| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
   |
Posted - 2008.08.23 09:49:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Inoshuu
Edited by: Inoshuu on 23/08/2008 05:47:35
I'm looking at putting together a list of 100 richest char in the universe, much similar to Forture's 100 richest person in the world list.
I probably would do is collect everyone's estimated wealth along with the industry they work in. And no, this does not count the corporation net worth, sorry eve bank ;)
Eg:
1. Aeon Lance - Weapons Manufacturing - Estimated 7.8 billion.
Is anyone interested in doing something like this?
This could be properly made only if people gave you their API keys, then you could check their real wealth. Without that there is no way to make such list in Eve. 
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.08.24 09:00:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Robacz on 24/08/2008 09:01:00
Originally by: Clair Bear
Point out a manufacturer not watching cashflow with an eagle eye...
I am not and I build quite a lot of things. It would take too much time to watch things closely, much more time than possible effectivity increase is worth of.
BTW, I was looking on Ravens and other BS recently (after another Danari's brag post) and I was quite surprised about possible returns (compared to BPO price), but then I added ISK required for 2 week or even month production cycles and good returns were suddently poor returns + a lot of logistics.
Quote:
And that's the mistake people make when analyzing bs production. There is zero need to produce for a month straight then sell a monstrous blob of these bad boys. A more realistic and far less risky approach is to produce 24 hours worth or less and interleave production with sales. 48 hours worth of minerals is plenty to run the pipeline consistently considering there are hundreds of M of each on the market.
True, but 48 hr cycle doesn't fall in "easy" category. That is a lot of work with buying minerals and setting up production lines and sales orders. Return looks much better with short production cycle, but not good enough to cover all the work IMO.
|
Robacz
Essence Trade
Essence Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.08.31 19:18:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Shadarle
None of the above. I'd say closer to 100 bil maybe 200 bil. If #100 had 500b then that would mean that the top 100 combined had a minimum of 50t and likely closer to 100t or more. I greatly doubt that when the entire eve economy is only made up of 75t. I know that is ISK and not including assets, but I still doubt that the top 100 players have more in wealth (including assets) then there exists ISK in the game. The top 1000 sure, not top 100.
Hm, if you mean wealth (not ISK) then I would be very suprised if the Top100 listed ended under 500B. Not many ppl keep 100B+ in cash, but assets? 
|
| |
|