It's funny listening to the goonies and their pets (test) cry. Their sandy vaginas must really hurt. If ya'll hadn't voted for such a dumb prick you wouldn't be where you are now. Ha, ha, ha.

That sir is very offensive to me and the rest of my alliance. CCP, would you please ban this individual? TIA.

If I apologize and give you 10 billion will the ban be only 30 days?

I do get to keep your tears, right?

With The Mittani now having been banned from serving on CSM7 and the change to the rules where there are no longer any alternates, it seems the only fair thing to do is to have a re-vote. With The Mittani receiving almost 20% of the votes all alone, that is a huge number of voters whose voice will no longer be heard on the CSM. Is this how CCP wants to have the "player's voice" influenced? With the positive changes they have been making and the beneficial support that CSM6 has given to CCP in a trying year, I believe they will want to do the right thing here and ensure that the disenfranchised voter's voice is heard.

Nixon was the peoples choice here in the US.

He resigned. No one was disenfranchised. There was no "re-vote."

True story.

Your vote was placed, it was counted. It counts still. It counted long enough for the guy you spent it on to waste it for you.

Don't blame CCP that you spent it on someone who immediately got himself thrown out by not stopping to think. Blame the guy that actually wasted it.

And then his running-mate took over. And that was, who now for Mittens?

EDIT: Did Nixon step down before assuming office? Just wondering, kinda fuzzy on my history.

It's funny listening to the goonies and their pets (test) cry. Their sandy vaginas must really hurt. If ya'll hadn't voted for such a dumb prick you wouldn't be where you are now. Ha, ha, ha.

He was about two years into his term.

Two step should get the chair and Hans move to #7.

You voted and lets be honest you got what you voted for.

And we were concern with it,but then some pubbies decided that its good time for old good witch hunt and white-knighting and stole it from us

:true story bro:

If he had been booted off the CSM I might be inclined to agree with a re-vote of some sort.

But by the looks of it, Mittens stepped down on his own. I don't think it was necessary but I guess he did.

Then again, nobody got to re-vote when Ankhenstinkapalooza or Larkonis were removed. Why would we re-vote when a member steps down?

With The Mittani now having been banned from serving on CSM7 and the change to the rules where there are no longer any alternates, it seems the only fair thing to do is to have a re-vote. With The Mittani receiving almost 20% of the votes all alone, that is a huge number of voters whose voice will no longer be heard on the CSM. Is this how CCP wants to have the "player's voice" influenced? With the positive changes they have been making and the beneficial support that CSM6 has given to CCP in a trying year, I believe they will want to do the right thing here and ensure that the disenfranchised voter's voice is heard.

Can we please have more comparisons to RL politics on the forums? There aren't enough. All of you who make these terrible comparisons should seriously thrill yourselves IRL.

Yeah, reading deeper it seems he's off CSM7 because of the ban and he'd only intended to step down from chairmanship.

Rules is rules though.

I also hope he runs again for CSM8 - things got done.

In the meantime, yeah those 10058 people have a right to feel cheated. But blaming the makers and enforcers of the rules instead of the one who irresponsibly broke them might be a little misguided.

Can we please have more comparisons to RL politics on the forums?

In the meantime, yeah those 10058 people have a right to feel cheated. But blaming the makers and enforcers of the rules instead of the one who irresponsibly broke them might be a little misguided.

There is a line of succession in place. That's what the alternates are for. "So you die, Captain, and we all move up in rank."

Actually, there are NO alternates this year, so the precedent does not apply in this situation at all.

There is one less member than initially voted for. And based on the previous year's work and the influence that Mittens had on CCP after the fiasco that was Incara, can you truly say that the vote was poorly placed? I, and many others, would hastily disagree with anyone who thinks (honestly) otherwise.

Even Riverini of all people said that Mittens had done a good job in the lead up to this CSM election.

With The Mittani now having been banned from serving on CSM7 and the change to the rules where there are no longer any alternates, it seems the only fair thing to do is to have a re-vote. With The Mittani receiving almost 20% of the votes all alone, that is a huge number of voters whose voice will no longer be heard on the CSM. Is this how CCP wants to have the "player's voice" influenced? With the positive changes they have been making and the beneficial support that CSM6 has given to CCP in a trying year, I believe they will want to do the right thing here and ensure that the disenfranchised voter's voice is heard.

You voted and lets be honest you got what you voted for.

The fact that you could not even be bother to figure out the exact number (was going to say it isn't difficult but you a Goon Pet Pubbie so I will forgive) shows how much you care

Any way, we Pubbie and Pub-Lords do not hate you

WE LOVE YOU

Such intelligent, witty banter. Thank you sir.

Re-vote, special election....call it what you want. It happens when positions are not properly filled for any number of reasons. And with their being no alternates this year, it seems that it is the only logical choice. Have everyone vote and the winner gets the spot.

UAxDEATH would move into #7, not Hans.