EVE Search - This lag has to go NOW.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

This lag has to go NOW.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Scorpyn	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:20:00 - [91] Originally by: Oveur We have a number of small issues causing some very interesting problems, that cause us not to be able to show that performance increase that was supposed to come (being worse in many cases). We are working our asses off fixing this "#$% &$%$& $%&&%$$%&, and will post a devblog about this and it's affect on patch release, since I don't really feel like adding a patch onto the current problems Good to know. Keep us updated please.
Mandros Aslay	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:21:00 - [92] B is byte No, it's a letter. (Just joking. Most frequently it is.) Computer nerd humour , love it !!
Scorpyn	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:27:00 - [93] Originally by: Mandros Aslay B is byte No, it's a letter. (Just joking. Most frequently it is.) Computer nerd humour , love it !!
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:28:00 - [94] Originally by: fras when you lose a ship you are told it's tough luck. thats not true....i lost my scorp due to the server performance and got it reimbursed www.dark-cartel.com
F4ze	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:29:00 - [95] Originally by: Oveur We have a number of small issues causing some very interesting problems, that cause us not to be able to show that performance increase that was supposed to come (being worse in many cases). We are working our asses off fixing this "#$% &$%$& $%&&%$$%&, and will post a devblog about this and it's affect on patch release, since I don't really feel like adding a patch onto the current problems Cool, thanks for the response. I've had it too: numerous warnings about "the item is being merged" and "the item is being moved to blahblah". It's good to see that you're aware of the problem and working on it :)
Jake Tyler	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:33:00 - [96] I know, another rant...Not a happy bunny, lag hell over the weekend too...definately got worse since the upgrade. Went to a gate yesterday morning, nobody else around...lagged for 22 seconds...arrgghh...never used to, if it did it was for like 3 seconds at the most.. This message was brought to you by a now angry bunny
fras	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:41:00 - [97] Originally by: Daakkon Originally by: fras when you lose a ship you are told it's tough luck. thats not true....i lost my scorp due to the server performance and got it reimbursed Good on you man, neither I or my corp mate did
illuminati	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:41:00 - [98] Edited by: illuminati on 14/06/2004 10:52:49 Edited by: illuminati on 14/06/2004 10:45:10 Info about bits and bytes for the confused Edit: And here Edit2: And an IEEE one In the military, people need to know what to do, when to do it and how to do it, pwn4g3 kthankzbye.
Hardin	Posted - 2004.06.14 10:54:00 - [99] Originally by: Oveur We have a number of small issues causing some very interesting problems, that cause us not to be able to show that performance increase that was supposed to come (being worse in many cases). We are working our asses off fixing this "#$% &$%$& $%&&%$$%&, and will post a devblog about this and it's affect on patch release, since I don't really feel like adding a patch onto the current problems Thanks for the reply Oveur. It is always nice to know that the Devs are reading the boards and paying attention to some of the issues. I am also glad that you have admitted that there is actually an issue and we are not all imagining that things have been more laggy since the hardware upgrade. Look forward to the updates on this issue. As an Amarrian I hope the patch comes asap too
Einheriar Ulrich	Posted - 2004.06.14 11:01:00 - [100] Originally by: Oveur We have a number of small issues causing some very interesting problems, that cause us not to be able to show that performance increase that was supposed to come (being worse in many cases). We are working our asses off fixing this "#$% &$%$& $%&&%$$%&, and will post a devblog about this and it's affect on patch release, since I don't really feel like adding a patch onto the current problems Thank you Oveur for the reply, and good luck in fixing the problem. And i am with you, that you dont wanna patch as long as these problems is still there. So Say I. Einheriar Ulrich of the Bloodline of Einheriar. **Minion Of VOTF**
Scorpyn	Posted - 2004.06.14 12:28:00 - [101] Edited by: Scorpyn on 14/06/2004 12:32:59 Originally by: illuminati Edited by: illuminati on 14/06/2004 10:52:49 Edited by: illuminati on 14/06/2004 10:45:10 Info about bits and bytes for the confused Edit: And here Edit2: And an IEEE one From the 2nd link : Note: If you append the 'B' for byte, make sure you use uppercase because some people use lowercase 'b' to mean bit. That's the key. There is a difference between "pure definition" and what ppl use. B is byte, b is bit but now always. The IEEE link is not computer related at all and is not applicable here. Milli is not used and mb is megabyte even if it's more correct to use MB. Back on topic : I don't like lag. It makes my ship move funny.
Kitten Hearder	Posted - 2004.06.14 12:45:00 - [102] No lag here. --------- Kitten Hearder Evolution made my sig Less Entertaining than your's.
Einheriar Ulrich	Posted - 2004.06.14 12:56:00 - [103] Originally by: Kitten Hearder No lag here. Kitten the DEV¦s have allready acknowledged that there is a lag rpoblem ingame, read up. So Say I. Einheriar Ulrich of the Bloodline of Einheriar. **Minion Of VOTF**
Talon SilverHawk	Posted - 2004.06.14 13:29:00 - [104] Originally by: Daakkon Originally by: fras when you lose a ship you are told it's tough luck. thats not true....i lost my scorp due to the server performance and got it reimbursed Its may not be true for you but it is true for alot of other peeps. You where damn lucky. Tal What goes around comes around...
Talon SilverHawk	Posted - 2004.06.14 13:30:00 - [105] Originally by: Einheriar Ulrich Originally by: Kitten Hearder No lag here. Kitten the DEV¦s have allready acknowledged that there is a lag rpoblem ingame, read up. From this thread and the other one on the same topic its amazing to see how many ppl don't read and just jump right in. Thx CCP for letting us know. Tal What goes around comes around...
Koda	Posted - 2004.06.14 13:58:00 - [106] Something's gone amiss since the last hardware upgrade. Stations in empire space (with no one around them) take 10-20 seconds to load. I jumped into EC-P8R yesterday and with a measley 10 ships camping, it was a slideshow. I'm running an Ath 64 with 1 GB of ram on a 3 MB cable modem... -------------- Share the love in the SNIGG Forums
fuze	Posted - 2004.06.14 14:46:00 - [107] So you guys thought it was a breeze to install the new hardware and get it running 100% after the backup was replaced? Especially with a MS SQL database. DBA's know better. It's not like using Norton Ghost to replace some drive images. And anyone who's going into blob wars after these kind of huge patches should know better. ___________________________ Favorite bumpersticker of the month: My head hurts!
Sphalerite	Posted - 2004.06.14 15:23:00 - [108] sigh Originally by: Scorpyn m is milli True, but milli is never used with computers. When m is used, we mean M. That's true. all the electronics inside are using Gigawatts and Femtoamps. Quote: b is bit Depends... could also be byte, depending on the situation. Best thing is to write out the whole bit. b should never be byte. Best things would be to stop corrupting standard abbreviations, and to teach people that not everone out there is as careful. Quote: M is mega Yup. 1024^2 in the computer world. Depends on who you're talking to. If you're the IEC or a hard drive company, A Megabyte is 10^6 bytes. The best thing would be to get people to start using Mebibytes and all the other nifty binary multiples, but I'm not holding my breath. Quote: If you add "per second", you almost always refer to bits and not bytes. hard drive throughput, motherboards, SCSI, Firewire, IDE... anything that stores data needs to move it. some are published in bits, and some in bytes. MB - Megabyte - 10^6 bytes Mb/Mbit - Megabit - 10^6 bits MiB - Mebibyte - 2^20 bytes Mibit - Mebibit - 2^20 bits mb/mobo - motherboard
Gundog Prime	Posted - 2004.06.14 16:15:00 - [109] Well until the lag settles ive started a second account with a Char rigged for Agent Missions, and doing pirate kills with a Kestrel on 2 Imputors is generating lag, that and leaving ANY station, warping ANYWHERE etc in the Empire makes up for 50% of the time i take to do Agent missions right now.... I cant even begin to imagine chain spawning in 0.0 at this time -------------------------------------------------------------- [email protected] - BEWARE THE CHEAP PAINT SIG -- Joshua Calvert, the true gamer's gamer
Scorpyn	Posted - 2004.06.14 16:19:00 - [110] Edited by: Scorpyn on 14/06/2004 16:22:26 Originally by: Sphalerite Best things would be to stop corrupting standard abbreviations, and to teach people that not everone out there is as careful. True. Originally by: Sphalerite Quote: M is mega Yup. 1024^2 in the computer world. Depends on who you're talking to. If you're the IEC or a hard drive company, A Megabyte is 10^6 bytes. The best thing would be to get people to start using Mebibytes and all the other nifty binary multiples, but I'm not holding my breath. Ok, a clarification : Computer (software) : 1024 (in most cases) Computer (hardware) : 1024 or 1000 depending on the hardware Originally by: Sphalerite Quote: If you add "per second", you almost always refer to bits and not bytes. hard drive throughput, motherboards, SCSI, Firewire, IDE... anything that stores data needs to move it. some are published in bits, and some in bytes. True. I was only thinking network speed when I made that comment... Originally by: Sphalerite MB - Megabyte - 10^6 bytes That's fairly accurate at least - very hardware related though. For software, it'd be 1024^2 bytes (in most cases). ppl will probably never start using mebibytes and similar... and mb IS used instead of MB in many cases...
Neslo	Posted - 2004.06.14 16:21:00 - [111] Originally by: Gundog Prime I cant even begin to imagine chain spawning in 0.0 at this time No offense but you shouldn't be thinking of 'chaining' anywhere in eve as it is a bannable offense. Chain spawning pirates is an exploit. So says the Devs... From Ashes to Ashes... From Dust to Dust....
NGRU Rix	Posted - 2004.06.14 16:49:00 - [112] I have noticed an almost constant rubber-banding effect when coming out of warp to approach gates as well as stations, constant hiccups when sitting still in space and an extended period of waiting when entering space from a gate or a station. Also, and this just started since the hardware upgrade, the game will time out frequently or just flat out freeze and the screen will go all black. Hitting ESC will show the fuzzy image of my ship wherever it is but will go black again after hitting ESC again. This all started after the hardware upgrade.
Aneu Angellus	Posted - 2004.06.14 17:46:00 - [113] Originally by: Neslo Originally by: Gundog Prime I cant even begin to imagine chain spawning in 0.0 at this time No offense but you shouldn't be thinking of 'chaining' anywhere in eve as it is a bannable offense. Chain spawning pirates is an exploit. So says the Devs... Ok, lets not get the thread closed please, but let me straighten this out for you. There is a certain bug in the system code that allows for a certain way of killing rats to create a much faster respawn, once a rat dies, it re-spawns instantly... Normal chaining isnt bannable, but over-chain-spawning (allowing to kill 4000+ per hour is an exploit and you will get a permban for it) Aneu ________________ Aneu Angellus Vengeance Of The Fallen - WolfPack Military Captain
bUBbLeS	Posted - 2004.06.14 18:21:00 - [114] no lagg for m3heither is cause t3h nan0-antz help m3h Julius ceaser : "operor vos volo MCCCXXXVII laganum bUBbLeS?"
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.06.14 18:30:00 - [115] Originally by: Talon SilverHawk Originally by: Daakkon Originally by: fras when you lose a ship you are told it's tough luck. thats not true....i lost my scorp due to the server performance and got it reimbursed Its may not be true for you but it is true for alot of other peeps. You where damn lucky. Tal I was lucky...but i think everybody that lost their ship in the battle should of been reimbursed (for both sides) www.dark-cartel.com
Joshua Calvert	Posted - 2004.06.14 18:37:00 - [116] I do not think it is surprising that Oveur replied to this thread. He is swiftly becoming the best and most responsive Dev on the forums and that is very much appreciated. LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
Einheriar Ulrich	Posted - 2004.06.14 19:31:00 - [117] Originally by: Joshua Calvert I do not think it is surprising that Oveur replied to this thread. He is swiftly becoming the best and most responsive Dev on the forums and that is very much appreciated. Hear Hear So Say I. Einheriar Ulrich of the Bloodline of Einheriar. **Minion Of VOTF**

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.