice, frigates cant fit one.
Jmanis Catharg Stickler inc	Posted - 2008.05.22 06:01:00 - [5] Quote: The cloaking issue Isn't.
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 07:52:00 - [6] cloaking is an issue. I am tired of wasting probes on the noobs.
Dirk Magnum Spearhead Endeavors	Posted - 2008.05.22 07:56:00 - [7] Maybe just identify on the system scanner who it is who's cloaked. Like, instead of saying Rump Ranger in the ship name column and Rifter in the other, just say Rump Ranger in one and "cloaked" in the other. At least then you'd know not to bother probing for them. Removing cloaking because people do it in safespots is ridiculous.
Anti Excedrin	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:03:00 - [8] Cloaked ships show up on the system scanner? wtf?
Shintai Balad Naran Orbital Shipyards	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:03:00 - [9] Originally by: Futtbucker Lets make cloak pretty heavy on the energy grid? How about this instead, you whine less and we all get peace from this constant WAAAHHHH WAAAAHHH!
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:09:00 - [10] Edited by: Futtbucker on 22/05/2008 08:10:14 Originally by: Shintai Originally by: Futtbucker Lets make cloak pretty heavy on the energy grid? How about this instead, you whine less and we all get peace from this constant WAAAHHHH WAAAAHHH! No penalty for cloaking and being able to go afk is just plain stupid. WOW, I can have my 2nd account afk and cloaked in a enemy alliance system gathering intel when I need it. you say there is no reason to revisit cloaking?
RuleoftheBone Ataraxia.	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:19:00 - [11] Better idea: Nerf futtbucker. "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:24:00 - [12] Edited by: Futtbucker on 22/05/2008 08:24:41 I have sat my cloaker in a BoB system for 8 days .... Its fun while I am on my main in a 10/10 plex I check my AFK intel bot and see people cussing him out in local. I bet there was some reds there that was hunting my for at least 3 of those 8 days. Probaly alot more try and waste probes on him for many more. I just checked and going on day 9 now. I can do nothing but laugh my arse off!
4rc4ng3L Assisted Homicide Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:30:00 - [13] ...we have a cloaking issue, A CLOAKING ISSUE, PLEASE GOD NOOOOOOooooOOOOooOOOOooo!!!!! Yea anyway, wtf issue.... cloaks are working JUST as they were intended. ------------------------------------------ - To Jumanji, or not to Jumanji...... -
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:33:00 - [14] Edited by: Futtbucker on 22/05/2008 08:34:42 Originally by: 4rc4ng3L ...we have a cloaking issue, A CLOAKING ISSUE, PLEASE GOD NOOOOOOooooOOOOooOOOOooo!!!!! AFK cloaking for months on in is not an issue?
Max Khaos	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:34:00 - [15] The only change I would hope for ... Give all cloaking device a 5000 cpu fitting requirement and give "designed" cloaking ships a 99.9% reduction to fitting cpu. Then only ships designed to cloak can cloak.
Midnight Firestarter	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:36:00 - [16] As above .... only cloakers can cloak ... But to stop a ship designed to cloak from cloaking or a ship designed to be convert from being covert is going to far.
Ordon Gundar Kingfisher Industries	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:43:00 - [17] Lets turn the whole of Eve into a procession of sheep, just for the benefit of the few! So what if cloakers go afk? Its a hard life, deal with it. Fly fast..Rats Die..Buy Low..Sell High
Ordon Gundar Kingfisher Industries	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:43:00 - [18] Originally by: Max Khaos The only change I would hope for ... Give all cloaking device a 5000 cpu fitting requirement and give "designed" cloaking ships a 99.9% reduction to fitting cpu. Then only ships designed to cloak can cloak. Why? Fly fast..Rats Die..Buy Low..Sell High
Futtbucker	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:49:00 - [19] Originally by: Ordon Gundar Lets turn the whole of Eve into a procession of sheep, just for the benefit of the few! So what if cloakers go afk? Its a hard life, deal with it. Cloaking will be visited soon. I can hear your whines now./
Polcor Rodal	Posted - 2008.05.22 08:51:00 - [20] Originally by: Futtbucker Edited by: Futtbucker on 22/05/2008 08:27:05 Edited by: Futtbucker on 22/05/2008 08:24:41 I have sat my cloaker in a BoB system for 8 days .... Its fun while I am on my main in a 10/10 plex I check my AFK intel bot and see people cussing him out in local. I like that alliance wastes alot time on my good afk dual logging skills. I have been in the same BoB system afk for 8 days. I just checked and going on day 9 now. I can do nothing but laugh my arse off! Well, increasing fitting req¦s on cloak wont solve that issue. What you are whining about was, is and will remain possible with any cov-op or recon. Originally by: Futtbucker cloaking is an issue. I am tired of wasting probes on the noobs. i think thats your real problem you are complaining about. If thats really frustrates you so much, then you are taking eve way too serious. Take some days off, and experience a season called summer - with all the nice side effect that comes with it.
