| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ivena Amethyst
   |
Posted - 2008.07.15 19:18:00 -
[31]
"yes" i want to hear what devs are thinking 'bau this
|
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 00:16:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Jinx Barker
Originally by: Danton Marcellus
More tech II BPOs, with tech III on the horizon maybe it's time to seed them openly with agents, as high end loot drops and on the open market?
The 'problem' isn't tech II BPOs, it's static moon mineral deposits and the monopoly there.
If anything ME research on tech II BPOs should cut down a lot more on materials needed.
This is not Tech 2 BPO discussion Denton.... It is either "YES" I want to hear what Devs think, or "NO" I do not want to hear what Devs think about T2 BPO future.
I never miss an oppertunity to get on the soapbox.
Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav!
Also Known As |
Arthmandar Valikari
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 01:15:00 -
[33]
Sure. Wish I owned T2 BPOs so this would really matter to me, but the consequences to those as do own them are clear enough. |
Herring
Alcatraz Inc.
Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 02:04:00 -
[34]
A statement of intent would indeed be a good thing for all the people who own and/or are thinking of investing in these.
|
Jinx Barker
GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 03:00:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Danton Marcellus
I never miss an oppertunity to get on the soapbox.
He he he.... 
|
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 03:10:00 -
[36]
They are not taking away your T2 BPOs yet
Asking for a definitive answer that they will never change something is a fool's question and CCP would be a fool to say they would never change something. Do we really need over 9000 dev blogs a month saying "No we won't change X mechanic yet, but maybe in the future"
If you think that you will get an answer so you can capitalize on something ingame, then you are a fool. This is EVE, at anytime they can trash T2 BPOs and wreck your investment. Don't like it? Then get out of the T2 BPO market. Most likely if CCP ever changes T2 BPOs, there will be a dev blog on it months in advance so calm down, you paranoid bear.
ITT: Fools asking fool's questions because they are fools who dropped out of fool school.
--
http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html |
Cyberman Mastermind
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 11:58:00 -
[37]
I haven't seen this thread till now.
Any information is better than no information. |
Jinx Barker
GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 15:14:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Vaal Erit
They are not taking away your T2 BPOs yet
Asking for a definitive answer that they will never change something is a fool's question and CCP would be a fool to say they would never change something. Do we really need over 9000 dev blogs a month saying "No we won't change X mechanic yet, but maybe in the future"
If you think that you will get an answer so you can capitalize on something ingame, then you are a fool. This is EVE, at anytime they can trash T2 BPOs and wreck your investment. Don't like it? Then get out of the T2 BPO market. Most likely if CCP ever changes T2 BPOs, there will be a dev blog on it months in advance so calm down, you paranoid bear.
ITT: Fools asking fool's questions because they are fools who dropped out of fool school.
 
I suppose you failed reading comprehension 101 in school, or the equivalent. Perhaps re-reading the OP, and subsequent posts by me should clarify things even for someone who went to Mr. T's School Of Etiquette.
All the information CCP given out so far, as the one made by CCP Chronotis in the linked text, is old. And most people who jump to conclusions, you should think about that one, are also the one who are stirring the pot when it comes to T2 BPOs.
Anyway, you do not want to know what devs think, OK. It is your choice. I do.
Have a nice day.
|
Lucy Lucy
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 23:51:00 -
[39]
I am very interested in hearing what the devs say about this.
|
Kasarandon
Suzaku Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 00:13:00 -
[40]
|
|
|
ian666
Rave Technologies Inc.
C0VEN
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 00:35:00 -
[41]
i sold my t2 bpos some time ago so .....
YES, Delete T2 BPOS, make people suffer
|
Aleus Stygian
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 00:54:00 -
[42]
Yeah. We need to know the future of this.
|
Carniflex
StarHunt
Fallout Project
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 12:29:00 -
[43]
Some new information would be great. Especially considering that next major patch is supposed to be 'industry' oriented.
|
Attas
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 21:22:00 -
[44]
supported |
Somealt Ofmine
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 22:36:00 -
[45]
I don't want an answer because I know the answer. It was stated when they introduced invention. No new BPOs. The BPOs that are in game will remain.
To ask for an answer again is asking for them to either revisit that decision, or repeat themselves. I don't think either is necessary. Let the whiners whine. |
TheCraftyHippo
Vanguard Frontiers
Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 00:12:00 -
[46]
Answers are always nice, especially when they come from the people who matter. |
Jeirth
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 17:35:00 -
[47]
|
Draygo Korvan
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 17:43:00 -
[48]
I personally think t2 bpo's should be removed from the game. It however should be fair, and the current T2 bpo holders need to be compensated appropriately.
With that thought I would be interested in what ccp has to say on this issue. |
Zerge Bacon
Ordos Humanitas
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 20:17:00 -
[49]
|
Kasedra
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 15:46:00 -
[50]
/support for a staement
|
|
|
Joey Meow
MURAKAMI INDUSTRIES
|
Posted - 2008.08.23 03:40:00 -
[51]
Sure, lets have a statement from the devs. I mean one way or another it will turn into a massive whine! So I am all for it.
|
Longtime Luver
101st Space Marine Force
|
Posted - 2008.09.04 00:38:00 -
[52]
Loving them all, one at a time please. |
Padanemi
|
Posted - 2008.09.04 09:47:00 -
[53]
I would like the devs to revisit the issue.
|
Malcanis
RuffRyders
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.04 12:29:00 -
[54]
There's no good reason not to have the issue clarified, given the very large scale of investment required.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |