EVE Search - HG Snakes - Removal and Reimbursal

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

HG Snakes - Removal and Reimbursal

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.25 17:48:00 - [1] Originally by: Zeba Even though your getting a nerf to your stats your relative speed boost will still be about the same. Meaning that whatever you were outrunning before you can still outrun after the patch. People keep saying this but it's dead wrong. They're not decreasing missile or drone speed. So nanos are going to be slaughtered wholesale. Admittedly, that's my talking-out-of-ass analysis without knowing how fast things will be in practice. But at least it accounted for more relevant facts than yours. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.25 17:51:00 - [2] Originally by: Sid Zero Originally by: Haradgrim Don't fly it if you can't afford to loose it. quoting this for truth... Quoting for 0% relevance. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.25 18:23:00 - [3] Originally by: Matrix Skye Originally by: Xaen They're not decreasing missile or drone speed. So nanos are going to be slaughtered wholesale. So now they'll be more vulnerable (ie, will actually take some damage). That's the point. They're more in line with armor and shield tank. You mean they'll be vastly inferior to the point of being nonviable. A "speed tank" that doesn't mitigate damage is not a tank of any kind. But as I said in my previous post, "that's my talking-out-of-ass analysis without knowing how fast things will be in practice." We'll see on Singularity, but the forecast is not good. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.25 20:37:00 - [4] Originally by: Sid Zero Edited by: Sid Zero on 25/07/2008 20:20:48 Originally by: Delos Korelian Why do you think you need to be reimbursed? No one forced you to buy something that got nerfed. tbh I was just in shock, and a bit emotional after reading the dev blog, and don't really expect reimbursement. But this is a logical argument for reimbursal: In real life, nothing gets nerfed. The density of water doesn't just suddenly change, the taste of carrots stays relatively constant, the earth goes around the sun. Oranges don't spontaneously turn into zebra excrement. Now if CCP makes a conscious decision to turn all the oranges in the game into zebra excrement, can't they just put an amount of isk equal to a conservative estimate of the difference in value between oranges and zebra excrement into the wallets of all the people who are now stuck with zebra excrement? PS: I know it's not happening so I'm just going to keep the snakes and work on a post nerf nano-AB Deimos fit. I'm sure to lose the 'plants soon enough Snake pilots might be the only things left in the universe that can effectively nano. Instead of finding yourself a hawk among slower hawks, you might just be the hawk among pigeons. Wait and see. And a Diemost? Seriously? - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.25 20:42:00 - [5] Originally by: Jinx Barker My guess is, and this pretty much on the money I think, it is the most people used Offline tool to fit the ships with full "Speedy Gonzales"set, and realized how powerful it really was, combined with regular run of the mill greed and jealousy they begrudged the few the possibility of even having it. Not that they actually, in their majority ever came under the guns of someone who has fully invested in the setup - it is the thought of it, that they could not stand. I think it was more along the lines of: 1) Get butthurt by experienced pvpers that happened to be nanoing. 2) Exaggerate the problem and whine loudly on the forums. Very few people can actually attain and sustain game engine breaking speeds in anything but an interceptor. My nano curse has always take significant damage, from even regular heavy missiles. My vagabond can only MWD intermittently, and so takes some heavy hits, then some negiligble ones. My brief stay in a nano ishtar was met with the sad realization that my drones were utterly sacrificed each time I deployed them, then subsequently sold in jita. And none of them were ever invulnerable. I've lost two curses in the last month and a vagabond not too long ago. All three were my own mistake, and extremely costly. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs
Xaen Caldari Caritas.	Posted - 2008.07.29 01:56:00 - [6] Originally by: Haradgrim Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Sid Zero Originally by: Haradgrim Don't fly it if you can't afford to loose it. quoting this for truth... Quoting for 0% relevance. DID I JUST GET RAINBOW TROLLED?? srslythgh, Do you actually type out those colours or do you have a program/macro? I have a java program I wrote in an afternoon. Works on PHP BB too with a different command line option. - Support fixing the UI\|Suggest Jita fixes\|Compact logs

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.