| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
   |
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:24:00 -
[1]
so, we got motherships, great, awesome, a little costy, buy HELL it's worth it if you have the money. tank, dps and needs a specified ship to tackle it down (or an absurd quantity of nos/neut ships)
titans...AHAH OH WOW are you still arguing about their potential? cmon, they're the final weapon for any big enough alliance.
now to the point:
IS THAT ALL?
i mean, that's all we can get from high-end capital construction?
ships are still evolving and producing new concepts on old hulls, and each expansion gives us more and more sub-capital T2 ships. most of them are specialized ships that require an awesome amount of time to train all the required skills, plus another useless Rank 5-12 skill for each new ship type.
then, why can't we have the same love for supercapital ships? did CCP forget about supercapitals? are they an "unwanted feature" (just like ghost training, i suppose)?
TL;DR -> NEED MOAR SUPAH CAPITOL SHIPS
no, i don't have enough money/skill to buy up a supercapital vessel
______________________________________________
|
Khemul Zula
Amarr
Black Plague.
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:26:00 -
[2]
We need T2 Motherships! 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did I really need certificates to tell me I lack Basic Core Competency? |
Karille
Gallente
Lordless
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:26:00 -
[3]
They're a bit hard to balance.
|
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:28:00 -
[4]
The titan class is pretty much the end of the line, tech II titans sure, in time, anything even larger would just turn things down the road of silly.
Armed outposts on the other hand...
Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav!
Also Known As |
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:28:00 -
[5]
 Originally by: Khemul Zula
We need T2 Motherships!
i didn't say "we need more powerfull supercapitals"
i just said "we need more supercapitals"
like, wouldn't you like a 13b dreadnaught supercapital?
______________________________________________
|
Djan Anaplian
Gallente
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:31:00 -
[6]
Currently there isn't much point in using a mom in 0.0 fleets over a carrier aside from possibly defending cynojammers; it would be nice to see them get a more dedicated role.
|
Dmian
Gallente
Gallenterrorisme
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:32:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Khemul Zula
We need T2 Motherships!
i didn't say "we need more powerfull supercapitals"
i just said "we need more supercapitals"
like, wouldn't you like a 13b dreadnaught supercapital?
I've heard the Jove have supercapitals...
----
Eve Alpha - The font of Eve - Get it here |
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:44:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Currently there isn't much point in using a mom in 0.0 fleets over a carrier aside from possibly defending cynojammers; it would be nice to see them get a more dedicated role.
motherships are fine imho, you just need different superacapitals with different roles. new supercapitals and new roles.
______________________________________________
|
ouroboros trading
Gallente
Medics On Fire
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:49:00 -
[9]
deathstars that cost a trillion isk and can blow up other capitals in a single hit.
there i said what everyone was thinking.
522528? That's Numberwang! |
Djan Anaplian
Gallente
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:51:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Currently there isn't much point in using a mom in 0.0 fleets over a carrier aside from possibly defending cynojammers; it would be nice to see them get a more dedicated role.
motherships are fine imho, you just need different superacapitals with different roles. new supercapitals and new roles.
Considering you can do pretty much the same with a carrier and any advantage a mom has is offset by the extreme liability of actually using it in combat situations (practically speaking) please explain how you think they are fine?
|
Crumplecorn
Gallente
Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:51:00 -
[11]
A mining supercapital might be nice.
-
DesuSigs |
Popperr
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:53:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Popperr on 24/11/2008 23:53:46
Edited by: Popperr on 24/11/2008 23:53:28
motherships are like two carriers stuck together at ten times their cost
titans are poorly thought out and need to be rebalanced pretty much from scratch
|
Khemul Zula
Amarr
Black Plague.
|
Posted - 2008.11.24 23:54:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
A mining supercapital might be nice.
Chribba is working on it. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did I really need certificates to tell me I lack Basic Core Competency? |
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:01:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 00:03:37
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Currently there isn't much point in using a mom in 0.0 fleets over a carrier aside from possibly defending cynojammers; it would be nice to see them get a more dedicated role.
motherships are fine imho, you just need different superacapitals with different roles. new supercapitals and new roles.
Considering you can do pretty much the same with a carrier and any advantage a mom has is offset by the extreme liability of actually using it in combat situations (practically speaking) please explain how you think they are fine?
how many smartbombing carriers have you seen near low-sec stargates camping the hell out of it even in popular hubs?
now, how much would you pay to make your ship invulnerable to regular points and be only tacklable by big fleets of nos/neuting ships or 200m specialized tackler?
EDIT:
As of supercapital mining ships, i'd like to see a capital mining ship that can ACTUALLY USE MINING LASERS.
And chribba would agree we also need capital-sized mining lasers. wouldn't you, lord of veldspar? :P
______________________________________________
|
Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:02:00 -
[15]
T2 Titans!
---------------------
It's me! Your lovable forum warrior!!! |
Khraunus
Amarr
Suddenly Ninjas
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:05:00 -
[16]
No, for gods sakes. What on earth would make you think we need more supercapitals? We need more small ships that add a lot of variety in the game that newer players and casual gamers can use. Not more capitals, not more battleships. We need more variation in small ships because that's where most players are at now.
Most importantly, how are you supposed to tell whether this is part of my post or my signature? |
Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:09:00 -
[17]
Ooh, for variety we could have a superdreadnoughtcarrierinterdictorstealthbomber
---------------------
It's me! Your lovable forum warrior!!! |
Djan Anaplian
Gallente
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:09:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 00:03:37
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Currently there isn't much point in using a mom in 0.0 fleets over a carrier aside from possibly defending cynojammers; it would be nice to see them get a more dedicated role.
motherships are fine imho, you just need different superacapitals with different roles. new supercapitals and new roles.
Considering you can do pretty much the same with a carrier and any advantage a mom has is offset by the extreme liability of actually using it in combat situations (practically speaking) please explain how you think they are fine?
how many smartbombing carriers have you seen near low-sec stargates camping the hell out of it even in popular hubs?
now, how much would you pay to make your ship invulnerable to regular points and be only tacklable by big fleets of nos/neuting ships or 200m specialized tackler?
EDIT:
As of supercapital mining ships, i'd like to see a capital mining ship that can ACTUALLY USE MINING LASERS.
And chribba would agree we also need capital-sized mining lasers. wouldn't you, lord of veldspar? :P
Have you been to lowsec lately and seen the popularity of hics? Using a mom on a gate in lowsec is tantamount to suicide nowdays.
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:11:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 00:14:19
Originally by: Khraunus
We need more variation in small ships because that's where most players are at now.
is there any mechanic that hasn't been introduced in the frigate part of eve?
more variety? what are you thinking about? mini-DDD frigate? Kamikaze-like frigates?
cmon...the only thing you're missing are logistic-like frigates, that would be completely useless anyway due to their limitated tank and tank-potential.
EDIT:
Quote:
Have you been to lowsec lately and seen the popularity of hics? Using a mom on a gate in lowsec is tantamount to suicide nowdays.
CCP introduced hdicts to make industrials more cath-able and to heavily nerf supercapitals. MOMs weren't that weak and tackable before empyrean age, were they?
now T2 industrials got boosted, and you won't catch em anyway, so the only defeated side on the infinite nerf-battle are the supercapitals (and minmatars, AH)
______________________________________________
|
Neesa Corrinne
Rogue Shadow Squad
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:13:00 -
[20]
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
|
Shar'Tuk TheHated
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:14:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
A mining supercapital might be nice.
What a nightmare, stuck in a super capital mining ship.
DRINK RUM It fights scurvy & boosts morale!
THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES! |
Berious
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:16:00 -
[22]
No thanks we've already got too much Capitals Online.
|
Daemien Murdoc
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:17:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Khemul Zula
We need T2 Motherships!
i didn't say "we need more powerfull supercapitals"
i just said "we need more supercapitals"
like, wouldn't you like a 13b dreadnaught supercapital?
Supernaught?
How much dps it has when it goes siege?
|
RogueAnt
Minmatar
R.U.S.T.
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:18:00 -
[24]
---
|
Djan Anaplian
Gallente
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:18:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 00:14:19
Originally by: Khraunus
We need more variation in small ships because that's where most players are at now.
is there any mechanic that hasn't been introduced in the frigate part of eve?
more variety? what are you thinking about? mini-DDD frigate? Kamikaze-like frigates?
cmon...the only thing you're missing are logistic-like frigates, that would be completely useless anyway due to their limitated tank and tank-potential.
EDIT:
Quote:
Have you been to lowsec lately and seen the popularity of hics? Using a mom on a gate in lowsec is tantamount to suicide nowdays.
CCP introduced hdicts to make industrials more cath-able and to heavily nerf supercapitals. MOMs weren't that weak and tackable before empyrean age, were they?
now T2 industrials got boosted, and you won't catch em anyway, so the only defeated side on the infinite nerf-battle are the supercapitals (and minmatars, AH)
Did i say they were before EA? God knows where you picked that up...
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:21:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 00:23:14
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Did i say they were before EA? God knows where you picked that up...
so you agree we need a supercapital revamp, Y/N?
if Y, expose your modifications
EDIT:
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
so, you're fine with each and every ship CCP introduces but you're reluctant to think of another capital ship type?
______________________________________________
|
Nikla Uthaan
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:22:00 -
[27]
Personally I'd prefer to see the glass-cannon battleships/mid-naughts specialised in taking down supercaps and not much else before I see T2 supercaps.
That said and done, it'd be kinda cool, though I'd like to similarly see different standard (dockable) capships first too.
|
Djan Anaplian
Gallente
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:23:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Djan Anaplian
Did i say they were before EA? God knows where you picked that up...
so you agree we need a supercapital revamp, Y/N?
if Y, expose your modifications
No, like i said before i think motherships need a dedicated role to justify their use, NOT their price (which is fine).
Expatiate on modifications to aforementioned motherships? To be perfectly honest i have no idea, but then that's not my job 
|
Neesa Corrinne
Rogue Shadow Squad
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:40:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Boomershoot
so, you're fine with each and every ship CCP introduces but you're reluctant to think of another capital ship type?
Yep. Absolutely. I'm not only reluctant to think about it, it's the last thing that this game needs.
EvE needs to stop getting bigger and bigger and bigger and put a little more focus on some other ship classes for once.
The power creep has pushed four ship classes out of this game already, the LAST thing we need is another capital ship.
|
Bloody Rabbit
Jita Miners
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:42:00 -
[30]
I just want to see T2 capital mods and T2 Carriers with T2 Dreads.
That's all.
|
Crumplecorn
Gallente
Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:42:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
For the correct serious answer, see quote.
-
DesuSigs |
Orb Lati
Minmatar
ANZAC ALLIANCE
Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:43:00 -
[32]
There was talk/discussion of a large ship transport for moving alot of large rigged ships around.
If that was ever perused i would think it would be required to be a new gate based cap.
"We worship Strength because it is through strength that all other values are made possible" |
Kayosoni
Caldari
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 00:46:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Popperr
motherships are like two carriers stuck together at ten times their cost
titans are poorly thought out and need to be rebalanced pretty much from scratch
Even some goons can see just how bad super-capitals are balanced. Super-capitals need to be their own ship class, with Super-capital reppers, something like 10x their current hp... titans are just completely wrong, DD shouldn't exist, titan's should not have any offensive capability. That should be left for super-capital dreads.
-----------------------------------
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:00:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
For the correct serious answer, see quote.
do you really think CCP can simply continue to add sub-capital stuff to the game without umbalancing it and just pretend that capitals are fine?
do you think CCP won't touch capitals anymore, when the median active playerbase has been playing for more than a year?
______________________________________________
|
Neesa Corrinne
Rogue Shadow Squad
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:17:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
For the correct serious answer, see quote.
do you really think CCP can simply continue to add sub-capital stuff to the game without umbalancing it and just pretend that capitals are fine?
do you think CCP won't touch capitals anymore, when the median active playerbase has been playing for more than a year?
Oh I agree. They DO need to work on capitals some more. Capitals need to have a drawback that's debilitating enough, so that every player in EVE doesn't automatically chart a course to capital ships on EVEmon the day after he/she starts playing the game.
Capitals need to be a two edged sword. Instead they are uber pwn machines that every corporation needs dozens of just to stay competitive in the increasingly "capitalized" theme of the game.
|
Berious
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:21:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
No! No no no no no!
The unmitigated use of capital ships has pushed every other aspect of this game down the damn toilet.
The last thing we need is another ship to add to power creep.
For the correct serious answer, see quote.
do you really think CCP can simply continue to add sub-capital stuff to the game without umbalancing it and just pretend that capitals are fine?
do you think CCP won't touch capitals anymore, when the median active playerbase has been playing for more than a year?
You don't seem to have a reason or role in mind for new supercaps beyond "wouldn't it be cool". As people have explained capitals are already heavily marginalizing sub cap fleets in 0.0. Conceptually huge cap battles may sound exciting but it's pretty boring to play. More supercaps with new whizzbang features would undoubtedly make that worse.
Hope you like training for years to be really useful then sitting laggy in an immobile hunk of junk occasionally switching targets and pressing F1-3.
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:26:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 01:27:45
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
Oh I agree. They DO need to work on capitals some more. Capitals need to have a drawback that's debilitating enough, so that every player in EVE doesn't automatically chart a course to capital ships on EVEmon the day after he/she starts playing the game.
Capitals need to be a two edged sword. Instead they are uber pwn machines that every corporation needs dozens of just to stay competitive in the increasingly "capitalized" theme of the game.
int nerfing(n){
if(n-1!=nerfed){nerfing(n-1)};
else nerf n;
}
// EDIT: fixed the recursive
next on the list are Bsses
______________________________________________
|
ramification
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:38:00 -
[38]
Edited by: ramification on 25/11/2008 01:43:16
Originally by: Kayosoni
Even some goons can see just how bad super-capitals are balanced. Super-capitals need to be their own ship class, with Super-capital reppers, something like 10x their current hp... titans are just completely wrong, DD shouldn't exist, titan's should not have any offensive capability. That should be left for super-capital dreads.
It might be better if the DPS-escalation stopped at capitals and the only supers were non-combatant command platforms (or fighter and defense-only) that exist primarily to grant gang bonuses.
If CCP changes the Leadership rules so that Gang leaders give bonuses only when on-grid, super-capitals with many times the current HP and tank would have a role as a optional tactical objective in fleet fights: destroy the titan first or make it leave and the rest of the fleet becomes easier to kill; or focus on the fleet and ignore the titan; or fight the fleet for a while until their ability to defend the titan is reduced and then kill the titan, etc. What we need are gameplay mechanics that create a variety of strategies, not a variety of lame exploits that make all other options ineffective.
|
Benilopax
Gallente
Pulsar Combat Supplies
Alternative Realities
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:48:00 -
[39]
Orbital Bombardment platforms anyone?
Anyone?
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:50:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 01:51:25
Originally by: Berious
You don't seem to have a reason or role in mind for new supercaps beyond "wouldn't it be cool". As people have explained capitals are already heavily marginalizing sub cap fleets in 0.0. Conceptually huge cap battles may sound exciting but it's pretty boring to play. More supercaps with new whizzbang features would undoubtedly make that worse.
Hope you like training for years to be really useful then sitting laggy in an immobile hunk of junk occasionally switching targets and pressing F1-3.
so, you're better off shooting down deathstars with 300 Bsses? tell me, what other uses do you have for dreadnaughts other than shooting great immovable objects (posses and other sieged capiatls)?
and as for capital warfare not including pos: it's like playing with bsses, only difference is the high amount of damage and the enourmous amount of logistic you're using.
EDIT:
Quote:
Orbital Bombardment platforms anyone?
Anyone?
Planets = Warp points
nothing else.
______________________________________________
|
DeadWeight
Minmatar
Botox Bandits
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 01:56:00 -
[41]
Motherships could be balanced if fighters were allowed to, in groups of 4, link up and create Voltron style robots that pwn everything
|
EnslaverOfMinmatar
Yarsk Hunters
DeaDSpace Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:00:00 -
[42]
Edited by: EnslaverOfMinmatar on 25/11/2008 02:04:11
They could make a new type of carrier that can carry frigates and dictors with players controlling them instead of just drones and fighters. It would work like a small mobile station without a repair bay or with a repair bay that takes a long time to repair (like 10 minutes for 1k of armor/hull).
uʍop ǝpısdn ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ ƃuıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ
|
Benilopax
Gallente
Pulsar Combat Supplies
Alternative Realities
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:04:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Boomershoot
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 01:51:25
Quote:
Orbital Bombardment platforms anyone?
Anyone?
Planets = Warp points
nothing else.
Your going to hate Q4 2010.
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:06:00 -
[44]
Originally by: EnslaverOfMinmatar
Edited by: EnslaverOfMinmatar on 25/11/2008 02:04:11
They could make a new type of carrier that can carry frigates and dictors with players controlling them instead of just drones and fighters. It would work like a small mobile station without a repair bay or with a repair bay that takes a long time to repair (like 10 minutes for 1k of armor/hull).
better off with a new type of fighters...
______________________________________________
|
Neesa Corrinne
Rogue Shadow Squad
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:08:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Benilopax
Originally by: Boomershoot
Edited by: Boomershoot on 25/11/2008 01:51:25
Quote:
Orbital Bombardment platforms anyone?
Anyone?
Planets = Warp points
nothing else.
Your going to hate Q4 2010.
That's assuming that everyone who isn't completely friggin bored with carrierfest 2009 won't be looking for other games to play.
|
Benilopax
Gallente
Pulsar Combat Supplies
Alternative Realities
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:13:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Neesa Corrinne
Originally by: Benilopax
Your going to hate Q4 2010.
That's assuming that everyone who isn't completely friggin bored with carrierfest 2009 won't be looking for other games to play.
Only carrier pilots are bored.
|
D'wayne
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:27:00 -
[47]
Edited by: D''wayne on 25/11/2008 02:27:39
How about a death star. Very literally. A giant planet sized object you can build. Complete with a death ray so powerful it can insta kill titans. Cost - 1 trillion ISK.
Edit - can only be taken down by frigates flying into some exhaust chute.
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:29:00 -
[48]
Originally by: D'wayne
Edited by: D''wayne on 25/11/2008 02:27:39
How about a death star. Very literally. A giant planet sized object you can build. Complete with a death ray so powerful it can insta kill titans. Cost - 1 trillion ISK.
Edit - can only be taken down by frigates flying into some exhaust chute.
Bigger I-WIN Button?
______________________________________________
|
Berious
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:33:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Boomershoot
so, you're better off shooting down deathstars with 300 Bsses? tell me, what other uses do you have for dreadnaughts other than shooting great immovable objects (posses and other sieged capiatls)?
Who said anything about being better off using subcaps? That's the problem right there.
Quote:
and as for capital warfare not including pos: it's like playing with bsses, only difference is the high amount of damage and the enourmous amount of logistic you're using.
Here's another difference, no role for any subcaps that aren't hictors or dictors.
|
Soporo
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 02:37:00 -
[50]
No. No moar.
The one change to caps and super-caps should be a complete banishment from LowSuck.
|
Boomershoot
Caldari
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 06:01:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Berious
Quote:
and as for capital warfare not including pos: it's like playing with bsses, only difference is the high amount of damage and the enourmous amount of logistic you're using.
Here's another difference, no role for any subcaps that aren't hictors or dictors.
so, you're going out without your support fleet? not even falcons?
______________________________________________
|
Joe
Umbra Legion
Shadow Empire.
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 07:16:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Boomershoot
so, you're going out without your support fleet? not even falcons?
we need Capital Recons, and Capital Dictors.
(I'd like a capital interceptor for tackling, and a capital Covert op for probing constellations)
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 07:44:00 -
[53]
Posting my support in a thread I haven't read but the keywords mining, veldspar and capital sized mining lasers is rumored. Win win win! Needs supercap with mining abilities besides the mighty Veldatars.
Secure 3rd party service ■ Veldspar |
|
Blank Protection
Insidious Existence
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 07:54:00 -
[54]
Personally i think Super Capitals like the Titan class should be bannen from Eve ASAP.
Ships with the i win button comes close to cheating.
Whe need to go back to the old fashion Pvp-ing tbh.
Carriers,Dreads and motherships are fine but the Titan class ships are just bull****.
**This Post belongs in Out of Pod Experience**
|
Anglo
Minmatar
Astral Mexicans
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 08:38:00 -
[55]
supercaps.. hmmmm
i am sitting in a mothwership and has been for months... its REALLY borring... the logistic behind it is hugh wich is fine. the damage it deals SUCKS every person with a litlle brain can outrun fighters... and the list continous..
a dedicated role would be ausome.. like moms should build ammo etc for the fighters... and as i see it the titan has a complete wrong role OR a new ship would be needed... say a titan/difrent ship should be able to anchor it self on the batllefield.. and the it is turning into a portable station... stuff like that would be FUN and own... might not be titan ofc but a difrent ship.. also its silly u cant dock em up somewhere to insure etc.. also to get out of the ship, i dont know many people who wants to leave there mothership in space.. not even at a pos. u cant trust anyone nowadays wich we see often. corpthiefs etc..
make it posible to dock em or anchor them or ANYTHING!!!
|
Joe
Umbra Legion
Shadow Empire.
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 08:47:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Joe on 25/11/2008 08:48:31
Edit = bourbon
|
Nhaz
Corp 1 Allstars
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 10:42:00 -
[57]
i want to see 5 titans group up and turn into voltron!
and extend that line of thought all the way down to frigs YES!
Mini voltrons !!
and just for the hell of it include shuttles. but since they didn't start with weapons.. or slots... nice flying robots but thats about it =>
oh course. it only works if they are of the same race....
But wouldn't it be awesome to watch a Mimatar bunch group up. and start losing parts from the rust !
_____________________________________________
It's NOT paranoia, If they REALLY ARE out to get you! |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 10:51:00 -
[58]
Factory ships incorporating refineries and err, factories.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
W3370Pi4
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 11:33:00 -
[59]
nope CCP made it clear they dont want to add more caps
just train for T3
*********************************************
Jovian Rope the real way to quit eve by the big door ! |
Rivur'Tam
Fatality.
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 11:46:00 -
[60]
T2 caps would be nice but we have engough ship types what we needs is more ships ie
We have 5 frig hulls so why not 5 bc , 5 bs etc
that would be nice and also a t2 tier 2 bc etc
We need less ship nerfs and more ships
And as titans having no weapons thats just stuiped
..
I like teh secs and teh boobies |
Dantes Revenge
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 12:06:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
A mining supercapital might be nice.
A capital ship that can actually mine would be an advantage. So far all the new mining ships we've had since the Exhumers have been passive support ships. I'm a miner, I smash roids, I don't want to sit in a ship bored out of my skull watching other players smashing roids and haulers hauling the ore back to the station.
The most exciting part about being a Rorqual/Orca pilot is popping NPC spawns with drones and tractoring in the occasional can.
--
There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken.
All this has happened before and will happen again |
Karille
Gallente
Lordless
|
Posted - 2008.11.25 12:17:00 -
[62]
Motherships can mine! I've seen it.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |