Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 16:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
Nydia Carver wrote:Well they fixed drone regions, next it-¦s T2 BPO-¦s. Whats broken about T2BPOs, that you dont have any? |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:31:00 -
[62] - Quote
Nydia Carver wrote:Well they fixed drone regions, next it-¦s T2 BPO-¦s.
Hopefully, CCP have been talking about t2npo lately so maybe something is on the cards. |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:35:00 -
[63] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Nydia Carver wrote:Well they fixed drone regions, next it-¦s T2 BPO-¦s. Hopefully, CCP have been talking about t2npo lately so maybe something is on the cards. Rogue drones were actually a problem T2BPOs are not. |
Haulie Berry
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 18:39:00 -
[64] - Quote
There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:00:00 -
[65] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry.
Meh I play the game the way I want I plex two accounts from afk trading and have isk to do what I want to do in EVE. I wanted to compete in invention but refuse to do so against T2BPO an item that was gifted by ccp to a pet player. |
Salo Aldeland
Luma Operations
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:00:00 -
[66] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry.
If only. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Salo Aldeland wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry. If only.
blah blah blah, psychology... I'm off to work to do some hard science and then enjoy my spaceship shooty game. |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:14:00 -
[68] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry. Meh I play the game the way I want I plex two accounts from afk trading and have isk to do what I want to do in EVE. I wanted to compete in invention but refuse to do so against T2BPO an item that was gifted by ccp to a pet player. The easiest way to not compete against T2BPOs is dont invent, if you are that well off give up this crusade, you are fighting an up hill battle alone, you will lose. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:25:00 -
[69] - Quote
lol fourm troll wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry. Meh I play the game the way I want I plex two accounts from afk trading and have isk to do what I want to do in EVE. I wanted to compete in invention but refuse to do so against T2BPO an item that was gifted by ccp to a pet player. The easiest way to not compete against T2BPOs is dont invent, if you are that well off give up this crusade, you are fighting an up hill battle alone, you will lose.
Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC? |
Haulie Berry
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:30:00 -
[70] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC?
Hey guys, look who still doesn't understand basic economics. |
|
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
242
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:35:00 -
[71] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:lol fourm troll wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:There's a tiny part of me that would thoroughly enjoy seeing players like the OP who, absent their favorite scapegoat, would finally be forced to accept that they simply aren't smart enough to thrive in industry. Meh I play the game the way I want I plex two accounts from afk trading and have isk to do what I want to do in EVE. I wanted to compete in invention but refuse to do so against T2BPO an item that was gifted by ccp to a pet player. The easiest way to not compete against T2BPOs is dont invent, if you are that well off give up this crusade, you are fighting an up hill battle alone, you will lose. Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC? If this were true, then i wouldnt make any isk from T2 ammo production, but I make loads. I'm sure there are T2 bpo owners for these items. So, you really don't understand industry at all then. Well actually you don't seem to understand the market nor the concept of supply and demand. What will you do if you choose to make mauraders and find out its not profitable? Blame T2 bpo owners and refuse to make something else? Or diversify and adjust to the market? Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 19:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC?
Hey guys, look who still doesn't understand basic economics. Poor guy he will never learn, there is a list of what t2 has bpos make something off of the list, or something that is expendable. |
Duvida
The Scope Gallente Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 20:10:00 -
[73] - Quote
Quote:If this were true, then i wouldnt make any isk from T2 ammo production, but I make loads. I'm sure there are T2 bpo owners for these items.
Now don't you be clouding the issue with facts. Ok, it'd be a stronger case if you can cite a BPO owner for these, but it's still a thing to consider, that it's probably true.
How about this? Keep the T2 BPOs, and let T2 BPC invention give a chance for, in addition to regular T2 BPCs, a T2 BPC for a named item of meta 6 to 9?
|
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 20:31:00 -
[74] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed.
Horsecrap.
You can easily compete with any T2 bpo holder simply by masively outproducing him. A T2 BPO is limited to 1 factory slot. You aren't. |
Stella SGP
182
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:03:00 -
[75] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC? You can't be that stupid... |
Stella SGP
182
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:06:00 -
[76] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Nydia Carver wrote:Well they fixed drone regions, next it-¦s T2 BPO-¦s. Hopefully, CCP have been talking about t2npo lately so maybe something is on the cards. Citation needed, I hate it when people put words in CCP's mouth.
|
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:30:00 -
[77] - Quote
Stella SGP wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. People come out with the same rubbish excuse ''well invent something else''. Why should I? Why should I not invent this item just because CCP have gifted another player the ability to create the item with out invention, zero effort and the ability to undercut every single BPC? You can't be that stupid... I know, you know, that I know, that you know, he can be. |
Maximum Panic
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:31:00 -
[78] - Quote
Needed to chime in at the continuous lol fail of the anti-T2BPO thread you are making....the game was different back then and is way different today. I think you are focusing on such a small aspect of the isk making in this game that it is laughable. Do you ever undock?
I had 3 accounts with 9 toons all trained up to Research Management 5 for the lottery. To make use of them I had to grind faction/corp standings wtih each toon. I then spent every day running the one per day research mission to get 2x research points across all these accounts (I am sure many others did that as well). I only hope I never ever have to run another research delivery boy mission as long as I live.
So I played the game as intended and I got dropped 4 BPOs in the lottery accross all my accounts. So you are saying it wasn't fair that I played the game the way it was set up at the time and now 7 years later I need to be punished and just given back some RP so I can get datacores???? While we are at it you can reimburse the players that all played "wrong" at that time and pay them back their account subs. Hell why stop there and in game.....take your activisim to real life and give out reparations for slavery, etc
Well, that was just crazy talk at the end of the last PP -sorry for that, but you need to look at reality. I still have all of my original BPOs . The best one only makes me a cool 100M isk per month in profits on a desireable item that is swamped by invention jobs. Still, it basically pisses off my corp mates when I am in high sec "builidng crap" instead of out defending null or doing cool ratting plexes or major corp operations because it is such low income generating activity.
I would much rather be scanning down and running 10/10 plexs and making 1B isk per night off loot profits - which absolutely dwarfs any isk made vs. time spent on the T2BPOs. Hell on a crappy night with no loot drops I make 20M isk per tick ratting.....so in 5 hours of play I just equalled the best T2BPO that I own that takes 3 hours to set up goods and run and get the stuff to market- net gain for equal activity is then 40M isk per month if I run them instead of ratting. You should just be glad that I still make the low selling rate items for my other 3 BPOs and stock them at market at a fair rate. More often than not some speculator comes along and buys the entire lot out and then places it back on the market at 20% more price - maybe it is you just trying to make sure the inventors get fair prices.
It is time to Panic. |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:38:00 -
[79] - Quote
Maximum Panic wrote:Needed to chime in at the continuous lol fail of the anti-T2BPO thread you are making....the game was different back then and is way different today. I think you are focusing on such a small aspect of the isk making in this game that it is laughable. Do you ever undock?
I had 3 accounts with 9 toons all trained up to Research Management 5 for the lottery. To make use of them I had to grind faction/corp standings wtih each toon. I then spent every day running the one per day research mission to get 2x research points across all these accounts (I am sure many others did that as well). I only hope I never ever have to run another research delivery boy mission as long as I live.
So I played the game as intended and I got dropped 4 BPOs in the lottery accross all my accounts. So you are saying it wasn't fair that I played the game the way it was set up at the time and now 7 years later I need to be punished and just given back some RP so I can get datacores???? While we are at it you can reimburse the players that all played "wrong" at that time and pay them back their account subs. Hell why stop there and in game.....take your activisim to real life and give out reparations for slavery, etc
Well, that was just crazy talk at the end of the last PP -sorry for that, but you need to look at reality. I still have all of my original BPOs . The best one only makes me a cool 100M isk per month in profits on a desireable item that is swamped by invention jobs. Still, it basically pisses off my corp mates when I am in high sec "builidng crap" instead of out defending null or doing cool ratting plexes or major corp operations because it is such low income generating activity.
I would much rather be scanning down and running 10/10 plexs and making 1B isk per night off loot profits - which absolutely dwarfs any isk made vs. time spent on the T2BPOs. Hell on a crappy night with no loot drops I make 20M isk per tick ratting.....so in 5 hours of play I just equalled the best T2BPO that I own that takes 3 hours to set up goods and run and get the stuff to market- net gain for equal activity is then 40M isk per month if I run them instead of ratting. You should just be glad that I still make the low selling rate items for my other 3 BPOs and stock them at market at a fair rate. More often than not some speculator comes along and buys the entire lot out and then places it back on the market at 20% more price - maybe it is you just trying to make sure the inventors get fair prices.
It is time to Panic. Well that is the long, but it seems necessary, explanation that will probally end this thread once and for all. Lets hope.
|
Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 21:49:00 -
[80] - Quote
A long post full of inconvenient facts? He will ignore it. :/ |
|
Boomhaur
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 22:13:00 -
[81] - Quote
Personally I think the OP is just bad at the industrial side at Eve and wants an easier game that he can play. Heck I started playing again about a week ago with 150mil in my wallet and right now I have closer to 10x that amount with what I do for isk (I do a bit of everything, industrial/trading/ratting/etc)
So let me give you a bit of advice Invention is profitable, very profitable. If you don't know how to make a profit doing it, I suggest you learn or give up now as the T2 bpo people don't control the market, we do. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 22:14:00 -
[82] - Quote
So your BPO reqs 23/7 supervision that prevents you doing anything else? Ehm no sorry your confusing T2BPO which is easy afk ISK with the click fest that is invention. You also neglect to mention that you could sell those T2BPO's for a few bill or maybe even a few 100bill.
A few 100 bill sounds kind of over the top for the effort you put into getting them. Why nerf incursions when this guy made billlions running a few poxy research agent missions. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 22:22:00 -
[83] - Quote
Boomhaur wrote:Personally I think the OP is just bad at the industrial side at Eve and wants an easier game that he can play. Heck I started playing again about a week ago with 150mil in my wallet and right now I have closer to 10x that amount with what I do for isk (I do a bit of everything, industrial/trading/ratting/etc)
So let me give you a bit of advice Invention is profitable, very profitable. If you don't know how to make a profit doing it, I suggest you learn or give up now as the T2 bpo people don't control the market, we do.
Yet again that would depend on the item, I suggest you look at the CCP figures for the % that some items are created using T2BPO. It varies a lot.
|
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
244
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 22:22:00 -
[84] - Quote
And again, you fail to address questions asked to you and make wild accusations about people that have T2 BPOs. Are you trying to convince anyone of anything? Because it seems like you've done nothing but shore up the opinion by almost everyone here that you have no clue what you are talking about.
Anywho, no reason to reply to you anymore. Not sure why I bothered posting again. I suggest everyone else stop feeding this thread and watch it die. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |
lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 22:32:00 -
[85] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:A long post full of inconvenient facts? He will ignore it. :/ Wow you nailed it, btw my last post also. |
Haulie Berry
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 23:15:00 -
[86] - Quote
Quote:Yet again that would depend on the item, I suggest you look at the CCP figures for the % that some items are created using T2BPO. It varies a lot.
We all have, which is why everyone here knows that, instead of actually considering the data in its entirety, you're just cherry picking the outliers and presenting them out of context, which is the only way they even remotely appear to support your position.
You keep citing "CCP figures". T2 BPOs were heavily featured in the Q2 2009 QEN. You know what the conclusion was? They're fine, and will have a continually diminishing impact on the market as time wears on. Kind of shows your cherry-picked outliers for exactly what they are. |
Bluestream3
the Goose Flock
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 23:24:00 -
[87] - Quote
Maximum Panic wrote:Needed to chime in at the continuous lol fail of the anti-T2BPO thread you are making....the game was different back then and is way different today. I think you are focusing on such a small aspect of the isk making in this game that it is laughable. Do you ever undock
I had 3 accounts with 9 toons all trained up to Research Management 5 for the lottery. To make use of them I had to grind faction/corp standings wtih each toon. I then spent every day running the one per day research mission to get 2x research points across all these accounts (I am sure many others did that as well). I only hope I never ever have to run another research delivery boy mission as long as I live.
So I played the game as intended and I got dropped 4 BPOs in the lottery accross all my accounts. So you are saying it wasn't fair that I played the game the way it was set up at the time and now 7 years later I need to be punished and just given back some RP so I can get datacores???? While we are at it you can reimburse the players that all played "wrong" at that time and pay them back their account subs. Hell why stop there and in game.....take your activisim to real life and give out reparations for slavery, et
Well, that was just crazy talk at the end of the last PP -sorry for that, but you need to look at reality. I still have all of my original BPOs . The best one only makes me a cool 100M isk per month in profits on a desireable item that is swamped by invention jobs. Still, it basically pisses off my corp mates when I am in high sec "builidng crap" instead of out defending null or doing cool ratting plexes or major corp operations because it is such low income generating activity
I would much rather be scanning down and running 10/10 plexs and making 1B isk per night off loot profits - which absolutely dwarfs any isk made vs. time spent on the T2BPOs. Hell on a crappy night with no loot drops I make 20M isk per tick ratting.....so in 5 hours of play I just equalled the best T2BPO that I own that takes 3 hours to set up goods and run and get the stuff to market- net gain for equal activity is then 40M isk per month if I run them instead of ratting. You should just be glad that I still make the low selling rate items for my other 3 BPOs and stock them at market at a fair rate. More often than not some speculator comes along and buys the entire lot out and then places it back on the market at 20% more price - maybe it is you just trying to make sure the inventors get fair prices
It is time to Panic.
Let's ignore the fact that you can make more isk by doing incursions, sanctums, missions, wormholes or whatever, note that if you look at the time spent actively playing, this would probably be a lot closer (set up your t2 bpo for a week of production and then "undock"). I understand how frustrating it would be to lose an advantage you have worked hard for earlier, but I also think you need to understand that things change. The game is not the same that it was those 7 years ago. No matter which side you're on I think everyone agrees that the way T2 BPOs were seeded was a bad move and perhaps it's time to do something about that.
You state you have no profit in a market "swamped with invention jobs", then how do you think their profits look? They will be a lot worse, and that's, in my opinion, the problem. You could also run your BPO on one line and invent on your other 9 and come out on top of all the other inventors running inventions on 10 slots, just because you don't do that doesn't mean every one else wouldn't.
I've been thinking about this quite a bit and I don't think removing T2 BPOs is the way to go. I also think it'd be fine to keep T2 BPOs as effortless as they are right now (in comparison to invention) because even if you own originals, if you're serious about manufacturing, you'd probably invent anyway. The thing I think needs changing is the simple fact that even with all the "effort" that comes with invention, the production cost from a T2 BPO is not even close to the production cost for the same item using invention.
The change I want, and I think many others who say they want the T2 bp "removal", is to make BPOs closer to invention in terms of production costs. How this would be done I don't know. It obviously wouldn't suffice to just increase the ME levels on invented BPCs like many have suggested because that might upset the raw material market in ways not desirable, but there are many other ways of solving that. |
Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.10 23:41:00 -
[88] - Quote
Bluestream3 wrote:Maximum Panic wrote:Needed to chime in at the continuous lol fail of the anti-T2BPO thread you are making....the game was different back then and is way different today. I think you are focusing on such a small aspect of the isk making in this game that it is laughable. Do you ever undock
I had 3 accounts with 9 toons all trained up to Research Management 5 for the lottery. To make use of them I had to grind faction/corp standings wtih each toon. I then spent every day running the one per day research mission to get 2x research points across all these accounts (I am sure many others did that as well). I only hope I never ever have to run another research delivery boy mission as long as I live.
So I played the game as intended and I got dropped 4 BPOs in the lottery accross all my accounts. So you are saying it wasn't fair that I played the game the way it was set up at the time and now 7 years later I need to be punished and just given back some RP so I can get datacores???? While we are at it you can reimburse the players that all played "wrong" at that time and pay them back their account subs. Hell why stop there and in game.....take your activisim to real life and give out reparations for slavery, et
Well, that was just crazy talk at the end of the last PP -sorry for that, but you need to look at reality. I still have all of my original BPOs . The best one only makes me a cool 100M isk per month in profits on a desireable item that is swamped by invention jobs. Still, it basically pisses off my corp mates when I am in high sec "builidng crap" instead of out defending null or doing cool ratting plexes or major corp operations because it is such low income generating activity
I would much rather be scanning down and running 10/10 plexs and making 1B isk per night off loot profits - which absolutely dwarfs any isk made vs. time spent on the T2BPOs. Hell on a crappy night with no loot drops I make 20M isk per tick ratting.....so in 5 hours of play I just equalled the best T2BPO that I own that takes 3 hours to set up goods and run and get the stuff to market- net gain for equal activity is then 40M isk per month if I run them instead of ratting. You should just be glad that I still make the low selling rate items for my other 3 BPOs and stock them at market at a fair rate. More often than not some speculator comes along and buys the entire lot out and then places it back on the market at 20% more price - maybe it is you just trying to make sure the inventors get fair prices
It is time to Panic. Let's ignore the fact that you can make more isk by doing incursions, sanctums, missions, wormholes or whatever, note that if you look at the time spent actively playing, this would probably be a lot closer (set up your t2 bpo for a week of production and then "undock"). I understand how frustrating it would be to lose an advantage you have worked hard for earlier, but I also think you need to understand that things change. The game is not the same that it was those 7 years ago. No matter which side you're on I think everyone agrees that the way T2 BPOs were seeded was a bad move and perhaps it's time to do something about that. You state you have no profit in a market "swamped with invention jobs", then how do you think their profits look? They will be a lot worse, and that's, in my opinion, the problem. You could also run your BPO on one line and invent on your other 9 and come out on top of all the other inventors running inventions on 10 slots, just because you don't do that doesn't mean every one else wouldn't. I've been thinking about this quite a bit and I don't think removing T2 BPOs is the way to go. I also think it'd be fine to keep T2 BPOs as effortless as they are right now (in comparison to invention) because even if you own originals, if you're serious about manufacturing, you'd probably invent anyway. The thing I think needs changing is the simple fact that even with all the "effort" that comes with invention, the production cost from a T2 BPO is not even close to the production cost for the same item using invention. The change I want, and I think many others who say they want the T2 bp "removal", is to make BPOs closer to invention in terms of production costs. How this would be done I don't know. It obviously wouldn't suffice to just increase the ME levels on invented BPCs like many have suggested because that might upset the raw material market in ways not desirable, but there are many other ways of solving that.
Bring BPO's down to the same profit of BPC's by reducing efficency's to match the cost of invention? |
Cardval Simalia
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 10:25:00 -
[89] - Quote
I always wondered how people got T2BPO's kinda sux knowing that most got theirs easily and now you have to pay them billions to get one. Also invention should be made to undercut the BPO to make it worth while to invent. |
sodney
Crazy Corporation
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 12:20:00 -
[90] - Quote
Since there are no new BPO-¦s getting brought into the game and BPO`s that are either located on banned acocunts or abandoned inactive Accounts or even getting destroyed for whatever reason are NOT getting replaced, T2 BPO`s will slowly but surely leave the game, anyway
If you only compare buildcost between a invention made T2 item and and a item thats made of a BPO, I agree that a T2 BPO must look totally OP. But If you run the numbers, and figure that you can only produce a very limited amount of them, it doesnt look that great anymore. Even "profitable" rated T2 Ship BPO`s rarely make more than 60-70 mil per day.
At the moment, if ppl actually HAVE the money, they can purchase a T2 just by checking forums or public contracts very easily, and just because they got much more valuable over time (and patches) it doesnt make them unfair, since that applies to litteraly any item in this game aswell
At the end of the day this game would become boring very quickly, if there wouldnt be any rare items at all, and no other goals to achieve than some numbers (either pure isk or kills)
Quote:Still selling [T2H8R] shares. 1M each and all proceeds go towards the purchase and trashing of T2 BPOs
If you really want to see T2 BPOs starting to be removed from the game then this is how you do it. We're about halfway to the first one visiting the recycler
Link in sig. Do it!
so you want to make the hated T2 BPO owners even more rich by buying their BPO-¦s to their conditions and prices, just to destroy them? Orwhy cant ppl buy affordable T2 BPO`s and trash them by themselves? Sorry this doesnt look as a scam, it screams for it! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |