| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
kessah
The Accursed
   |
Posted - 2008.11.15 11:03:00 -
[1]
Linkage
I didnt expect it to be quite like that. The acting isnt really that good from what i can see, but its definetly more gritty. Like what they have done to James Bond, which im a massive fan of.
Look forward to this one most definetly ^_^
|
TimGascoigne
The Graduates
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 11:42:00 -
[2]
meh Star Trek needs to be put to bed. |
ouroboros trading
Gallente
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 11:43:00 -
[3]
Looks good
Sounds good
Looks good
Feels good too.
|
Dantes Revenge
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 11:48:00 -
[4]
That's not Star Trek!
Nudity and sexual scenes in Star Trek, it's just not right It can't be Star Trek.
|
Xtreem
Gallente
Knockaround Guys Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 11:51:00 -
[5]
wont be the same without data :(
but ill still be there peeing my pants like a toddler to watch this when it comes out :)
<3 startrek |
Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 12:48:00 -
[6]
I am genuinely excited to see what Abrams does with this.
|
Arianhod
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 12:56:00 -
[7]
I beleive Star Trek needs to be taken out of the house, behind the barn and introdiced to Jayne with a double barrled shotgun.
Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007.
 Originally by: Janu Hull
You're making me tingly in the special places...
|
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 13:13:00 -
[8]
Hm. It seems quite odd for a Star Trek trailer, a little more explosiony/T&A than I would expect |
ReaperOfSly
Gallente
Zetsubou Corp
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 13:16:00 -
[9]
That's not Spock! That's Sylar in disguise! Watch out, Kirk - he's going to eat your brain! |
Tzar'rim
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 14:02:00 -
[10]
Startrek just died, bury it.
|
|
|
Janu Hull
Caldari
Terra Incognita
Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 14:13:00 -
[11]
WANT! |
Gneeznow
Minmatar
North Eastern Swat
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 15:16:00 -
[12]
its probably going to be very shallow and suck
|
soldieroffortune 258
Gallente
Trinity Council
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 15:18:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
Hm. It seems quite odd for a Star Trek trailer, a little more explosiony/T&A than I would expect
this
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258
"Eve is about making yourself richer while making the other guy poorer"
|
Sniper Wolf18
Gallente
Apocalypse Ponies
H E L I C O N
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 15:18:00 -
[14]
im guessing all the parts that arent in the trailer are just gonna be dialogue and that i have alredy seen the best of the movie from the trailer?
And above all, read my sig! |
Xen Gin
Universal Mining Inc
Forged Dominion
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 15:42:00 -
[15]
This is the NEW look Enterprise for the Film.
 Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |
Atomos Darksun
Infortunatus Eventus
Obsidian Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:01:00 -
[16]
I like it. They're taking the franchise to places it hasn't been.
those space battles? NOM NOM NOM
Originally by: Amoxin
My vent is talking to me in a devil voice...
Atomos' Guide to Forum Flaming |
Crumplecorn
Gallente
Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:07:00 -
[17]
In terms of concept: Star Trek is basically dead, and going back and doing the original series with new actors is pretty much the worst thing they could do. However, going back and rebooting the series with a new style like Bond, Batman etc., could be quite interesting, as it would actually be something new based on the old franchise, rather than a continuation.
In terms of implementation: It looks awful. Bad acting, cheesy lines, stupendous amounts of action. However, it should be an interesting study in what would happen if you took Roddenberry's concept and executed it in the modern entertainment industry. Just to show how far it's fallen.
Ofc, Batman and Bond took silly over the top series of movies, and by rebooting turned them into something more serious. Thus is makes sense that taking a serious seies and rebooting it will result in a Star Trek version of Batman and Robin.
-
DesuSigs |
Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:21:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Tzar'rim
Startrek just died, bury it.
It died ages ago.
Voyager and Enterprise were ****ing horrible and the last couple of films huffed giant chodes.
I doubt the new film could make things any worse.
Anyone who thinks they don't need new actors to redo the original show is clearly a plant by the corset industry.
Bill Shatner, god love him, is 108 or something. |
Teron D'Amun
Slacker Industries
Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:24:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Davina Braben
Originally by: Tzar'rim
Startrek just died, bury it.
It died ages ago.
Voyager and Enterprise were ****ing horrible and the last couple of films huffed giant chodes.
I doubt the new film could make things any worse.
Anyone who thinks they don't need new actors to redo the original show is clearly a plant by the corset industry.
Bill Shatner, god love him, is 108 or something.
by "last couple of films" you are referring to Nemesis, right? Cause First Contact was awesome
and Shatner is no longer Kirk, he is DENNY CRANE
|
Davina Braben
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:27:00 -
[20]
Nemesis and Insurrection.
See?
Insurrection was so good you don't even remember it. |
|
|
Zyck
KDS Navy
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:43:00 -
[21]
I thought it looked good. Seems to be very mixed feelings in this thread though. I've been a fan of star trek for a while...not really a huge fan or a particularly devoted one, but I do enjoy the movies and the TV show when they're on. Or, at least I watch TNG and DS9. The rest...meh. I've seen em and once is enough.
This looks interesting to me for three reasons:
- I'm not a die-hard trekkie so a new take on it doesn't bother me in the slightest
- I'm interested to see where JJ Abrams goes with this, there's nothing wrong with trying something at a new angle
- We're lacking some serious sci-fi movies for the most part, so I'm happy for just about anything that comes out with spaceships and 'splosions.
-Zyck |
Nomakai Delateriel
Amarr
Shadow Company
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:45:00 -
[22]
...did they just take Star Trek and removed the Sci-fi part?
Seriously, every good Star Trek film/series had (at its core) a large dose of Sci-fi, where the movie explores current and future technological/social issues in a different context (in order to more easily illuminate the central problems without our pre-conceived perceptions of the problem being in the way).
It looks like this movie replaced that part with more explosions.
______________________________________________
-My respect can not be won, only lost. It's given freely and only grudgingly withdrawn. |
Captain Hudson
Caldari
Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 16:52:00 -
[23]
Not being a Fan of Star Trek at all this film looks quite good to me  |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 17:17:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Zyck
This looks interesting to me for three reasons:
- I'm not a die-hard trekkie so a new take on it doesn't bother me in the slightest
- I'm interested to see where JJ Abrams goes with this, there's nothing wrong with trying something at a new angle
- We're lacking some serious sci-fi movies for the most part, so I'm happy for just about anything that comes out with spaceships and 'splosions.
This. Decent scifi movies are rare these days. I'll add the fact that star trek movies in general are horrible(Wrath of Khan not included). They are simply bad movies. They always seem to be full of unnecessary crap, that I suspect was only in the movie because they wanted to do some fan service and give screentime to every character in the TV show. Since the new movie doesn't have this limiting factor it might actually be worth watching.
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 17:25:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Dantes Revenge
That's not Star Trek! Nudity and sexual scenes in Star Trek, it's just not right It can't be Star Trek.
Orion Slave Girls... never heard of'em ?
Also, the "hey, let me just rip another shirt" Kirk ?
Now take the rules and regulations of television from nearly 40 years ago, compare it to today's rules and regulations, and this ST is relatively tame in comparison 
_
Create a character || Fit a ship || Get some ISK |
Teron D'Amun
Slacker Industries
Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 17:38:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Davina Braben
Edited by: Davina Braben on 15/11/2008 16:33:02
Nemesis and Insurrection.
See?
Insurrection was so good you don't even remember it.
And Nemesis was such a bumnugget I'd totally forgotten they killed Data off in a last ditch attempt to squeeze some gravitas out of the script.
Denny Crane, coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs.
Insurrection was that movie where Picard was hitting on that hundred year old MILF no?
|
Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 19:20:00 -
[27]
.... Was that Syler as Spock? Thats just plain evil right there. |
Sanka Cofie
Amarr
Fractured Core
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 19:20:00 -
[28]
[a] Insurrection wasn't half bad. Nemesis was ok too. They're both way better than that one where Spock's brother took them to visit God, and the first Trek movie was rather crap too.
[b] They should have let trek rest alot longer than they did. Its like they just crapped out Voyager and Enterprise and then said 'this isn't working, reboot'. The problem is partially in the writing, but mostly in the vision, or lack thereof.
They had no idea where to go with Voyager.
"hey... lets send it really far away so its exploring new
stuff".
"ok. we're exploring new stuff. now what?"
"um. how about some sort of holodeck malfunction"
"the borg"
"time travel"
"how about an episode with klingons?"
So they said this blows... lets try exploring new stuff at the very beginning.
"ok. so. here we are at the beginning, now what?"
"time travel"
"klingons"
"how about an episode with the borg, but like... some sort of accident"
They aren't actually writing anything new, so much as trying to milk new stories out of old material. The entire franchise is totally devoid of creativity.
I can fairly well guarentee that the movie is going to have [1] time travel [2] klingons [3] the borg.
Possibly, time traveling borg klingons?
I for one am NOT going to give them my money.
Sends producers the wrong message "mindless sequels and prequels and reboots of old familar stuff > creative new stuff".
Even as far as sequels go. There are so many other universes that haven't been bled dry. So many old dead sci-fi shows which could be rebooted.
FireFly.
Pitch Black.
Earth2.
Space Above and Beyond.
Let Trek rest its nipples for a day before you get back to milking. |
Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 19:27:00 -
[29]
I do hope that this is a fundimental relaunch of the franchise, IE the whole prime directive BS thrown out the window and so forth. |
Atomos Darksun
Infortunatus Eventus
Obsidian Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.15 19:48:00 -
[30]
I think a ST series (or mini series, or movie) based on the mirror universe would be absolutely FANTASTIC. Plenty of unexplored political/social issues, and more action than an entire season of your preferred series.. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |