|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DIABBLOSS
   |
Posted - 2008.09.24 14:14:00 -
[1]
Its about time that all cap ships,maybe with exception of titans and rorqs were allowed to dock in high sec.dreads/carriers should be able to park in a safe area.As long as they do not attack players/station guns/used in wars/attack concord or any policing force,stations pos etc etc.they should be dual drive aswell able to use warp gates in high sec,and jump drives in low.
There seems little point paying billions 4 a cap ship then all the training time to use them if u risk the chance of losing it as soon as u undock. And as capital ships that were built in high sec can dock there it should be a reasonable request to let others irrespective of where they were built.
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 16:33:00 -
[2]
Well i thought i already stated that if the ones that were built in high sec can access it then all of the same type should also b allowed.why discriminate purely on where it was built its not fair to any 1 that has the misfortune of not having 1 built in high sec. and why should they lose out over a rather foolish attitude towards them.
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 18:19:00 -
[3]
no missioning is not my intention a cap ship would b far to much 4 a lvl 4 less they moved lvl 5s high sec but that wont happen.mind u that might b good hmmmm......
i just dont c why sum built in high sec r are allowed but others not i personally dont see the logic in that at all.plus maybe sum people cant afford to replace them if they did lose them
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 18:21:00 -
[4]
no missioning is not my intention a cap ship would b far to much 4 a lvl 4 less they moved lvl 5s high sec but that wont happen.mind u that might b good hmmmm......
i just dont c why sum built in high sec r are allowed but others not i personally dont see the logic in that at all.plus maybe sum people cant afford to replace them if they did lose them
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 18:23:00 -
[5]
they wouldnt b allowed to run amok the ones that can park up in high sec have strict rules applied that could easily b implemented 4 others.
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 19:45:00 -
[6]
well i dont agree,
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 20:31:00 -
[7]
eve is about setting goals.training and then enjoyment of the fruition of that training.now where is the harm in being able to park your capital ship in a high sec station until a time as u want to take it to low sec.meaning u can fit it safely and save it 4 a time when u want to risk it.as iv stated probably several times there are allowances 4 sum high sec built caps all i am asking 4 is all to have the same perk and parking rights.nothing to do with risk reward or ganking anything that moves.not everybody wants to shoot the first thing that moves. sum people just enjoy having ships 4 a collection.and should b able to enjoy them.this is a game games r about enjoyment of the experience your paying 4.
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 00:32:00 -
[8]
Ivy Axisur: And tell me when a pirate who just blew up your best faction ship (since you wouldn't be able to use any capital ship in high sec for anything) can just take a hop to high sec easily to avoid risking his precious carrier would count as a goal for you?
If your goal is providing safety for the pirates who blow up your ships and stops you from seeing some low sec with acceptable risk, sign up for this idea, they will blow up your ship easier, after all they can store their carrier safely in high sec, and just jump after you when they see that you entered low sec for a mission. Good luck with reaching safety after this.
well if hed just blown up her best faction ship she would b in an egg so whatever ship the pirate was flying would be safe carriers dont come into it so ur points not valid.
oh and she can agree with whoever she likes it may come as a shock to u but the whole point of posting stuff is that people express there own opinion.this is not a agree with me or else situation.just because she does not agree with you does not mean her opinion is not valid
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 16:48:00 -
[9]
Yea the orca is a welcome addition.and the haulers do need a overhaul i was always thought that freighters would make a good hauler if they could pick up jetcans as well, and would not need much programming either to change it.
|
DIABBLOSS
|
Posted - 2008.10.03 18:04:00 -
[10]
Yea i like the o.5 idea think it has merit expecially if sum lvl 5 agents were posted there to.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|