| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Esmenet
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2008.06.29 11:44:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Esmenet on 29/06/2008 11:45:55
 Originally by: Market AltLOLOLOLO
Originally by: Xercies Ravere
Ok you were a bit hard to read but i think I got the general statement. Wardecs agains Player corps in Militia should go ahead, otherwise people could exploit a system where you are in the militia you are immune to war decs. So I think if they had that system every corp would go into militia to stop them selves being war deced. Anyway being war deced means there are more targets 
If you wardec a milita corp, then the whole Milita needs to be able to fight back.
E.G Playercorp is running a 20 man gang of milita. 3 of the 20 are under wardec. FC watches his gang get kileld in highsec and the rest of gang cannot help otherwise be concorded in high sec, or lose sec rating in low sec.
This is the problem. Alliances can freely pick people to wardec so they are 100% immune from rest milita gang thought the eve universe.
It would be great if the militia follows the same rules as a normal alliance, but you will probably regret it when the militia gets a bunch of wardecs from alliances out to have some fun. |
Esmenet
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.03 13:48:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Skyy
As for numbers vs numbers, that's an irrelevant statement. We know from the past smaller groups will declare on larger groups for the sole purpose of griefing them with gank tactics.
 Grief? You might be playing the wrong game.
Quote:
And if you think CCP will allow you dec our entire militia and STILL have the safety of Gallente space without the consequences of Caldari space, you are GREATLY mistaken.
They are unlikely to allow full wardecs towards the militia, but its also unlikely that they will change the wardecmechanics towards corps within the militia.
|
Esmenet
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.03 14:08:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Skyy
EDIT: lets go back to what CCP originally stated... FW is not for alliances, they do not want it for alliances. They have 0.0 and way too much power to be a part of alliances. As it is now, alliance can pick out the largest militia corps, declare war on them, and have a huge effect on FW... while not having to deal with FW rules. That's a broken game if you ask me, and CCP will likely find a fix.
Then leave your corp and join the militia as a soloplayer.
The likely fix that ccp would come with is to not allow corps to join the militia.
|
Esmenet
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.03 14:44:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ulstan
Originally by: Jade
It would be utterly unbalanced to have a single corp forced to wardec single corps
No ones forcing you to wardec single corps in the militia. You freely chose to do that. You can also freely choose to join the militia of your choice and get free permanent war decs against everyone in that militia.
Similarly noone is forcing you to join a corp that leaves you open to wardecs.
|
Esmenet
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.07.03 21:18:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Drenan
We waited years for Faction Warfare.
Is anyone at CCP actually paid to carry out a basic 'impact assessment' before major changes to game mechanics are introduced?
If they are, how did they miss this one, and the navy response loophole?
They didnt miss it, it is intentional and the only way corps are allowed to join Fw without disbanding. If you cant deal with the wardec from within the militia then jusrt drop out of the militia for a bit until you finish your war.
|
| |
|