| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
RougeOperator wrote:Ai Mei wrote:Wait wasnt all this stuff said and done in Iceland where the US has no juristiction? You are subject to US laws while abroad. Basically if you break a US law in another country you can be brought up on charges in the US for that crime. This came about in the lat 90s early 00s because of the sex tours to other countries.
Interesting I'd have to look that up.
In the military we were subject to both military and local laws but as a citizen abroad I'm not sure as I know several vacation spots are popular, like Germany, do to a drinking age lower than ours.
Regardless of that show us where he broke Federal US law then. So far all we have is California law and I don't think either person in question lives there, and if one of them did they would have to use the federal government to prosecute across state lines.
Also you know what I just remembered, The Mittani is a lawyer, he should know this **** better than most of us lol. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote:You missed the point, I guess i should have posted every US state law there was. That's the problem in utilizing samples, people take it at face value and that's it. I USED THIS AS A SAMPLE! There's obviously a ton of laws on cyber bullying, harassment, etc. What I accept as "common knowledge" isn't as common as I thought.
there are many states with laws on cyber bullying, none of which have jurisdiction outside of their state border, which is where this occurred, unless you think Iceland is the 51th state. That is what you and rouge operator aren't getting.
I'm not saying you shouldn't be enraged or pissed off about this, that's your opinion and you're certainly welcome to it, but on the subject of the applicable laws you're factually incorrect. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:33:00 -
[33] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote: Regardless of that show us where he broke Federal US law then. So far all we have is California law and I don't think either person in question lives there, and if one of them did they would have to use the federal government to prosecute across state lines.
there's that too, it's sad how little people who live in the US understand the basics of how the US judiciary functions. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:RougeOperator wrote:Ai Mei wrote:Wait wasnt all this stuff said and done in Iceland where the US has no juristiction? You are subject to US laws while abroad. Basically if you break a US law in another country you can be brought up on charges in the US for that crime. This came about in the lat 90s early 00s because of the sex tours to other countries. Interesting I'd have to look that up. In the military we were subject to both military and local laws but as a citizen abroad I'm not sure as I know several vacation spots are popular, like Germany, do to a drinking age lower than ours. Regardless of that show us where he broke Federal US law then. So far all we have is California law and I don't think either person in question lives there, and if one of them did they would have to use the federal government to prosecute across state lines. Also you know what I just remembered, The Mittani is a lawyer, he should know this **** better than most of us lol.
You are partially correct. I know of a case in which a man from Alabama was charged with the death of his wife while they were on their honeymoon in Australia. I'd have to look at what part of the United States Code gives the government authorization to do it, but I'm assuming it would be because the suspect was an American citizen, as was his wife.
Second, Mittens is either an aspiring lawyer, a lawyer currently, or a "retired" lawyer depending on which lie the Goons want to propagate. |

Florestan Bronstein
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
488
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote: Game greifing, perfectly fun, what I love most about eve.
Joking about someone committing suicide and hinting at possible encouragement of such act. Honestly, where do people not see something wrong with that?
The dude joked about a guy committing suicide. (And The Wis may have some under lying condition that people don't know about.) Line crossed, thanks for playing, time for you do something else with your free time. Mr. Alexander Gianturco perception of reality and gaming has blurred.
In a hyper politically correct world, you have to be careful what you say. There are social norms, and this isn't being recognized.
~ eve is real ~
our "hyper politically correct world" only exists because you choose to be a part of it |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:38:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sobach wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:You missed the point, I guess i should have posted every US state law there was. That's the problem in utilizing samples, people take it at face value and that's it. I USED THIS AS A SAMPLE! There's obviously a ton of laws on cyber bullying, harassment, etc. What I accept as "common knowledge" isn't as common as I thought. there are many states with laws on cyber bullying, none of which have jurisdiction outside of their state border, which is where this occurred, unless you think Iceland is the 51th state. That is what you and rouge operator aren't getting. I'm not saying you shouldn't be enraged or pissed off about this, that's your opinion and you're certainly welcome to it, but on the subject of the applicable laws you're factually incorrect.
I hoped utilize laws as a subject of focus on what should be considered socially acceptable, as we as a human race seem to have lost its way. In the news, cyber harassment/bullying is a large issue, not just here in the states, but also in the UK and abroad. It's not something to be taken lightly.
Having someone stating that they are going to make a game burn because they made jokingly remarks about someone committing suicide, why are people OK with this, is this the type of people the game fosters?
I should try and focus this more on a PR and risk management standpoint in the perspective of CCP, and from outside of our little world of the EVE, the real world dose notice things like this.
My apologies for confusing law w/ my main point. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:You are partially correct. I know of a case in which a man from Alabama was charged with the death of his wife while they were on their honeymoon in Australia. I'd have to look at what part of the United States Code gives the government authorization to do it, but I'm assuming it would be because the suspect was an American citizen, as was his wife.
nope.
In that particular case the prosecutor charged the man on the theory that his conspiracy to commit murder against his wife was conducted while he was still in Alabama, thus granting the state the power to prosecute as part of the crime was committed there.
also, the case was subsequently tossed out by the judge over a complete lack of evidence to support the prosecution's theory, so there's that. |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
Florestan Bronstein wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote: Game greifing, perfectly fun, what I love most about eve.
Joking about someone committing suicide and hinting at possible encouragement of such act. Honestly, where do people not see something wrong with that?
The dude joked about a guy committing suicide. (And The Wis may have some under lying condition that people don't know about.) Line crossed, thanks for playing, time for you do something else with your free time. Mr. Alexander Gianturco perception of reality and gaming has blurred.
In a hyper politically correct world, you have to be careful what you say. There are social norms, and this isn't being recognized.
~ eve is real ~ our "hyper politically correct world" only exists because you choose to be a part of it
That's the most ignorant comment I've read in a long time. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:49:00 -
[39] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote:Having someone stating that they are going to make a game burn because they made jokingly remarks about someone committing suicide, why are people OK with this, is this the type of people the game fosters?
you referring to the Jita-burn campaign that's planned? personally I have zero issue with that, as that really exemplifies what EVE is all about. As long as it's conducted properly within the boundaries of the game, I see no problem with it.
as far as why some people aren't all up in arms over this incident... it depends on each person's experience and perspective. People who may have had to deal with suicides in their families and friends would obviously react differently to those who didn't. Others may view people who threatens suicides in a more contemptuous light than you do. Others, me included in this category, may have seen much worse things than this in life, which again puts things in a different perspective.
Compared to to people who've died and suffered in war zones, and/or are living in abject poverty, or any other myriad of far more egregious injustices in the world, a tasteless drunken comment at a internet spaceship game convention that objectively did little actual harm simply doesn't seem that big of a deal to me. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:49:00 -
[40] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:RougeOperator wrote:Ai Mei wrote:Wait wasnt all this stuff said and done in Iceland where the US has no juristiction? You are subject to US laws while abroad. Basically if you break a US law in another country you can be brought up on charges in the US for that crime. This came about in the lat 90s early 00s because of the sex tours to other countries. Interesting I'd have to look that up. In the military we were subject to both military and local laws but as a citizen abroad I'm not sure as I know several vacation spots are popular, like Germany, do to a drinking age lower than ours. Regardless of that show us where he broke Federal US law then. So far all we have is California law and I don't think either person in question lives there, and if one of them did they would have to use the federal government to prosecute across state lines. Also you know what I just remembered, The Mittani is a lawyer, he should know this **** better than most of us lol. You are partially correct. I know of a case in which a man from Alabama was charged with the death of his wife while they were on their honeymoon in Australia. I'd have to look at what part of the United States Code gives the government authorization to do it, but I'm assuming it would be because the suspect was an American citizen, as was his wife. Second, Mittens is either an aspiring lawyer, a lawyer currently, or a "retired" lawyer depending on which lie the Goons want to propagate.
RE: The Alabama dude, it's part of the Constitution that deals with it on a local (US) level. International Treaties deal with it on the Australian to US level. I'm pretty sure the USA likes Kangaroos . Hmm I wonder if because both parties involved were Alabama residents that they just kept it local because of that, and charged/prosecuted when he returned from his trip? I remember the case you are talking about but not the details cause I don't plan on killing my wife so I'm not interested in them haah! |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc Order of the Void
242
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 06:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:This just in. California is everywhere. Exactly! Neither CCP nor "that person" are subject to California's local laws. What about the "target" of this harassment? If he lives there then MAYBE you have a leg to stand on. IIRC I'm going to tell someone to die in a fire tonight in local. Someone please call the internet police, and I don't mean CONCORD. I used it as a mere example. I forgot I'm arguing with the "EVE" forums. To hell with it. I made my point. Moving On. No I think the issue is you failed to make a point. Or rather your point was here >.< and the issue is over there ----------->
Point was made - there are laws against cyber bullying. We dont know if they apply to the parties invloved becasue we dont know their laws. |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:03:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sobach wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Having someone stating that they are going to make a game burn because they made jokingly remarks about someone committing suicide, why are people OK with this, is this the type of people the game fosters? you referring to the Jita-burn campaign that's planned? personally I have zero issue with that, as that really exemplifies what EVE is all about. As long as it's conducted properly within the boundaries of the game, I see no problem with it. as far as why some people aren't all up in arms over this incident... it depends on each person's experience and perspective. People who may have had to deal with suicides in their families and friends would obviously react differently to those who didn't. Others may view people who threatens suicides in a more contemptuous light than you do. Others, me included in this category, may have seen much worse things than this in life, which again puts things in a different perspective. Compared to to people who've died and suffered in war zones, and/or are living in abject poverty, or any other myriad of far more egregious injustices in the world, a tasteless drunken comment at a internet spaceship game convention that objectively did little actual harm simply doesn't seem that big of a deal to me.
Good analysis on the view. I myself work quite closely from time to time with such individuals.
It was interesting reading this article: http://freebooted.blogspot.com/2012/03/eve-morality-tale-mittani-versus.html and the comment sections below. There is a part of me that feels Mr Gianturco may be suffering from his own type of condition. He definitively not the type of person, I personally would not associate myself with. Being an ass in EVE, OK, letting that slide into some personal beliefs on an individuals, not OK.
I have a firm belief that their needs to be some moral standard that carry with us in gaming. There should be some lines that shouldn't be crossed.
If anything, Mr Gianturco would appear to be one of those "shock value" type of personalities; and in some respects, this situation could be compared to the Michael Richards Laugh Factory incident.
I feel we must be careful in how much we "let slide" in our morale fabric. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:This just in. California is everywhere. Exactly! Neither CCP nor "that person" are subject to California's local laws. What about the "target" of this harassment? If he lives there then MAYBE you have a leg to stand on. IIRC I'm going to tell someone to die in a fire tonight in local. Someone please call the internet police, and I don't mean CONCORD. I used it as a mere example. I forgot I'm arguing with the "EVE" forums. To hell with it. I made my point. Moving On. No I think the issue is you failed to make a point. Or rather your point was here >.< and the issue is over there -----------> Point was made - there are laws against cyber bullying. We dont know if they apply to the parties invloved becasue we dont know their laws.
Ignoring the other points we have been making about jurisdiction, nobody seems to know if either party involved is subject to these laws.
Therefore >.< and ------------------------> |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:15:00 -
[44] - Quote
Quote:
I used it as a mere example. I forgot I'm arguing with the "EVE" forums. To hell with it. I made my point. Moving On.
No I think the issue is you failed to make a point. Or rather your point was here >.< and the issue is over there ----------->[/quote]
Point was made - there are laws against cyber bullying. We dont know if they apply to the parties invloved becasue we dont know their laws.[/quote]
Ignoring the other points we have been making about jurisdiction, nobody seems to know if either party involved is subject to these laws.
Therefore >.< and ------------------------>[/quote]
Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP. |

Sobach
Fourth Circle Total Comfort
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:15:00 -
[45] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:nobody seems to know if either party involved is subject to these laws.
the most likely, and probably only court system that would have jurisdiction over this would be Iceland's, and I don't know anything about the specifics of Iceland's laws and statutes regarding these type of incidents.
I'd say the chance of this going that far though would probably be about the same as me winning that half a billion lottery :P |

Davor
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Everyone in this thread should be banned for 30 days. |

Davor
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:19:00 -
[47] - Quote
And banned from posting forever. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:21:00 -
[48] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote:Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP.
OK then
CCP Games Hf is an Icelandic company/entity and has no legal responsibility for the actions of it's clients.
How is that? |

Testerxnot Sheepherder
DeadHeads - Question Authority Crew
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:23:00 -
[49] - Quote
Davor wrote:And banned from posting forever.
Sounds like a thrill. |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:32:00 -
[50] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP. OK then CCP Games Hf is an Icelandic company/entity and has no legal responsibility for the actions of it's clients. How is that?
But public image is, and in the case of CCP, it is something they've been fighting to fix for that past 9 months, since incarna.
CCP is a company and at the end of the day, it has its own priorities to protect itself from what other people say. Why do you think advertisers remove their ads from radio stations when a DJ says something stupid.
Guilty by association, it's how people think.
Reasons:
#1:Morale high ground. (If CCP ever wants to go public...)
#2: Legal issues related to one of your clients doing something stupid at one of your conferences, that you moderated. And however weak and doubtful they have been, they last think you would want as a company is your name and cyber bullying in the same article. http://videogamewriters.com/eve-online-player-banned-after-cyberbullying-comments-43118 |

Ismol Mond
Hedion University Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:33:00 -
[51] - Quote
A synopsis of Misato's rambling: It"s against the law! CCP's legal department doesn't know the law like I do the game will be shut down shortly! (Proved worng on every point. Plus you and your kind are why tort reform is so sorely needed here in the US) Misato trying to save face: Well maybe it's not against the legal law but it's against the moral law! (Please unsunscribe from the game and go away. Man is again the measure of all things if you haven't noticed lately but mostly go away for starting another thread where you could have just added to the other dozen or so. Which indicates you are nothing more than a mere drama queen)
|

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ismol Mond wrote:A synopsis of Misato's rambling: It"s against the law! CCP's legal department doesn't know the law like I do the game will be shut down shortly! (Proved worng on every point. Plus you and your kind are why tort reform is so sorely needed here in the US) Misato trying to save face: Well maybe it's not against the legal law but it's against the moral law! (Please unsunscribe from the game and go away. Man is again the measure of all things if you haven't noticed lately but mostly go away for starting another thread where you could have just added to the other dozen or so. Which indicates you are nothing more than a mere drama queen)
Thanks for reading and posting. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP. OK then CCP Games Hf is an Icelandic company/entity and has no legal responsibility for the actions of it's clients. How is that? But public image is, and in the case of CCP, it is something they've been fighting to fix for that past 9 months, since incarna. CCP is a company and at the end of the day, it has its own priorities to protect itself from what other people say. Why do you think advertisers remove their ads from radio stations when a DJ says something stupid. Guilty by association, it's how people think #1:Morale high ground #2: Legal issues related to one of your clients doing something stupid and one of your conferences, that you moderated. And however weak and doubtful they have been, they last think you would want as a company is your name and cyber bullying in the same article.
OK... Martha Stewart "served five months in a West Virginia federal prison" and still owns a large business and does business with other people and companies.
The Mittani mouthed off and is not even subject to his own state's local laws on the subject (I looked them up but out of respect, and forum rules, I won't hand out his home state or any other personal information, go look it up yourself and then keep it to yourself). Check this out http://www.cyberbullying.us/Bullying_and_Cyberbullying_Laws.pdf and look at all those "NO"s for "Off Campus".
Wait off campus! HOLY **** this only applies to school children.
I propose that CCP is not even slightly legally responsible.
PR.... All respects to CCP Manifest but he should be working some long hours just to keep an eye on things.
*sings a ditty about ship toasting* |

Misato Katsuragi
Bellum Aeternus En Garde
23
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 07:50:00 -
[54] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP. OK then CCP Games Hf is an Icelandic company/entity and has no legal responsibility for the actions of it's clients. How is that? But public image is, and in the case of CCP, it is something they've been fighting to fix for that past 9 months, since incarna. CCP is a company and at the end of the day, it has its own priorities to protect itself from what other people say. Why do you think advertisers remove their ads from radio stations when a DJ says something stupid. Guilty by association, it's how people think #1:Morale high ground #2: Legal issues related to one of your clients doing something stupid and one of your conferences, that you moderated. And however weak and doubtful they have been, they last think you would want as a company is your name and cyber bullying in the same article. OK... Martha Stewart "served five months in a West Virginia federal prison" and still owns a large business and does business with other people and companies. The Mittani mouthed off and is not even subject to his own state's local laws on the subject (I looked them up but out of respect, and forum rules, I won't hand out his home state or any other personal information, go look it up yourself and then keep it to yourself). Check this out http://www.cyberbullying.us/Bullying_and_Cyberbullying_Laws.pdf and look at all those "NO"s for "Off Campus". Wait off campus! HOLY **** this only applies to school children. I propose that CCP is not even slightly legally responsible. PR.... All respects to CCP Manifest but he should be working some long hours just to keep an eye on things. *sings a ditty about ship toasting*
Cyber bullying and Cyber Harassment have been used interchangeably for sometime now without regard to the age/campus limitation.
But the fact that this is coming up now in news articles with the terms "cyber bullying", "harassment", etc.. Do I need even make this point...
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/116503-Eve-Online-Panel-Encourages-Harassing-Suicidal-Player
http://www.vg247.com/2012/03/28/eve-online-sm-council-chairman-intending-to-resign-over-suicidal-remarks-at-fanfest/comment-page-1/
http://www.develop-online.net/news/40327/Eve-man-ashamed-and-sorry-for-suicide-jokes
http://games.on.net/article/15232/EVE_Online_SM_Council_Chairman_to_Resign_After_Public_Mockery_of_Suicidal_Player_at_Fanfest |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Joseph Sulaco wrote:Misato Katsuragi wrote:Sadly this is not what my intent was, read my above comments and you will see this thread is more of a focus on what I view as weak risk management on the part of CCP. OK then CCP Games Hf is an Icelandic company/entity and has no legal responsibility for the actions of it's clients. How is that? But public image is, and in the case of CCP, it is something they've been fighting to fix for that past 9 months, since incarna. CCP is a company and at the end of the day, it has its own priorities to protect itself from what other people say. Why do you think advertisers remove their ads from radio stations when a DJ says something stupid. Guilty by association, it's how people think #1:Morale high ground #2: Legal issues related to one of your clients doing something stupid and one of your conferences, that you moderated. And however weak and doubtful they have been, they last think you would want as a company is your name and cyber bullying in the same article. OK... Martha Stewart "served five months in a West Virginia federal prison" and still owns a large business and does business with other people and companies. The Mittani mouthed off and is not even subject to his own state's local laws on the subject (I looked them up but out of respect, and forum rules, I won't hand out his home state or any other personal information, go look it up yourself and then keep it to yourself). Check this out http://www.cyberbullying.us/Bullying_and_Cyberbullying_Laws.pdf and look at all those "NO"s for "Off Campus". Wait off campus! HOLY **** this only applies to school children. I propose that CCP is not even slightly legally responsible. PR.... All respects to CCP Manifest but he should be working some long hours just to keep an eye on things. *sings a ditty about ship toasting* Cyber bullying and Cyber Harassment have been used interchangeably for sometime now without regard to the age/campus limitation. But the fact that this is coming up now in news articles with the terms "cyber bullying", "harassment", etc.. Do I need even make this point... http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/116503-Eve-Online-Panel-Encourages-Harassing-Suicidal-Playerhttp://www.vg247.com/2012/03/28/eve-online-sm-council-chairman-intending-to-resign-over-suicidal-remarks-at-fanfest/comment-page-1/http://www.develop-online.net/news/40327/Eve-man-ashamed-and-sorry-for-suicide-jokeshttp://games.on.net/article/15232/EVE_Online_SM_Council_Chairman_to_Resign_After_Public_Mockery_of_Suicidal_Player_at_Fanfest
Lets see....
,com
.com
.net
.net
I don't see any .gov in there that would potentially have the authority to support your argument. Escapist magazine could call it whatever it wants too but by no means does it make it an actual legal issue. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1290
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:00:00 -
[56] - Quote
Cool story, I'm glad that the media can decide what counts as harassment. With a small modicum of research you can go look up the relevant harassment statues and see for yourself that it was not: - Cyberbullying (not a school kid) - Harassment in general (didn't know the guy's real name) - Cyberharassment (wasn't harassment)
At most, you got that Mittens had an unfortunate lapse in judgment and broke the TOS/EULA resulting in a 30 day ban. Which he owned up to like a champ.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

The Mittardi
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
im apparently a lawyer even though I don't show up as ever having taken the BAR in any state. so actually im probably just a lowly paralegal, or liar oh wait
anyway, ccp should hire me Dear Goons: I will sell you this character for 50B ISK. EVE mail me if interested. |

Davor
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:03:00 -
[58] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Cool story, I'm glad that the media can decide what counts as harassment. With a small modicum of research you can go look up the relevant harassment statues and see for yourself that it was not: - Cyberbullying (not a school kid) - Harassment in general (didn't know the guy's real name) - Cyberharassment (wasn't harassment) At most, you got that Mittens had an unfortunate lapse in judgment and broke the TOS/EULA resulting in a 30 day ban. Which he owned up to like a champ. -Liang
Show me where the EULA covers what you do out of game. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Cool story, I'm glad that the media can decide what counts as harassment. With a small modicum of research you can go look up the relevant harassment statues and see for yourself that it was not: - Cyberbullying (not a school kid) - Harassment in general (didn't know the guy's real name) - Cyberharassment (wasn't harassment) At most, you got that Mittens had an unfortunate lapse in judgment and broke the TOS/EULA resulting in a 30 day ban. Which he owned up to like a champ. -Liang
Does the fact that he named the person individually make this a TOS/EULA violatoin? Because about once a year Helicity Boson organizes and event that is eve advertised by CCP whose sole bases is to suicide gank miners as much as you possibly could. GRANTED I don't remember Mittani's exact words at the moment but I do know he said to go suicide gank this guy.
I guess the distinction is the intended results of said actions? Suicide vs Carebear Tears?
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1293
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 08:06:00 -
[60] - Quote
Davor wrote:Show me where the EULA covers what you do out of game.
My personal opinion is that this wasn't covered by the EULA or TOS. CCP disagreed with me in the dev blog, and Mittens isn't inclined to make waves over it. I see no point in fighting about it.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |