Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

paik
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 21:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game. I am advocating the Deletion of all Ttitan Class vessels :FULL STOP:. I am also advocating the deletion of all Titan specific skills from the database ( Racial Titan skill , Doomsday device Operation) :FULL STOP: I am also advocating the removal of all Titan BPO/BPC's and Titan specific component BPO/BPC as well as any and all Doomsday Device BPOS/BPC's :FULL STOP:.
In compensation to the effected pilots I am advocating the return of the minerals for the build of the Titan and its Doomsday Device all equipped modules and equipment within the Titan to be moved to JITA 4-4 so effected pilots can easily decide what to do with the assets at that point. Reimburse all skillpoints from the deleted Titan specific skills as has been done in the past with other skill deletions.
Make this change at the exact same time compounds are removed from Drone Region NPC's. This will offset the vacuum left from that change and soften the potential flood of minerals to market from Titan deletion with both changes counter-balancing each other ( perhaps not perfectly).
After the deletion or at the time of deletion ( If CCP can make it happen "time constraints" ) Introduce a new capital or supercapital platform. This supercapital platform would have specific skills required to pilot it and specific BPO's to produce it . This new platform would have no offensive capability only defensive. Its role would be a support/logistic capital/supercap. It would do things such as create Jumpbridges , Provide Gang bonuses , Have a large corporate hanger and Ship maintnence array to support its fleet.
My arguments for this are pretty simple. Changing Titans to do this job is silly as not that many would be required to achieve having enough to support the role. Currently there are more titans in game that what would be needed to outfit all nullsec/lowsec groups with this important role. Furthermore a very large portion of Titan pilots did not train for over a year or spend billions upon billions acquiring a hull or further billions upon billions acquiring modules to outfit a Titan that has been deemed since inception to be a offensive roled hull to have it suddenly changed to a non offensive hull.
The Supercarrier will retain the role as the dominant force in Supercapital warfare specializing in laying waste to capital class vessels and sovereignty structures. This is also a stealth buff for Dreadnaughts as they will be used in greater frequency to shoot POS & Sov Structures in the abscense of Titans.
I make the assertion with the complete removal of Titans and a addition of Support/Role Supercapital we will see a more dynamic player experience. With more specific roles for players to fill instead of Titans dominating the battlefield of all types.
Sincerely, Paik AKA Manfred Sideous |

Trusty Jutspezic
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
74
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 21:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
paik wrote:Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game. I am advocating the Deletion of all Ttitan Class vessels :FULL STOP:. I am also advocating the deletion of all Titan specific skills from the database ( Racial Titan skill , Doomsday device Operation) :FULL STOP: I am also advocating the removal of all Titan BPO/BPC's and Titan specific component BPO/BPC as well as any and all Doomsday Device BPOS/BPC's :FULL STOP:.
In compensation to the effected pilots I am advocating the return of the minerals for the build of the Titan and its Doomsday Device all equipped modules and equipment within the Titan to be moved to JITA 4-4 so effected pilots can easily decide what to do with the assets at that point. Reimburse all skillpoints from the deleted Titan specific skills as has been done in the past with other skill deletions.
Make this change at the exact same time compounds are removed from Drone Region NPC's. This will offset the vacuum left from that change and soften the potential flood of minerals to market from Titan deletion with both changes counter-balancing each other ( perhaps not perfectly).
After the deletion or at the time of deletion ( If CCP can make it happen "time constraints" ) Introduce a new capital or supercapital platform. This supercapital platform would have specific skills required to pilot it and specific BPO's to produce it . This new platform would have no offensive capability only defensive. Its role would be a support/logistic capital/supercap. It would do things such as create Jumpbridges , Provide Gang bonuses , Have a large corporate hanger and Ship maintnence array to support its fleet.
My arguments for this are pretty simple. Changing Titans to do this job is silly as not that many would be required to achieve having enough to support the role. Currently there are more titans in game that what would be needed to outfit all nullsec/lowsec groups with this important role. Furthermore a very large portion of Titan pilots did not train for over a year or spend billions upon billions acquiring a hull or further billions upon billions acquiring modules to outfit a Titan that has been deemed since inception to be a offensive roled hull to have it suddenly changed to a non offensive hull.
The Supercarrier will retain the role as the dominant force in Supercapital warfare specializing in laying waste to capital class vessels and sovereignty structures. This is also a stealth buff for Dreadnaughts as they will be used in greater frequency to shoot POS & Sov Structures in the abscense of Titans.
I make the assertion with the complete removal of Titans and a addition of Support/Role Supercapital we will see a more dynamic player experience. With more specific roles for players to fill instead of Titans dominating the battlefield of all types.
Sincerely, Paik AKA Manfred Sideous
qtiyd |

Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
507
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 21:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
GoonSwarm Federation will remove all titans free of charge :FULL STOP: |

SamGromoff
Padded Helmets
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 21:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
I agree with this idea and would like to subscribe to its newsletter |

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 21:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
paik wrote:Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game. I am advocating the Deletion of all Ttitan Class vessels :FULL STOP:. I am also advocating the deletion of all Titan specific skills from the database ( Racial Titan skill , Doomsday device Operation) :FULL STOP: I am also advocating the removal of all Titan BPO/BPC's and Titan specific component BPO/BPC as well as any and all Doomsday Device BPOS/BPC's :FULL STOP:.
In compensation to the effected pilots I am advocating the return of the minerals for the build of the Titan and its Doomsday Device all equipped modules and equipment within the Titan to be moved to JITA 4-4 so effected pilots can easily decide what to do with the assets at that point. Reimburse all skillpoints from the deleted Titan specific skills as has been done in the past with other skill deletions.
Make this change at the exact same time compounds are removed from Drone Region NPC's. This will offset the vacuum left from that change and soften the potential flood of minerals to market from Titan deletion with both changes counter-balancing each other ( perhaps not perfectly).
After the deletion or at the time of deletion ( If CCP can make it happen "time constraints" ) Introduce a new capital or supercapital platform. This supercapital platform would have specific skills required to pilot it and specific BPO's to produce it . This new platform would have no offensive capability only defensive. Its role would be a support/logistic capital/supercap. It would do things such as create Jumpbridges , Provide Gang bonuses , Have a large corporate hanger and Ship maintnence array to support its fleet.
My arguments for this are pretty simple. Changing Titans to do this job is silly as not that many would be required to achieve having enough to support the role. Currently there are more titans in game that what would be needed to outfit all nullsec/lowsec groups with this important role. Furthermore a very large portion of Titan pilots did not train for over a year or spend billions upon billions acquiring a hull or further billions upon billions acquiring modules to outfit a Titan that has been deemed since inception to be a offensive roled hull to have it suddenly changed to a non offensive hull.
The Supercarrier will retain the role as the dominant force in Supercapital warfare specializing in laying waste to capital class vessels and sovereignty structures. This is also a stealth buff for Dreadnaughts as they will be used in greater frequency to shoot POS & Sov Structures in the abscense of Titans.
I make the assertion with the complete removal of Titans and a addition of Support/Role Supercapital we will see a more dynamic player experience. With more specific roles for players to fill instead of Titans dominating the battlefield of all types.
Sincerely, Paik AKA Manfred Sideous
+1 |

Raivi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
72
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
paik wrote:Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game. I am advocating the Deletion of all Ttitan Class vessels :FULL STOP:. I am also advocating the deletion of all Titan specific skills from the database ( Racial Titan skill , Doomsday device Operation) :FULL STOP: I am also advocating the removal of all Titan BPO/BPC's and Titan specific component BPO/BPC as well as any and all Doomsday Device BPOS/BPC's :FULL STOP:.
In compensation to the effected pilots I am advocating the return of the minerals for the build of the Titan and its Doomsday Device all equipped modules and equipment within the Titan to be moved to JITA 4-4 so effected pilots can easily decide what to do with the assets at that point. Reimburse all skillpoints from the deleted Titan specific skills as has been done in the past with other skill deletions.
Make this change at the exact same time compounds are removed from Drone Region NPC's. This will offset the vacuum left from that change and soften the potential flood of minerals to market from Titan deletion with both changes counter-balancing each other ( perhaps not perfectly).
After the deletion or at the time of deletion ( If CCP can make it happen "time constraints" ) Introduce a new capital or supercapital platform. This supercapital platform would have specific skills required to pilot it and specific BPO's to produce it . This new platform would have no offensive capability only defensive. Its role would be a support/logistic capital/supercap. It would do things such as create Jumpbridges , Provide Gang bonuses , Have a large corporate hanger and Ship maintnence array to support its fleet.
My arguments for this are pretty simple. Changing Titans to do this job is silly as not that many would be required to achieve having enough to support the role. Currently there are more titans in game that what would be needed to outfit all nullsec/lowsec groups with this important role. Furthermore a very large portion of Titan pilots did not train for over a year or spend billions upon billions acquiring a hull or further billions upon billions acquiring modules to outfit a Titan that has been deemed since inception to be a offensive roled hull to have it suddenly changed to a non offensive hull.
The Supercarrier will retain the role as the dominant force in Supercapital warfare specializing in laying waste to capital class vessels and sovereignty structures. This is also a stealth buff for Dreadnaughts as they will be used in greater frequency to shoot POS & Sov Structures in the abscense of Titans.
I make the assertion with the complete removal of Titans and a addition of Support/Role Supercapital we will see a more dynamic player experience. With more specific roles for players to fill instead of Titans dominating the battlefield of all types.
Sincerely, Paik AKA Manfred Sideous
May actually be the best solution long-term. The flood of minerals would be the big problem, but it might be something that needs to be done sooner or later. |

Lord Thorin
Viziam Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Raivi wrote:paik wrote:Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game. I am advocating the Deletion of all Ttitan Class vessels :FULL STOP:. I am also advocating the deletion of all Titan specific skills from the database ( Racial Titan skill , Doomsday device Operation) :FULL STOP: I am also advocating the removal of all Titan BPO/BPC's and Titan specific component BPO/BPC as well as any and all Doomsday Device BPOS/BPC's :FULL STOP:.
In compensation to the effected pilots I am advocating the return of the minerals for the build of the Titan and its Doomsday Device all equipped modules and equipment within the Titan to be moved to JITA 4-4 so effected pilots can easily decide what to do with the assets at that point. Reimburse all skillpoints from the deleted Titan specific skills as has been done in the past with other skill deletions.
Make this change at the exact same time compounds are removed from Drone Region NPC's. This will offset the vacuum left from that change and soften the potential flood of minerals to market from Titan deletion with both changes counter-balancing each other ( perhaps not perfectly).
After the deletion or at the time of deletion ( If CCP can make it happen "time constraints" ) Introduce a new capital or supercapital platform. This supercapital platform would have specific skills required to pilot it and specific BPO's to produce it . This new platform would have no offensive capability only defensive. Its role would be a support/logistic capital/supercap. It would do things such as create Jumpbridges , Provide Gang bonuses , Have a large corporate hanger and Ship maintnence array to support its fleet.
My arguments for this are pretty simple. Changing Titans to do this job is silly as not that many would be required to achieve having enough to support the role. Currently there are more titans in game that what would be needed to outfit all nullsec/lowsec groups with this important role. Furthermore a very large portion of Titan pilots did not train for over a year or spend billions upon billions acquiring a hull or further billions upon billions acquiring modules to outfit a Titan that has been deemed since inception to be a offensive roled hull to have it suddenly changed to a non offensive hull.
The Supercarrier will retain the role as the dominant force in Supercapital warfare specializing in laying waste to capital class vessels and sovereignty structures. This is also a stealth buff for Dreadnaughts as they will be used in greater frequency to shoot POS & Sov Structures in the abscense of Titans.
I make the assertion with the complete removal of Titans and a addition of Support/Role Supercapital we will see a more dynamic player experience. With more specific roles for players to fill instead of Titans dominating the battlefield of all types.
Sincerely, Paik AKA Manfred Sideous May actually be the best solution long-term. The flood of minerals would be the big problem, but it might be something that needs to be done sooner or later.
The flood of minerals would be a temporary problem, also it would be the end game considering CCP don't have a clue what to do with titans.. |

mxzf
Shovel Bros
996
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
I see what you did there.
Posting in a stealth "give me my ISK and SP back because you're nerfing Titans to no longer be solo-pwn-mobiles" thread. |

paik
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
mxzf wrote:I see what you did there.
Posting in a stealth "give me my ISK and SP back because you're nerfing Titans to no longer be solo-pwn-mobiles" thread.
Yeah pretty much as the ship since its inception was based around its tenacity and devastating offensive capability as well as logistical support. Taking away a role that was the driving force for majority of players that sought them out and skilled directly for them is unfair actually highly unfair. Instead do the sensible should have been done years ago and remove them and introduce something better. |

testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
140
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
paik wrote:mxzf wrote:I see what you did there.
Posting in a stealth "give me my ISK and SP back because you're nerfing Titans to no longer be solo-pwn-mobiles" thread. Yeah pretty much as the ship since its inception was based around its tenacity and devastating offensive capability as well as logistical support. Taking away a role that was the driving force for majority of players that sought them out and skilled directly for them is unfair actually highly unfair. Instead do the sensible should have been done years ago and remove them and introduce something better.
It stil is an offensive weapon just not against subcaps. If this makes you sad, CCP does not care. |
|

Kayl Breinhar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
paik wrote:mxzf wrote:I see what you did there.
Posting in a stealth "give me my ISK and SP back because you're nerfing Titans to no longer be solo-pwn-mobiles" thread. Yeah pretty much as the ship since its inception was based around its tenacity and devastating offensive capability as well as logistical support. Taking away a role that was the driving force for majority of players that sought them out and skilled directly for them is unfair actually highly unfair. Instead do the sensible should have been done years ago and remove them and introduce something better. To be fair, that's what you and PL consider them to be. Everyone else, at least after remote doomsdays were removed, has more or less been using them primarily for logistics. |

India99
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
sounds like a fair deal to me, Titan owners wouldnt get screwed that much by wasting that much ISK/SP for a ship that they never signed in for and Gewnies would save some tears for something else to cry over.
EVERYONE WILL BE A WINNER
 |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
235
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 22:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kayl Breinhar wrote:paik wrote:Yeah pretty much as the ship since its inception was based around its tenacity and devastating offensive capability as well as logistical support. Taking away a role that was the driving force for majority of players that sought them out and skilled directly for them is unfair actually highly unfair. Instead do the sensible should have been done years ago and remove them and introduce something better. To be fair, that's what you and PL consider them to be. Everyone else, at least after remote doomsdays were removed, has more or less been using them primarily for logistics. They give nice bonuses too. Of course having 30 titans doesn't give you 30x the bonuses, but hey.
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
327
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 23:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
I've got a better idea, why don't CCP just make large fleets of titans extremely undesirable, as they should have been all along.
That way the self entitled little crybabies that fly them will make a vast mountain of hilarious spergy rant threads which the rest of us can take great pleasure in, then unsub, and the titans will be removed from the game, without the massive influx of minerals caused by ship recycling, or the rampant FOTM-chasing that a skillpoint re-allocation would lead to.
Seems like a win-win to me. ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006 |

Sephiroth CloneIIV
Vitriol Ventures BLACK-MARK
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 03:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
Modularity is for nich ships, keep titans, Big Fracking Ships that can do allot of things.
With current change by CCP that will diminish them as being subcap pasters in solo fleets.
Though.... big super ship should have some thing it does that other ships can't do.
As I suggested before, allow capitals to dock inside them, being that they are so huge a fleet should be able to fit inside them and or fit.
that in addition to its titan bridge, and a huge corp hanger (freighter size) would give it a power for assisting fleets. Along with fleet bonus found on no other ships. Not a solo ship I win button, but a big boast to top the balance. |

Mama Durka
Cult of the Crayon
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 05:58:00 -
[16] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:I've got a better idea, why don't CCP just make large fleets of titans extremely undesirable, as they should have been all along
That way the self entitled little crybabies that fly them will make a vast mountain of hilarious spergy rant threads which the rest of us can take great pleasure in, then unsub, and the titans will be effectively removed from the game, without the massive influx of minerals caused by ship recycling, or the rampant FOTM-chasing that a skillpoint re-allocation would lead to
Seems like a win-win-win to me.
It figures that a Goon would find fault in any solution that could actually help the game rather than specifically help goons, then accuse others of being cry-babies. Bit rich isn't it, seeing as goons cried the loudest to CCP because those big bad titans that naughty PL fly somehow managed to shoot double LSE drakes with microwarp drives?! HOW DARE THEY SHOOT GOONS! I'm surprised you guys didn't also demand the sig radius on drakes be lowered so that nobody can shoot back at you. I mean hey, there's only 7000 or so goons (clearly you are outnumbered so maybe you should have also asked CCP for a nerf to alliance sizes while they were at it (for every alliance except goons of course, since you are all so "Special" - note the capital "S" there...yes, the big red bus will be along to pick you up shortly). Stop being a bunch of hypocrites and start using what little brain power you actually have and try seeing this from the perspective of ALL eve players
So onto the serious part, yes this is a solution, no I don't see it as being the only solution but you all have to admit it would resolve the age old question once and for all: is the problem titans themselves, or is the real problem the lack creativity that everyone else seems to have when trying to come up with a counter to them?
I don't actually think the problems are titans, I think the problem is 2 parts politics, 1 part CCP not having a clue about what they were doing introducing them in the first place. Seems almost like introducing titans was done similar to how the technetium changes were made (e.g. lets try this and see what happens...and if anything bad happens then we can always say "it's on our roadmap of things to fix"). The issues with titans are not much different from a lot of other ships, it happened with battleships blobbing up and shooting everything else smaller, happened with super carriers doing much the same, and so on. Regardless of ship type, what makes the difference is this: someone who is better organised than you (and not necessarily bigger) is very likely going to come at you and if you aren't ready or aren't well organised, then you'll probably die. It's really that simple.
How about we just remove every ship type higher than a BS? That way goons can still keep up with their jihadi behaviour toward ice miners (still gonna need isotopes for fuel blocks so plenty of room for market manipulation) and they won't have to spend so much time whinging about capitals (I'm sure there will be something else they'll find to complain about though). |

sodney
Radioactive Crew
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 07:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:
It stil is an offensive weapon just not against subcaps. If this makes you sad, CCP does not care.
while reading all the forum-signatures of your Alliance mates about this topic , I actually do get the impression that CCP does care if you cry long enough.
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
329
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 09:16:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mama Durka wrote: CCP not having a clue about what they were doing introducing them in the first place. Seems almost like introducing titans was done similar to how the technetium changes were made (e.g. lets try this and see what happens...and if anything bad happens then we can always say "it's on our roadmap of things to fix").
Your angry keyboard flailing about Evil Goony Dev Manipulation aside, this bit I completely agree with. CCP never had a clear vision for what Titans should do in the game since they were first introduced, and showed a complete lack of understanding as to how introducing them would affect the game. If CCP had been running itself like a proper grownup company at the time, rather than throwing new ships at the game with a design brief of "lets make something KOOL AND AWESOME with a lot of wildly diverse abilities, but its ok because at 40bn per hull only the biggest alliances will be able to afford even one or two, there's no way they'll ever be mass-produced or thrown around casually!", we wouldn't be in this mess.
Thankfully, this tracking nerf seems to be step one of CCP righting its long-standing mistakes and going through the process of giving Titans a clear defined role. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Jean McBean
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 10:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Thankfully, this tracking nerf seems to be step one of CCP righting its long-standing mistakes and going through the process of giving Titans a clear defined role.
not sure if you are trolling or get what you are actually saying, but where are Titans in the process of getting a "clear" defined role, when your JUST reducing their abilities? besides the jump portal (whohoo 100b PVP ship just to bridge other ships aorund) there is literaly no purpose you cant just replace a Titan with a different type of ship. T3's are mostly prefered as a Bonus supplier already, since they are way cheaper, easier to move and can give different,mostly more usefull Boni. Dreads and SC's do both better DPS anyway. So would you please explain, why you think this is an improvment for defining the role of Titans?
|

Disgustin Justin
PAILkidz
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 12:51:00 -
[20] - Quote
This is easy...
If Titans cant shoot subcaps then subcaps shouldent be able to lock Titans (exept Hics of course)
Then, if you want to kill a Titan you bring your own capitals, ships a Titan still can kill. If you want to kill a Titan you should risk getting raped in your own super capitals and not lean back looking smug orbiting in your cheap ass Drake and think you are good at this game. |
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
330
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 17:04:00 -
[21] - Quote
Jean McBean wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:
Thankfully, this tracking nerf seems to be step one of CCP righting its long-standing mistakes and going through the process of giving Titans a clear defined role.
not sure if you are trolling or get what you are actually saying, but where are Titans in the process of getting a "clear" defined role, when your JUST reducing their abilities? besides the jump portal (whohoo 100b PVP ship just to bridge other ships aorund) there is literaly no purpose you cant just replace a Titan with a different type of ship. T3's are mostly prefered as a Bonus supplier already, since they are way cheaper, easier to move and can give different,mostly more usefull Boni. Dreads and SC's do both better DPS anyway. So would you please explain, why you think this is an improvment for defining the role of Titans?
Its almost like you didn't read the tracking nerf thread or something.
CCP Greyscale wrote:We're not happy with the effectiveness of large groups of titans against subcapital ships, so we're making some adjustments to titans and to XL turrets.
This is a quick, surgical adjustment to solve a specific issue we have identified. It's not a general titan balance pass, and we don't consider titans "done" after this change. Titans will require significant further changes, and probably an overall adjustment in role, before they're in a place where we're really happy with them. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Ivanda Nothabeer
Frontier Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 18:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
By CCP's own admission the tracking Nerf is a quick fix because they can't decide on a role for Titans. It's almost like you didnt read the Dev Blog.
Anyway - Titan's were always meant to be very rare in Eve. Frankly, deleting all existing titans, compensating players by returning some Titan specific skillpoints and some portion of their value in minerals is a pretty good idea.
If you still think there should be Titans in Eve - and tbh, I think there should be a ship class called "Titan" - then give us a new, properly designed and properly balanced Ship that fills a role that doent completely unbalance large scale warfare. Most importantly, remove BPO's and tightly control the supply of BPC's to limit the number of those ships
|

paik
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 19:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
The main problem I see is the Greyscale nerf realistically reduces DPS versus subcaps by 25%. Subcaps will still be blapped in short order. This is a useless slap in the face in a long list of useless slaps in the face against Titans. Every Titan nerf the "Anti-Titan" parties gather in celebrations and countdowns to nerf day. To only find out soon later that they are still getting ownzoned by Titans. If you read Seleene's Blog(My CEO GÖÑ Vote Seleene) you will see where the problem with this and pervious nerfs are.
Basically CCP has done this over and over through the years with Titans "kick the can down the road". However when they do so the Titan falls down the list of priorities on the backlog allowing them to divert attention to higher priorities. Instead of repeating this scenario again for the 5th time lets just do the sensible thing.
Delete Titan's as they exist now and everything Titan involved. Problem solved! Then CCP can take all the lessons learned over the years and design a new Titan that better fits into Eve. At that point the players will decide if they want to skill for or pilot the new Titan. Its really that simple.
Now I get it the "anti-titan" crowd wants vengence they are unhappy to have been subjugated to Titan blapping. They would like nothing more than to see the pilots punished. But I say punished for what? Titan pilots used the ship that CCP put into the game. No matter what CCP's best intentions were reality is the Titan has been a subcap smashing machine since introduction and will continue to be post Greyscale nerf.
Deleting Titans is a victory for everyone and a damn sure sight better than "Kicking the can down the road" again for the 5th time with a open-ended statement "We will revisit these later". We all have seen what that means.
18 month anyone? As a titan pilot I can live with blapping with 25% less dps for another 18 months. Can you?
Delete Titans
Seleene's Blog http://seleenes-sandbox.blogspot.com/2012/03/balancing-costs-benefits.html |

paik
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 19:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode |

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 07:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
paik wrote:Dear CSM & CCP;
Hello I fly a Titan class vessel in a corporation with many Titan Class vessel's in a Alliance with the most Titan class vessels. My alliance uses Titans more than anyother organization in game
You forget to tell to us, Your alliance bought for RMT so many titan from Morsus Mihi when they leaving this game.
So, before you ask titan delete, you need to ask delete those pilot accounts too from CCP.
|

India99
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 10:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
Tiger's Spirit wrote:
You forgot to tell to us, Your alliance bought for RMT so many titan from Morsus Mihi when they leaving this game.
So, before you ask titan delete, you need to ask delete those pilot accounts too from CCP.
you forgot to learn the language, that your accusing ppl stupid untruths with, mate |

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 11:03:00 -
[27] - Quote
India99 wrote:Tiger's Spirit wrote:
You forgot to tell to us, Your alliance bought for RMT so many titan from Morsus Mihi when they leaving this game.
So, before you ask titan delete, you need to ask delete those pilot accounts too from CCP.
you forgot to learn the language, that your accusing ppl stupid untruths with, mate
Tipical damage control. My language is the main problem, not the PL's RMT supcap transfer from MM.
|

India99
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 11:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Tiger's Spirit wrote:[quote=India99][quote=Tiger's Spirit]
Tipical damage control. My language is the main problem, not the PL's RMT supcap transfer from MM.
your questionable reading skills might actually be the reason why you think PL has to RMT at all. Have you checked the Technetium prices recently?
|

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 11:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
India99 wrote:Tiger's Spirit wrote:[quote=India99][quote=Tiger's Spirit]
Tipical damage control. My language is the main problem, not the PL's RMT supcap transfer from MM.
your questionable reading skills might actually be the reason why you think PL has to RMT at all. Have you checked the Technetium prices recently?
Because i know, who sold those ships for to PL and Raiden. Maybe it's time to check for the CCP those titans, how they transfered without ISK and without build to new proprietors. |

knobber Jobbler
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 16:13:00 -
[30] - Quote
Raivi wrote:[quote=paik]Dear CSM & CCP;
May actually be the best solution long-term. The flood of minerals would be the big problem, but it might be something that needs to be done sooner or later.
There's 400 Titans give or take a few, that in minerals is a fair amount but they need to get to market and back into the chain. I bet you'd notice a slight change in the market in some bits of null for a very short while then nothing.
CCP might lose 400 subscriptions, big deal, thats 0.001% of the EVE player base. Likely they'll just all become supercap pilots and the minerals will be used to build supercaps. Then supercaps will be removed.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |