Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
371
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:50:00 -
[901] - Quote
Hulks look pretty good actually. Maybe I should make some.
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/3638/hulks726.jpg Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

P3po
Treasures Collectors Solar Citizens
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:24:00 -
[902] - Quote
This guy is horrible and have no idea what he is talking about.
Covetor BPO cost 2B in NPC station.
You can research it to ME12 in less than month i believe, thats all you need for prouction of covetor, the further research is just not worth it.
..... and thats it basicly.
Even if you run invention without decryptors with lvl 4 skills you have 25% chance of success ..... just pls stop being terrible and read something about the problem before going on forums and make idiot of yourself. |

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
110
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:51:00 -
[903] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:I sell you one for 15bn that I researched in 3 month, deal? not a troll!
Did you research it on NPC station? No, you didn't.
I dont even own a BPO ;) I would have just bought the BPO of contracts for like ~2bn to resell it to you for 15 beacuse they are aparently worth that much ;) Also you can research the BPO within 2 Month to a perfect level on a NPC station, no issue at all.
I want to take back my assumption that you dont own any T2 BPO, infact you must have a lot because with your straight back backpedalling and invalidating any removal reasons it makes only sense to save your BPO`s!
|

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1196
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 14:57:00 -
[904] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Not anymore since now everyone knows... Everyone but you already knew. Here's also something most people also know that you don't seem to know either : at least 9 out of 10 Hulks is produced via invention, not from a BPO. And you'll probably want to start using something like this : http://sourceforge.net/projects/eveiph/files Probably not that one, but something similar. There's a few.
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T
http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T
T2 BPO poll : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 |

MR rockafella
Santa's Factory
36
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:35:00 -
[905] - Quote
i think t2 bpc should be nerfed, they are destroying the t2bpo's. invention needs to be nerfed and made much harder so my t2bpo's becomes more valueble.
|

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
111
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 21:40:00 -
[906] - Quote
MR rockafella wrote:i think t2 bpc should be nerfed, they are destroying the t2bpo's. invention needs to be nerfed and made much harder so my t2bpo's becomes more valueble.
word |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
579
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 21:47:00 -
[907] - Quote
Akita T wrote:HULK, not HML, you spaz. As in, the damn friggin' exhumer. The ship. The one you fly in. To mine ore.
Yay! You finally almost got angry at the absolute ridiculousness.
Hint: math and facts haven't worked worth a damn; please shift tactics to insisting that everyone else is an exotic bird and birds don't need spaceships anyway. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:35:00 -
[908] - Quote
46 pages later, and you guys are STILL feeding the trolls. Amazing. |

Pipa Porto
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 01:17:00 -
[909] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:46 pages later, and you guys are STILL feeding the trolls. Amazing.
It's pretty clear to me that both Jorma and Brewlar honestly believe what they're saying even after every point they've tried to make has been discredited. Which makes them fanatics, not trolls. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
107
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 18:25:00 -
[910] - Quote
Still waiting for CCP to destroy the T3 manufacture by seeding T3BPO's. After all ''BPO's have no market effect'' said by a douche at ccp, so why should they not seed more BPO's both t2 and t3?
CCP grow some balls and fix your mistakes other wise follow through with them. Don't just stop at being half a tard either go full on tard by seeding more BPO's for t2 and t3 or actually gain some intelligence and remove T2BPO's. Kugutsumen - My signature insures that my post is always read by an ISD or Dev, does yours? |
|

Pipa Porto
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 18:41:00 -
[911] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Still waiting for CCP to destroy the T3 manufacture by seeding T3BPO's. After all ''BPO's have no market effect'' said by a douche at ccp, so why should they not seed more BPO's both t2 and t3?
CCP grow some balls and fix your mistakes other wise follow through with them. Don't just stop at being half a tard either go full on tard by seeding more BPO's for t2 and t3 or actually gain some intelligence and remove T2BPO's.
So, what you're saying is that you are no longer willing to address the points others have made and thus concede the argument. Gotcha.
/thread EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
1196
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 20:56:00 -
[912] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:After all ''BPO's have no market effect'' said by a douche at ccp Except for the small inconvenient fact that it's not actually what he said. A more accurate paraphrasing of what he really said would be that in markets of "in demand" items, T2 BPOs don't really affect prices by any noteworthy amount, which was obvious since well before he actually said it. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/User:Akita_T http://eve-search.com/stats/Akita_T T2 BPO poll : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=114789 |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
473
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 17:37:00 -
[913] - Quote
I'm sorry, the t2 BPO's were seeded YEARS ago....
T2 BPO's do NOT need to be removed from the game.... While I'm open to new invention/production mechanics that allow the production of t2 items at better ME levels, I vehemently demand these requires lowsec/nullsec production.
T2 BPO's allow players to produce all t2 items profitably compared to invention (that is, when you ignore the cost of acquiring the t2 BPO). But so what....
In March 2012, the percentage of modules produce from invention:
93.95% of T2 Gyrostabilizers, 89.77% of 1400mm II, 87.34% of 425mm Rail II, 82.00% of Tachyon II, 74.23% of Torpedo Launcher II.
In March 2012, the percentage of ships produce from invention:
90.23% of Hulks, 67.85% of Sabres 65.01% of Wolves 22.16% of Pilgrims 6.00% of Eagles
Source Summary Direct Source
There are a lot more stats, but I cba to list them all... Here's the point: Modules and Ammo are primarily produced through invention, so removal of those BPO's wont do anything but HURT the BPO holder.... These producers wont see more profit, and the consumers wont get any items cheaper.... Considering the work most BPO holders put in to acquire their BPO, this is just cruel and wrong to do!!!! Now, Ship production is often dominated by t2 BPO holders... however these items move slowly, and typically priced BELOW the invention production cost.... so removing these BPO's would result in HIGHER PRICES for people that want to buy these ships.... How is that good???? Sure, it means people that want to produce Eagles via invention could then make a profit, but who wants to reward the idiotic fool that is trying to produce slow moving T2 Ships for profit by paying more for those ships????
I have few more points: 1.) Many serious produces secure moongoo and minerals at BELOW MARKET VALUE. If you are competing against them, you're just going to lose.... Should this be fixed too? I think not, I like getting cheaper items....
2.) I'm not opposed to giving a boon to t2 production at POS's, such that we can produce t2 items at high-ME levels (which won't really alter module production all that much, but will ammo & ship production). The caveat.... this new POS production module can ONLY be done in LOWSEC or NULLSEC....
3.) I'd like there to be more risk to using ALL BPOs.... Having a BPO safely locked away in a station where it's at extremely low risk seems broken to me.... I realize we can't force expensive BPOs to be used AT THE POS until POS's have been revamped so players can have secure-able POS hangars, but implementing something like this would be awesome!!
|

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
390
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 17:47:00 -
[914] - Quote
Damit Gizznitt Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
195
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:36:00 -
[915] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Ginger Barbarella wrote:46 pages later, and you guys are STILL feeding the trolls. Amazing. It's pretty clear to me that both Jorma and Brewlar honestly believe what they're saying even after every point they've tried to make has been discredited. Which makes them fanatics, not trolls.
Indeed, they believe in doing the right thing, while the Goons behind most of the profits in this game believe the complete apposite. |

Tarendar
Sparkle Pony Inc Twilight Military Industrial Complex Alliance
13
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:46:00 -
[916] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
In March 2012, the percentage of ships produce from invention:
90.23% of Hulks, 67.85% of Sabres 65.01% of Wolves 22.16% of Pilgrims 6.00% of Eagles
Now, THAT is actually an interesting bit of data... and a strong argument for killing T2 BPOs, the first one I've seen.
I've been building T2 hulls for a couple of years now. In particular, Hulks and Mackinaws. Why only barges? Because combat T2 hulls aren't profitable. Never have been. (1) We're talking maybe five percent margins most of the time, at which point there's no reason to go into the market. And I've always wondered who these idiots are, who keep the prices on T2 hulls below cost so much of the time. Now I know.
T2 ammo, drone, and module BPOs aren't a significant barrier to entry for new players looking to go industrialist. I know that, I've competed successfully against BPO holders in those markets, and I've talked about it on this forum. However, it is apparent that T2 hull BPOs are such a barrier.
-t is data-driven
1) There's actually a weird price spike going on with a particular subset of combat hulls in a particular place during the past couple of months... I won't say which ones or where, because I'm exploiting it as fast as I can invent. If anybody wants to ask me, the trend on prices on that set of hulls shows them being back down to 0% margin in about a month and I'll talk about it then :) |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
628
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 18:56:00 -
[917] - Quote
Tarendar wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
In March 2012, the percentage of ships produce from invention:
90.23% of Hulks, 67.85% of Sabres 65.01% of Wolves 22.16% of Pilgrims 6.00% of Eagles
Now, THAT is actually an interesting bit of data... and a strong argument for killing T2 BPOs, the first one I've seen. I've been building T2 hulls for a couple of years now. In particular, Hulks and Mackinaws. Why only barges? Because combat T2 hulls aren't profitable. Never have been. (1) We're talking maybe five percent margins most of the time, at which point there's no reason to go into the market. And I've always wondered who these idiots are, who keep the prices on T2 hulls below cost so much of the time. Now I know. T2 ammo, drone, and module BPOs aren't a significant barrier to entry for new players looking to go industrialist. I know that, I've competed successfully against BPO holders in those markets, and I've talked about it on this forum. However, it is apparent that T2 hull BPOs are such a barrier. -t is data-driven 1) There's actually a weird price spike going on with a particular subset of combat hulls in a particular place during the past couple of months... I won't say which ones or where, because I'm exploiting it as fast as I can invent. If anybody wants to ask me, the trend on prices on that set of hulls shows them being back down to 0% margin in about a month and I'll talk about it then :)
Are you sure you read that data right? Less than 10% of all Hulks produced are from BPOs. How is that an argument for BPO removal?
Unless you're referring to some of the other hulls. In which case, all the BPOs are doing is creating an artificial bottom in the economy. Which frankly is needed for things like Eagles or there just wouldn't be any. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
473
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 21:03:00 -
[918] - Quote
I don't understand what the Double Face Palm is for..... what did I do???? |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
473
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 21:14:00 -
[919] - Quote
Tarendar wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
In March 2012, the percentage of ships produce from invention:
90.23% of Hulks, 67.85% of Sabres 65.01% of Wolves 22.16% of Pilgrims 6.00% of Eagles
Now, THAT is actually an interesting bit of data... and a strong argument for killing T2 BPOs, the first one I've seen. I've been building T2 hulls for a couple of years now. In particular, Hulks and Mackinaws. Why only barges? Because combat T2 hulls aren't profitable. Never have been. (1) We're talking maybe five percent margins most of the time, at which point there's no reason to go into the market. And I've always wondered who these idiots are, who keep the prices on T2 hulls below cost so much of the time. Now I know.
Your own data supports why having t2 BPO's is a GOOD THING....
Quote:We're talking maybe five percent margins most of the time.... And ... prices on T2 hulls below [production via invention] cost so much of the time.
Why does anyone want T2 BPOs removed, when it either doesn't effect the market (see t2 ammo and modules) or it results in LOWER PRICES for everyone (see your quote)????
It's not like you have to produce eagles to make isk, and it's not like you can't produce eagles without the BPO... So, I don't understand why your panties are in a twist... |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Intrepid Crossing
390
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 21:29:00 -
[920] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:I don't understand what the Double Face Palm is for.....  what did I do???? You bumped this thread...which was dead for over a month 
It's the same back and forth, no one adds anything different and no one is convinced of anything one way or the other. It needs to die and get locked indefinitely. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |
|

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
473
|
Posted - 2012.08.31 22:15:00 -
[921] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:I don't understand what the Double Face Palm is for.....  what did I do???? You bumped this thread...which was dead for over a month  It's the same back and forth, no one adds anything different and no one is convinced of anything one way or the other. It needs to die and get locked indefinitely.
I was linked to it from another post... I wasn't browsing the S&I forum.... and I'll stop bumping it now and let it die... |

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 02:44:00 -
[922] - Quote
Hi. I wasn't going to comment in this thread but I see it's still going. I'm speaking as someone who "won" a T2 BPO years ago and made a nice profit on it.
How much profit you get from T2 BPOs, and how much affect they have on market prices, is irrelevant to whether they belong in the game or not. There are no BPOs for Tech2 BS or Tech3 and the markets for them are fine.
In a game where player innovation is celebrated, encouraged and really sets this game apart from others, T2 BPOs as they exist are the opposite of everything Eve Online stands for. With any other aspect of the game you can work towards getting whatever it is you want. Sometimes by yourself or with teamwork. Think about it:
You want to shoot players? Go for it. You want a BPO for a Tech 1 ship? Buy it. You want to make special Tech 2 items? Invention. You want to produce Technetium? Alchemy or claim a Tech moon.
You want a no risk, little effort, ISK-printing Mackinaw BPO? No.
That goes against everything Eve Online is about. In this way T2 BPOs are probably the worst feature in the game. Sorry, T2 BPO owners. With no other meaningful asset can you say "sorry this is mine and you can't have one like it, ever".
|

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 04:35:00 -
[923] - Quote
Traedar wrote:You want a no risk, little effort, ISK-printing Mackinaw BPO? No.
That goes against everything Eve Online is about. In this way T2 BPOs are probably the worst feature in the game. Sorry, T2 BPO owners. With no other meaningful asset can you say "sorry this is mine and you can't have one like it, ever".
Exhumer BPOs come up for sale with some regularity.
If you want a risky (prices are volatile over the course of a month), medium effort (quite a lot of logistics and marketeering if you want to make any money), poor investment T2 BPO, you can buy it.
And they're all poor investments. The best ones make ~3b Isk a month and are worth over 150b Isk if you sell them. So to break even, you need to run it for over 50 months (that's not counting the opportunity cost of not using that manufacturing slot for invention). All the while, risking further enhancement to invention (reducing the relative value of a BPO) or price fluctuations (Hulk BPO owners probably aren't very happy right now). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
124
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 09:41:00 -
[924] - Quote
Traedar wrote: Hi. I wasn't going to comment in this thread but I see it's still going. I'm speaking as someone who "won" a T2 BPO years ago and made a nice profit on it.
infact, the discussion ended month ago but somebody necroed it. Congratz you won a T2 BPO, now that we know that, anything u say against them has twice the value
Traedar wrote: There are no BPOs for Tech2 BS or Tech3 and the markets for them are fine.
funny you mentioned the T2 BS....There is prolly no market beeing more unstable than these. Before you say anything smart again, try to make a golem and sell it in jita without making a loss.... so bad.
Traedar wrote: You want to shoot players? Go for it. You want a BPO for a Tech 1 ship? Buy it. You want to make special Tech 2 items? Invention. You want to produce Technetium? Alchemy or claim a Tech moon.
You want to produce from a T2 BPO? buy one on forums and do so <---- whats wrong with that?
Traedar wrote: That goes against everything Eve Online is about. In this way T2 BPOs are probably the worst feature in the game. Sorry, T2 BPO owners. With no other meaningful asset can you say "sorry this is mine and you can't have one like it, ever".
Oh unique Items are bad and stand (apparently) against anything eve stands for, you say? why is CCP giving new, absolute unique items out every year at the tournies, then? |

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 20:47:00 -
[925] - Quote
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: funny you mentioned the T2 BS....There is prolly no market beeing more unstable than these. Before you say anything smart again, try to make a golem and sell it in jita without making a loss.... so bad.
If the Golem is not profitable then invent something else. If enough people do this then it will become profitable. Just like all other industry in the game. BTW you might want to move out of Jita. I would suggest Lonetrek or maybe the Rens area.
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:Traedar wrote: You want to shoot players? Go for it. You want a BPO for a Tech 1 ship? Buy it. You want to make special Tech 2 items? Invention. You want to produce Technetium? Alchemy or claim a Tech moon.
You want a no risk, little effort, ISK-printing Mackinaw BPO? buy one on forums and do so <---- whats wrong with that? There's nothing wrong with buying or selling stuff on forums. What I'm saying is, getting something on the forum should be an option, not a necessity. With anything else in the game, I can get it in-game if I work enough towards it.
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Oh unique Items are bad and stand (apparently) against anything eve stands for, you say? why is CCP giving new, absolute unique items out every year at the tournies, then?
They give out unique ships, right (Freki, Mimir, Adrestia, Utu, etc)? I'm not sure how much practical value they have other than bragging rights and being collectors' items. To get practical use out of them, you have to fly them and maybe lose them. So who knows if they are used. A T2 BPO, on the other hand, provides all its benefit while sitting in a station. Not to mention, if you want a ship you can just build or buy another ship to fly but if you want another T2 BPO there is no way to work toward one in the game.
I'd like to add, I'm not saying Tech 2 BPOs should be removed from the game. I'm saying they don't belong as they exist. Removing them is a different question. Before doing that you'd have to consider some problems, like all the players who paid a ton of ISK for them and who would get pissed off.
|

shar'ra matcevsovski
Hedion University Amarr Empire
124
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 01:49:00 -
[926] - Quote
Traedar wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: funny you mentioned the T2 BS....There is prolly no market beeing more unstable than these. Before you say anything smart again, try to make a golem and sell it in jita without making a loss.... so bad.
If the Golem is not profitable then invent something else. If enough people do this then it will become profitable. Just like all other industry in the game. BTW you might want to move out of Jita. I would suggest Lonetrek or maybe the Rens area.
lol, so your saying that Marauders market is just fine, but recommend to invent something else because its not profitable? BTW other T2 Ships (Hulk, Huginn, Scimitar etc.) with BPO`s are still profitable even when selling in Jita...im not making anything of these things anyway, but thanks for the advice
Traedar wrote: There's nothing wrong with buying or selling stuff on forums. What I'm saying is, getting something on the forum should be an option, not a necessity. With anything else in the game, I can get it in-game if I work enough towards it.
1. wrong again...T2 BPO`s can and are getting purchased via public contracts. 2. titans and supers cant be purchased via market/contracts either...so?
Traedar wrote: They give out unique ships, right (Freki, Mimir, Adrestia, Utu, etc)? I'm not sure how much practical value they have other than bragging rights and being collectors' items.
Traedar wrote: With no other meaningful asset can you say "sorry this is mine and you can't have one like it, ever".
what now, the asset has to be profitable to apply to this?
|

Matarella
The Last Call. Black Core Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 13:03:00 -
[927] - Quote
oh this thread is back. hello there. |

Traedar
InterStellar Trading Syndicate
7
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 17:08:00 -
[928] - Quote
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:lol, so your saying that Marauders market is just fine, but recommend to invent something else because its not profitable?  Welcome to EvE. Adapt or die.
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: BTW other T2 Ships (Hulk, Huginn, Scimitar etc.) with BPO`s are still profitable even when selling in Jita...im not making anything of these things anyway, but thanks for the advice
Yeah that's why I would love to be able to produce one of these from BPO. No risk, little effort income.
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:Traedar wrote: There's nothing wrong with buying or selling stuff on forums. What I'm saying is, getting something on the forum should be an option, not a necessity. With anything else in the game, I can get it in-game if I work enough towards it.
1. wrong again...T2 BPO`s can and are getting purchased via public contracts. 2. titans and supers cant be purchased via market/contracts either...so?
I think you're completely missing my point. I have no problem with trading stuff on market, forum, contracts, Chribba, etc.
My point is that with any item in the game I can work towards building or otherwise obtaining it without relying on getting it from someone who already has it (by hunting for the right officer spawn, by buying a BPO, by starting a factory job or putting up a POS, etc). For instance I can mine or make an alt and train him to help me mine. But I can never create a T2 BPO or create an alt to train him to make one.
Traedar wrote: what now, the asset has to be profitable to apply to this?
Comparing unique ships from AT, with T2 BPOs is apples and oranges. If I want a unique ship AT reward I can choose to compete in the next Alliance Tournament and have the same chance to get one as anyone else. I don't have to rely on getting it from someone who already has one.
|

Matarella
The Last Call. Black Core Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 18:17:00 -
[929] - Quote
no you dont get the chance to get one as anyone else. at every AT they give out a difrent prize. you wont see a state raven being given out again. just like you wont see a T2 BPO being given out again.
and having gotten a state raven at the AT back then is profitable. as people are willing to pay billions to get one. |

Pipa Porto
854
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 18:23:00 -
[930] - Quote
Traedar wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: BTW other T2 Ships (Hulk, Huginn, Scimitar etc.) with BPO`s are still profitable even when selling in Jita...im not making anything of these things anyway, but thanks for the advice
Yeah that's why I would love to be able to produce one of these from BPO. No risk, little effort income.
Just have to look back a couple pages to find the links to T2 BPO auctions. Including a Scimitar BPO, which sold for 525 Billion ISK. Assuming that you discount the cost of material inputs entirely, you make roughly 7.7 (call it 10) billion ISK per month, so you'd break even after 52 months, or 4 and a half years. Since moon goo you mine is not, in fact, free, your actual profit per month is something like 4 Billion ISK per month so you need to wait ~130 months to break even (that's almost 11 years, for those keeping score).
Now, you might say "well you got it free" or somesuch. Well, in that case, the smart thing to do is to sell the dang thing immediately because you can do much better things with 525 Billion ISK than sink it into something that, with a fair amount of effort to run efficiently, can earn you 4 Billion ISK a month.
And given the number of T2 BPOs that it is unprofitable to manufacture, and the possibility that, sometime in the next 11 years, CCP might do something to further change the balance between BPOs and Invention, owning a T2 BPO is a pretty risky venture. And again, it's a fair bit of effort if you actually want to make money off of it.
Quote:I think you're completely missing my point. I have no problem with trading stuff on market, forum, contracts, Chribba, etc.
My point is that with any item in the game I can work towards building or otherwise obtaining it without relying on getting it from someone who already has it (by hunting for the right officer spawn, by buying a BPO, by starting a factory job or putting up a POS, etc). For instance I can mine or make an alt and train him to help me mine. But I can never create a T2 BPO or create an alt to train him to make one.
If you are a collector, and want them for their rarity, then making new ones available hurts their rarity. If you are a producer, then you're goal isn't "use a T2 BPO," your goal is "Produce a T2 Item profitably." Invention works just fine for you. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |