EVE Search - UNICORN Tactics = Most Cowardly Thing I've Ever Seen

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

UNICORN Tactics = Most Cowardly Thing I've Ever Seen

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:22:00 - [91] Originally by: RollinDutchMasters Let me do a little prediction about what would happen if this happened... Fleets warp in Cao Cao: OMGWTF u n00bs r using ewar!\ UNICOR: Ummm.... so? Cao Cao: You all forfeit for being l4m3! TPS Fleet warps off Cao Cao on forums: UNICOR got PWNED! And I'm giving myself 2 points for the nice use of 'l4m3' UNICOR claims: Lims Kragma - Apoc Hanns - Scorpion Its at 3-2 in your favor Cao Cao... I guess we're getting forum-pwned. Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:22:00 - [92] Originally by: RollinDutchMasters Let me do a little prediction about what would happen if this happened... Fleets warp in Cao Cao: OMGWTF u n00bs r using ewar!\ UNICOR: Ummm.... so? Cao Cao: You all forfeit for being l4m3! TPS Fleet warps off Cao Cao on forums: UNICOR got PWNED! And I'm giving myself 2 points for the nice use of 'l4m3' UNICOR claims: Lims Kragma - Apoc Hanns - Scorpion Its at 3-2 in your favor Cao Cao... I guess we're getting forum-pwned. Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
Bared Bel'Medar	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:29:00 - [93] well, first off, I have my doubts on Ca0's claims, I have seen footage that doesn't back up those, bold claims. To the latter, "When a foe is defeated, but will not admit it, he calls his enemy a coward for defeating, and frequently makes claims of his own grandure in the process" -******, Mien Kompf (I think I spelled it right, and hoe the translation is correct) I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer...
Bared Bel'Medar	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:29:00 - [94] well, first off, I have my doubts on Ca0's claims, I have seen footage that doesn't back up those, bold claims. To the latter, "When a foe is defeated, but will not admit it, he calls his enemy a coward for defeating, and frequently makes claims of his own grandure in the process" -******, Mien Kompf (I think I spelled it right, and hoe the translation is correct) I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer...
Zzazzt	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:42:00 - [95] Gah - what a horrible misuse of Res Ipsa Loquitur.... Please elaborate as to how that - HIGHLY SPECIFIC - piece of legalese relates in any way to what you've been saying? ____________________________________________ MLM: Gentlemen at Play
Zzazzt	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:42:00 - [96] Gah - what a horrible misuse of Res Ipsa Loquitur.... Please elaborate as to how that - HIGHLY SPECIFIC - piece of legalese relates in any way to what you've been saying? ____________________________________________ MLM: Gentlemen at Play
Modar	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:45:00 - [97]
Modar	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:45:00 - [98]
Ca0 Ca0	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:58:00 - [99] Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 04:04:18 Zzazzt, It certainly isn't a misuse of the term. Res ipsa loquitur is a legal doctrine where you don't have to establish two elements of negligence in order to prove negligence - you don't have to establish duty or breach. The reason? Because what happened is so egregious that such a thing would NEVER happen in the absence of negligence. Thus the law infers a duty and a breach of duty. In essence, what the doctrine says is that "the fact this event occurred is, in and of itself, proof of negligence." So . . . what I am saying here is that this completely lame tactic is, without further discussion, proof of UNICORN's cowardice (or at least the lamers that took part in it tonight). The thing speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur. Okay thanks for playing now go home please. EDIT: an example of real world res ipsa loquitur would be a situation where an automobile is driving down the road when the gas tank spontaneously combusts, killing the occupants. When the next of kin sue for wrongful death, they won't be required to articulate that the car manufacturer had a duty to make a safe gas tank, nor will they be required to show exactly how the gas tank exploded, what went wrong, or where the defect in the thing was. Since gas tanks don't usually explode in the absence of negligence, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine would apply, and the car manufacturer would lose.
Ca0 Ca0	Posted - 2004.07.06 03:58:00 - [100] Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 04:04:18 Zzazzt, It certainly isn't a misuse of the term. Res ipsa loquitur is a legal doctrine where you don't have to establish two elements of negligence in order to prove negligence - you don't have to establish duty or breach. The reason? Because what happened is so egregious that such a thing would NEVER happen in the absence of negligence. Thus the law infers a duty and a breach of duty. In essence, what the doctrine says is that "the fact this event occurred is, in and of itself, proof of negligence." So . . . what I am saying here is that this completely lame tactic is, without further discussion, proof of UNICORN's cowardice (or at least the lamers that took part in it tonight). The thing speaks for itself. Res ipsa loquitur. Okay thanks for playing now go home please. EDIT: an example of real world res ipsa loquitur would be a situation where an automobile is driving down the road when the gas tank spontaneously combusts, killing the occupants. When the next of kin sue for wrongful death, they won't be required to articulate that the car manufacturer had a duty to make a safe gas tank, nor will they be required to show exactly how the gas tank exploded, what went wrong, or where the defect in the thing was. Since gas tanks don't usually explode in the absence of negligence, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine would apply, and the car manufacturer would lose.
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:06:00 - [101] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 or at least the lamers that took part in it tonight Ding ding ding! 2 more points to Cao Cao for the nice use of 'lamers'. You can now claim: Darcon: Raven Mechanical Death: Scorpion This brings the total for tonights battle up to 5-2 in your favor... I guess we'd best do some mining to make up for the losses youve infliced on us. Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
RollinDutchMasters	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:06:00 - [102] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 or at least the lamers that took part in it tonight Ding ding ding! 2 more points to Cao Cao for the nice use of 'lamers'. You can now claim: Darcon: Raven Mechanical Death: Scorpion This brings the total for tonights battle up to 5-2 in your favor... I guess we'd best do some mining to make up for the losses youve infliced on us. Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
N'Fran D'Larn	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:36:00 - [103] It's truly amazing; these forums never change You Suck! Your tactics suck! We Pwnd you! Doh! You're pirates! You're cowards! We came to fight and you dampened our ass so we couldn't kick your butts! We pwned you! Doh! You suck! You're n00bs got smarter! Doh1 You suck! Yer mutha sucks! And she wore combat boots! And had a boob job at 65! And yer lame! And..... And..... And.... I'm a child. Complain to CCP about exploits Complain within your corp if you don't like the way things are going Complain to your "partner" if your computer craps out. Otherwise, just play the game to have fun folks! Let go of the forum spaz outs I can see that this thread has plenty of thrash from pirates and old friends, but what it really lacks is content. Save the "pwnd" "lame" "you suck" and just play the game! These rantings serve no one and nothing. CCP I thought you had a better handle on these threads... Cao Cao - no thrash intended bro, but perhaps if you made your fun in the game less dependent on what other's do, you'd enjoy your evenings a bit more
N'Fran D'Larn	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:36:00 - [104] It's truly amazing; these forums never change You Suck! Your tactics suck! We Pwnd you! Doh! You're pirates! You're cowards! We came to fight and you dampened our ass so we couldn't kick your butts! We pwned you! Doh! You suck! You're n00bs got smarter! Doh1 You suck! Yer mutha sucks! And she wore combat boots! And had a boob job at 65! And yer lame! And..... And..... And.... I'm a child. Complain to CCP about exploits Complain within your corp if you don't like the way things are going Complain to your "partner" if your computer craps out. Otherwise, just play the game to have fun folks! Let go of the forum spaz outs I can see that this thread has plenty of thrash from pirates and old friends, but what it really lacks is content. Save the "pwnd" "lame" "you suck" and just play the game! These rantings serve no one and nothing. CCP I thought you had a better handle on these threads... Cao Cao - no thrash intended bro, but perhaps if you made your fun in the game less dependent on what other's do, you'd enjoy your evenings a bit more
ProphetGuru	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:38:00 - [105] This coming from old fe guys, who are the absolute king of the- 25 scorps sitting at 200km running ecm, is kinda funny. In the end though, I agree with cao cao. Ecm spoils a lot of decent fights, and is over powered, dampers especially. If they completely took ecm and ew stuff out of the game tomorrow, I wouldn't shed a tear. Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
ProphetGuru	Posted - 2004.07.06 04:38:00 - [106] This coming from old fe guys, who are the absolute king of the- 25 scorps sitting at 200km running ecm, is kinda funny. In the end though, I agree with cao cao. Ecm spoils a lot of decent fights, and is over powered, dampers especially. If they completely took ecm and ew stuff out of the game tomorrow, I wouldn't shed a tear. Evolution..... Just when you thought you were winning.
Notferr	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:01:00 - [107] Sounds like TPS got shut down, and started whining. - N - Cowboy - Celestial Apocalypse Now hear this, I am selling clues on market in gehi.
Notferr	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:01:00 - [108] Sounds like TPS got shut down, and started whining. - N - Cowboy - Celestial Apocalypse Now hear this, I am selling clues on market in gehi.
Ca0 Ca0	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:06:00 - [109] Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 05:09:20 Notferr, We have waited days for a decent battle, and it looked like we were gonna get one until the bull**** tonight. Oh well. Like I said earlier, it would be one thing if they were outnumbered and used something like this to gain an edge. However they had vastly superior numbers and they still felt they had to be the Kings of Cheap. Either way, it was just dumb, nobody lost ships, and they got to sit longer at safespots. Whoop-dee-doo. Cao EDIT: as some UNICORN tweed said above, yes we did outnumber you (slightly) for most of the night. Funny that we never saw any of you - oh yeah, except for Zarthanon in his vigil (or whatever he uses) at the UNICORN regulated 300km.
Ca0 Ca0	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:06:00 - [110] Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 05:09:20 Notferr, We have waited days for a decent battle, and it looked like we were gonna get one until the bull**** tonight. Oh well. Like I said earlier, it would be one thing if they were outnumbered and used something like this to gain an edge. However they had vastly superior numbers and they still felt they had to be the Kings of Cheap. Either way, it was just dumb, nobody lost ships, and they got to sit longer at safespots. Whoop-dee-doo. Cao EDIT: as some UNICORN tweed said above, yes we did outnumber you (slightly) for most of the night. Funny that we never saw any of you - oh yeah, except for Zarthanon in his vigil (or whatever he uses) at the UNICORN regulated 300km.
Kalki Nibiru	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:07:00 - [111] Its UNICOR NOT UNICORN Taken from the May 29th 2003 Devchat at EveGate . <Muaddid> Q: When will sentry gun and station and similar construction pods be introduced on the market? <Hellmar> we have various player owned entities already implemented. Sentry guns, power/shield generators, field repair mini-stations, mobile refineries. We are still working out the last tidbits of how they can be over taken, what is the penalty of having a sentry gun kill a n00b etc. and we have been a bit busy with plugging the holes that people have found.I would say that you'd start to see these items on the market in about 2-3 weeks, very expensive to begin with
Kalki Nibiru	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:07:00 - [112] Its UNICOR NOT UNICORN Taken from the May 29th 2003 Devchat at EveGate . <Muaddid> Q: When will sentry gun and station and similar construction pods be introduced on the market? <Hellmar> we have various player owned entities already implemented. Sentry guns, power/shield generators, field repair mini-stations, mobile refineries. We are still working out the last tidbits of how they can be over taken, what is the penalty of having a sentry gun kill a n00b etc. and we have been a bit busy with plugging the holes that people have found.I would say that you'd start to see these items on the market in about 2-3 weeks, very expensive to begin with
Staind Cold	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:39:00 - [113] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 03:02:08 RollinDutchMaster, I never thought I would ever get to use this little phrase outside of my legal practice: Res Ipsa Loquitur. RES IPSA LOQUITUR - Lat. "the thing speaks for itself." Refers to situations when it's assumed that a person's injury was caused by the negligent action of another party because the accident was the sort that wouldn't occur unless someone was negligent.<> The only negligent action I see in what happen is that even thought you claim playing over a year you are handicap to learn about simple practice of using FoF missiles.
Staind Cold	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:39:00 - [114] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 03:02:08 RollinDutchMaster, I never thought I would ever get to use this little phrase outside of my legal practice: Res Ipsa Loquitur. RES IPSA LOQUITUR - Lat. "the thing speaks for itself." Refers to situations when it's assumed that a person's injury was caused by the negligent action of another party because the accident was the sort that wouldn't occur unless someone was negligent.<> The only negligent action I see in what happen is that even thought you claim playing over a year you are handicap to learn about simple practice of using FoF missiles.
Fred0	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:57:00 - [115] Cao Cao. Fit up for real close range and fof's. Get a frig and do a warp in to that. Have a look on their faces when they've wasted all their midslots for nothing. If they don't have balls you gotta have extra big you know ;)
Fred0	Posted - 2004.07.06 05:57:00 - [116] Cao Cao. Fit up for real close range and fof's. Get a frig and do a warp in to that. Have a look on their faces when they've wasted all their midslots for nothing. If they don't have balls you gotta have extra big you know ;)
Presidio	Posted - 2004.07.06 06:23:00 - [117] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 05:09:20 Notferr, We have waited days for a decent battle, and it looked like we were gonna get one until the bull**** tonight. Oh well. Like I said earlier, it would be one thing if they were outnumbered and used something like this to gain an edge. However they had vastly superior numbers and they still felt they had to be the Kings of Cheap. Either way, it was just dumb, nobody lost ships, and they got to sit longer at safespots. Whoop-dee-doo. Cao EDIT: as some UNICORN tweed said above, yes we did outnumber you (slightly) for most of the night. Funny that we never saw any of you - oh yeah, except for Zarthanon in his vigil (or whatever he uses) at the UNICORN regulated 300km. lol.. I agree a fight with no significant losses sux, especially after days of waiting. - "Passivity is fatal to us. Our goal is to make the enemy passive." Mao Tse-tung
Presidio	Posted - 2004.07.06 06:23:00 - [118] Originally by: Ca0 Ca0 Edited by: Ca0 Ca0 on 06/07/2004 05:09:20 Notferr, We have waited days for a decent battle, and it looked like we were gonna get one until the bull**** tonight. Oh well. Like I said earlier, it would be one thing if they were outnumbered and used something like this to gain an edge. However they had vastly superior numbers and they still felt they had to be the Kings of Cheap. Either way, it was just dumb, nobody lost ships, and they got to sit longer at safespots. Whoop-dee-doo. Cao EDIT: as some UNICORN tweed said above, yes we did outnumber you (slightly) for most of the night. Funny that we never saw any of you - oh yeah, except for Zarthanon in his vigil (or whatever he uses) at the UNICORN regulated 300km. lol.. I agree a fight with no significant losses sux, especially after days of waiting. - "Passivity is fatal to us. Our goal is to make the enemy passive." Mao Tse-tung
Joshua Calvert	Posted - 2004.07.06 06:31:00 - [119] If there was one module which I would LOVE to see nerfed to hell and back, it would be the Remote Sensor Dampener. LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!
Joshua Calvert	Posted - 2004.07.06 06:31:00 - [120] If there was one module which I would LOVE to see nerfed to hell and back, it would be the Remote Sensor Dampener. LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.