EVE Search - *Poll* Would you (re)Vote for The Mittani?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

*Poll* Would you (re)Vote for The Mittani?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Fishmaskle Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 26	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:48:00 - [1] - Quote Just throwing up a quick poll as I am curious. Outside of the other candidates, would you (re)Vote for The Mittani now even after what has happened? Quick Yes or No Poll What is done is done for CSM7, but we do have CSM8 to ponder about in only a year. It will be here before you know it... If I helped you out, Technical Issue,-áenemy gank, popped your poor fit,-áhit the "Like" button.
Nick Bison Bison Industrial Inc Thundering Herd 83	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:50:00 - [2] - Quote Fishmaskle wrote: Just throwing up a quick poll as I am curious. Outside of the other candidates, would you (re)Vote for The Mittani now even after what has happened? Quick Yes or No Poll What is done is done for CSM7, but we do have CSM8 to ponder about in only a year. It will be here before you know it... No, as he doesn't match what I want represented. That said, i have no issue with him running for CSM8. Nothing clever at this time.
Princess Bride Corripe Cervisiam Trade Consortium 358	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:51:00 - [3] - Quote Fishmaskle wrote: Just throwing up a quick poll as I am curious. Outside of the other candidates, would you (re)Vote for The Mittani now even after what has happened? Quick Yes or No Poll What is done is done for CSM7, but we do have CSM8 to ponder about in only a year. It will be here before you know it... ...and when it gets here, Alex won't be allowed to run because he's been banned. More accurately, it's up to CCP. And considering how he has conducting himself after being banned (accusations of being "thrown off a cliff", "thrown under a bus", "nailed to a cross") over a silly 30 day ban, I'd say his exclusion is a foregone conclusion. http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/
Amity Lane Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 139	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:56:00 - [4] - Quote I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity.
Grumpy Owly 445	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:58:00 - [5] - Quote Urgh, I'm not going anywhere near Mittens' Poll. Bounty Hunting for CSM7 It's just criminal - Smuggling
Vertisce Soritenshi Varion Galactic Tragedy. 1390	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:59:00 - [6] - Quote Amity Lane wrote: I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity. Who? Now, Jewel Staite, wow...she is a fox! EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!!
Testerxnot Sheepherder DeadHeads - Question Authority Crew 13	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:59:00 - [7] - Quote I sure would! There's no doubt in my mind that he'd manage to f*ck it up again and make an ever bigger ass out of himself.
Doc Fury Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 610	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:59:00 - [8] - Quote Who cares? There is not going to be a "do over" no matter how much the goonies, their alts and their pets want one. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.'
Simi Kusoni HelloKittyFanclub 413	Posted - 2012.03.29 16:59:00 - [9] - Quote Amity Lane wrote: "would you sleep with Graham Norton?" Yes on all counts. --Will Support Your Terrible Forum Thread For ISK--
Fishmaskle Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 26	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:01:00 - [10] - Quote Just speculate "If" he is allowed to and does run in CSM8. Even though I voted for Trebor, I still would have liked him to be on CSM7. But that is a whole collection of other threads. Just keep this simple. If I helped you out, Technical Issue,-áenemy gank, popped your poor fit,-áhit the "Like" button.
Goatse Girl GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 0	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:06:00 - [11] - Quote yes
AC Resonance Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 2	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:08:00 - [12] - Quote Nick Bison wrote: That said, i have no issue with him running for CSM8. Not possible. People with a ban on their history for misconduct, can't run for CSM. /Schadenfreude
Liang Nuren Parsec Flux 1298	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:12:00 - [13] - Quote No, but I didn't vote for him in the first place. I'd like him to be on the CSM as a whole, but I'd say from SOTG that he wouldn't run again even if the option was open. He'll probably find some other upstanding citizen and ask them to run in his place. -Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
Capacity gear Stella Contego Security Stella Stargate Security 15	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:15:00 - [14] - Quote Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Amity Lane wrote: I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity. Who? Now, Jewel Staite, wow...she is a fox! hell yeah she is,. and bring back FIREFLY!!!!!!
Vertisce Soritenshi Varion Galactic Tragedy. 1394	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:26:00 - [15] - Quote Capacity gear wrote: Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Amity Lane wrote: I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity. Who? Now, Jewel Staite, wow...she is a fox! hell yeah she is,. and bring back FIREFLY!!!!!! Hell yes! Firefly was awesome! This is now a thread about Firefly and how hot Jewel Staite is. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!!
Tokclik GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 10	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:30:00 - [16] - Quote I'll bet my 4 stolen Nyx there won't be a CSM8
Markus Reese Debitum Naturae ROMANIAN-LEGION 64	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:31:00 - [17] - Quote I really cannot say one way or the other. I would of course need to see how other canditates comment. Not for CSM 7 if there was a revote. For CSM 8, I want to see further how he performs during this year as a player. The response to the ban would make me not want to. Wasn't mature and also disrespectful.
Tristan North I.Net Academy 80	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:35:00 - [18] - Quote No.
RougeOperator Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 605	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:36:00 - [19] - Quote Liang Nuren wrote: No, but I didn't vote for him in the first place. I'd like him to be on the CSM as a whole, but I'd say from SOTG that he wouldn't run again even if the option was open. He'll probably find some other upstanding citizen and ask them to run in his place. -Liang Ling your latest blog post is a freaking joke. No one was disenfranchised. They got to vote. He blew it. Its all his fault. Lesser people would have been banned instantly as has been the case in the past. There was existing precedent of people being banned for lesser infractions. You being a mittani fanboi is hilarious. Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence"-á
Capacity gear Stella Contego Security Stella Stargate Security 17	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:39:00 - [20] - Quote Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Capacity gear wrote: Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Amity Lane wrote: I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity. Who? Now, Jewel Staite, wow...she is a fox! hell yeah she is,. and bring back FIREFLY!!!!!! Hell yes! Firefly was awesome! This is now a thread about Firefly and how hot Jewel Staite is. Capital idea, i concur also inara is amazing too.
Ranger 1 Ranger Corp 1374	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:41:00 - [21] - Quote Tokclik wrote: I'll bet my 4 stolen Nyx there won't be a CSM8 Even considering all that has happened, I don't think Mittani would be very happy if that came to pass. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point. Also, I can kill you with my brain.
Vaerah Vahrokha Vahrokh Consulting 453	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:41:00 - [22] - Quote It's irrelevant whether he gets in a future CSM or not. He can just do as everyone does in RL: make everybody vote a trusty pet and then manouver him as a puppet. He got all the capabilities to do so. Auditing \| Collateral holding and insurance \| Consulting \| PLEX for Good Charity Twitter channel
DeMichael Crimson Republic University Minmatar Republic 1336	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:42:00 - [23] - Quote Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Capacity gear wrote: Vertisce Soritenshi wrote: Amity Lane wrote: I can understand being interested in speculation, but there's really not much point. It's a bit like asking "would you sleep with Graham Norton?". It's not very likely that you'll get the opportunity. Who? Now, Jewel Staite, wow...she is a fox! hell yeah she is,. and bring back FIREFLY!!!!!! Hell yes! Firefly was awesome! This is now a thread about Firefly and how hot Jewel Staite is. Ahhh, Jewel Staite as Kaylee 'Nethers'.
Liang Nuren Parsec Flux 1301	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:45:00 - [24] - Quote RougeOperator wrote: Ling your latest blog post is a freaking joke. No one was disenfranchised. They got to vote. He blew it. Its all his fault. Lesser people would have been banned instantly as has been the case in the past. There was existing precedent of people being banned for lesser infractions. You being a mittani fanboi is hilarious. The funny thing is that in your hatred of GSF you are willing to literally burn Eve itself to the ground. Its far less about me being a Mittani fanboy and far more about me simply wanting what's best for the game itself. And frankly, I think its pretty inarguable that he was an effective player advocate - regardless of politics. And let's be clear: I am one of those ~elite PVP~ people that Goonswarm continually lampoons. And I return the favor. Its just that sometimes we need to put aside our differences instead of trying to burn our house down around our ears. *******. -Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
RougeOperator Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance 606	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:50:00 - [25] - Quote RougeOperator wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: No, but I didn't vote for him in the first place. I'd like him to be on the CSM as a whole, but I'd say from SOTG that he wouldn't run again even if the option was open. He'll probably find some other upstanding citizen and ask them to run in his place. -Liang Ling your latest blog post is a freaking joke. No one was disenfranchised. They got to vote. He blew it. Its all his fault. Lesser people would have been banned instantly as has been the case in the past. There was existing precedent of people being banned for lesser infractions. You being a mittani fanboi is hilarious. Im going to add that the EULA/TOS do cover this. It was a CCP sponsored event where they were representing their alliances etc. There are many ways the EULA/TOS apply. Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence"-á
Jake Warbird Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 173	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:56:00 - [26] - Quote OP WTF?? I voted and now the rest of my 10k alts can't vote! Fix it,NAO!
Liang Nuren Parsec Flux 1304	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:58:00 - [27] - Quote RougeOperator wrote: Im going to add that the EULA/TOS do cover this. It was a CCP sponsored event where they were representing their alliances etc. There are many ways the EULA/TOS apply. There are a large number of ways in which someone could argue that the TOS/EULA do not apply. In fact, a strict reading of them will imply that they do not in fact apply. However, as I said in the blog post: CCP disagrees. And even if they didn't disagree, it is within their power at their sole discretion to ban any of us. And that's really all that matters. I still contend you are one of the worst of the worst of the **** posters and what you are doing borders on real life harassment and defamation. -Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
adam smash University of Caille Gallente Federation 23	Posted - 2012.03.29 17:59:00 - [28] - Quote I'd vote this time for anyone BUT him lulz. Ya we need him telling ccp what to do with the game... I mean I guess the only saving grace is... ccp don't listen to the CSM lol.
Fishmaskle Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 26	Posted - 2012.03.29 18:00:00 - [29] - Quote RougeOperator wrote: RougeOperator wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: No, but I didn't vote for him in the first place. I'd like him to be on the CSM as a whole, but I'd say from SOTG that he wouldn't run again even if the option was open. He'll probably find some other upstanding citizen and ask them to run in his place. -Liang Ling your latest blog post is a freaking joke. No one was disenfranchised. They got to vote. He blew it. Its all his fault. Lesser people would have been banned instantly as has been the case in the past. There was existing precedent of people being banned for lesser infractions. You being a mittani fanboi is hilarious. Im going to add that the EULA/TOS do cover this. It was a CCP sponsored event where they were representing their alliances etc. There are many ways the EULA/TOS apply. But when the EULA/TOS do allow the Griefing of a Player "Character" ingame, what truly was the difference between doing what was announced at the Alliance Panel Ingame to thousands of Alliance members and other allies, or doing it on camera during an alliance panel to the thousand or so viewers. People react like Alex told everyone his real name, but it was just his sob story + ingame character name. Unless you are an EVE player, nothing Ingame was breached, the the method of delivery makes it appear otherwise. Though it may sound so bad and horrible to those on the outside (or those on the inside that have yet to learn how this is found enjoyable to others) this is what makes (made?) EVE so unique and different from the mass of other MMO's, If this part of the game dies, then it just turns EVE into another one of the WoW clones that punishes playstyles that think outside of the box. If I helped you out, Technical Issue,-áenemy gank, popped your poor fit,-áhit the "Like" button.
Rico Minali Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension 457	Posted - 2012.03.29 18:00:00 - [30] - Quote Princess Bride wrote: Fishmaskle wrote: Just throwing up a quick poll as I am curious. Outside of the other candidates, would you (re)Vote for The Mittani now even after what has happened? Quick Yes or No Poll What is done is done for CSM7, but we do have CSM8 to ponder about in only a year. It will be here before you know it... ...and when it gets here, Alex won't be allowed to run because he's been banned. More accurately, it's up to CCP. And considering how he has conducted himself after being banned (accusations of being "thrown off a cliff", "thrown under a bus", "nailed to a cross") over a silly 30 day ban, I'd say his exclusion is a foregone conclusion. See theer you go talking all crap again, ccp stated clearly that he could run again in csm 8 if he chose to. Yes, yes id vote for him again. please do not post here if you didnt vote for him in the first place since that is what the op asked. WOULD YOU VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN? Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.