EVE Search - Alliance Rankings: See Alliance built/conquered the most outposts

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Alliance Rankings: See Alliance built/conquered the most outposts

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 11:43:00 - [1] Edited by: Serenity Steele on 29/06/2008 11:44:16 Eve-maps.com website now has two "All time" Alliance rankings: - Rank of alliances by Outposts Built - Rank of alliances by Outposts Conquered (excludes ones they built themselves) This came about from an discussion last weekend about which alliance had built the most outposts, and well .. it just needed a definitive answer. Hopefully this kills a few more CAOD arguments
Jake Nooble White Nova Corp	Posted - 2008.06.29 11:53:00 - [2] hey look at dat we're topz!
EdFromHumanResources Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 11:57:00 - [3] Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again
Hey You Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:00:00 - [4] Originally by: Serenity Steele Hopefully this kills a few more CAOD arguments Doubt it with COAD but awesome job again Serenity. __________________________________ We Ride Together We Die Together We Few, We Happy Few...
BuIIseye Amarr Pax Amarria Corp	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:03:00 - [5] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again Thats for the places of which the alliances have the same number of outposts built/conquired ...
EdFromHumanResources Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:05:00 - [6] Originally by: BuIIseye Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again Thats for the places of which the alliances have the same number of outposts built/conquired ... Ah, well what are the odds of using a symbol for that? So we can still have a nice number list instead of having to count towards the nearest one. ------------------------------------------------- Everyone hates goonswarm for one reason or another. ... And they promote****gotism -Zurrar
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:06:00 - [7] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again Originally by: BuIIseye Thats for the places of which the alliances have the same number of outposts built/conquired ... Yep. If 2 alliances are on equal 3rd place, the next alliance isn't in 4th place, it's in 5th place. ≡v≡ Strategic Maps now in Eve-Online Store - Includes Black Rise & Empyrean Age
Cippalippus Primus GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:17:00 - [8] Nice job.
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:19:00 - [9] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again Originally by: BuIIseye Thats for the places of which the alliances have the same number of outposts built/conquired ... Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Ah, well what are the odds of using a symbol for that? So we can still have a nice number list instead of having to count towards the nearest one. Odds are 100%. I've added in the duplicate numbers
EdFromHumanResources Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:21:00 - [10] Originally by: Serenity Steele Odds are 100%. I've added in the duplicate numbers Sweet thanks. Looks a bit busier but you can also scan through it much easier now.
Swamp Ziro GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:26:00 - [11] Originally by: Serenity Steele Edited by: Serenity Steele on 29/06/2008 11:50:56 Eve-maps.com website now has two "All time" Alliance rankings: - Rank of alliances by Outposts Built - Rank of alliances by Outposts Conquered (excludes ones they built themselves) This came about from an discussion last weekend about which alliance had built the most outposts, and well .. it just needed a definitive answer. Hopefully this kills a few more CAOD arguments Great job! However this does not differentiate between outposts conquered and outposts "given" (rented) but it still gives us the bigger picture
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:34:00 - [12] Originally by: Swamp Ziro Great job! However this does not differentiate between outposts conquered and outposts "given" (rented) but it still gives us the bigger picture Hmm .. that's a whole new bag of tricks to create. It's possible, with collusion from the alliance leader who is renting. Ie. They'd have to be willing to state that they are renting the outpost, and who they were renting it from. The flaw being it's entirely optional as to whether or not it's displayed. Some alliances would chose to hide the fact they are renting, and other reveal they are renting, which would make it innaccurate. The question then becomes; - If it is inaccurate, is it still useful? - Would alliances really show that they were renting? The two of which make me think: Since rentals are quite a common thing, is that a feature people would like to see introduced to the game in the contract system? ie. Ability to establish contracts for rental of an outpost, moon, access for mining to space etc., and would that need to be shown on the overview in some way to the "landlord" alliance members? If it is, post it up in the CSM forums! ≡v≡ Strategic Maps now in Eve-Online Store - Includes Black Rise & Empyrean Age
EdFromHumanResources Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:40:00 - [13] Originally by: Serenity Steele Originally by: Swamp Ziro Great job! However this does not differentiate between outposts conquered and outposts "given" (rented) but it still gives us the bigger picture Hmm .. that's a whole new bag of tricks to create. It's possible, with collusion from the alliance leader who is renting. Ie. They'd have to be willing to state that they are renting the outpost, and who they were renting it from. The flaw being it's entirely optional as to whether or not it's displayed. Some alliances would chose to hide the fact they are renting, and other reveal they are renting, which would make it innaccurate. The question then becomes; - If it is inaccurate, is it still useful? - Would alliances really show that they were renting? The two of which make me think: Since rentals are quite a common thing, is that a feature people would like to see introduced to the game in the contract system? ie. Ability to establish contracts for rental of an outpost, moon, access for mining to space etc., and would that need to be shown on the overview in some way to the "landlord" alliance members? If it is, post it up in the CSM forums! Renters would be neat to see. Not to mention it'll provide a neat list of targets
Saldoro Disco Biscuits New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.29 12:48:00 - [14] Look how much Goonswarm has contributed to the infrastructure of 0.0.
dastommy79 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.29 13:06:00 - [15] Good work as always
Tiger Delivery Minmatar THE INTERNET.	Posted - 2008.06.29 13:06:00 - [16] So the only alliance more carebear than ASCN is BOB. What a suprise, really.
Saldoro Disco Biscuits New Eden Research	Posted - 2008.06.29 13:10:00 - [17] Your tears, I drink them.
puh hadada	Posted - 2008.06.29 13:48:00 - [18] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Edited by: EdFromHumanResources on 29/06/2008 12:03:40 Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 you look dumb
Spoon Thumb Paladin Imperium Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.29 14:31:00 - [19] I found the list of all outposts really useful because you could order by weeks and see what outposts have been taken before the sov changes show up necessarily on map. Be cool if you could put that back in please :D Or maybe have a section "outpost ownership change" as well as sov change
Wesley Baird D00M. The Requiem	Posted - 2008.06.29 14:58:00 - [20] Peoke once posted in a thread on this forum that Smashkill had taken more stations than anyone else....of course I lol'd...too bad hes not around to look for himself...
Splagada Minmatar Tides of Silence Hydra Alliance	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:03:00 - [21] pretty nice. can you do that for systems lost/conquered too?
General Windypops Skullduggery Inc	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:04:00 - [22] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Edited by: EdFromHumanResources on 29/06/2008 12:03:40 Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again EDIT: But neat rankings nonetheless. Are you incapable of just thanking someone for providing an excellent service to Eve? Would have helped if you hadn't posted something so eye-wateringly embarrassing.
sakana North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:15:00 - [23] Aww yea, PL swoops in at joint #60 in outposts conquered!!
Ryuga VonRhaiden Caldari Insurgent New Eden Tribe Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:22:00 - [24] Hmmm... so actually BOB contributed to the development of the nullsec space the most while RA and Goons mostly razed and pillaged only O.o Don't know why but i always thought the opposite was true O.o
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:25:00 - [25] Edited by: Graalum on 29/06/2008 15:28:48 Originally by: Wesley Baird Peoke once posted in a thread on this forum that Smashkill had taken more stations than anyone else....of course I lol'd...too bad hes not around to look for himself... i like to think that our 12 outposts (tde, bwf, bnd, mj- ngm, 9iz, those two atlas had and the 3 fix had) we conquered isn't a bad accomplishment. It doesn't help that we added about 10 uncontested stations to goonies capture count though. We also built 7, which i think is pretty chill. of course thats doesn't really take much away from the fact that peoke was talking with his head up his ass.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.06.29 15:28:00 - [26] unless i'm clicking the wrong things, is there a way to make a pages that will display which outposts they've owned and when?
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 17:24:00 - [27] Originally by: Spoon Thumb I found the list of all outposts really useful because you could order by weeks and see what outposts have been taken before the sov changes show up necessarily on map. Be cool if you could put that back in please :D Or maybe have a section "outpost ownership change" as well as sov change It's back! as "All Outposts". ≡v≡ Strategic Maps now in Eve-Online Store - Includes Black Rise & Empyrean Age
Serenity Steele	Posted - 2008.06.29 17:31:00 - [28] Originally by: Graalum unless i'm clicking the wrong things, is there a way to make a pages that will display which outposts they've owned and when? I will do it soon(tm) combined with some additional info on alliances, it's been on the backlog for about a year ≡v≡ Strategic Maps now in Eve-Online Store - Includes Black Rise & Empyrean Age
Wednesday Sheffield Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.06.29 17:31:00 - [29] There seem to be two tenth legions and two alliances that share the ticker, "RISE." Might want to fix that.
Mr Kindjal Amarr 32nd Amarrian Imperial Navy Regiment	Posted - 2008.06.29 17:35:00 - [30] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Edited by: EdFromHumanResources on 29/06/2008 12:03:40 Was it too hard to number things in some of of standard way? 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 15 16 20 25 28 31 41 60 85 Seriously what the hell. It looks like you just threw in a number every now and again EDIT: But neat rankings nonetheless. How on earth is this hard to understand ed?

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.