RuleoftheBone Ataraxia.	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:00:00 - [21] Edited by: RuleoftheBone on 22/05/2008 11:03:01 Nerf stations. Too much AFK there. Nerf POS. Too much AFK there. Nerf shuttles. Too much AFK there. Nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf. The sandy vag brigade strikes again "If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound"? If there was no local would anyone care about cloaks? But thanks for yet another useless thread. "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
StainLessStealRat Firman AB 101010 Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:14:00 - [22] AFK cloaking does need to be looked at IMHO.
RuleoftheBone Ataraxia.	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:18:00 - [23] Originally by: StainLessStealRat Edited by: StainLessStealRat on 22/05/2008 11:16:35 AFK cloaking does need to be looked at IMHO. A POS Mod that takes 1 hr to uncloak any ship cloaked i think would be a good idea. as then you could only uncloak a ship in a system that you have settled in. Ahahahahahahahaha! For what...so you can safely AFK in your POS? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Chris Bartlett shadow and flame Hydra Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:21:00 - [24] Cloaking is fine, deal with it. Last time i checked it reduced nah your scan resolution pretty heavily? Thats enough of a penalty for me tbqfh, stopped me putting them on my interceptors to say the least.
cheesyhead Cruoris Seraphim Project Alice.	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:24:00 - [25] Edited by: cheesyhead on 22/05/2008 11:24:33 Originally by: StainLessStealRat Edited by: StainLessStealRat on 22/05/2008 11:18:35 Edited by: StainLessStealRat on 22/05/2008 11:16:35 AFK cloaking does need to be looked at IMHO. A POS Mod that takes 1 hr to uncloak any ship cloaked i think would be a good idea. as then you could only uncloak a ship in a system that you have settled in. P.S i fly cloaking ships so i belive i say this from an unbiased position. how are you unbiased? I for one do very much believe afk cloaking is a huge problem. simply because it is to easy as an escape button. for example: ow snap there is a gang here, i better ss and press my cloak and bake some cookies. It nerfs pvp, there are other ways of staying out of hostile hands, they just take more effort, therfore its good. my solution would be: (i actually think they have already started thinkign about it) make cloaking ships (except for recons and cov-ops and black-ops of course) scannable (probable), just not visible.
StainLessStealRat Firman AB 101010 Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:25:00 - [26] Edited by: StainLessStealRat on 22/05/2008 11:25:54 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ahahahahahahahaha! For what...so you can safely AFK in your POS? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Umm,No so you can uncloak a cloaked enemy that is AFK in the same system as your POS thus allowing probers to then locate and fight said ship. the area of 0.0 i live in has a pipe to high sec that is allways occupied by a cloaker or two who log in cloak in a safe spot go afk for hrs on end. every other Mod in this game has a counter of some type yet there is no counter to safe spot cloaking. people cloaked camping a gate is fine as they are there not washing there car or formulating stupid responses to posts that offer no insight to the topic.
Wren Alterana The Baros Syndicate Kissaki Republic	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:25:00 - [27] obvious troll is obvious
Dotard Kinda'Shujaa Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:32:00 - [28] I SAY: Give cloaking intended ships the ability to passive target and scan ships. Better intel gathering/scouting abilities. Also gives us mission invaders another tool for deciding to return to salvage only or to fit a proper gankship. --------------- Nerf You! Buff Me!
StainLessStealRat Firman AB 101010 Alliance	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:33:00 - [29] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- how are you unbiased? I for one do very much believe afk cloaking is a huge problem. simply because it is to easy as an escape button. for example: ow snap there is a gang here, i better ss and press my cloak and bake some cookies. It nerfs pvp, there are other ways of staying out of hostile hands, they just take more effort, therfore its good. my solution would be: (i actually think they have already started thinkign about it) make cloaking ships (except for recons and cov-ops and black-ops of course) scannable (probable), just not visible. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sorry it seemed obvious that i belived i was unbiased because i also fly cloaking ships so that puts me in an unbiased position as i both hunt and fly cloakers. and also large cloaked ships are allready scannable. cloak a raven next to you do a directional scann and it will show up,but only large ships have not tried this with a BC but have been in a gang that uncloaked a Raven this week using this method.
Zudari coracao ardente Cruel Intentions	Posted - 2008.05.22 11:45:00 - [30] How about you quit *****ing about this stuff and just go play the bloody game?

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.