| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

EBANK Ricdic
Eve-Tech Savings n Loans
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:24:00 -
[61]
I generally don't have a problem with people holding back on business details if they have been proven trustworthy in the past. Whilst the RDIR returns weren't as spectacular as one might assume they could have been they still were acceptable. I wouldn't say it was a failed business, far from it. Generally a failed business would be one that resulted in a loss for investors.
Anyway I don't have an issue with the operation itself, the only thing stopping an EBANK or even my own personal investment in this operation is the interest rate. The amount being requested is quite minimal compared to what Shar has dealt with in EBANK. On a regular basis Shar had access to anywhere up to 25b and in one case he had access to an amount closer to 100b (I didn't have Eve access and Shar was distributing isk to staff for operational purposes).
I don't question his trustworthiness and I am certain Shar is the kind of person who (even if he lost all of the isk) would work his rear end off to get the funds back no matter the cost.
Plus having Athre as a backup is a big plus. Athre is an absolute workhorse and has phenomenal organisational skills. Even though she is only a teller in EBANK she is always on the ball, making sure deadlines are met and pushing issues that need pushing.
I believe the risk factor is virtually nil and the only factor that an investor need be concerned of is the rate of return and whether or not it is acceptable to them. I don't personally like the reverse dutch auction type style design but I do like the layout Shar has used in his first post. Obviously there is a lack of detail in regards to his business plan but I am sure he has reasons for withholding information and I don't believe the amount being requested needs any major form of oversight.
Eefrit, Ionia, Fastlearner had over 200b of funds without telling people an inch of what they were doing. Obviously they may not be the best examples as two of the three are virtually scams however other trusted parties have done similar things before. Most people don't know where EBANK spend all the isks as well (look out for EBANK outposts!!
|

Redbad
Minmatar Mean Corp Mean Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:25:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Originally by: Redbad I noticed that 13 Bonds have bidders now at this moment I write this. The bond amount was between 6 and 12 bil. Does this mean you have reached the critical amount to start with this project even if the remaining bonds don't sell?
This is entirely true but only in part. I didn't put a minimum to start as I was going to proceed with whatever limit I reached. I'm not limited by economics of scale here nor am I trying to leverage it either. The only limit I'm placing on myself is essentially the same kind of limit that I watched, very closely, when I was an eBank director: Debt load and Utilization.
Thanks for the answer, it answered my question, but it raises another question. The purpose of me asking further is figuring the limits of the bond itself and not necesarily your own limits.
You use the words: "I'm not limited" and "limit I'm placing on myself" in the above answer. In my vison that doesn not equal to the limits of the bond itself necesarrily.
Did I understand correctly that the maximum of the total bond amount is not exactly 12 bil., but is determined by the debt load and utilization you can handle/work with and the words "I' and "The Bond" were intermixed?
|

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:33:00 -
[63]
Originally by: EBANK Ricdic Whilst the RDIR returns weren't as spectacular as one might assume they could have been they still were acceptable. I wouldn't say it was a failed business, far from it. Generally a failed business would be one that resulted in a loss for investors.
This is a matter of opinion. Proton Power described his last IPO as a "failed business" even though it returned capital and some dividends. I agree. [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Ricdics
Tleilex Developments
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:47:00 -
[64]
Yeh it's definetly subjective. |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:52:00 -
[65]
Originally by: EBANK Ricdic Whilst the RDIR returns weren't as spectacular as one might assume they could have been they still were acceptable. I wouldn't say it was a failed business, far from it. Generally a failed business would be one that resulted in a loss for investors.
Originally by: Lo Lightshard This is a matter of opinion. Proton Power described his last IPO as a "failed business" even though it returned capital and some dividends. I agree.
Hmmmm... I'd agree that it was subjective if RDIR was my IPO. It was not. My job was to provide security and oversight. Not to provide performance. I provided exactly what I was hired to do. The effectiveness of my part is academic as the person's whose IPO RDIR was ran off with 10 billion isk from a second IPO he started. So, while I do not gloss over the events surrounding RDIR I also do not feel that I failed. "Underperformed" is a concession to the opportunity costs lost to investors. And I never make light of anything connected to people who place their trust in me.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Mr Horizontal
Gallente KIA Corp KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 09:59:00 -
[66]
For me the combination of low rate and the fact I can't trade the shares are what eliminate me from investing in this. If it matched Ray's bond, my disposition would be different.
This bond he's offering is simply because he has chosen to get a better rate going public than keeping it as a loan. Elementary and sound business practice.
As per Shar's rep, while virtually everything he's done (EVE Guardian, RDIR, and leaving EBANK) have almost routinely ended in a huge drama of some kind (even Shar will admit this), Shar's fundamental ethical values and honesty have always been vindicated. So while he has many battlescars to show off (and hence in part leading to his aggressive stance in posts), he's possibly the most tested and most vindicated public character around. So for what its worth, I cannot stress enough that there's absolutely no reason Shar cannot be trusted even with 10 times more money than he's requesting.
Director | www.eve-bank.net |

Jaeger Orlofsson
VentureCorp Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:02:00 -
[67]
Put me down for an additional 500m at 4% please.
|

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:06:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Shar Tegral Final interest rate will be determined from the average of all bids. No bid as good until I say accepted.
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Anyone else seen this in an IPO before?
Yes. Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro stuff
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Not a warning?
Is that supposed to be some sort of warning about me specifically? Or is that an expression on his part that he did not like that I did not share my plan with him. (Mind you it has been shared, just not with him nor publicly.) Finally, are you concerned here about this IPO or are you attempting this? At this point your actual intent is unclear.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:07:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Mr Horizontal Shar's fundamental ethical values and honesty have always been vindicated.
In the context of EBank, are you sure? [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:15:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Shar Tegral Yes.
The fact that you have employed this mechanism in the past doesn't make it acceptable.
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro stuff
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Not a warning?
Is that supposed to be some sort of warning about me specifically? Or is that an expression on his part that he did not like that I did not share my plan with him. (Mind you it has been shared, just not with him nor publicly.)
This is cleary advice to this community. The quote explicitly states this.
Originally by: Shar Tegral Finally, are you concerned here about this IPO or are you attempting this? At this point your actual intent is unclear.
Both. [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles Zzz
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:17:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Shar Tegral For instance I trust Kazuo to look at my affairs on both my accounts. Even offered him access to my private "sexy" server so that he could look over historical data. I trust the guys at eBank as well (though I disagree with the "hows").
Although this set of data is useful to the extent that it allows me to comment on your general ability to turn a profit, none of it can be applied to this particular IPO, with any certainty, if you don't disclose any details of what your plans involve. You said, yourself, that your records were not relevant. For all I know, you might be using the proceeds to play poker.
Of course, you remain a widely trusted figure and plenty of people have chosen to invest in you anyway, on the strength of your previous actions and your reputation. I'm sure you won't let them down. ----- DIY copying in Liekuri 20:1 mineral compression Nomad JF for sale |

Khrillian
Minmatar Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:19:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Rho'varo
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Originally by: Khrillian 2-Why are you using average bid to determine the interest rate? You do realize you might get some people pulling out because of that after the fact - if the interest rate they get is significantly lower than what they bid.
That is a common risk of Dutch auctions. Not an unusual circumstance. Anyone that backs out over such is not worth doing business with.
I agree that anyone who backs out of a bid for a known amount (or rate or risk) is a sub-optimal business partner, and it is true that in any auction without payment up front (Dutch or otherwise), there is a possibility of nominally winning parties failing to pay.
However, as identified by Khrillian, this enterprise's use of the average interest rate introduces a problem that is atypical of auctions (Dutch or otherwise). In a regular auction, the winning bidder is expected to pay only what he or she has bid. Similarly, in a typical Dutch auction, the winners all participate on terms at or better than those they themselves bid.
Here, a "winner" in the auction may end up "winning" terms that are worse than they themselves tendered. This may make some more reluctant to bid in the first place (e.g., me) and may induce others to back out after winning terms they would not have tendered.
Maybe this is what Shar is going for, but this auction payout system creates strong incentives to bid lower interest rates than you otherwise might. If the current bid is 4% and you bid 2%, you only pay for 1/24th of the change in the average but you are a winner.
Also, someone could bid -92% on a single bond and Shar would get his loan for free.
IMO it would be simpler to just give everyone the interest rate of the winner with the highest interest rate. This way everyone (in theory) will bid exactly once and will bid their value. But of course its your auction.
|

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:21:00 -
[73]
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:23:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Shar Tegral Is there something inherently flawed about this though? Other than it being different to you.
I will take two bonds at 2%. [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:25:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Is there something inherently flawed about this though? Other than it being different to you.
Originally by: Shar Tegral I will take two bonds at 2%.
In your case, your bid will only be accepted upon receipt of 1 billion. Otherwise you are trolling.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:26:00 -
[76]
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Is there something inherently flawed about this though? Other than it being different to you.
Originally by: Shar Tegral I will take two bonds at 2%.
In your case, your bid will only be accepted upon receipt of 1 billion. Otherwise you are trolling.
Please let me know when to transfer the cash. [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Ji Sama
Caldari Department of Defence
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:32:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Edited by: Lo Lightshard on 17/09/2008 09:25:02
Originally by: Shar Tegral The Plan: Withheld
No plan. I obviously mean published, no other context is relevant to investors. Originally by: Shar Tegral issuer of several repaid bonds and one completed (but underperformed) IPO
Did not perform as intended = fail.
Originally by: Shar Tegral Final interest rate will be determined from the average of all bids. No bid as good until I say accepted.
Anyone else seen this in an IPO before? Originally by: Kazuo Ishiguro I would not encourage anyone seeking public investment to maintain such complete silence. While it could be argued that statements of future intent cannot be proven true in any way that will protect investors, it's a lot easier for swindlers to dodge all questioning than it is for them to submit a detailed plan to the scrutiny of a trusted third party. Historically, this has proven to be a fruitful strategy for them. It is not in the community's interest to tolerate it.
Not a warning?
Edit: wrong quote, sorry.
QFT, noes teh lies "the majority of men has been dealt cards to a game they do not know how to play" |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:33:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Please let me know when to transfer the cash.
You don't need my permission to send it. You said buyout, thus you should be ready to send it right now. Kazuo still has access to my api, among others, so I don't even have to log in to confirm transfer.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:43:00 -
[79]
Confirming 2 bonds at buyout purchased by Lo Lightshard. In 90 days you may choose to cash in your bond sir or allow it to rollover.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Lo Lightshard
Insurrection Inc Tygris Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:48:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Confirming 2 bonds at buyout purchased by Lo Lightshard. In 90 days you may choose to cash in your bond sir or allow it to rollover.
Just so we're clear. This is an exercise in proving a point by manipulating interest rates. Not an endorsement in the format of this IPO. This will be my last post in this thread. [IMA6E REMOVED] |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 10:53:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Shar Tegral Confirming 2 bonds at buyout purchased by Lo Lightshard. In 90 days you may choose to cash in your bond sir or allow it to rollover.
Originally by: Lo Lightshard Just so we're clear. This is an exercise in proving a point by manipulating interest rates. Not an endorsement in the format of this IPO. This will be my last post in this thread.
I sincerely hope not. Though you really really really don't like me at all you are now an investor. That means I do have a responsibility to you that I will keep regardless of my opinion of how you have tried to slander me. In the end, even if everyone else pulls out because of you, for the next 90 days we will have cause to interact. If I should fail, I want you to post it here. However, in equal measure, should I keep my word... ... In the end, it is that simple mate.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Ambo
Dirty Deeds Corp. Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 11:15:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Shar Tegral
Originally by: Ambo To your last point, I'm not saying reputation does not matter at all but I'm saying that even the best reputation does not nullify risk. I'm not comparing you to these recent failures at all, I'm simply pointing out that no matter how good your reputation is, there is still risk. In my opinion, that risk is always greater than 4% so when your rates are that low, yes, your reputation does become irrelevant to me.
This kind of circular logic bothered me until I understood what you may have been saying. Reputation is not fool proof, not at all. Fair to say that for 12 billion I am very likely to run off with people's isk and trash 5+ years of reputation and be forced to sell off a toon with 76M SP. Either that or I'd be using up that 12 billion to fund the years of pvp and hostility I would get for being a scammer. Of course I think what you are saying is that 4% is not worth the risk to you. Offering a low interest rate does not necessarily make me a risk. After all, if I'm risk at 4% what am I at 5%? 7%? 10%? Where does it matter and where does it not? So what I'm taking from your opinion is that this is not worth the trouble/liability to you and somehow you are bringing up Feronia and FastLearner at the same time in some sort of mixed signal message.
Exactly, I believe the chances of you deciding to run off with the money are virtually zero. I also believe the chances that your business plan will fail are virtually zero.
I brought up Feronia and FastLearner because they were both characters with long-term business success and immacualte reputations. Both of whom collapsed leaving investors hundreds of billions out of pocket. I would have said the same about both of them, they wouldn't have run off with the money and their business plans were clearly effective. That does not change the fact that, in the end, they failed investors. They are simply an illustration of the fact that investing in someone is always a risk, no matter how perfect the rep or business plan may be.
For me personally, I'm simply not willing to risk 1 bil for just 40 mil per month.
--------------------------------------
Trader? Investor? Just want to track your finances? Check out EMMA |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 11:30:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Ambo That does not change the fact that, in the end, they failed investors. They are simply an illustration of the fact that investing in someone is always a risk, no matter how perfect the rep or business plan may be.
Cool, now that we are on the same sheet of music I simply find myself wondering why you felt it necessary to say it so much, so many times, so strongly, when I myself said the same in my prospectus? And I do find it a bit strange that you keep bringing those two up? I still have a few FRPB shares myself. The originals I purchased back when they were first being sold. As for FastLearner, I invested nothing in him but he invested in me (collaterally). And received 100% of his investment back with less than stellar returns. Other than that, why does the failings of someone else have to be constantly dragged through my thread? Is my offering supposed to be the place to exemplify and condemn all scammers and absconders? Truly told, I'd rather you ask about my bond instead of taking the time to tell us about someone else's history or the fact that this bond is not for you. < sigh>
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 11:45:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Redbad Did I understand correctly that the maximum of the total bond amount is not exactly 12 bil., but is determined by the debt load and utilization you can handle/work with and the words "I' and "The Bond" were intermixed?
I'm not aware that I mixed the context like that. But now that we've finally gotten past a few hurdles I'd like to return to your concerns. The maximum capital to be raised is 12 billion. This is to be raised by issuing 24 500M bonds. So, in truth, there is more than just one bond. However it is common practice to label this action under the ubiquitous "bond issuance" or "the bond". Now, this maximum could be extend at a later time however this extension would be with the prior notice and approval of all involved parties. Originally by: Shar Tegral All things being equal all bond repayments will be on, or before, the 15th of each month. All payments will be one month in advance as well. There are no reports expected to be issued, no need for e-peen spamming, however every 3rd month a report will be issued and the continuation status of the bond will be up for deliberation by involved parties.
The scheduling is not just for redeeming of the bond but for feedback and deliberation between myself and bondholders who wish to continue forward. So, you rightfully suspect that I am limiting myself with the potential of extending my reach further. However that extension will not be without notice or approval from those who are currently invested with me. (Even if I know I'll have some troublemakers, already.) In the real world bondholders have power. Unfortunately in Eve this power is entirely hostage to the honor of the bond issuer. Thus things become simple again: Either I have honor or I do not. The proof of that "this time" can only be discovered at that time. As people like to say, "Shar hasn't scammed anyone, yet." As has been stated, no matter how little the risk is there still exists risk. PS: Remember at some point this is still a game. While that is often an excuse used by many to dismiss the kinds of malfeasance that they commit for me the saying means something similar but entirely different. Here in this game, this "sandbox", I can indulge in my idealistic fantasies. Idealistic dreams that simply do not stand up well in the light of day in the real world. So yeah, "how I am" is part roleplay. It is the role I want to play all the time. Game or no game. And, regardless of Eve being a game, I'm very serious about that.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |

Kazzac Elentria
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 12:14:00 -
[85]
Originally by: EBANK Ricdic
Anyway I don't have an issue with the operation itself, the only thing stopping an EBANK or even my own personal investment in this operation is the interest rate. The amount being requested is quite minimal compared to what Shar has dealt with in EBANK. On a regular basis Shar had access to anywhere up to 25b and in one case he had access to an amount closer to 100b (I didn't have Eve access and Shar was distributing isk to staff for operational purposes).
Exactly, the length of the offer, with the rate of return and lack of details (if even vague to prevent sniping) are preventing me from investing my investors isk in it.
I'd much rather short term loan/bond on someone like Ambo, than lock up something for 3 months at such a low rate at this point in time. |

Mike'P
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 12:29:00 -
[86]
I find it somewhat reassuring that Shar is being dragged into the sort of hostile environment that has been created on these forums with IPO posts. I also find the 'no idiots' clause hilarious, and the vetting of potential investors is a new twist - apparently, only money of a certain reputation is required in this bond.
I do, however, applaud Shar for setting a good example in the tone of his replies, but I'll note that because he's on the other side of the fence, there's not the same level of hostility for him to reply to. If this IPO turned up with someone else's name on it, I'm sure Shar would have been wading in to send them packing. Not even disclosing your plan to the auditor or other trusted referee would have been the sticking point - do *you* even know what you're going to be doing, Shar ?
But, back to the meat of the offer: the first thing that springs into my mind upon reading this, is that he is trading on his 'reputation' (sic) on these forums to get cheap cash. That's entirely his perogative and good business, but if you think back to all the posts where he has hinted and alluded to his abilities to generate vast quantities of ISK, the 4% looks a bit insulting.
Plus, I'd also like to bet that he was counting on the exact outcome we have witnessed: someone bidding at the buyout rate to 'have a jab at Shar', hence lowering the interest rate even further.
I also can't quite get clear in my head why we should consider it 'low risk', if he is mitigating risk by not telling anyone what he's doing. We've all seen how well security through obscurity works for Microsoft.... so I can only assume that the 'low risk' here actually refers to his ability to pay out should the bond fail, rather than the use of the money raised in this particular bond in a 'low risk' venture.
Not a good example for the forum, and not good business. Like someone said, he could be playing poker!
Having said all of that, and as much as I'm tempted to just say 'too low interest', I've got ISK that I can't be bothered to use myself, and it's a better rate than EBank. [Gets coin out of pocket, lobs into the air... coin lands on wrist...]
I'll take one bond (500m) at 4%, and I'm happy to stay in all the way down to 2%.
Take it or leave it, Shar. Apparently I'm a lemming when it comes to investment, according to some of your peers, so you might not want my money. I won't be insulted if you don't. 
|

flakeys
Coalition of Nations Free Trade Zone.
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 12:41:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria
Exactly, the length of the offer, with the rate of return and lack of details (if even vague to prevent sniping) are preventing me from investing my investors isk in it.
I'd much rather short term loan/bond on someone like Ambo, than lock up something for 3 months at such a low rate at this point in time.
Basicaly says how i feel about the deal.
|

Ricdic
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 12:42:00 -
[88]
I have seen about 5 times now you guys have mentioned Feronia in various derogatory terms. Now, I actually know who Feronia is in Eve, and it's not Ionia. Seems one person got the name wrong and everyone followed suit.
--- Ionia ran FRPB and scammed lots of people --- Feronia is a quiet, friendly Eve player
I feel sorry if Feronia ever goes for a loan with the banks and these threads come up indicating he has scammed people when people are naming the wrong person |

Feronia
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 12:59:00 -
[89]
Thanks Ric for clearing that out. I'm in no way related to Ionia and never scammed a living soul.
I've contacted my lawyer about this 
|

Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 13:10:00 -
[90]
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria Exactly, the length of the offer, with the rate of return and lack of details (if even vague to prevent sniping) are preventing me from investing my investors isk in it.
Then may I assume you've never taken an eBank bond? Because, for all intents and purposes, this is exactly what I'm offering. The only difference is that I'm letting the market decide the final rate for the bond and my trying to limit alt investment. Exactly like every eBank bond previously issued. - No secondary market. - Locked in time period. - Manually handled. (Don't be fooled by what you saw on the website, it was manually done.) - 3.5% interest rate. - No Plan Disclosure. Of course that's eBank right? Or was that eBank when I was with it and several hundreds of billions was fine then? Truly Kazzac, I don't want your money. You can keep it, honest. I won't lose sleep over it. (Seriously, you can consider this a rejection of any offer you might make, twice or more.)
Originally by: Mike'P That's entirely his perogative and good business, but if you think back to all the posts where he has hinted and alluded to his abilities to generate vast quantities of ISK, the 4% looks a bit insulting.
I've never epeened about my trade activities. That's Shadarle Mister Obviously Remembering Others Not correctly. He's the one that pwns you all in income and trade. I never discuss what I do. I leave you to decide who is smarter. Originally by: Mike'P so I can only assume that the 'low risk' here actually refers to his ability to pay out should the bond fail, rather than the use of the money raised in this particular bond in a 'low risk' venture. Not a good example for the forum, and not good business.
Yes, obviously not a good example and not good business. Wait? What are we talking about here? Did you not miss a 3rd party state full disclosure of the plan to them? I guess reading is not a fundamental where you are from. Originally by: Mike'P Like someone said, he could be playing poker!
I wish Kazuo would check his chat logs. Because I specifically told him that I would not disclose the plan to him. However if he should offer possibilities I would respond honestly to them. Kazuo may think that being apprised of the plan makes him better able to comment on an IPO however I also think that it can create a conflict of interest. Kazuo was given api keys to both of my accounts. He had my full permission to poke around as much as he wished to confirm a variety of details. No suspicious alts, no suspicious share holders, no suspicious transfers, no suspicious (or lack) of inventory. Skill points to cover all eventualities and assets, confirmed hard assets, that can be used to cover any disaster if it may arise. The fact that Kazuo holds a negative opinion regarding my choice to not disclose to him my activities is his prerogative. However that "opinion" has nothing to do with the facts of his audit. IMHO if he felt that my not disclosing the "plan" to him was such a major issue he could have, and likely should have, done the ethical thing and refuse to do the audit. That being said, I am not playing poker. I've never visited any eve gambling site. I think I've tossed money into the Big lottery once but that was a return gesture of support to BIG for all of their support to Eve Guardian. Such things are always remembered, even years later. Originally by: Mike'P I'll take one bond (500m) at 4%, and I'm happy to stay in all the way down to 2%.
Listen, if you want to invest then invest. I know your not an alt and I don't find you particularly objectionable. However I'm quite serious when I say that I'd rather not have your money if I don't have to be jerked around by you at the same time.
To Shar -verb: 1 - To say what you mean. 2 - To say what it means. 3 - To say something mean. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |