Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 01:16:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Sabe on 16/06/2008 01:17:48 Edited by: Sabe on 16/06/2008 01:17:08 I think the title is pretty simple and clear.
I'm not looking for "your" personal objection to why it shouldnt happen, frankly I dont give a rats arse about what you think... I paid my dues for years just like you and many wannabe's like you, this is my cash and my game so butt your arse out... this is my request to the Developers at CCP not to the player base of arrogant egotistical snobs who have nothing better to do in life then ruin other peoples game for the sheer sadistic glee of it.
all that asside... Directors and CEO's have a serious headache in large alliances with their dedicated and hard working members who for security reasons do not have the role to setup their own personal POS's. Understandable and I won't argue "that" issue.
We need the option to place POS's up as launched personally with options to allow Sov claiming ability for each tower to that persons alliance.
Work it out Dev's... but the time has come for Control Towers to have the "Launch for Self" option.
Thank you,
Sabe ----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
Kame Malice
Mitsukashi Holdings Limited
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 02:08:00 -
[2]
I agreed with you up to the point where you insulted everyone who may or may not have a legitimate reason to oppose you... so now I must oppose you.
/Not signed
|
KingOzar
Brute Strength THORN Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 04:37:00 -
[3]
Edited by: KingOzar on 16/06/2008 04:38:53
Originally by: Kame Malice I agreed with you up to the point where you insulted everyone who may or may not have a legitimate reason to oppose you... so now I must oppose you.
/Not signed
I feel the same way. I'm not even going to try and rebuttal this, the OP just doesn't know how to post and make a SUGGESTION to the PLAYER BASE because devs need the PLAYER BASE to RECOMMEND something before they implement it. Thank god I'm not in your corp. Arse.
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 04:55:00 -
[4]
On one hand, this sounds like a good idea. On the other hand, you may just be the single biggest jackass I've ever seen on a Web forum.
/not signed. ------------------ Fix the forums! |
Siigari Kitawa
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 05:17:00 -
[5]
I disagree on all fronts.
Why should CCP allow you to be invulnerable?
|
PtolemaiosPlato Solomon
DEFCON. Hydra Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 05:20:00 -
[6]
I agree on all fronts.
Why should CCP not allow us to truly own them ("player"-owned structures? Greetings, thanks for reading,
Sven Location: 18¦ 0'33.80"N - 76¦46'52.66"W - Elevation 344 ft Your sig lacks visible EVE-related content. Email us at [email protected] for more information -HornFrog |
Jinx Barker
GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 05:36:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Jinx Barker on 16/06/2008 05:36:49 Other than the combative mode with which the OP has presented the often recurring idea - I think that personal space structures should be introduced to EVE.
I will not get into the discussion about the approach the OP took, or the form of address adopted..... we can all see it.
May I suggest this thread:S.P.O.S.S
|
Thunderbird Anthares
Crimson Star Empire CORPVS DELICTI
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 05:42:00 -
[8]
you know,i always hated people like you,and i do think ure a complete arse,but aside from the trash you threw around you have a point
------------------------------------------------ When you get to the end of your journey,everything that really matters is the journey itself. |
Jurgen Cartis
Interstellar Corporation of Exploration Nex Eternus
|
Posted - 2008.06.16 06:24:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto On one hand, this sounds like a good idea. On the other hand, you may just be the single biggest jackass I've ever seen on a Web forum.
/not signed.
Biggest jackass, no. Biggest preemptive jackass, maybe.
The idea is not bad if confined to wardeccable corps. Otherwise. . . offlined, nigh-invulnerable towers in highsec. Just what Eve needs. -------------------- ICE Blueprint Sales FIRST!! -Yipsilanti Pfft. Never such a thing as a "last chance". ;) -Rauth |
Astria Tiphareth
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 13:21:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Jurgen Cartis The idea is not bad if confined to wardeccable corps.
Surely if this were the case, they could just make one-person corps? Maybe I've missed the point, but I don't see the benefit or indeed what needs to be changed? ___ My views may not represent those of my corporation or alliance, which is why I never get invited to those diplomatic parties... |
|
Altaree
Red Frog Investments Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 14:45:00 -
[11]
I kinda like the idea. I would like to launch a personal high-sec small tower and remain in my current corp without having to worry about my corps standings. Then I can rent out the research slots to my alliance and do my own copying. This biggest problem with towers right now are two fold: 1) I have to take a BPO to a tower to copy it. I can't use scientific networking. I don't know how to say "Only Jim in corpB can manipulate the labs in corpA's POS but Jane in corpC can't when all three corps are part of the same alliance!" 2) I have to use a corp hanger to do any manipulation on my BPO with an alliance tower. This is fine for a cheap BPO, but if I have something expensive like a bship or larger BPO (heaven forbid a T2 or titan BPO) I will get a bit nervous that any director can just steal that bpo.
Blue Sky |
Altaree
Red Frog Investments Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 14:46:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Astria Tiphareth
Originally by: Jurgen Cartis The idea is not bad if confined to wardeccable corps.
Surely if this were the case, they could just make one-person corps? Maybe I've missed the point, but I don't see the benefit or indeed what needs to be changed?
I don't want to have to maintain a separate corp (or leave my current one) just to set up a POS so I can make copies.
Blue Sky |
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 15:24:00 -
[13]
It can be done by changing the structure of how access to pos's are done.
Allow people within a corp to be able to put up their pos without being given access to other pos's by default.
Right now a person needs to be given the Anchor Role in a corp thus giving them access to ALL corp pos's...
Lets have a way to individualize the pos's so I can run one of my own within my corp and not worry about corp thieves... yes a real problem for those who have large corps which some of you may not understand the complexities of yet.
as for those who oppose the idea just because I preemptively insulted you...
Here's a tissue... :)
----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
Blancanieves
Increasing Success by Lowering Expectations
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 15:36:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Sabe (...) this is my cash and my game so butt your arse out... (...) player base of arrogant egotistical snobs (...)
LOL please CCP don't listen to arrogant egoistical snobs. Now you only have to anwser the question what he (Sabe) is :). -
|
Bloody Rabbit
Jita Miners
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 15:41:00 -
[15]
I understand what you are asking for,
but don't you think that POS are getting too easy to have if single players are about to keep it up and running?
POS are for multiple people and here everyone wants their own POS, I think its time to raise the fuel use or something so that POS aren't everywhere with everyone having one or three.
Local and Covert cloaking Idea |
Shaemell Buttleson
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 15:58:00 -
[16]
Nice going!
This is the first thread I have seen where someone starts flaming away before anyone trolls or disagrees with you in this section of the E-O forum!
|
Empyre
Domestic Reform
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 16:34:00 -
[17]
i like the idea, but maybe not the sov claiming option. if someone feels they can weather the risk of launching and maintaining a tower by themselves somewhere then they should be able to.
You're doing it wrong. |
Zirconium Blade
Ass Pounding Space Monkeys
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 16:58:00 -
[18]
Nope, never. Create your own corp. With your attitude I'm suprised anyone let you in theirs anyway.
|
Sabe
Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 18:20:00 -
[19]
1: I kinda like my attitude and so do many of the people I fly with, but not all... tough chit, I have to get along with people I dont like much either.
2: Running POS's with one person has always been possible, I've run a dozen POS's with moon mining and reactions and still have time to pvp. Obviously you know nothing about POS's. They have always been able to setup and upkept by one person, the labor involved is not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the game mechanics.
POS's have for a long time been waiting for tweaking. They just did some but there's more that needs to be done. POS's have been under almost the same rules with the same features since the beginning of the game 5 years ago. Yes they have tweaked it some but I think its time for "launch for self" option or a tweak of the system to allow idividuals more freedom within their corp to have personal POS's.
3: CCP loves isk sinks... POS's are a big one. Promote people to buy more POS's.
4: Moon material market will have more materials available for more people to buy to build more T2 ships and mods with thus, lowering the costs for T2 mods and ships before they begin bringing in T3 Mods and ships.
5: I already have a small alt corp for my empire POS, this isn't what I'm talking about doing.
6: one last good solid preemptive "up yours" flame for any and all future flamers. (Disclaimer: Read my sig boneheads)
7: Come to 0.0 if you dont like me and put your money where your mouth is. We're low on targets anyways... seems wherever we go the reds dwindle down to nothing.
8: And yes, I've been know to be a little biatch when I wanna be.
----- TROLL
One mans "flame" is another mans "constructive criticism".
I'm not smacking... I'm telling you how it was, is and will be. |
Zirconium Blade
Ass Pounding Space Monkeys
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 18:27:00 -
[20]
Ohhh your and your attitude are so damn EDGY
|
|
Straight Chillen
Solar Wind Ministry Of Amarrian Secret Service
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 19:49:00 -
[21]
i agree, to an extent.
Yes you should beable to launch a tower for you self.
But if your launching it for your self, it shouldnt contribute to the const/system Sov. If your launching a tower for your self, it should be your own envdevour and should have no bearing what-so-ever on your alliance.
And PS your opening statement fails, keep your bull**** in CAOD, no body needs your attitude down here.
|
Dianeces
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 20:44:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Sabe We're low on targets anyways... seems wherever we go the reds dwindle down to nothing.
That's what happens when you NAP everyone around you.
|
Typhado3
Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.06.18 00:16:00 -
[23]
/signed on launching personal poses... would help with empire pos standing issues with corps that are multi national (eve nations).
/signed against op's bad attitude
/signed not possible for noob corps.... a pos with 23/7 concord protection is just wrong.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |