EVE Search - Survivor Class T2 Battlecruisers

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Survivor Class T2 Battlecruisers

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:06:00 - [1] we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it! Heres my idea..... Each faction gets a new battlecruiser They are Survivor class. They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price. Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill): +50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount 50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake) 50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers) 50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks) But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons. -75% to turret tracking -75% to missile launcher rate of fire +75% to reload time of modules +75% to turret rate of fire. Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
Deyalarah	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:12:00 - [2] no. also nice job on balancing the armour vs shield buffs...
the plague Galactic Shipyards Inc HUZZAH FEDERATION	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:14:00 - [3] LOL
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:16:00 - [4] new stats!!!!!!!!! --------- +50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount 50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake) 50% bonus to repair module repair amount 50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks) But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons. -75% to turret tracking -75% to missile launcher rate of fire +75% to reload time of modules +75% to turret rate of fire. -15% tractor beam range
Shira Elan	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:20:00 - [5] tractor beam range!?
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:21:00 - [6] so u cant use it as a salvager as easily. makes sense when you think about it.
Kil'Roy Minmatar The Rat Patrol	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:21:00 - [7] Why
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:25:00 - [8] why? because eve doesnt have ships that can tank capitols!
Mike Ludkips	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:27:00 - [9] This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one.
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:27:00 - [10] Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. :P Heres my idea..... Each faction gets a new battlecruiser They are Survivor class. They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price. Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill): +50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount 50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake) 50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers) 50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks) But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons. -75% to turret tracking -75% to missile launcher rate of fire +75% to reload time of modules +75% to turret rate of fire. Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter.
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:40:00 - [11] Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. The templar one at least was funny. The raven one was just crap spam.
Mike Ludkips	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:43:00 - [12] Originally by: Lance Fighter Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. The templar one at least was funny. The raven one was just crap spam. I liked the raven one because it was such a shitty setup if it was even real. Although i was sad that he didn't use the noob shield/armor/hull omnitank.
Faife Minmatar Kinda'Shujaa	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:45:00 - [13] i think the difference is that i laughed when the raven one happened and when the templar one happened. this not so much - -
Faife Minmatar Kinda'Shujaa	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:46:00 - [14] Originally by: Lance Fighter Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. The templar one at least was funny. The raven one was just crap spam. it was a real one though, the guy accidentally posted it 5 times in a "i cant tank this lvl 4 mission" thread and blamed his son. and then it took off from there. - -
Slade Hoo Amarr	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:47:00 - [15] 2/10
masternerdguy	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:48:00 - [16] this is a serious idea! think of the tactics
Mike Ludkips	Posted - 2008.07.12 07:50:00 - [17] Originally by: Faife Originally by: Lance Fighter Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. The templar one at least was funny. The raven one was just crap spam. it was a real one though, the guy accidentally posted it 5 times in a "i cant tank this lvl 4 mission" thread and blamed his son. and then it took off from there. I liked the one where the guy asked for a setup and everyone was like ZOMG YOUR FACE?!
Mithfindel Gallente Gariushi Foundation	Posted - 2008.07.12 08:08:00 - [18] Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. Hm, I fail at forumwhoring. I know what a Templar, an Amarr fighter drone used by carriers is, but I don't remember the Raven one.
Vaal Erit Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2008.07.12 08:53:00 - [19] Originally by: masternerdguy we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower Quoting the new meme. Someone send out the SHC meme signal, let's get this out to teh peoples of the interwebs! -- http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
Le Verde Bong'z N Beer'z Militia	Posted - 2008.07.12 08:58:00 - [20] what type of wnker posts on a thread to congratulate peeps on their wedding day about some stupid ass code that no-one gives a flying fck about
Fay DeLion Gallente	Posted - 2008.07.12 10:29:00 - [21] Aren't command ships t2 battlecruisers?
Ashen Angel Minmatar Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2008.07.12 10:48:00 - [22] Originally by: Fay DeLion Aren't command ships t2 battlecruisers? yes
vostok Minmatar Suns Of Korhal Mutual Assured Destruction	Posted - 2008.07.12 11:04:00 - [23] Originally by: masternerdguy we need a t2 drake, with twice the tanking power and half the firepower. In fact, a whole role! I got it! Heres my idea..... Each faction gets a new battlecruiser They are Survivor class. They are extremely effective tanks, can be used for baiting, tanking 0.0 complexes, etc. But they have a price. Here are the pros (per level of Survivors skill): +50% bonus to shield (or armor) amount 50% reduction in shield recharge time (for caldari passive t2 drake) 50% reduction in repair module capacitor need (for armor reppers) 50% bonus to shield boost amount (for active shield tanks) But as with all this gain comes some hard hitting cons. -75% to turret tracking -75% to missile launcher rate of fire +75% to reload time of modules +75% to turret rate of fire. Basically this ship is a solid tank, but a poor poor hitter. oh dear me where to start... primarily your idea is dreadful, we already have enough overtanking ships tbh and who the ** is going to ohh look its that silly ship used for baiting lets attack it Now we get onto how your ideas for stats is so bad that it makes me wonder if you have ever used anything but a ing passive shield tank. you took the most stupidly powerful tank going and then gave it a 300% bonus, cos I want to meet a T2 drake tanking 4-5k dps <- sarcasm here then you comparatively gave armour reppers, (generally the weakest form of tanking) no bonus, so they will tank exactly what they do already while having a few more med slots free for whatever now giving a shield booster a 50% bonus is something a lot of ships have already, in the form of a 37.5% bonus. and with all your hard hitting cons.... your obvious caldari noobdom levels disturb me, you have given 3 nerfs to turrets, both crippling and just 2 nerfs to missiles. not to mention, why not just give the ship LESS GUNS if you want to know about these ships that tank hard and hit poorly then next time think about what your typing and try not to fail so much, heres a short list: ALL THE COMMAND SHIPS! (bar maybe the astarte) the tier 3 BS depending on fittings the **ing drake Had you said we need an insane T2 gank ship that tanks nothing and is basicly a weapons platform, I might have been interested. hell even a BC/BS sized dread would be better than what you have said
Steve Celeste	Posted - 2008.07.12 11:19:00 - [24] Originally by: Le Verde what type of wnker posts on a thread to congratulate peeps on their wedding day about some stupid ass code that no-one gives a flying fck about It's the same asshat that made those horrible Caldari Militia video's.
Hannobaal Gallente Federal Defence Union	Posted - 2008.07.12 11:42:00 - [25] Edited by: Hannobaal on 12/07/2008 11:45:16 Originally by: Lance Fighter Originally by: Mike Ludkips This can't be a forced meme it isn't as funny as the templar one or the raven one. The templar one at least was funny. The raven one was just crap spam. That's because you didn't see the original thread that caused it. --------------- I'm not as think as you drunk I am.
Caffeine Junkie 2 Guys In Motherships	Posted - 2008.07.12 11:46:00 - [26] No The drake already has one of the best tanks in the game, why would you want more? There are many places in this game where battles are fought and won, EFT isn't one of them.
Dotard Minmatar Suddenly Ninjas	Posted - 2008.07.12 12:24:00 - [27] /Fail Idea If an explaination of why it fails is necessary you should go and join Chribba in some Veld mining. --------------- Nerf You! Buff Me!
NanDe YaNen The Funkalistic	Posted - 2008.07.12 15:24:00 - [28] Originally by: masternerdguy this is a serious idea! think of the tactics No. It's not serious. Drake already falls to the bottom of my list of things to kill in gang. Let's see, we could take out a battleship for the damage required to pop a Drake and the Drake is threatening nothing compared to every other ship on the overview. With that kind of gimped firepower and no reason to get shot, it's going to be one hell of a survivor. Very last ship to get popped
NanDe YaNen The Funkalistic	Posted - 2008.07.12 15:30:00 - [29] Originally by: vostok Had you said we need an insane T2 gank ship that tanks nothing and is basicly a weapons platform, I might have been interested. I'm working on it.
TerrorBaBy Caldari Jolly Rogerers	Posted - 2008.07.12 15:43:00 - [30] Originally by: vostok and who the ** is going to ohh look its that silly ship used for baiting lets attack it This actually made me 'lol' when I read it. _______________ Originally by:** Constance Harme It's like willfully getting into a car full of strangers and then being driven out to the woods and being shot.quote]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.