| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 13:10:00 -
[61] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Kirith Vespira wrote: Seriously, dude, you don't have a friggin' clue what you're talking about. You should really stop posting now.
Your comment lacks substance enlighten me on the clue that I should be talking about.
First clue: Not all T2 bpos are worth 100B.
Second clue: Most original T2 BPO holders worked their butts off to get them. Yes, they were randomly distributed. But each research point was like a lottery ticket, and you didn't get those RP by shaking a tree. Try to get 30 Lv5 R&D agents on two accounts, across multiple factions, whose standings you grinded for 4 months, to get a Wasp II BPO in the end (which ended resold to my corp for 750M), and come back tell me how I "unfairly got a massive 100B isk support from CCP".
Third clue: Without having any T2 BPO atm, I can easily gain more than double the isks than a holder of even the best T2 bpo over the same time period. It just require a bit more sweat. Hint: a T2 BPO can't use more than one factory line. |

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
31
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 13:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Kirith Vespira wrote: Seriously, dude, you don't have a friggin' clue what you're talking about. You should really stop posting now.
Your comment lacks substance enlighten me on the clue that I should be talking about. First clue: Not all T2 bpos are worth 100B. Second clue: Most original T2 BPO holders worked their butts off to get them. Yes, they were randomly distributed. But each research point was like a lottery ticket, and you didn't get those RP by shaking a tree. Try to get 30 Lv5 R&D agents on two accounts, across multiple factions, whose standings you grinded for 4 months, to get a Wasp II BPO in the end (which ended resold to my corp for 750M), and come back tell me how I "unfairly got a massive 100B isk support from CCP". Third clue: Without having any T2 BPO atm, I can easily gain more than double the isks than a holder of even the best T2 bpo over the same time period. It just require a bit more sweat. Hint: a T2 BPO can't use more than one factory line.
Some BPO's were handed out fairly. What you fail to mention was that some players were privy to how many tickets were in each lottery and how many BPO's were on offer in each lotto. This gave them a massive advantage in obtaining said BPO. You fail to mention that other players recived items as drops from Rats that were handed to them in Allince space. You also say nothing about the BPO's that were just directly handed to players as assets and you also fail to mention that members of CCP were handing BPO out to friends accounts too, |

Gravecall
Nordic Innovations BLACK-MARK
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 13:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Gravecall wrote:So let see, basically T2 BPOs should be removed because not everyone has one and they cost more than some noob can afford?
Thats not the problem. Was a broken mechanic and CPP changed it. And nowdays we cant compete. Colector ships are destroyed by use but BPO t2 never expire and thats wrong.
T2 BPOs have been removed when peoples' accounts get suspended due to being caught using exploits (see below), and I've seen at least one killmail showing a destroyed T2 BPO, so that claim's a bit wide of the mark too.
Quote:The assets removed from the game by our actions because of this exploit consist of large numbers of capital ships including some motherships and titans, over 30 Tech II BPOs and other valuable items as well as large amounts of ISK.
|

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
31
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 13:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
Yes T2 BPO's can be ganked while in ships. One of the major porblems with T2 BPO's is that they can not be stolen by corp members. This is wrong if you trust a player to use this item it should be able to be stolen. How the hell do CCP explain this. ''Here have free access to this item so you can make stuff, hey don't go near that item or steal it''. It makes zero sense a good nerf for T2 BPO would have been to make them unlockable. Although we should not comprimise and still push for a complete removal of said items. |

Gizan
Hounds Of War WHY so Seri0Us
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:22:00 -
[65] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Yes T2 BPO's can be ganked while in ships. One of the major porblems with T2 BPO's is that they can not be stolen by corp members. This is wrong if you trust a player to use this item it should be able to be stolen. How the hell do CCP explain this. ''Here have free access to this item so you can make stuff, hey don't go near that item or steal it''. It makes zero sense a good nerf for T2 BPO would have been to make them unlockable. Although we should not comprimise and still push for a complete removal of said items.
YOU SIR, are a moron. t2bpo's are unlockable. if they werent then they would be in the same corp for forever. they change hands DAILY! all you have to do is start an UNLOCK VOTE (which requires shares). so if you dont have shares then you cant steal it.
Are you now asking ccp to remove locking blueprints in hangers?
|

Gizan
Hounds Of War WHY so Seri0Us
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:24:00 -
[66] - Quote
also, I dont have a state raven, and new players cant get them, remove them too? I dont have a freki, remove those? i dont have a mimir, remove those? ive never gotten an officer spawn, nerf officers? i dont have a titan, remove those? i dont have a technicium moon, nerf those? i dont have a revanant, remove those? |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
Gizan wrote:also, I dont have a state raven, and new players cant get them, remove them too? I dont have a freki, remove those? i dont have a mimir, remove those? ive never gotten an officer spawn, nerf officers? i dont have a titan, remove those? i dont have a technicium moon, nerf those? i dont have a revanant, remove those?
Collector ships are destroyed if used no invalance there. You can build new titans you can conquest a technetium moon.
BPO T2 in a station cant be destroyed and make an invalance in the economy. You cant compete in lots of item because it invention cost is above its selling point.
EvA
|

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:41:00 -
[68] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Gizan wrote:also, I dont have a state raven, and new players cant get them, remove them too? I dont have a freki, remove those? i dont have a mimir, remove those? ive never gotten an officer spawn, nerf officers? i dont have a titan, remove those? i dont have a technicium moon, nerf those? i dont have a revanant, remove those? Collector ships are destroyed if used no invalance there. You can build new titans you can conquest a technetium moon. BPO T2 in a station cant be destroyed and make an invalance in the economy. You cant compete in lots of item because it invention cost is above its selling point. EvA
honestly, if you think t2 bpo's are so powerfull and you can make trillions from them, go buys some. like most of teh people who own them currently have. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=90294&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=87441&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=90371&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=91651&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=90413&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=91701&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=87733&find=unread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=89975&find=unread
if they are so so bad, ccp can buy many every week and remove them the fair way CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:42:00 -
[69] - Quote
Increase production time for all T1 and T2 module BPO's by 500% Increase production time for all T1 and T2 sub capital ships BPO's by 300% multiply number of factory slots on stations and POS mods by 1.5
This will solve the problem.
Another solution is to make it IMPOSSIBLE to produce ANYTHING from a T2 BPO without first making a copy of it. That would force me into putting up a POS, since, well, there are no free copy/ME slots withing 3 jumps of Jita... |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
Lets do some numbers :
Excl. drones/charges, the most produced T2 items from BPOs in March were: Exp. Cargohold (19%), Rocket Launcher (94%), Cap Recharger (22%).
cap recharger ii selling 2k-4k unit / day
http://www.eve-market-guide.com/t1item.php?id=2032#
Optimal manufacturing cost171,913.16 Optimal manufacturing time42m 46s Jita sales price712,896.00 Profit per hour758,978.27 Per day 18,215,478,48 Per month 546464160
Free money
invention cost
Totals Invention cost216,233.64 Optimal manufacturing cost181,347.47 Optimal manufacturing time1h 46m 40s Jita sales price712,896.00 Profit per hour177,364.62
see any diference?
|

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:07:00 -
[71] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Lets do some numbers : Excl. drones/charges, the most produced T2 items from BPOs in March were: Exp. Cargohold (19%), Rocket Launcher (94%), Cap Recharger (22%). cap recharger ii selling 2k-4k unit / day http://www.eve-market-guide.com/t1item.php?id=2032#Optimal manufacturing cost171,913.16 Optimal manufacturing time42m 46s Jita sales price712,896.00 Profit per hour758,978.27 Per day 18,215,478,48 Per month 546464160 Free money invention cost Totals Invention cost216,233.64 Optimal manufacturing cost181,347.47 Optimal manufacturing time1h 46m 40s Jita sales price712,896.00 Profit per hour177,364.62 see any diference?
yeh you forgot to x the invented number by 10, as the inventor can make at least 10 slots worth and teh bpo holder can only use that bpo once... nerf invention, buff t2bpo's dam it CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:12:00 -
[72] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:
yeh you forgot to x the invented number by 10, as the inventor can make at least 10 slots worth and teh bpo holder can only use that bpo once... nerf invention, buff t2bpo's dam it
With the other 9 spaces i can make invention with the money i earn i can pay another acount for free and have 30 new slots.
your point?
EvA |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:20:00 -
[73] - Quote
Unless there are wars and people destroying these goods, it does not matter.
Buff Thrashers, Nerf Concorde, Nerf Jita |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:21:00 -
[74] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:
yeh you forgot to x the invented number by 10, as the inventor can make at least 10 slots worth and teh bpo holder can only use that bpo once... nerf invention, buff t2bpo's dam it
With the other 9 spaces i can make invention with the money i earn i can pay another acount for free and have 30 new slots. your point? EvA
i have 150 t2 build slots, i make a crap tonne from invention, i make a few items not many and they all have t2 bpo's. would i like to own a t2 bpo of teh items i invent? not a chance as the bpo's have a ROI cost of about 8 years currently and it isnt worth it.
i also own t2 bpo's. they make me far less money than my invention does. like 10 times less. why do i own them? its becasue i made so much isk from invention i needed to invest it into something that makes a little isk and is safer than eve bank. and lets face it there pretty cool much like a titan epeen for industrial guys.
i do not understand your thinking tbh. only thing that springs to me is, somehow you feel intiled to a level playing field, this is eve, its not level, you get rewarded for your work efforts and risk. if ccp want to give me the isk back i paid for the bpo's and remove them, so be it. but they will be removing a part of eve's rich history and removing my ability to troll people like you.
CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Yes T2 BPO's can be ganked while in ships. One of the major porblems with T2 BPO's is that they can not be stolen by corp members. This is wrong if you trust a player to use this item it should be able to be stolen. How the hell do CCP explain this. ''Here have free access to this item so you can make stuff, hey don't go near that item or steal it''. It makes zero sense a good nerf for T2 BPO would have been to make them unlockable. Although we should not comprimise and still push for a complete removal of said items.
Two things and then I'm done with this ludicrous thread: 1) You should stop now. You look like an idiot, so just move on. 2) Since you started this anorexic thread, how many T2 BPOs have you bought and trashed? |

Kalipoli
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:46:00 -
[76] - Quote
Tis life. Nothing is fair. If you believe that a video game is devoid of the same inequities of the physical world than you are just ignorant. rage quit and forget about it.
with that said, this is EVE, put your brain to work, start making spreadsheets, stop bitching and play the game. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 16:09:00 -
[77] - Quote
Katja Faith wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Yes T2 BPO's can be ganked while in ships. One of the major porblems with T2 BPO's is that they can not be stolen by corp members. This is wrong if you trust a player to use this item it should be able to be stolen. How the hell do CCP explain this. ''Here have free access to this item so you can make stuff, hey don't go near that item or steal it''. It makes zero sense a good nerf for T2 BPO would have been to make them unlockable. Although we should not comprimise and still push for a complete removal of said items.
Two things and then I'm done with this ludicrous thread: 1) You should stop now. You look like an idiot, so just move on. 2) Since you started this anorexic thread, how many T2 BPOs have you bought and trashed?
I have T2 BPO's that I have stopped manufactuing from since it takes a HUGE amount of time to actually make, move and sell those items, and the margins are slim.
Also, tell your friends about this game. Get another 50k to log in, and the T2 BPO's will not be a problem. Also, once a Drake cost as much as a HAC, the use of HAC's will go up, and, voila, profit. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 18:44:00 -
[78] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
I have T2 BPO's that I have stopped manufactuing from since it takes a HUGE amount of time to actually make, move and sell those items, and the margins are slim.
Also, tell your friends about this game. Get another 50k to log in, and the T2 BPO's will not be a problem. Also, once a Drake cost as much as a HAC, the use of HAC's will go up, and, voila, profit.
So u can guess what are the margins for the same items doing invention?
T2 will still be a problem. Only owners of BPO T2 like the free card that they have free money isnt easy to say not too.
EvA
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:10:00 -
[79] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
I have T2 BPO's that I have stopped manufactuing from since it takes a HUGE amount of time to actually make, move and sell those items, and the margins are slim.
Also, tell your friends about this game. Get another 50k to log in, and the T2 BPO's will not be a problem. Also, once a Drake cost as much as a HAC, the use of HAC's will go up, and, voila, profit.
So u can guess what are the margins for the same items doing invention? T2 will still be a problem. Only owners of BPO T2 like the free card that they have free money isnt easy to say not too. EvA
Margins on that item on invention does not exist. Just like trying to manufacture 100mm steel armor plates. They are also only worth the minerals they are made off.
I could do like most others and sell my BPO's to an industrialist with 4-5 trillion isk looking to find some investment that will give them 1-2% return on invested capital.
What I fail to see is WHY the investment of these industrialists should be nulled?
However, cutting the amount of mods being able to be manufactured from my prints would be awesome. That would cut supply and drive the prices up. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:18:00 -
[80] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:[quote=Eva Volkova][quote=qDoctor Strangelove]
What I fail to see is WHY the investment of these industrialists should be nulled?
.
1- Its like any bussines you think something is worth X but in reallity is Y. 2- for the better of the game. Like all nerf in games is for the better of the "whole" not the better of a "few".
I never said nulled but changed. I will be glad if their final product will be more expensive than invention. So you could spend more time and get a better product (invention) or less time and get a worse product (BPO). If not let introduce the BPO T2 again in the sistem.
Everything in eve has a perceived value and a real value. We have to return money to those that bought pax amaria book before the nerf and they didnt refine it? If something isnt good for the game you have to change it.
|

Gatan Hahran
Brukterer DUCT TAPE UNION
89
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:20:00 -
[81] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote: T2 will still be a problem. Only owners of BPO T2 like the free card that they have free money isnt easy to say not too.
The stupidity of your postings made my eyes bleed.
Paying 2b-150b isk does NOT equal free
I invented and still invent an insane amount of modules (yes i used the system you claim is broken) to earn the money to pay for my "free" T2 BPO.
Everyone else can do exactly the same thing if he wants.
|

Karim alRashid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
176
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 20:01:00 -
[82] - Quote
There's no need to remove T2 BPOs.
What is needed is to balance
(a) the invention mechanism, and (b) T2 manufacturing times
until for any particular ship/module type, 80% or so of the actual ships/modules produced are from invention.
This should affect mostly ships.
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 20:19:00 -
[83] - Quote
Gatan Hahran wrote:[quote=Eva Volkova]
The stupidity of your postings made my eyes bleed.
Paying 2b-150b isk does NOT equal free
I invented and still invent an insane amount of modules (yes i used the system you claim is broken) to earn the money to pay for my "free" T2 BPO.
Everyone else can do exactly the same thing if he wants.
Please if you dont agree with me say so but lets not call us names? You are entitled to pay any amount of money for anything if you think it is worth that. Dosent mean that the item real value is that.
The first owner didnt pay that amount of money if was given by a lottery.
If you payd that is because the owner didnt whant the BPO.
And if you paid 5 isk o 5 billion dosnt make you have more reason.
The sistem is broken lets agree how to change it.
If you think BPO T2 are good then look for a sistem to reintroduce them in the game.
I have explain mi point of view.
Ships (like titans) cost a lot of money and they are being balanced all the time.
why cant we look for a way to resolve the problem?
EvA |

Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:31:00 -
[84] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote: The first owner didnt pay that amount of money if was given by a lottery.
And winning the lottery was, in the vast majority of cases, the result of a lot of sweat and time involved.
And time = money.
I know a guy who had 3 accounts. 9 characters. 54 lv5 R&D agents. With all relevant skills maxed. Involved SP in the multiple dozens of millions.
So he got a few BPOs. If you imply again that he just was handed over those BPOs because he got lucky, I'll start calling you names.
Quote: If you payd that is because the owner didnt whant the BPO.
And if you paid 5 isk o 5 billion dosnt make you have more reason.
The sistem is broken lets agree how to change it.
If you think BPO T2 are good then look for a sistem to reintroduce them in the game.
I have explain mi point of view.
Ships (like titans) cost a lot of money and they are being balanced all the time.
why cant we look for a way to resolve the problem?
EvA
Invention need to take into account the ME/PE of the BPC used in the process. That would reduce significantly the margin between Bpo-produced and invention-produced stuff. But that's all that's needed.
There is no need to reintroduce T2 BPOs. If you still want reasons, just think how a massive influx from those prints would obsolete Invention. Or the unnecessary economic disruption for those who invested in one.
Speaking of reasons, I have yet to see a reason for removing T2 Bpos that doesn't reek of envy. |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
238
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:56:00 -
[85] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote: why cant we look for a way to resolve the problem?
EvA
Because we don't think there is a problem.
Want to complain about domething you think is unfair? Complain to CCP in some way they'll notice (hint: not forums)
Want to make isk on T2 items in a T2 bpo universe? Use the program in my sig. Problem solved.
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:59:00 -
[86] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:
And winning the lottery was, in the vast majority of cases, the result of a lot of sweat and time involved.
And time = money.
I know a guy who had 3 accounts. 9 characters. 54 lv5 R&D agents. With all relevant skills maxed. Involved SP in the multiple dozens of millions.
So he got a few BPOs. If you imply again that he just was handed over those BPOs because he got lucky, I'll start calling you names.
Invention need to take into account the ME/PE of the BPC used in the process. That would reduce significantly the margin between Bpo-produced and invention-produced stuff. But that's all that's needed.
There is no need to reintroduce T2 BPOs. If you still want reasons, just think how a massive influx from those prints would obsolete Invention. Or the unnecessary economic disruption for those who invested in one.
Speaking of reasons, I have yet to see a reason for removing T2 Bpos that doesn't reek of envy.
Great at least one with an idea-í!
People dont like changes and if they have an advantage will fight to retain it.
- BPO and Invention are two diferent ways to produce items. This is a game and the reality are mechanics that can be changed for the better of the game. - In mi opinion invention is a good system i like your idea of ME/PE of the BPC. And i think it has been proven that invention alone can sustain the market with items. - the matter of compensation (if any) is a diferent one. I personally have lots of R&D agents and whent the new changes to FW come will personally lose a lot of money but i agree that moving a static way to earn money - to a dinamic one will be better for the game (i might be wrong i dont think FW for industri is any good maybe some new type of mini game like PI to get datacores). - So i believe that invention should be the main way to get T2 items. And that an "active" way to get them "invention" should earn better results that a "pasive" one. Understanding here you spend some time/isk obtaining it but after that its allmost a pasive way to get what in invention you need to work for.
So i see we have two options making a sistem where t2/Invention work togheter. And where invention (that needs more work to sustain) should make the less cost items than a semi/pasive way of the BPO T2. If we introduce BPO T2 with mi sistem will not make obsolete Invention. Invention items will be cheaper than BPO T2. So you can decide make lots and lots of item with less time. O make cheaper items spending more time in the process.
Or remove the sistem or make a new one.
EvE
|

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 22:04:00 -
[87] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote: You are entitled to pay any amount of money for anything if you think it is worth that. Dosent mean that the item real value is that.
The first owner didnt pay that amount of money if was given by a lottery.
If you payd that is because the owner didnt whant the BPO.
And if you paid 5 isk o 5 billion dosnt make you have more reason.
The sistem is broken lets agree how to change it.
If you think BPO T2 are good then look for a sistem to reintroduce them in the game.
I have explain mi point of view.
Ships (like titans) cost a lot of money and they are being balanced all the time.
why cant we look for a way to resolve the problem?
EvA
I think I said I was done with the thread, but like the Mob, it just keeps pulling me back in again.
So let me get this straight. You think that because the original owner of the BPO didn't pay the price they demand today that the "sistem" [sic] is broken? And what does selling price of a T2 BPO have to do with anything at all?
I'm trying to get your point, but your jumps in rational logic are hard to follow. It's been made clear both in threads of this nature and CCP's own numbers that items from T2 BPOs on the whole barely scratch the surface in terms of numer of T2 igtems sold. So the argument that the T2 BPOs that you guys are INSISTING were free are imbalancing the system is rediculous. It's just another take on the "free minerals" non-sense. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 22:13:00 -
[88] - Quote
Katja Faith wrote:
I think I said I was done with the thread, but like the Mob, it just keeps pulling me back in again.
So let me get this straight. You think that because the original owner of the BPO didn't pay the price they demand today that the "sistem" [sic] is broken? And what does selling price of a T2 BPO have to do with anything at all?
I'm trying to get your point, but your jumps in rational logic are hard to follow. It's been made clear both in threads of this nature and CCP's own numbers that items from T2 BPOs on the whole barely scratch the surface in terms of numer of T2 igtems sold. So the argument that the T2 BPOs that you guys are INSISTING were free are imbalancing the system is rediculous. It's just another take on the "free minerals" non-sense.
I say that the price they pay at start (lotery) or 20 B if bought yesterday dosent matter. The fact that you have two diferent ways to produce items is. So lets them be diferent.
If you whant BPO T2 lets the final product be more expensive that the one you get from invention. (able to build lots of items more expensive ones less time from the user).
Let invention build less expensive items (able to build items more cheap with more time from the user.)
Or use only one. Having two sistems to do the same isnt good. If you whant two sistem let one be good at A bad at B and the other good at B bad at A.
EvA
|

Gizan
Hounds Of War WHY so Seri0Us
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 00:01:00 -
[89] - Quote
if you change invention to be more profitable for X item, then people will start inventing X item until there is no profit. removeing the t2 bpo's will do the same thing, people will flock to what ever is most profitable until there is no more profit!] the only thing removing t2 bpo's will do, is cause people to do massive ammounts of speculation. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 00:28:00 -
[90] - Quote
Gizan wrote:if you change invention to be more profitable for X item, then people will start inventing X item until there is no profit. removeing the t2 bpo's will do the same thing, people will flock to what ever is most profitable until there is no more profit!] the only thing removing t2 bpo's will do, is cause people to do massive ammounts of speculation.
thanks for giving and argument and not trollin.
Its like PI people can make 15 minutes cicles o 2 weeks cicles. Less efort less money. BPO T2 its easier less efort (less time involved) so it should return less profit than doing invention (same number slots more time spended.) How to archive this is something we can talk about. (someone sugested me/pe from BPO T1 should change BPO T2)
Most of the items are invented now so if one item makes no profit will move to make another like in BPO T1 i dont see a problem there.
Some items allready dont have BPO T2 do you see the speculation you are afraid there? Offer / demand will make the new value of things.
Tornado is an T1 item that is higly especulated nowdays.
http://www.eve-market-guide.com/t1item.php?id=4310
Sure more people will start building them and more offer = less price.
Speculation is mostly used when u perceive an item is worth more that the price you pay for it and you buy it not for use it. you buy it to sell it latter at a higher price. Sometimes you are right sometimes you arent.
EvA
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |