EVE Search - falloff bonus on tracking enhancers/puters!

All Channels

Ships and Modules

falloff bonus on tracking enhancers/puters!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lego Maniac Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.23 10:55:00 - [1] or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support
sdthujfg	Posted - 2008.08.23 10:57:00 - [2] Originally by: Lego Maniac or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support I think not.
Ihrda Siharkhail	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:11:00 - [3] Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Lego Maniac or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support I think not. why not?
sdthujfg	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:12:00 - [4] Originally by: Ihrda Siharkhail Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Lego Maniac or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support I think not. why not? OP on some ships.
eXtas Atomic Battle Penguins	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:13:00 - [5] really should since tracking disruptors now **** over mini guns falloff :( --------
Ihrda Siharkhail	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:14:00 - [6] Edited by: Ihrda Siharkhail on 23/08/2008 11:14:08 Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Ihrda Siharkhail Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Lego Maniac or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support I think not. why not? OP on some ships. yea, we wouldnt want to give races depending on falloff a way to get the same bonus as , say amarr.
Burn Mac Minmatar Burning Steel Inc.	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:14:00 - [7] Do it we minnies need it
Lego Maniac Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:36:00 - [8] Originally by: sdthujfg OP on some ships. care to tell us which ships they would be?
Cpt Branko Surge.	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:48:00 - [9] Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/08/2008 11:48:42 More falloff is never OP. You do 38% or so DPS at optimal+falloff. You do 100% at optimal, yet tracking computers/etc giving optimal bonuses is somehow not overpowered (not even on optimal bonused ships?) while falloff is. Laughable. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
Captator Universal Securities	Posted - 2008.08.23 11:58:00 - [10] Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Ihrda Siharkhail Originally by: sdthujfg Originally by: Lego Maniac or add a script to these modules to change the optimal bonus to falloff bonus yay or nay? yes I'm digging an old idea out of the grave (that I've posted about previously) but with the upcoming change in game climate I thought it won't hurt to ask if this idea has gained support I think not. why not? OP on some ships. Falloff script is not overpowered, falloff bonus added to the optimal script would be, it would be nice if you posted more usefully, rather than simple sentence posts.
Lego Maniac Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.23 12:00:00 - [11] Originally by: Captator hey you're from unsec, whatever happened to ecky? he disappeared
Captator Universal Securities	Posted - 2008.08.23 12:19:00 - [12] Originally by: Lego Maniac Originally by: Captator hey you're from unsec, whatever happened to ecky? he disappeared He was away during the summer, but he's back now - gone to fly with goodfellas for a bit, do some 0.0 pvp and fix his sec and stuff.
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Daisho Syndicate	Posted - 2008.08.24 12:36:00 - [13] it IS strange that flight time and falloff lack a bonus module.. Support the introduction of well thought out Amarr solutions! I believe rats should avoid you if you have high standing with them.
SERGI MANESTI	Posted - 2008.08.24 13:14:00 - [14] lol, but flight time has a rig! and falloff is actually effected heavily by the tracking speed script. throw that bad boy in there and you'll see similar effects.. but then... BAM tracking disruptor.. needs a counter.. or somthing like that
Fel Flash The Accursed	Posted - 2008.08.24 13:17:00 - [15] Originally by: SERGI MANESTI lol, but flight time has a rig! and falloff is actually effected heavily by the tracking speed script. throw that bad boy in there and you'll see similar effects.. but then... BAM tracking disruptor.. needs a counter.. or somthing like that Uhm, falloff has a rig too...
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Daisho Syndicate	Posted - 2008.08.24 14:31:00 - [16] Originally by: Fel Flash Originally by: SERGI MANESTI lol, but flight time has a rig! and falloff is actually effected heavily by the tracking speed script. throw that bad boy in there and you'll see similar effects.. but then... BAM tracking disruptor.. needs a counter.. or somthing like that Uhm, falloff has a rig too... Optimal has a rig, AND med\low slot modules, see the problem? Support the introduction of well thought out Amarr solutions! I believe rats should avoid you if you have high standing with them.
Cpt Branko Surge.	Posted - 2008.08.24 15:12:00 - [17] Also, remove the hit quality reduction in falloff. Firing at optimal+falloff for 38% damage isn't funny. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint
BiggestT Caldari Space Oddysey Pupule 'Ohana	Posted - 2008.08.24 15:14:00 - [18] Originally by: Burn Mac Do it we minnies need it therefore it wont happen x) poudly annoying fc's since 2007 Originally by: Sheriff Jones ding ding! Wrangler: Hello and w ding ding! Wrangler: ...damn nanowhiners...goes back to reading
AstroPhobic Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.24 15:21:00 - [19] Originally by: Cpt Branko Also, remove the hit quality reduction in falloff. Firing at optimal+falloff for 38% damage isn't funny. This. x9000000.
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Daisho Syndicate	Posted - 2008.08.24 22:46:00 - [20] Originally by: Cpt Branko Also, remove the hit quality reduction in falloff. Firing at optimal+falloff for 38% damage isn't funny. More falloff should be plenty, whould not want you to step on the toes of amarr and actually be EFFECTIVE at range :P Support the introduction of well thought out Amarr solutions! I believe rats should avoid you if you have high standing with them.
AstroPhobic Minmatar	Posted - 2008.08.24 22:51:00 - [21] Edited by: AstroPhobic on 24/08/2008 22:52:27 Somehow I think a maelstrom with barrage, 3 falloff rigs, and no hit quality scaling doing HALF the damage of a geddon at scorch range isn't stepping on toes.
Dristra Amarr Shadows of the Dead Daisho Syndicate	Posted - 2008.08.25 13:13:00 - [22] Originally by: AstroPhobic Edited by: AstroPhobic on 24/08/2008 22:52:27 Somehow I think a maelstrom with barrage, 3 falloff rigs, and no hit quality scaling doing HALF the damage of a geddon at scorch range isn't stepping on toes. Extra falloff will help :P And currently ac's are easier to fit and use no cap. Tbh arma got 2 weapon bonuses, mael just 1 You know from my earlier posts that im quite in favor of a mini weapon boost, but don't forget the many disadvantages lasers have. Support the introduction of well thought out Amarr solutions! I believe rats should avoid you if you have high standing with them.
Cpt Branko Surge.	Posted - 2008.08.25 13:31:00 - [23] Originally by: Dristra Originally by: Cpt Branko Also, remove the hit quality reduction in falloff. Firing at optimal+falloff for 38% damage isn't funny. More falloff should be plenty, whould not want you to step on the toes of amarr and actually be EFFECTIVE at range :P Generally, what most people want for autocannons is not to step on the toes of other weapon systems and be EFFECTIVE at range - or, more precisely, any range I only conclude that we should buff projectiles in the direction where they're good at already, which means that making projectiles have negative cap consumption is the only balanced fix! Adding a whole new dimension to capless! Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.