EVE Search - LOUD NOISES!!!1one! Overload is now STACKING PENALIZED?!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

LOUD NOISES!!!1one! Overload is now STACKING PENALIZED?!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
doctorstupid2 The Accursed	Posted - 2008.06.25 22:54:00 - [31] Originally by: Jurgen Cartis I know ECM heat has been stacknerfed for some time now, so now rep heat is stacknerfed. Is overheat on guns/launchers still non-stacking nerfed? Oddly, it appears that the rep amount is stacknerfed, but the rep speed is not. I had to check my guns in something full of mag fields to assure myself CCP wasn't really that intent on making me cry, and thank god overload on guns is not subject to stacking. The idea of stacking anything's overload bonus just seems absurd to me. Abusive \| Deadspace2 \| Deadspace
Goremageddon Box Soldiers Of Mercy	Posted - 2008.06.25 23:13:00 - [32] Originally by: doctorstupid2 Originally by: Jurgen Cartis I know ECM heat has been stacknerfed for some time now, so now rep heat is stacknerfed. Is overheat on guns/launchers still non-stacking nerfed? Oddly, it appears that the rep amount is stacknerfed, but the rep speed is not. I had to check my guns in something full of mag fields to assure myself CCP wasn't really that intent on making me cry, and thank god overload on guns is not subject to stacking. The idea of stacking anything's overload bonus just seems absurd to me. /signed
doctorstupid2 The Accursed	Posted - 2008.06.27 22:44:00 - [33] MOAR OUTRAGE!! Unnerf overload please? Abusive \| Deadspace2 \| Deadspace
Sorum Daemoth Insidious Existence RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.27 23:46:00 - [34] Originally by: Pusha Man Originally by: Blind Man the whole concept of overloading fails anyway If this were true, then nobody would train Energy Management to V (I sure as hell wouldn't be training it right now) except for, maybe, the Amarr. Just...fail.... God Damn the Pusha Man *You just got WTF EXIT ganked!*
Tarminic Black Flame Industries	Posted - 2008.06.28 00:10:00 - [35] Time for someone to bring this up in the CSM Assembly Hall. Any volunteers? ---------------- Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.81 (Updated 4/8)
Treean	Posted - 2008.06.28 00:44:00 - [36] /rant_on CCP strikes again. Seems to me that these people lack a fundamental understanding of the word communication. EvE is a great game founded on great ideas but marred by **ty developers with even **tier ideas. /rant_off
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2008.06.28 09:38:00 - [37] Totally not cool. www.siigarikitawa.com
Feilamya Minmatar Pelennor Swarm Souls of Vengeance	Posted - 2008.06.28 10:23:00 - [38] Edited by: Feilamya on 28/06/2008 10:25:26 Originally by: Mr Krosis I thought making it stronger was kind of the point of overloading, but No says CCP. I recall when overloading was introduced, CCP said it would "add a whole new dimension to the game", and they made a lot of fuzz about it like it was a new killer feature in this game that would have justified a new "expansion" (it finally turned out to be a feature that not even justifies ******* up the whole module interface, which it does) Now apparently it turns out that overloading also adds a whole new dimension to game balance. Unfortunately, CCP can't afford to hire the whole new dimension of game designers needed to handle that, so they decided to make overloading viable only for a select few modules, such as webs. Working as intended, I'd say. I won't cry about lost training time though. Energy Management V, is nice to have.
Sokratesz Rionnag Alba The Requiem	Posted - 2008.06.28 10:31:00 - [39] I'd like to hear what ccp has to say about this.. I refuse to respect religious beliefs, and i refuse to respect people who hold them.
Venkul Mul Gallente	Posted - 2008.06.28 10:52:00 - [40] Originally by: doctorstupid2 Originally by: Jurgen Cartis I know ECM heat has been stacknerfed for some time now, so now rep heat is stacknerfed. Is overheat on guns/launchers still non-stacking nerfed? Oddly, it appears that the rep amount is stacknerfed, but the rep speed is not. I had to check my guns in something full of mag fields to assure myself CCP wasn't really that intent on making me cry, and thank god overload on guns is not subject to stacking. The idea of stacking anything's overload bonus just seems absurd to me. Pretty coherent: your guns aren't stacking nerfed as they have nothing to stack with; you overload the gun/missile launcher, not the magnetic stabilizer, or heatsink or gyroscope or ballistic control. About the armor rep it seem an effect of the stacking nerf of rigs for armour repairs. Seem a bit absurd to stack nerf dual rep system if that is what you are saying as it is already weaker than shield boost and amplifier.

Allanon Wren Minmatar Republic Military School	Posted - 2008.06.28 11:19:00 - [41] More CCP communication incompetence? How is that possible CCP are awesome and infallible! 'Crowd Control Productions, not saying **** since 1997.'
doctorstupid2 The Accursed	Posted - 2008.06.28 17:20:00 - [42] Originally by: Venkul Mul Originally by: doctorstupid2 Originally by: Jurgen Cartis I know ECM heat has been stacknerfed for some time now, so now rep heat is stacknerfed. Is overheat on guns/launchers still non-stacking nerfed? Oddly, it appears that the rep amount is stacknerfed, but the rep speed is not. I had to check my guns in something full of mag fields to assure myself CCP wasn't really that intent on making me cry, and thank god overload on guns is not subject to stacking. The idea of stacking anything's overload bonus just seems absurd to me. Pretty coherent: your guns aren't stacking nerfed as they have nothing to stack with; you overload the gun/missile launcher, not the magnetic stabilizer, or heatsink or gyroscope or ballistic control. About the armor rep it seem an effect of the stacking nerf of rigs for armour repairs. Seem a bit absurd to stack nerf dual rep system if that is what you are saying as it is already weaker than shield boost and amplifier. I've not yet managed to overload aux nanos either, yet the reps' overload bonus is stacking with the aux nanos. Same applies to shield boost amps. What I'm saying is the overload amount bonus of armor repairers and apparently shield boosters is now stacking nerfed against rigs, as in the overload bonus is being counted as a module. Someone else pointed out that boost amps are stacking against the overload bonus as well, in my first post I assumed this didn't apply to shield boosters at all as there are no boost amount rigs; I was incorrect. Ignoring any differences between armor and shield tanks, it's still patently absurd.
Endless Subversion The Accursed	Posted - 2008.07.04 17:42:00 - [43] This is seriously dumb. It's a stealth nerf to PvP active tanking which is seriously in need of buffing, not nerfing. It'd be nice to either hear some justification for this or to see it changed back. Self Destruct & LogOffs
Malen Nenokal Eden Federal Recon	Posted - 2008.07.04 18:01:00 - [44] Can we get a dev confirmation on this? I -just- finished my thermo training too =( -
Kaileen Starsong Amarr Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2008.07.04 18:34:00 - [45] There's more to this than just reps, ECMs come to mind as well. Also, webs/disruptors' overloading is stacking penalized with a skirmish gangmod(!). I.e. normal web's 10km, overloaded is 13km, web with gangmod is 13,150km, but overloaded web with gangmod is not 101.31.315=17,095. Instead it's 16,578=101.3(1+0.315*0.87). Awesome, eh? Especially when you only come to know this after a month's worth of training That's been bugreported for ages, but nothing's changed so far... and I honestly don't think something'll change in near future.
Napro Caldari	Posted - 2008.07.05 20:22:00 - [46] Originally by: Malen Nenokal Can we get a dev confirmation on this? I -just- finished my thermo training too =( 2nded
Bellum Eternus Gallente D00M. The Requiem	Posted - 2008.07.05 20:37:00 - [47] Originally by: Kaileen Starsong There's more to this than just reps, ECMs come to mind as well. Also, webs/disruptors' overloading is stacking penalized with a skirmish gangmod(!). I.e. normal web's 10km, overloaded is 13km, web with gangmod is 13,150km, but overloaded web with gangmod is not 101.31.315=17,095. Instead it's 16,578=101.3(1+0.3150.87). Awesome, eh? Especially when you only come to know this after a month's worth of training That's been bugreported for ages, but nothing's changed so far... and I honestly don't think something'll change in near future. Because skirmish gangmods are just soo overpowered... Also, posting in a doctorstupid2 thread. \o/ waves* Bellum Eternus [Vid] L E G E N D A R Y COLLECTION Inveniam viam aut faciam.
doctorstupid2 The Accursed	Posted - 2008.07.06 01:40:00 - [48] Originally by: Bellum Eternus Originally by: Kaileen Starsong There's more to this than just reps, ECMs come to mind as well. Also, webs/disruptors' overloading is stacking penalized with a skirmish gangmod(!). I.e. normal web's 10km, overloaded is 13km, web with gangmod is 13,150km, but overloaded web with gangmod is not 101.31.315=17,095. Instead it's 16,578=101.3(1+0.3150.87). Awesome, eh? Especially when you only come to know this after a month's worth of training That's been bugreported for ages, but nothing's changed so far... and I honestly don't think something'll change in near future. Because skirmish gangmods are just soo overpowered... Also, posting in a doctorstupid2 thread. \o/ waves* FAILUM ETERNUS! \o/ get your noob ass in game Abusive \| Deadspace2 \| Deadspace


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.