| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Neo Harald
The All-Seeing Eye
G00DFELLAS
   |
Posted - 2008.05.31 10:53:00 -
[61]
/signed
|
Soulita
Inner Core
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 11:45:00 -
[62]
Edited by: Soulita on 31/05/2008 11:47:00
Agreed
Station containers are a way of sorting stuff.
Currently anything that has been sorted can not be searched for, that should be fixed.
|
Natalya RUS
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 12:10:00 -
[63]
|
NereSky
Trinity Nova
Trinity Nova Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 12:20:00 -
[64]
Agreed
|
Andrea Griffin
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 15:18:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Andrea Griffin on 01/06/2008 15:18:45
I understand that this may cause extra load on the servers, but probably little more load than creating a contract with the item - which lists the contents of the container. The container can appear on the assets screen and simply be another expandable node, the contents of which are not populated until the container is selected.
Then the contents could be cached on the client - at least for containers in your own personal hangar, since you are the only one with access to the container and therefore the only one with the ability to change the contents.
|
Ketora Kitana
Polaris Project
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 22:24:00 -
[66]
|
Efa Morgan
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 17:22:00 -
[67]
|
Iragael
The Miner's Paradise
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 18:18:00 -
[68]
/signed
|
makanesi
Storm Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 18:25:00 -
[69]
Great idea.
|
namelessclone01
blackbox ops
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 19:09:00 -
[70]
/signed
if the devs think the current implementation would cause more lag, they need to redesign something..
it can be done.
|
|
|
Rouque Vanderbuilt
Nuts and Bolts
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 23:08:00 -
[71]
/signed
|
ceyriot
Induseng Enterprises
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 23:18:00 -
[72]
Duh...
Faction Store - Killboard |
Lord Fitz
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.03 01:56:00 -
[73]
This would encourage people to put things in containers (currently a practice avoided for just this reason) and as such it would reduce some of the stress on the server generated when opening hangars that are currently much more full than they should be so that items can be seen remotely.
|
Irista Ari'star
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 03:28:00 -
[74]
i use station warehouses pretty frequently and it's a real drag when i've forgotten what i had put in it and have to fly to that station to look :(
|
Melissa Naile
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 06:01:00 -
[75]
Exactly what I am missing. It is rather a joke that you have to refer to third party programmes to achieve that goal. And i am rather convinced that it should be possible to implement this without having to reduce EvE's speed.
However if there is truly a good reason that I as a person not very versed in programming can't spot and would lead to EvE lagging more than before I, too would rather let it be undone.
|
MirrorGod
Heretic Army
Heretic Nation
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 06:19:00 -
[76]
would be nice, but tbh, just let us make folders/tabs in our items hangar. Then have it be an in-station view only so it's no different when searched. (simple xml could organize all items while they're all in the same list -- type of situation)
approved anyway
Recruitment: [ANTI]
|
Chuck Skull
BBK Corp
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 06:26:00 -
[77]
Agreed, unless you stick to one station religiously they're pretty useless for most people at the mo.
---
Also available in 'sober' |
Illaria
The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 07:31:00 -
[78]
Yes please
|
AltBier
Blue.
Blue Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 13:45:00 -
[79]
 Originally by: Andrea Griffin
I understand that this may cause extra load on the servers, but probably little more load than creating a contract with the item - which lists the contents of the container.
|
Chocan
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 15:33:00 -
[80]
/signed
|
|
|
hamster humpster
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 21:42:00 -
[81]
i see no reason to disagree
|
Takimi Star
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 23:23:00 -
[82]
/signed I cant count the number of times I have needed to identify what is in a container across the universe
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 23:25:00 -
[83]
Pointless thread as a dev has already said it wont happen.
|
AltBier
Blue.
Blue Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.05 13:40:00 -
[84]
He has said no to searching assets inside cans. I didn't even know you could search for remote assets.
That seems very differnt to this proposal, which is to be able to open one or two remote cans.
So I'm not so sure he has said no to this proposal.
|
Tiger313
313th Squadron
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 01:56:00 -
[85]
Every station I frequent I have a large amount of containers to sort all my stuff, all named in the same manner and all placed in the same order (visually). So that when I need something, I can just have a peek and grab it when I have it in stock. Not being able to see this from outside the station is a bit odd if you ask me, seeing as you can build stuff remotely and such. Computers should be able to tell what's in your containers, no?
Therefore I support this proposal.
|
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country
Aegis Militia
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 02:26:00 -
[86]
aye
|
Rovern Hashu
Imperial Dreams
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 06:07:00 -
[87]
|
Nessaji
Rosa Alba
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 08:26:00 -
[88]
/signed
______________________________________
"Originally by: Tuxford
It was a dirty hack to be honest but we couldn't find anyway around it. I hope we never have to do it again."
|
Exodus Alpha
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 16:23:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Tiger313
Therefore I support this proposal.
Protip: Gotta check the support box.  |
Spoon Thumb
Paladin Imperium
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.08 22:57:00 -
[90]
Ya please (though i suspect that there is a DB reason that this hasn't been done already)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |