| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
DonHel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
14
   |
Posted - 2012.04.01 14:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi there ccp, Not sure on how easy it would be.. but is it possible that there could be 2 systems instead of one that are set as main zones. One able to block super caps from entering? this way ccp doesnt have to hear, theres a dude on beacon with super ever.. Keep it still a ffa all over, to much hassle trying to maintain whats going on in the individual sites. Just make the supers have to play in another zone if someone wants to play .. and if they want to try and organize a super cap defense test.. they can be the ones having to hunt down people to help test that, as there is alot more people without supers being told they have to go somewhere else and pretty much do the same if they want to test.. This should clear up the whole crying of it, and at the same time you can make it to where supers are able to be accessed much easier because the damage they can do to other testers will be limited.
Thanks |
DonHel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 11:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Reduce the timers when logging off etc (so you disappear quickly). I've lost a number of supercaps to "probers" just because they feel it's enjoyable to kill someone after they log out - regardless if they were in the consensual combat or not.
/c
I don't doubt this is a problem, but isnt that how it functions on TQ? |
DonHel
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.02 14:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chribba wrote:DonHel wrote:Chribba wrote:Reduce the timers when logging off etc (so you disappear quickly). I've lost a number of supercaps to "probers" just because they feel it's enjoyable to kill someone after they log out - regardless if they were in the consensual combat or not.
/c I don't doubt this is a problem, but isnt that how it functions on TQ? It is, I was under the impression how to update the SiSi rules though - and while this isn't a rule change and CCP saying that they want more time spent on bugs rather than investigating people breaking the rules, a thing like this could make more time for bugspending since less risk of people breaking rules by non-consensual combat. /c
ahh, I see your argument |
| |
|